Saplings, stalking, and spying: Government bills this week
Photo:
RNZ / Alexa Cook
This week in Parliament is a Members' Week, with Wednesday evening dedicated to debating non-government legislation.
Members' Days cut into government time for lawmaking, so they have now added Wednesday morning to the schedule (rather than the usual 2pm start time for a sitting day) to maintain momentum.
This week's bills are a mixture of unfinished business from
last week
and other bills plucked from the Order Paper that area waiting their respective next stages. Of particular interest are;
The
Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme-Forestry Conversion) Amendment Bill
is back in the House after truncated consideration by the Environment Committee.
The bill seeks to address growing concerns about the conversion of farms into "exotic" forestry land, under the auspices of the Emissions Trading Scheme. The word exotic may evoke visions of coconut palms or banana trees, but it is the mass planting of pine trees that has largely been at the centre of the issue.
Obviously not all farmland is the same, and New Zealand employs the Land Use Capability (LUC) scale to distinguish highly productive, arable land (LUC class 1) from very unproductive land (LUC class 8). This bill would determine a farm's eligibility for ETS registration based on its LUC rating and restrict the amount of exotic forestry conversion on farmland with an LUC rating between 1 and 6.
"The current settings in the emissions trading scheme have tipped the scales too far," said the minister in charge of the bill, Todd Mclay, during the first reading. "We're seeing entire farms converted into exotic forests under the ETS from Invercargill to Ruatōria. These are not marginal lands; these are productive farms supporting families, communities, and local economies. Once they are planted into exotic carbon forests, they are, effectively, lost to food production for decades, if not permanently so."
In that same debate, Labour offered what they have called very cautious support for the bill, citing the need to carefully work through issues in select committee.
Meanwhile, the Green Party, who are against the bill, have said the real issue is that the whole concept of carbon offsetting is inherently flawed. "The fiction of offsetting has the same practical impact as an alcoholic paying somebody to drink water and thinking that they have solved their drinking problem", said Steve Abel. "That is the distortion that we have in this country to this day, and what's more, the person who's drinking all the water's making a lot of money and thinking that they're doing something about alcoholism, but they're not at all."
There have been a number of bills this parliament relating to infrastructure, consenting, and public works, and getting those things done fast.
This week's bill
aims to speed up the acquisition of private land that is desired for projects listed in the Fast Track Approvals law, or under the Roads of National Significance programme.
The Public Works debate was one of the three (Government Bill) committee stages this week. In the committee stage, debate is not time-limited, so it took a while, but was eventually wrapped up by midday Wednesday, before the House moved onto the second committee stage - the
Hauraki Gulf / Tikapa Moana Marine Protection Bill
, which was interrupted part of the way through its third and final part.
The third planned committee stage was for a new
stalking law
(though the slow pace of debating makes progress on this bill this week unlikely). The last time this bill was in the House was for its second reading, when it received unanimous support from all parties after a robust select committee stage, during which several amendments were adopted.
"The committee recommended a broader definition for the pattern of behaviour," National's Erica Stanford explained. "The offence will now require two specified acts within two years, rather than three specified acts within one year. This broadens the pattern of behaviour by capturing fewer acts across a longer time frame. I agree that this change will better address strategies such as anniversary-based stalking. It will also make it harder for stalkers to work around the law."
Ginny Andersen is Labour's spokesperson on this. She applauded the adopted amendments but was worried that a remaining aspect might make prosecution difficult - intent.
"Currently, it must be proven that the stalker acted knowingly, that their behaviour is likely to cause fear or distress to their target, so it means that the stalker has to know that their behaviour is likely to cause fear or distress. Proving that intent of someone who is lying or is genuinely deluded about how another person feels about them may well be extremely difficult to prove in a court of law and this is concerning."
Minister of Justice Paul Goldsmith has a second key bill up this week -
The Crimes (Countering Foreign Interference) Amendment Bill
, which may resume its second reading (interrupted last week), probably on Thursday afternoon (but only if the pace of debating is brisk).
It intends to fill gaps in criminal law concerning clandestine actions made on behalf of foreign actors intending to harm New Zealand, which the Government has said there has been an increased risk of. This law change would introduce treason, inciting mutiny or espionage - all on behalf of foreign actors - as new offences. Only the Green Party voted against the Bill at its first reading, although Te Pāti Māori were absent for the vote.
