NT Police Sergeant Patrick Carson sues government for malicious prosecution
Sergeant Patrick Carson was found not guilty of two counts of rape by an NT Supreme Court jury in 2022, following the encounters with the woman two years earlier.
It took jurors less than an hour to return an acquittal after his barrister, Mary Chalmers SC, told the court the woman was a "barefaced liar" who "had some kind of infatuation with him".
In a civil action filed with the court earlier this year, Sergeant Carson claims prosecutors either "did not honestly believe in the case" or "did not have an objectively sufficient basis, or reasonable grounds, for such a belief".
He says he was arrested by members of the elite Territory Response Group in September 2020 while visiting a McDonald's restaurant in Ludmilla with his children, before facing trial in June 2022.
Before the trial began, Sergeant Carson says Director of Public Prosecutions Lloyd Babb SC — who is also named as a defendant — rejected an application by Ms Chalmers to withdraw the case.
He claims that was despite the fact trial prosecutor Marty Aust SC "agreed with the plaintiff's counsel ... that there was no reasonable prospect of the prosecution succeeding".
He claims "malice may be inferred from the lack of an honest belief by the prosecutors" in the case against him.
However, the "particulars of absence of reasonable and probable cause" are almost entirely redacted from the documents released by the court.
"The institution and maintenance of the criminal proceeding, in light of the material totally undermining the credibility of the complainant, was high-handed and in contumelious disregard of the proper purpose in bringing criminal proceedings," the statement of claim reads.
"The conduct of the defendants requires the denunciation of this court via substantial lawful exemplary damages."
Sergeant Carson is also seeking aggravated damages as well as compensation for legal costs, reputational loss and "distress, embarrassment and humiliation", which he says was exacerbated by his public arrest.
"The criminal proceeding was instituted and maintained by the prosecutors for the dominant purpose of simply getting a result, as opposed to bringing a person guilty of a crime to justice," the document reads.
"[It] was instituted and maintained by the prosecutors because the plaintiff was a serving police officer and the prosecuting authorities did not want to be seen as protecting one of their own by not prosecuting the allegations."
In its response, the NT government broadly denies the claims and argues some fall outside the relevant limitation period and that prosecutors were acting in good faith.
In her closing address to the jury during the trial, Ms Chalmers said the woman had "all the hallmarks of the most unreliable witness".
"This is a woman who lies, she lies when she's under an obligation to tell the truth and when she's confronted with her own lie, she reverts to 'oh well I just can't recall'," she said.
"It is very easy for a young woman like [the complainant] to make an allegation against a married man when there's only two of them there on the occasion in question.
"It is very easy for her to make that allegation and very hard to disprove."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Mother of man killed by Yatala prison cellmate tells court she feels let down by authorities
The mother of a man with mental illness who was killed by his prison cellmate two years ago has told South Australia's Supreme Court that she feels "let down by the government". Earlier this year, Benjamin Anthony Shuman, 35, was found not guilty by way of mental incompetence of the murder of 52-year-old Jason Douglas Wright in June 2023. Mr Shuman was arrested and charged with murder on June 17 after Mr Wright was found dead in his cell at Yatala Labour Prison in Adelaide's north. Justice Anne Bampton previously recorded a finding that the elements of murder were met, but that Mr Shuman was mentally incompetent at the time. During a brief hearing on Monday, a prosecutor read a victim impact statement on behalf of Mr Wright's mother which detailed her frustrations at how her son's mental illness was dealt with in the prison system. "We have been let down by the government and the departments of mental health through to correctional services," Frances Wright wrote. "Where is the duty of care when an acutely mentally unwell person … on remand with no previous convictions, is incarcerated in high security prison … then placed in a cell with inadequate supervision with somebody also suffering mental illness? "Why was he not placed somewhere safe, and where his mental health could be maintained and supported? "This is a serious issue seen as a violation of a person's rights." Ms Wright went on to detail the struggles she faced for "35-plus years" dealing with her son's mental health issues. "Over this time my input regarding his mental health was not taken seriously," she said. "Mental illness is a