Elon Musk's 'X Corp.' sues MN over constitutionality of political deepfake law
X Corp. filed a lawsuit suing Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison over the state's laws over political deepfakes.
The lawsuit says the state law is a violation of free speech and X's Community Notes can provide context for deepfake content.
Minnesota passed a bill on deepfakes with political misinformation into law in 2023.
ST. PAUL, Minn. (FOX 9) - Elon Musk's company, X Corporation, filed a lawsuit against Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison challenging the constitutionality of a law that prohibits political misinformation from being shared through deepfakes.
The law went into effect in 2023 and was meant to prevent deepfake technology from interfering in the 2024 election, according to the Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State.
Click to open this PDF in a new window.
Big picture view
The lawsuit claims the state law "violates the First and Fourth Amendments of the United States Constitutition, because its requirements are so vague and unintelligible that social media platforms cannot understand what the statute permits and what it prohibits, which will lead to blanket censorship, including of fully protected, core political speech."
READ MORE: Social media restrictions in Minnesota focus of new bills
The lawsuit also takes issue with the threat of criminal liability, saying there is no penalty for too much censorship, which incentivizes platforms to remove any content that could even be close to a deepfake under Minnesota statutes.
Instead of government regulation, the lawsuit points to "robust policies and features" meant to address problematic content. Among those features are "Community Notes," which X uses to provide context to a post in the form of "replies," and can also outright disagree with the original post.
Another feature includes an AI chatbot to help the user better understand the content.
A full copy of the lawsuit can be viewed below:
Click to open this PDF in a new window.
What they're saying
A spokesperson for the Minnesota Attorney General's Office released a statement, saying, "The Minnesota Attorney General's Office is reviewing the lawsuit and will respond in court."
FOX 9 also reached out to the authors of the bill and will update this story if they respond.
Dig deeper
Minnesota lawmakers also hope to criminalize "nudification" technology that uses another person's likeness without their permission.
The bill defines "nudify" as the "process by which an image or video is altered to reveal an intimate part that is not depicted in the original unaltered image or video."
READ MORE: Minnesota advances deepfakes bill to criminalize people sharing altered sexual, political content
The Source
This story used a court filing document from Minnesota District Court and past FOX 9 reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[LIVE 08/21 at 10:30AM ET] Migrants Tested for Anti-Americanism; Musk Could Be Changing Third Party Plans](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.theepochtimes.com%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F08%2F20%2Fid5903879-082125_REC.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[LIVE 08/21 at 10:30AM ET] Migrants Tested for Anti-Americanism; Musk Could Be Changing Third Party Plans](https://www.theepochtimes.com/_next/static/media/logo.32553ed2.svg){kind=logo}
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
[LIVE 08/21 at 10:30AM ET] Migrants Tested for Anti-Americanism; Musk Could Be Changing Third Party Plans
People looking to immigrate to the United States could soon be questioned on just how much they love the country—and could face rejection if it turns out they're anti-American. And in other news, Elon Musk may be changing his plans of creating a new political party to instead back a future presidential campaign for JD Vance, acc...
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sam Altman Is One of the Richest People in the World. It Isn't Because of OpenAI.
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." 1985–present Who Is Sam Altman? Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, is one of the leading proponents of artificial intelligence in the world. Raised in St. Louis, Altman dropped out of college before founding social mapping company Loopt and launching a career as a venture capitalist. He co-founded OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, in 2015 with Elon Musk and others and became CEO in 2019. He remains in this role despite the company's decision to briefly remove him in 2023. In addition to his work in AI, Altman is a successful investor and one of the richest people in the world thanks to stakes in companies such as Reddit and Stripe. Quick Facts FULL NAME: Samuel Harris AltmanBORN: April 22, 1985BIRTHPLACE: Chicago, IllinoisSPOUSE: Oliver Mulherin (2024–present)CHILD: 1 sonASTROLOGICAL SIGN: Taurus Early Life and Family Samuel Harris Altman was born on April 22, 1985, in Chicago. He primarily grew up in St. Louis after his family moved there during his childhood. Sam's mother, Connie Gibstine, works as a dermatologist, while his father, Jerry Altman, was a real estate broker. Sam is the oldest of the couple's four children; he has two brothers, Jack and Max, and a sister, Annie. According to New York Magazine, the close-knit family ate dinner together every night and bonded through games such as table tennis, billiards, and charades. The three Altman boys also played water polo. While Connie is still a practicing doctor, Jerry died unexpectedly from a heart attack in 2018. His death deeply affected Altman. 