Finally, among Thursday's bills is a brand new government bill, the
recently announced bill
to prohibit mounting protests outside someone's private residence.
You can listen to the audio version of this story by clicking the link near the top of the page.
RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, its legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
16 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Secret climate change memo warned of diplomatic damage
By Eloise Gibson of RNZ Officials warned the government that reneging on climate commitments could have a domino effect and give bigger countries, like China, an excuse to do less. The advice was mistakenly released under the Official Information Act by the Ministry for the Environment (MFE). MFE and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) have sought to retrospectively redact the information. The sensitive information was contained in a briefing paper released under the OIA in April. The paper warned that if the government decided not to meet New Zealand's first target under the Paris Agreement, it could impact a "delicate" hard-won global agreement and risk "undermining confidence in the solidarity of our climate effort" and harming "a number of our priority relationships". New Zealand's is a member of the Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance which includes Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. The advice said the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia as well as Europe would view "backing off from Paris Agreement commitments extremely negatively". The United States has since pulled out of the Paris Agreement. The memo urged ministers to show their commitment by sealing climate cooperation deals with other countries last year - before a crucial deadline to show progress under the Paris Agreement. Officials said sealing these deals to pay for emissions-cutting projects overseas - which are needed to achieve around two thirds of New Zealand's 2030 target - was a critical step for reassuring other nations this country was committed to meeting its obligations. The government did not take this step, and still has not. So far it has declined to make a decision either way, despite the urging of its own advisers. However after questions were put to Climate Change Minister Simon Watts in July, officials asked RNZ to delete the material so they could replace it with a more fully redacted version. The advice also contained legally privileged material which RNZ has decided not to use. The advice also said Pacific Island countries would share similar concerns to New Zealand's larger "priority" partner countries about the implications for the durability of the Paris Agreement, "which is seen as a critical, if fragile, safeguard against an existential threat". It said a loss of confidence in New Zealand's commitment to climate action would likely diminish its influence in the region at a time of "increased strategic competition." "It is extremely likely that an individual country rejecting its commitments would be viewed through a lens of outsized impacts," it said. The warning was part of a package prepared by environment officials and MFAT in March 2024 outlining why the government should not lower its 2030 climate target - and why it should take "concrete steps" to seal international deals. Sixteen months later, the government has not reduced its target - and still says it is committed to meeting it - but it also hasn't taken the steps officials said it should take to reassure other nations that New Zealand planned to deliver. Paying money to other countries to fund decarbonisation projects (for example electrifying diesel buses or shuttering coal plants in Asia or the Pacific) was explicitly baked into New Zealand's target when it was set. Doing much of the work overseas was deemed cheaper and less disruptive than making faster, deeper cuts here, at least until the farming, electricity, manufacturing and transport sectors in New Zealand had had more time to deliver bigger emissions savings, which was expected to happen after 2030. Without overseas help, this country will fall more than a year's worth of emissions short of its promise, according to latest estimates. But since the 2023 election, ministers have repeatedly baulked at committing to paying for overseas carbon deals, saying spending billions offshore is not realistic, and that they still have time before 2030 - and even hinting that they might find 80 million tonnes of additional emissions savings here at home. Officials have repeatedly told ministers that overseas deals are the only realistic way to meet the target. Advisers have calculated that meeting the target here at home would take the equivalent of fully electrifying all road transport, eliminating all industrial energy emissions, and eliminating half of all agricultural emissions, all in the next four years. That would cause unnecessary "social and economic" pain, according to the Climate Change Commission. Concerns about a domino effect In the documents, officials warned that countries whose cooperation was important to New Zealand "would view backing off from Paris Agreement commitments extremely negatively - undermining confidence in the solidarity of our climate effort with theirs and triggering concerns this would 'push the domino' that gave cover to others." They told the government taking concrete action last year to close deals with other countries would "mitigate the risks" of damaging important relationships. Switzerland, Sweden, Singapore and other countries have already signed deals with the likes of Kenya, Peru, Nepal and Ghana to secure what's been called the "low hanging fruit" of climate action, including paying for energy efficiency upgrades to buildings, electric buses, ebikes and renewable energy. Paying for poorer countries to cut emissions is cheaper than it would cost to achieve the same climate benefits in a wealthier country. Some climate lobby groups say taking the cheaper route is cheating - however government advisors say it is now New Zealand's only choice, short of reneging. The sensitive advice said announcing concrete steps to buy carbon savings last year would help the New Zealand government to prove its commitment before the first deadline for all countries under the Paris Agreement to publish their Biennial Transparency Reports. The transparency reports are the Paris Agreement's main mechanism for countries to keep each other honest on their progress. "It is important that New Zealand retains a clear narrative that it will uphold its legal obligations under the Paris Agreement, including pursuing measures with the aim of achieving the NDC," the government was told. "This will provide partners more reassurance if this narrative is supported by a robust plan to optimise domestic mitigation and take concrete steps toward purchasing a steady stream of offshore emissions reductions. Early decisions to stand up purchasing arrangements will enable this progress to be demonstrated to key partners through the 2024 Biennial Transparency Report (BTR) and other channels," the advice said. "Domestic mitigation" refers to steps inside New Zealand to cut emissions and meet the country's emissions budgets, which the government does through its Emissions Reduction Plans. The Emission Reduction Plans have been set at a level that would meet around a third of the total 2030 target, with the other two thirds were expected to come from overseas, at a cost likely to end up in the low billions. As of August 2025 the government had not announced any purchases. That's despite MFE presenting Watts with six options for meeting New Zealand's commitments. The details of those options were redacted from the documents. In an interview on July 25, Watts confirmed that Cabinet had not made any decisions, either to buy help from offshore or rule it out. "Our position on offshore mitigation remains consistent with what I've said previously, which is at this point Cabinet hasn't made any decisions on entering into any arrangements, however the government has made decisions since being in office in a number of countries to put in place mechanisms to enable that to occur, if the decision is made to do that," he said. Last year the government announced memorandums of understanding with countries such as the Philippines, to "explore" potential future carbon trading under the Paris Agreement. "Our focus remains that we are focussed on domestic emissions reduction opportunities... we are still making good progress to close that gap, it is a significant challenge but we are closing that gap, as I've noted with some of the technology that's come through even in the last six months," Watts said. Asked if he accepted there was no path to closing an 80 million tonne gap by 2030 domestically, Watts said: "I'm not going to make any statements on where we are going to be five years from now, what we are focussed on is what we can do with the tools that are available. There are new tools and innovations coming on month by month that allow us to close that gap." Asked again if he was saying there was a prospect of meeting the 2030 target inside New Zealand, Watts said the government was "focussed and committed to its climate targets" and spoke about steps to meet the domestic emissions budgets. "The government remains committed to the plan we have published and our domestic budgets," he said. "I have optimism around our ability to get to those positions in the future."
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Council's housing density plan will bring more people to inner Auckland, architect says
Auckland Council has voted to take the draft changes out for consultation. Photo: RNZ / Kate Newton An Auckland architect says the council's draft plan for housing density around key transport routes and town centres will change suburbs for the better, if done right. The plan provides an alternative means for the council to meet the government's goal of Auckland accommodating two million new homes over coming decades. Auckland Council's Policy and Planning Committee met in the town hall on Thursday to discuss changes to the Auckland Unitary Plan that would replace Plan Change 78, while keeping its focus on housing. The draft changes would allow for more apartments and terrace homes in walking distance of train and bus stations, more restrictive consenting requirements to increase resilience, and an increase in mixed housing suburban zones. The changes were a response to the widespread flooding in the region in 2023. Auckland Council has voted to take the draft changes out for consultation, with two councillors opposing. The plan will now go out for consultation with local boards and mana whenua, with a final decision on whether or not to replace Plan Change 78 in late September. The Urban Design Forum's Graeme Scott told Morning Report they had strong support for the draft changes. "The idea of just spreading three-storey terrace houses over the whole of the isthmus and beyond is not working very well," he said. "There have been some spectacularly poor ones built and we think a rethink is needed, and this is along the right lines." Scott said there were ways of carrying out the plan that had great urban outcomes, attracting people who want to visit the areas, and not just those who lived there. "We that, given the right process that council's embarking on, let's give it a go," he said. "We have to try." More people were needed in the living closer to town to drive the Auckland economy, Scott said. "The population in the inner suburbs of Auckland is actually falling, because wealthy people can afford more space," he said. "That's exactly the opposite to what we need, we need a lot more people close to the centre to get the economic activity and the productivity of the city up." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Attempted spying conviction for soldier who was less Bond, more bumbling