medical condition, but it is stigmatised, leading to misconceptions and discrimination." Ms Wright said she hoped "that other families don't have to go through this trauma caused by mismanagement". "Some things need to change and be addressed," she wrote. Ms Wright said that, given her understanding of mental illness, she did have "a compassionate understanding", but that it was "hard to forgive what has happened". A prosecutor told the court two psychological reports found "the defendant's risk of relapse and reoffending in the community remains significant without the appropriate supports and supervision". Defence barrister Casey Isaacs, for Mr Shuman, said his client is "in a far better mental state then he has been in the past", and apologised to Mr Wright's family on his behalf. He also said Mr Shuman is "open to rehabilitation". Justice Bampton remanded Mr Shuman to a limiting term of life at psychiatric facility James Nash House — which equates to the same amount of time he would be sentenced to if he'd been found guilty of murder. Acting SA Premier Susan Close said, although she did not "know the circumstances" of the case, she had "no doubt that it will be looked into very carefully". "It sounds absolutely … a heartbreaking tragedy. I feel very much for the mother and all my sympathy is with her," she said. "When we run our prisons, we try to run them with the best interests of all of the people living there at heart and the idea that this tragedy has happened is very distressing. A Department for Correctional Services spokesperson said the "circumstances surrounding Mr Wright's death will be the subject of a coronial inquiry". "The death of Mr Wright is a sad and tragic event, and the department extends its sympathies to his family and friends," they said.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Bus driver stabbed in neck on Sunshine Coast as union urges action
The stabbing of a Sunshine Coast bus driver's neck at the weekend has become the fifth high-profile attack on bus drivers and passengers in just four months, according to the industry's major union. Warning: This article contains graphic images The 67-year-old man was stabbed at Caloundra station. He has been recovering since having surgery. An alleged offender has been charged with serious assault, acts intended to cause grievous bodily harm and possession of a knife in a public place. Transport Workers' Union Queensland director of organising Josh Millroy said the government must resurrect the Bus Safety Forum, in which the industry, including drivers, unions and government bodies, worked together to protect drivers and passengers. Mr Millroy said he had written to Transport Minister and Sunshine Coast MP, Brent Mickelberg, but had not received a response. "We're working closely with the driver and his colleagues." "Translink and the state government's decision to scrap these safety forums, without any consultation with drivers or their union, is a disgrace. "Five serious assaults since March and countless more incidents of aggression and verbal abuse shows the urgency of this issue." The union said the incidents since March included an attack on a teenage girl on the Gold Coast, a Townsville driver being punched and spat on, a Brisbane driver left with facial injuries and possibly permanent ear damage, and four teenagers who were attacked while riding a bus in Cairns. Mr Mickelberg has been sought for comment.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
How can we solve the moral problem of indigenous deaths in custody? - ABC Religion & Ethics
There is near universal agreement that the deaths in custody of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are a shocking outrage. But repeated expressions of shock and outrage are of little use if people keep dying. I want to offer a philosophical diagnosis that makes clear why these failures are systemic. They cannot be fixed by cultural sensitivity training for individuals working in the justice system. Some individuals are at fault, but they aren't the real problem. The system is at fault, especially when it promulgates 'tough on crime' crackdowns on crime waves. In a broken system, even good people doing their best can find beneficent intentions come to nothing — or even make things worse. Philosophy has a long tradition of thought experiments that place individuals in morally terrible circumstances. One famous example was advanced in a 1965 paper by the Australian philosopher H.J. McCloskey. It was published at the height of the civil rights debates in the United States and involves an imagined sheriff in a Southern town who must decide whether to frame an innocent black man in order to prevent mob violence or social unrest. The following thought experiment updates this approach to expose how even well-intentioned individuals may be powerless, or even complicit, in an unjust system. This deliberately inverted scenario draws on the stereotype of the racist cop — not to trivialise injustice, but to make visible how systems entangle even those who aim to rectify injustice. The reverse-racist cop Frank is the moral mirror image of the stereotypically racist cop. He is committed to correcting historical harms suffered by First Nations peoples. To balance the scales of justice, Frank decides to be especially tough on crime committed by wealthy people of European descent. Determined to redress what he sees as a long history of disproportionately punishing indigenous people for minor infractions, Frank targets white-collar offences like corporate tax evasion. He petitions his superiors for drone technology to track expensive cars exceeding the speed limit. Once suspects are detained, he resolves to make no effort to accommodate their emotional or cultural needs. His colleagues caution him that two wrongs don't make a right. Frank understands that many of those he arrests have legitimate grievances. But he replies that even the best judicial systems sometimes treat individuals unfairly. His dominant concern is fairness between peoples , not fairness to individuals . However, Frank's new approach coincides with politicians' announcement of a law-and-order crackdown. During such crackdowns, police don't simply pursue justice. They go where politicians and voters want them. The people Frank wishes to target have taken the hint and avoid the areas now labelled as 'crime ridden'. Frank would love to report that there is no crime to pursue. But his is a reported high-crime area during a politically designated crime wave. Needing arrests to prove he's doing his job, Frank finds himself, despite his intentions, arresting the usual suspects for the usual kinds of crimes. I don't mean to morally endorse Frank's policy. It is simply wrong to consign to solitary confinement a Porsche driver for wilfully travelling at 60 in a 50 zone. The thought experiment shows that the system has a biased view about which kinds of crimes to punish and which to tolerate. Its purpose is to illuminate how even those determined to correct historical harms can be thwarted by flawed systems. The thought experiment isn't meant to be an empirically accurate description of policing in Australia. But that shouldn't matter. Consider Judith Jarvis Thomson's famous story about an individual hooked up to a sick violinist for nine months. Her scenario carried a moral lesson that paid little regard to the biological specifics of pregnancy or abortion. Populist politicians understand that identifying specific individuals who have committed terrible crimes can swing an election. Police forces cracking down on crime can apprehend many such individuals. There is a crude-but-effective electoral logic in presenting immigrants as inclined to crime. So long as you can find some actual examples, such claims are not straightforwardly falsified. There is, in contrast, little emotional gratification in blaming the system. Isn't the system just the system? Who should we blame for the system? If we need individuals to blame for the justice system's current failures, we can find them? Today's morally malfunctioning policies and laws were enacted by individuals in the past, most of whom are now dead. Aboriginal peoples have at least 65,000 years of continuous occupation of Australia. But it was the ancestors of settlers who made most of the laws — laws that may have made sense in their own time. We live in another. If we are going to respect the views of the dead, we must not omit the views of indigenous Australians who had insufficient input into our nation's laws. Suppose you could talk to those ancestors and update them on the fact that Australia is now a rich multicultural nation. They are unlikely to suggest logging onto social media to hashtag #CancelThePolice. What might they say about indigenous deaths in custody? What recommendations might they make? Fortunately, we can do better than idle speculation. We can ask their descendants. The Voice to Parliament would have offered a format for that advice to be given on a regular basis. I have avoided the easy trope of the racist cop. Most people in law enforcement are decent individuals doing their best. But, as Hannah Arendt and others have shown, even good people can be slowly reshaped by bad systems. Just turning up to work each day can require moral adaptation. Over time, a kind of moral dulling sets in, required by those who continue to work within the system. For those who want to advance in the system, the path may demand more than compliance. It may demand vocal endorsement of policies they privately know are unjust. We don't need to wait for history to judge the system. We are the system. And we must change it. Nicholas Agar is Professor of Ethics at the University of Waikato in Aotearoa New Zealand. He is the author of How to be Human in the Digital Economy and Dialogues on Human Enhancement, and co-author (with Stuart Whatley and Dan Weijers) of How to Think about Progress: A Skeptic's Guide to Technology.