'I had to pick up the pieces of his life for a little while,' he said in an interview on the What Now? with Trevor Noah podcast. 'And it wasn't until like a week after that, that I really got a moment to just catch my breath and be like, holy sh––, I can't believe this happened.' As adults, Jack and Max developed an entrepreneurial spirit similar to their older brother. Jack co-founded the human resources platform Lattice in 2015 and served as CEO before stepping down in 2023. According to his LinkedIn profile, he now serves as a managing partner at Alt Capital. Max is a co-founder and managing partner at the investment firm Saga Ventures. Altman is estranged from his sister, who has been candid about her mental health and financial struggles. Annie has said the family kept money left to her by her father, and she has supported herself financially through online and in-person sex work. Annie also created and hosts the All Humans Are Human podcast. In January 2025, Annie filed a lawsuit alleging Sam had sexually abused her starting when she was 3 years old. Sam released a joint statement with his mother and brothers calling the claims 'utterly untrue' and countersued his sister for defamation. Both legal proceedings are ongoing. Education Altman developed an interest in technology while in elementary school. At age 8, he received his first computer, an Apple Macintosh, and learned how to code and deconstruct its hardware. 'That was like the glory days of computing, you could immediately do whatever you wanted on the computer, and it was very easy to learn to program, and it was just crazy fun and exciting,' Altman told Stratechery. 'Eventually my parents got me a computer or got us a computer at home, and I was always a crazy nerd, like crazy nerd in like the full sense, just science and math and computers and sci-fi and all of that stuff.' That passion continued into his high school tenure at the John Burroughs School, a private college prep school in St. Louis. While there, Altman befriended a computer science teacher who shared an interest in the future of artificial intelligence. After graduating from Burroughs in 2003, Altman enrolled at Stanford University to study computer science. However, he dropped out two years later at age 19 to create Loopt, an application allowing smartphone users to share their location with friends and colleagues. Altman later said he found the risks of leaving school—and knowing he could always return—worth the potential rewards of forgoing a traditional career path. 'In what is now a very dynamic world, the risky thing is to not go try the things that might really work out,' he said. Investor Altman eventually sold Loopt to banking company Green Dot in 2012 for $43.4 million. However, that was far from his only business project. That same year, Altman used the money from the sale to launch the investment firm Hydrazine, cleverly named after the chemical used in rocket fuel, with his brother Jack. Since 2010, Altman has personally invested in 125 companies, according to The Washington Post. They include Helion Energy, a nuclear fusion researcher; Retro Biosciences, a biotechnology company specializing in cell restoration; and Cruise, a self-driving car company. In 2011, Altman became a partner at Y Combinator, a juggernaut among technology startup accelerators and venture capital firms, and was promoted to president in February 2014. YC has invested in more than 5,000 companies, with DoorDash, Airbnb, Instacart, Twitch, and Reddit among the most recognizable. By December 2015, Altman valued all YC companies at more than $65 billion. Altman eventually stepped down from his role as president in 2019 to focus on another burgeoning venture. OpenAI Co-Founder In December 2015, Altman became one of 11 co-founders of OpenAI, a nonprofit artificial intelligence research company whose goal is to 'advance digital intelligence in the way that is most likely to benefit humanity as a whole, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return.' Altman took control as CEO in 2019 after leaving YC. OpenAI is known for creating ChatGPT, a generative chatbot able to respond to written or spoken prompts and questions. As of August 2025, OpenAI has reported roughly 700 million weekly ChatGPT users and is reportedly seeking a valuation of $500 billion. Temporary Removal as CEO In November 2023, the OpenAI board announced it had fired Altman as CEO. In a news release, the company said Altman 'was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities.' However, after more than 500 OpenAI employees signed an open letter threatening to leave the company and follow Altman to a new division at Microsoft, the board reached an agreement within five days of his firing for Altman to return to his leadership position. Despite the controversy, Altman has solidified his status as a leading figure in the AI space. Following the creation of ChatGPT, Time included him on its 2023 list of the 100 most influential people. That same year, he testified before U.S. Congress and urged lawmakers to create regulations for the expanding industry. Feud with Elon Musk Tesla CEO Elon Musk initially served as an OpenAI co-chair with Altman, but the pair became mired in a public rift over the latter's direction for the company. Under Altman's guidance, OpenAI began taking on investors and making money through a for-profit subsidiary—contradictory to the company's for-the-greater-good mission. Musk stepped down from the board in 2018 and later created the xAI program, a direct competitor to OpenAI. Then in 2024, Musk escalated his feud by filing two separate lawsuits against Altman and OpenAI, accusing the company of fraud, breach of contract, and reserving some of its most promising technology for private users. Musk also began derisively referring to the CEO as 'Scam Altman.' OpenAI has denied many of the claims in Musk's litigation. 'I wish he would just compete by building the better product, but I think there's been a lot of tactics, many, many lawsuits, all sorts of other crazy stuff,' Altman said. 'We'll try to just put our head down and keep working.' OpenAI ultimately abandoned plans to create a public benefit corporation, which would have taken control of the company away from its nonprofit branch, in 2025. Net Worth According to Forbes, Altman is one of the 2,500 richest people in the world with an estimated net worth of $1.9 billion as of August 20, 2025. Although OpenAI was valued at $157 billion as recently as November 2024, the vast majority of Altman's fortune doesn't stem from the company. He didn't take any equity upon its 2015 launch—which previously caused concern among investors over his confidence in the venture—and only makes $76,000 per year as CEO. 'If I could go back in time, I would have taken [equity], just some little bit, just to never have to answer this question,' Altman said. Instead, Altman owes much of his wealth to investments, including his stakes in Stripe, Reddit, and Helion. According to Fortune, the value of his Reddit shares alone climbed to $1.4 billion by October 2024. Husband Oliver Mulherin and Personal Life Altman married Oliver Mulherin, an Australian software engineer, in January 2024. The pair met at a party in 2015 and immediately connected despite dating other people at the time. Once Altman and Mulherin were a couple, they split their time between San Francisco and a ranch in Napa, California. Altman has spoken about their future plans, telling The San Francisco Standard they hope to build a family with multiple children. 'I am more excited for that than I think I've ever been for anything,' Altman said. 'Let's start with a few [kids] and see how it goes, but maybe a lot.' The couple welcomed their first son through a surrogate in February 2025. Coming out as gay around age 17 was an unusually anxiety-producing experience for Altman. In addition to telling his parents, he shared his sexual orientation with his classmates during a high school assembly. 'I don't really get nervous for stuff, and I was so nervous to do this. Because I was like, mostly out. Most people knew about it, but it was not the kind of school where you would really stand up and talk about being gay and that was okay,' he told Mostly Human Media. 'I got a long standing ovation out of it and, sort of all day at school that day, people telling me how much it meant to them.' Altman considered running for governor of California in 2018 but eventually declined to seek the office. He affirmed his belief in 'techno-capitalism' and has advocated for universal basic income but also described himself as 'politically homeless' in 2025. Quotes The most expensive investing mistake in the world to make is to be a pessimist, and it's a common one. I think that's actually the most common mistake to make in life. We can manage [AI], I am confident about that. But we won't successfully manage it if we're not extremely vigilant about the risks, and if we don't talk very frankly about how badly it could go wrong. We seem to be really great as a society, as individuals, as a species at dealing with change and with technological change. You know, think about how different the world was 20 years ago. We didn't all have smartphones, and that seems unimaginable now. I do think there's something freeing about getting older and caring less what people think. Fact Check: We strive for accuracy and fairness. If you see something that doesn't look right, contact us! You Might Also Like Nicole Richie's Surprising Adoption Story The Story of Gypsy Rose Blanchard and Her Mother Queen Camilla's Life in Photos
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla shareholder group urges probe, ‘appropriate remedial action' from Nasdaq over Elon Musk's $29 billion pay package
In the latest twist in a long-running battle over Elon Musk's compensation at Tesla, the SOC Investment Group has requested that Nasdaq formally investigate 'and take appropriate remedial action' against Tesla for its recent $29 billion equity grant to the CEO. In a letter to Nasdaq, the group raised concerns about compliance with executive compensation rules and shareholder transparency. The SOC Group, formerly known as the CtW Investment Group, works with pension funds sponsored by a coalition of unions representing over 2 million members; many of those funds are Tesla investors. In a letter dated Aug. 19, 2025, addressed to Erik Wittman, deputy general counsel and head of enforcement at Nasdaq, SOC expressed 'serious concerns' about Musk's new compensation package. Specifically, SOC said it was concerned that Tesla's board circumvented Nasdaq listing rules when awarding Musk a '2025 CEO Interim Award,' disclosed earlier this month. The group claims this equity award should have required a shareholder vote, as stipulated under Nasdaq's rules, given that it materially amended compensation plans. Tesla's board approved Musk's new equity package under the company's 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, largely as compensation for his previously awarded—and overturned—$56 billion options package from 2018, known as the '2018 CEO Performance Award.' That older award was (twice) overturned by the Delaware Chancery Court owing to questions regarding board independence—a decision currently being appealed at the Delaware Supreme Court. Fortune's Shawn Tully reported that the new package will only apply if