
‘There's an us v them mentality': are young Australian men and women drifting apart politically?
After Grace Richardson broke up with her long-term boyfriend, she entered a period she affectionately refers to as her 'rat girl summer'.
'I was using Hinge, I was going out, I was meeting people. I was 23, flirty and thriving,' the Sydney musician and podcast producer says.
It was during this season of self-discovery that Richardson met a man whose views, she says, 'immediately set off alarm bells'.
When Richardson mentioned her job, he revealed his favourite podcast was one that 'gets feminists on and makes fun of them'.
When she said she enjoyed going to the gym, he told her 'men weren't attracted to women with an athletic physique'.
'From there the conversation descended,' Richardson says.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
She says her date told her women were 'past their peak' after 24, that he didn't 'believe' in the gender pay gap and argued feminism had gone too far because women, in his view, now had 'more rights than men'.
'You hear about this stuff online but I had never expected to sit down with someone and have a conversation about it,' she says.
Her experience may not be an isolated one. Research suggests there is a growing gender gap among gen Z voters, with election results around the world showing young men are shifting to the right while young women are becoming more progressive.
At the 2024 US election men aged between 18 and 29 turned out in force for Donald Trump, favouring him by 56% to 42%, while women of the same age voted for Kamala Harris by an even wider margin, 58% to 40%.
Young men at the 2024 UK election were twice as likely to vote for Nigel Farage's rightwing populist party Reform UK (12% to 6%) while young women were more likely to vote Green than their male counterparts (23% to 12%).
This trend isn't just a Western phenomenon, according to Intifar Chowdhury, a lecturer in government at Flinders University.
'In China, Taiwan and South Korea – particularly South Korea – the gulf between genders is quite wide and the young men are much more conservative than women,' Chowdhury says.
So what about Australia? Are we likely to see a similar pattern emerging at the federal election?
Dr Sarah Cameron is circumspect. A political scientist at Griffith University's school of government and international relations and a chief investigator of the Australian Election Study, which has surveyed voters on their political attitudes and behaviours after each election since 1987, she says the gender gap in politics is 'much smaller' than the generational gap.
Polls tracked by Guardian Australia over the past year show Labor ahead 61.2% to 38.8% on a two-party-preferred basis among 18- to 34-year-olds, and marginally ahead among those aged 35 to 49, but significantly behind among older age groups.
'Younger generations are much further to the left than previous generations were when they were at the same stage of life. That's the biggest difference we are seeing among young people in Australia,' Cameron says.
'Young women are a bit further left, in comparison to young men.'
Chowdhury agrees. She says long-term trends show men and women shifting leftwards – though young women are doing so more quickly.
'There is a gender gap, in the sense that women are moving to the left at a quicker pace. But they aren't moving in different directions,' she says.
Cameron attributes women's shift left to their increasing participation in higher education and the workforce, as well as greater representation on the Labor benches in parliament. Chowdhury points to the #MeToo movement and the former Coalition government's response to sexual assault allegations that followed.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Both Cameron and Chowdhury, however, note a substantial number of gen Zs will be voting for the first time in 2025, which could change existing assumptions.
Chowdhury points to a recent poll in the Australian Financial Review which found 37% of men aged 18 to 34 preferred Peter Dutton as prime minister, compared with 27% of women in the same age group. It also found 32% of women in the same age group would give their primary vote to the Greens (equal with Labor), compared with only 20% among men.
Anthony Albanese has been actively courting young female voters, including by appearing on Abbie Chatfield's It's a Lot podcast and the Happy Hour podcast with Lucy Jackson and Nikki Westcott.
Darien, 19, a music student at the University of Sydney, says he hangs out with 'mostly progressive people', but there is a gap between his male and female friends, particularly when discussing social issues.
'There is a divide between the genders – I'd like to think in my group there isn't, but it's there,' he says, citing the debate during the voice to parliament referendum as an example.
'A lot of my female friends were voting yes and sharing posts about it – I know that they had issues with some of their male friends who weren't.
'There's probably also a divide during conversations around things like reproductive rights.'
Darien says most of his friends are more across US politics than Australian but he tends to avoid the topic because it's 'only going to create conflict'.
'When it comes to Australian politics, people know less. My friends tend to either really not like Peter Dutton or just don't know who he is. I know that some of my friends don't like Albo a whole lot. I personally think he's doing an all right job,' he says.
'But there's this sort of us v them kind of mentality that's developed, which makes it difficult for conversation around these topics to go anywhere.'
Chowdhury says it is important not to paint a picture of young men as a 'looming reactionary force', describing the discourse as 'harmful' and 'divisive'.
'Many gen Z voters are going to vote for the first time and they're voting during a cost-of-living crisis,' Chowdhury says.
She says young voters' frustrations may stem more from economic challenges – such as stagnant wages, rising costs and dwindling opportunities – rather than 'a feminism backlash'.
'Economic concerns can really shape an election,' Chowdhury says. 'People might be voting for the Coalition because of that, but we're very quick to rush into making this conclusion that they're moving to the right, so they must be conservative on all things.'
Hannah Ferguson, the founder of Cheek Media, a feminist platform aimed at educating young people about politics, says she sees a growing 'anti-establishment streak' in young Australian men, who are frustrated with the 'political system as a whole'.
'The difference between us and the US is that a lot of young men are fed up with both parties, as opposed to the divide in America, which is based on that tribal red or blue, Democrats or Republicans,' Ferguson says.
'I do think there will be a divide between how young men and women vote – on the whole, young men lean further right, but I think we're not anywhere near the toxicity of the US.'
She also anticipates young people will turn to more independents and the Greens as a result.
As for Richardson, her date marked the end of rat girl summer.
'I had a good run, and I met some nice guys, but this one just left a bad taste in my mouth,' she says.
Richardson emphasises their conversation, which stretched four hours, was not heated or aggressive. She says she stayed because she wanted to understand his perspective and challenge it. But by the end, she realised his views were 'entrenched'.
'It made me take the blinkers off a bit,' Richardson says.
'I felt disappointed, scared and misunderstood. It made me realise the hill is so much steeper than I thought it was.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Don't think Nigel Farage will kill off the Tories? Just look at Reform UK's surge in Scotland
If you were doubting that Nigel Farage had a serious chance of heading a hard-right British government in 2029, the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse just poured a bucket of particularly icy water over your head. Though Labour won the Scottish parliamentary byelection, defying predictions it would be beaten into third place, Reform UK chalked up more than a quarter of the vote – trailing the victors by an unsubstantial 1,500 voters. This tells a devastating story. Nigel Farage's outfit seriously outperformed the level of support indicated by Scottish polling: the last four surveys had Reform on between 12% and 19%, yet it secured 26% of the vote after standing here for the first time. This suggests it is mobilising previous non-voters whom pollsters are not picking up. The latest UK-wide YouGov poll, which asked people how they would vote if there were a general election tomorrow, put Reform in first place, eight points ahead of Labour. Imagine if that polling in fact underestimates their reach. There is, however, an important caveat. The multimillionaire businessman Zia Yusuf did an impressive job as Reform's chair in professionalising its operations: his resignation speaks to a perennial threat of internal chaos. Like Ukip, Reform may be hobbled by its excessive dependence on its frontman. The SNP, meanwhile, has ruled Holyrood for nearly two decades in an age in which most incumbents are clobbered. The party has lost its best asset, Nicola Sturgeon. Even so, it did not expect to lose 17 points in this byelection. Its activists are divided on whether this loss is down to the party soft-pedalling on the independence cause, or failing to address voters' bread-and-butter concerns. It seems almost certain that it suffered the opposite phenomenon to Reform: its demotivated supporters stayed at home. The byelection offered up yet more striking evidence that the Tories are being replaced as the standard bearers of the right, as they bagged a paltry 6% of the vote. This is the end stage of a process kickstarted by David Cameron in 2010: try to placate the right of his own party by throwing them endless red meat, making them fatter and hungrier. It's the same phenomenon that is unfolding across the west: the old centre-right is dying, and being replaced by a radical right that is increasingly contemptuous of democratic norms. Given Reform's racist claim that the Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar, would 'prioritise the Pakistani community', its defeat is hardly reassuring, as it still finds popular support among hardcore Scottish unionists. As the pre-eminent psephologist John Curtice notes, Labour was in fact down on its already weak 2021 performance in this seat, triumphing only because of the fragmentation of the electorate. The result shows Labour is not on course to retake the seat of Scottish power, he concludes. The big message, he says, is that if Farageism is making inroads even in Scotland, its strength has been underestimated. What next? Starmer's foot soldiers have a strategy. Having achieved unparalleled unpopularity by attacking state provision for disabled people and elderly people, they are opting for a 'squeeze' message. They believe Farage replacing the Tories is beneficial, because he has a lower ceiling of support than the traditional party of the right. Our electoral system will force voters to make a binary choice between a Labour government they strongly dislike, and a Farage premiership most fear. The choice is between two bad options – and they're hoping that voters will pick the least worse. Cast your mind back to the decision of Hillary Clinton's team to intentionally promote Donald Trump as the Republican standard-bearer for much the same reason. That didn't go well. Labour must surely understand how Farage's capacity to enthuse non-voters raises the ceiling to an unpredictable height. Starmer's team clearly looks to Canada, where an incumbent liberal government was on course for electoral meltdown, until progressives abandoned the leftwing New Democrats to prevent the hard-right Conservatives triumphing. Yet there are key differences. One is the small factor of the US president openly planning to annex their country. Another is that although Justin Trudeau's administration may have been deeply disappointing from a progressive perspective, it did not ceaselessly alienate its natural supporters, as Labour has done, including by adopting rhetoric on immigration associated with the far right. Labour won about two-thirds of the seats in the general election with only one-third of the overall vote share. Surely it recognises that Reform could do the same. This ability is only entrenched by our first past the post electoral system, which even the former Conservative minister Tobias Ellwood has described as 'dated and unrepresentative'. Faced with a choice between lesser evils, the strategy for progressives ought to be clear: cement a pact between the Green party and other leftwing candidates, focus on 50 or so seats, and throw every resource at them. In a resulting hung parliament, they could force an end to this antiquated electoral system. But the central belt of Scotland just underlined an important lesson. The west is in crisis: the rise of the radical right is both a symptom and an accelerant, and nowhere is immune. Owen Jones is a Guardian columnist


The Herald Scotland
26 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Sarwar says surprise by-election win could help Labour back to power at Holyrood
With the votes showing a swing of more than 7% from the SNP to Labour, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said on Friday the result showed people have 'voted for change'. The by-election had been held following the death earlier this year of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie. When the votes were counted, Mr Russell polled 8,559, SNP candidate Katy Loudon took 7,957 votes, while Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088. And although Mr Russell was elected with fewer votes than Labour secured in the seat in the 2021 Scottish Parliament election, the SNP's support fell from just over 46% of all ballots then to 29.35% in the by-election. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice insisting they were 'delighted' with coming third – despite speculation prior to the count that they could come in second or may even pull off a surprise victory. Labour's win came after Scotland's First Minister John Swinney – who made numerous campaign visits to the area – had declared the contest to be a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Nigel Farage's Reform. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice (centre) insisted the party was 'delighted' after coming in third (Jane Barlow/PA) But speaking at a media event in Hamilton on Friday morning, Mr Sarwar accused the SNP leader of running a 'disgraceful' campaign. Mr Sarwar also insisted the by-election could 'help lead the way' to him becoming Scotland's next first minister in the May 2026 Holyrood elections. The Scottish Labour leader said he believed the victory to be 'even more significant' than the party's win in the nearby Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election in October 2023 – which he said had been key in helping to secure Labour's general election win in July last year. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (centre) is hoping to become Scotland's next first minister (Robert Perry/PA) Mr Sarwar declared: 'I think in some ways this by-election result is even more significant than the Rutherglen by-election result two years ago. 'It is right to say, I believe, the result in Rutherglen helped lead the way in helping to elect a UK Labour Government and I also believe the by-election result here will help lead the way to elect a Scottish Labour government next year.' Looking ahead to that election, Mr Sarwar told the PA news agency: 'I want us to gain scores of seats across the country so we can remove this SNP government from office.' Anas Sarwar and new MSP Davy Russell celebrated the party's win in Hamilton with supporters on Friday (Robert Perry/PA) He went on to accuse Mr Swinney of running a 'disgraceful campaign' in the by-election, saying that despite the SNP having been in power for 18 years, 'the best he had to offer was 'vote SNP to stop Farage''. And while Reform UK came in third in the by-election, Mr Sarwar said Mr Farage's party could not win the Scottish Parliament elections. He insisted: 'Nigel Farage is not standing to be first minister. 'It is a straight choice – it is either going to be John Swinney, or it's going to be me.' The Scottish Labour leader continued: 'The choice is stark next year. Our Parliament is not about protests, our election is not about protest, it is about choosing a government here in Scotland. 'The choice is stark – a third decade of the SNP with John Swinney as first minister or a new direction for Scotland with me as first minister.' However, Mr Tice told BBC Radio 4's that the result in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse was 'truly remarkable'. He said: 'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result.' Mr Swinney, meanwhile, said the SNP was 'clearly disappointed' with the result. The party leader said Labour had 'won by an absolute landslide' in Rutherglen and Hamilton West – noting the SNP 'came much closer' this time round. But he added: 'The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do. 'Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully.'


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Next Scottish elections will be between SNP and Labour, says Anas Sarwar
Next year's Scottish parliament elections will be a straight choice between the SNP and Scottish Labour, a jubilant Anas Sarwar has said following his party's surprise victory in Thursday's key Holyrood byelection. Scottish Labour's popular local candidate Davy Russell defied predictions to beat the incumbent SNP and fight off Reform UK's 'racist' campaigning in the central Scotland seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. Sarwar told a victory rally in Hamilton town centre on Friday morning that they had proved everyone wrong following speculation that Reform UK might push Scottish Labour into third place, as the rightwing populist party gained ground in Scotland for the first time. 'The reality is we proved the pollsters, the pundits, the political commentators and the bookies all wrong, and they are not understanding what is happening on the ground,' Sarwar said. 'On the ground, people believe the SNP are done. The balloon has burst, people think they are a busted flush and they want them out.' The byelection result proved to people across Scotland that only Scottish Labour could beat the SNP in 2026, he added, as he praised the results of 'the most significant and best ground operation in any constituency in the history of the Scottish Labour party'. Sarwar said: 'Reform can make the noise. The Tories aren't even at the races. It's a straight choice between the SNP and Scottish Labour.' While continuing to condemn Reform's 'dirty campaign' – which involved increasingly personal attacks on him by Nigel Farage that were condemned cross-party as racist – Sarwar also attacked 'the spin, nonsense, and misinformation from the SNP'. Their attempts to present the contest as a two-horse race between SNP and Reform had risked pushing voters towards the rightwing populists, he said. Although Reform came in third place, the party gained 26% of the vote share – a significant success for a party that still has minimal, though expanding, infrastructure north of the border and no dedicated Scottish leader. This mirrored levels of support it has enjoyed in recent central belt council byelections. Many of its votes appear to have come from a collapse in Conservative support, down from 18% in 2021 to 6% yesterday, but the SNP also lost almost 17% of its vote share while Labour was down 2%. Sarwar suggested that three blocks of voters had moved to Reform – former Conservatives, those making a protest vote against both Westminster and Holyrood incumbents, and some who believed 'the frankly ludicrous campaign that this was a straight choice between Reform and the SNP'. At the rally, the Scottish Labour deputy leader, Dame Jackie Baillie, said the contest was a vindication of the party's strategy, demonstrating that 'talking to people and doing to work on the doorstep is absolutely vital to how we win'. Other Labour figures pointed out that the party had made a conscious decision to focus on the ground campaign, which is largely invisible to the national media but secured victory in the end. That ground campaign also paid off in terms of countering the dissatisfaction with the decision-making of Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves that voters were making loudly clear on the doorstep. Labour politicians who were helping the canvas described local people as having 'a lot to get off their chests' and the need for lengthy engagement on the thinking behind unpopular Westminster decisions, which appears to have won over many voters.