logo
SC Directs IAF Not To Release Officer Part Of Op Sindoor Who Was Denied Permanent Commission

SC Directs IAF Not To Release Officer Part Of Op Sindoor Who Was Denied Permanent Commission

News1823-05-2025
Last Updated:
Wing Commander Nikita Pandey had alleged discrimination for being denied permanent commission in the Air Force. The matter will be taken up on August 6.
The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the Central government and the Indian Air Force (IAF) not to release a woman officer from service, who was part of Operation Balakot in 2019 and Operation Sindoor, but was denied permanent commission.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and NK Singh sought responses from the Centre and IAF while hearing a plea from Wing Commander Nikita Pandey, who alleged discrimination for being denied permanent commission.
The bench noted that a 'tough life" for Short Service Commission (SSC) officers began following their recruitment, which called for some incentive after 10 or 15 years to grant them permanent commission. Justice Kant hailed the Air Force as one of the best organisations in the world and an asset to the nation, but said the uncertainty may hurt the force.
'That sense of uncertainty may not be good for the Armed Forces. It's a layman's suggestion, because we are not experts. On minimum benchmarks, there can't be a compromise," he said.
Who Is Wing Commander Nikita Pandey?
Senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy, representing Wing Commander Pandey, said her client was an expert fighter controller, who participated as an expert in the Integrated Air Command and Control Systems (IACCS), which were deployed in Operation Sindoor and Operation Balakot.
Pandey had served over 13.5 years in service but was impacted by a 2019 policy that denied her permanent commission and forced her to conclude her service after a month. She ranked second in the merit list of expert air fighter controllers in India, her counsel said.
Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for the Centre and the IAF, told the court that the petitioner was found unfit by the selection board. She said the officer directly moved the apex court without filing any representation and informed the bench that a second selection board would be considering her case.
The Supreme Court has directed that Wing Commander Pandey remain in service until further notice, adjourning the matter to August 6. However, it clarified that this interim relief would not grant her any legal advantage, and all issues in the case will remain open for consideration.
Bhati said a 'steep pyramidal structure" was followed by the IAF, which requires that certain officers go out of the service after serving 14 years and new officers come in their place. Justice Kant told Bhati that the armed forces should have the capacity to accommodate all SSC officers in the permanent commission, highlighting that women officers performed exceedingly well.
First Published:
May 23, 2025, 12:27 IST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EC makes public names of 6.5 mn people deleted from Bihar voter list
EC makes public names of 6.5 mn people deleted from Bihar voter list

Business Standard

time19 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

EC makes public names of 6.5 mn people deleted from Bihar voter list

The Election Commission (EC) on Monday came out with the names of 65 lakh people who were removed from the draft electoral rolls published as part of the special intensive revision (SIR) exercise, officials said. The development came in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's direction that details of the deleted names be made public by August 19 and a compliance report be filed by August 22. The EC is publishing the names of 'ASD' (Absentee, Shifted, and Dead) voters across polling booths, and is likely to do so online as has been directed by the apex court, they said. According to the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), Bihar, ASD lists have been displayed at polling booths in Rohtas, Begusarai, Arwal and other places.

Election Commission makes public names of 65 lakh people deleted from Bihar voter list during SIR
Election Commission makes public names of 65 lakh people deleted from Bihar voter list during SIR

New Indian Express

time19 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Election Commission makes public names of 65 lakh people deleted from Bihar voter list during SIR

PATNA: The Election Commission (EC) on Monday came out with the names of 65 lakh people who were removed from the draft electoral rolls published as part of the special intensive revision (SIR) exercise, officials said. The development came in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's direction that details of the deleted names be made public by August 19 and a compliance report be filed by August 22. The EC is publishing the names of 'ASD' (Absentee, Shifted, and Dead) voters across polling booths, and is likely to do so online as has been directed by the apex court, they said. According to the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), Bihar, ASD lists have been displayed at polling booths in Rohtas, Begusarai, Arwal and other places.

SC dismisses AAP MP's plea against UP government shutting 105 primary schools
SC dismisses AAP MP's plea against UP government shutting 105 primary schools

Scroll.in

time19 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

SC dismisses AAP MP's plea against UP government shutting 105 primary schools

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a petition filed by Aam Aadmi Party MP Sanjay Singh challenging the Uttar Pradesh government's decision to shut down 105 primary schools, Live Law reported. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih noted that the matter is pending before the Allahabad High Court. It agreed to Singh's request to direct the High Court to hear the matter expeditiously. In June, the Uttar Pradesh government had ordered the closure of the schools after finding that they had either zero or very few students enrolled. The state government had said that they would be 'paired' with other institutions. In his petition, Singh had argued that the state government's decision was 'arbitrary, unconstitutional and legally impermissible'. He added that it would negatively affect the access to education of many children in the state. Singh also said that the order violated children's right to education under Article 21A of the Constitution and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The MP told the court that the Right to Education Rules require the establishment of a primary school within one kilometre of every habitation with at least 300 residents. The Uttar Pradesh government has defended the move as part of a policy restructuring and alignment with the National Education Policy 2020, arguing that sustaining schools with negligible student strength was inefficient, the Hindustan Times reported.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store