Musk and Tesla lose on appeal in Delaware. He also noted that unlike with the $56 billion award, the newer $29 billion award includes restrictions that protect shareholders: The shares vest on the second anniversary of the grant, or early August 2027, only if Musk serves for the entire period as CEO or chief of product development or operations. Musk can't sell any of those vested shares until five years later, or on Aug. 3, 2030. Fortune's Amanda Gerut reported that, such restrictions notwithstanding, the package lacks hard performance targets for Musk. Brian Dunn, director of the Institute for Compensation Studies at Cornell University, told Fortune that experts sometimes refer to these as 'fog-the-mirror grants.' In other words: 'If you're around and have enough breath left in you to fog the mirror, you get them.' The objections lobbied by SOC Investment Group in its letter have nothing to do with either feature of the grants. The group argues that the Tesla board dodged shareholder approval for the package, in contravention of Nasdaq listing policy. Tejal Patel, executive director of the SOC Investment Group, told Fortune in an interview that the 'real issue is the fact that the original plan … was pretty clear in the disclosures that the company did not intend to include Elon Musk in that plan.' Acknowledging that such issues are usually raised with the Securities and Exchange Commission, she added: 'Admittedly, this is the first time I've flagged something like this to Nasdaq, [and that's] because it was a very specific listing standard.' Her understanding of the Nasdaq standard is that 'this is exactly what it was designed to avoid.' Shareholders likely 'did not believe' they were voting to approve a new Musk package The SOC Investment Group emphasizes that when Tesla shareholders approved the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, company disclosures explicitly excluded Musk from eligibility, stating that his compensation would be exclusively tied to the extraordinary 2018 award. 'When shareholders voted on the 2019 Plan it is likely that, based on the available disclosures and research, they did not believe they were voting on an equity plan that would cover compensation to Mr. Musk,' the SOC letter notes, 'precisely because of the 'truly extraordinary' nature of the 2018 CEO Performance Award.' The SOC letter also notes that Tesla's 2019 proxy statement repeated multiple times that the 2019 plan was not intended to cover awards to Musk. Furthermore, the letter mentions that major proxy advisory firms indicated that the 2018 CEO Performance Award was 'intended to be the sole means of compensation for Mr. Musk, relying on the Company's disclosures.' Therefore, SOC writes, the 2025 CEO Interim Award 'appears to expand the class of participants under the 2019 Plan in manner that would be sufficiently material to require a separate shareholder vote.' The letter also warns that Tesla's board has indicated further interim awards could follow, potentially bypassing shareholder votes while the Delaware case, the so-called Tornetta litigation, is pending. The SOC letter urges Nasdaq to act to 'restore 'the rightful balance between shareholder and management's interests,'' prevent dilution, and ensure executive compensation transparency. SOC has 'real concerns over director independence,' Patel told Fortune. 'This is sort of the outcome of having a board that is not independent.' She said her group is concerned with issues over a lack of director independence and the juggling of responsibilities by Elon Musk, and matters have 'come to a head in the last several months.' This timeline overlaps with Musk's brief engagement as a special advisor to the White House, including extensive involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The new compensation plan, if anything, 'was an opportunity for the board to get Musk to focus on Tesla, and instead' they've arrived at this package, she said. She also noted that the conditions under which Musk would receive the same pay, even if he was a chief of product development or operations, is 'pretty unheard-of.' A vocal, active shareholder SOC Investment Group has a long and active history of engagement with Tesla, focusing on issues such as executive compensation, governance, board independence, and labor rights. The group has repeatedly opposed large pay packages for Musk—including leading campaigns to encourage shareholders to vote against Musk's $56 billion option award and calling for votes against related awards, especially when it believed proper shareholder approval procedures were circumvented or governance standards were not met. The group has also urged Tesla shareholders to vote against the reelection of certain directors, such as Kimbal Musk and James Murdoch, citing concerns about lack of board independence from Elon Musk and alignment with shareholders' interests. Similar to its current letter to Nasdaq, it has requested investigations by regulators into Tesla's governance practices, arguing that the company's board favors Musk's interests over those of public shareholders. For example, the group asked the SEC to probe Tesla's plan to shrink its board in 2022. The group has also joined with other investors in co-filing shareholder resolutions calling for Tesla to adopt comprehensive labor rights policies, including noninterference with worker organizing and compliance with global labor standards. SOC has been involved in webinars and resolutions highlighting risks related to Tesla's approach to unions and labor issues across several countries. Tesla has not publicly responded to the letter and did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