Photo: ADELE RYCROFT At first glance, it reads like a Tom Clancy spy thriller. A disloyal, far-right soldier, an undercover officer posing as a foreign agent, and the passing on of secret army information, which could put the safety and defence of the country at risk But this time, it isn't fiction. It's real life, in New Zealand. For the first time, a serving soldier has been convicted of attempted espionage , sent to a military prison, and dismissed from service for attempting to spy on the Defence Force. At his long-awaited trial, in front of a court martial at Linton Military Camp, the man - whose name is currently suppressed - pleaded guilty to three charges of attempted espionage, dishonestly accessing a computer system, and possessing an objectionable publication. Newsroom journalist Marc Daalder broke the story six years ago, and attended the court case this week, and tells The Detail , that "this isn't James Bond, it's not the Hunt for Red October either ... what we have here is maybe more like a bumbling wannabe-spy". "As the judge put it in his sentencing decision, 'How could you be so naive as to think this is the way forward, this is the right thing to do?'" Daalder says that the soldier did have ties to far-right groups and "it's a serious, serious issue, but you don't want to overstate it either". So how and why did a Kiwi kid grow up to be a would-be spy? Daalder says the soldier had a troubled childhood; he was a loner and didn't make friends easily. "Even once he joined the NZDF, he was not particularly well-liked, and that's part of what drove him, he says, to these far-right groups." Daalder says in social media posts the soldier would boast that he "joined a Nazi organisation and [he said that] it's the best thing that ever happened to me, I used to be a loser, no job, no fitness or social skills. Now I'm working a decent job, have plenty of friends and a half-decent life, all thanks to the mentoring I got from older Nazis, and I have no regrets". Before the 15 March terror attacks, the soldier founded a far-right group, 'The Dominion Movement', which meant that after the attacks he was on the radar of police and was pulled in for questioning several times. In an affidavit presented at his court-martial hearing this week, the soldier said, "The investigators were incredibly aggressive towards me, often getting in my face and shouting. To me, their approach was actually violent." The soldier said he was terrified, and felt he had to leave New Zealand and get to another country where he thought he would be safe. "He frames himself as a victim of political persecution," Daalder says. The soldier then contacted a third party, indicating that he wanted to defect. "Following the New Zealand government learning of the contact with that third party, an undercover officer, posing as an agent of the foreign country, reached out to him and asked to meet ... and the soldier was asked to provide a letter, asking what he could provide that would assist that foreign country," Daalder tells The Detail . "From there, it's a mixture of spy thriller and maybe a bumbling spy version." Among the items the soldier provided were documents, including maps and aerial photographs of various defence force bases, along with passcodes, access codes, login details to its IT system, and telephone directories. He also passed on handwritten assessments of the vulnerabilities of the Linton Military Camp, where he was stationed. The soldier was eventually arrested at the Linton Military Camp in 2019, and put under open arrest, living in defence-subsidised housing and receiving full pay. He initially faced 17 charges, including espionage. This week, he pleaded guilty to attempted espionage, accessing a computer for a dishonest purpose, and knowingly possessing an objectionable publication, and was sentenced to two years in military detention - the longest possible sentence of detention available under the law. Otago University law lecturer Sean Whittaker, who moved to New Zealand from Scotland a year ago, told The Detail he was "very surprised" by the spying conviction. "New Zealand has a reputation of being a safe place to live, to work, and not being vulnerable to such action - either by external forces or by people within the country itself. "I think that it's important to mention that the limited number of instances of espionage being detected and prosecuted is not indicative of the lack of quality of New Zealand's security intelligence services. "Ultimately, I think they are doing a good job; they have detected espionage in this particular instance, and I think that's overall because New Zealand isn't exceptionally vulnerable to espionage," he says. But does New Zealand really have anything worth spying on or information worth selling to foreign countries? "Despite New Zealand's small size, it is a decent-sized player in the international community ... we do have things that are worth [spying on], as it were, things that are valuable, both intrinsic to us and to the global system as well." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook
