Hampshire County Council urged to save 'essential' bus route
It added that it must "prioritise bus services with the highest passenger numbers and those serving school routes".
Mr Stevens said it was "not just a means of transportation", it was "an essential lifeline" and "primary route" connecting the community to work, education and healthcare.He added: "Losing it would mean greater isolation for many who rely on public transport, reduced accessibility to essential services and increased traffic and traffic costs."Hampshire County Council has a deficit gap of £97.6 million for 2025/26.A spokesperson for the authority said: "Over 90% of Hampshire's bus services are operated commercially by private companies. "The county council provides financial support for a small number of the remaining routes, where budget allows."It said it continued "to listen to residents' concerns and have advised on alternative community transport options, which vary by district".
You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 hours ago
- The Independent
Young people could soon travel on buses for free
The Transport Select Committee has recommended that the government introduce free bus travel for all under-22s across England. This proposal aims to improve young people's access to work and skills opportunities and encourage long-term public transport use. The committee highlighted England 's inconsistent local youth concessions, contrasting them with national free travel schemes in Scotland and discounted fares in Wales. The report identified public transport as a significant barrier to employment for young people, particularly in areas with limited services. The committee also urged the government to reform local bus service funding and establish a national ambition for minimum public transport connectivity.
Telegraph
17 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Government's plans for older drivers smack of London-centrism
SIR – I accept that the laws governing the right to hold a driving licence require scrutiny ('Over-70s who fail mandatory driving tests to be banned', report, August 11), but the Government must consider carefully how changes could affect many people. Politicians tend to struggle to see beyond the M25. While they spend most of their time living and working in a place where they can jump on a bus or the Tube, or summon a taxi at any time, those outside London or one of the major conurbations often have none of these things. Driving is a necessity rather than a luxury. I hope that any new legislation will be accompanied by substantial investment in public transport for the regions, reversing the cuts of recent years and preventing further isolation, particularly among the elderly. Mike Bussell Yeovil, Somerset SIR – When I passed my driving test in 1966 I thought I was a brilliant driver. Fifty-nine years later my view is the same. However, it does not seem unreasonable that the authorities could now be the judge of that. Simon Cook Sutton, Surrey SIR – I appreciate the concern about older drivers and their eyesight, but do not understand why there isn't a compulsory annual test for over-70s. I would also recommend a yearly test for all drivers under 25, and a five-yearly test for everyone else. Susan Eccles Tunbridge Wells, Kent SIR – Am I being cynical in thinking that the Government is considering going after older drivers and not younger ones because the younger ones are far more likely to be potential Labour voters? For the record, I am 79, have 20:20 vision and at the last election didn't vote for any of them. John Newbury Warminster, Wiltshire SIR – I have my eyesight tested regularly and always wear the appropriate glasses. I therefore support mandatory tests. However, my late uncle failed his eyesight test while in his 20s. It should be understood that eye health deterioration often occurs much earlier in life than 70. Jim Sokol Minehead, Somerset SIR – It's not the vision of older drivers that's the real problem – it's the lack of indicator use, especially approaching roundabouts. Tina Ramsden Bramhall, Cheshire SIR – If there are to be new driving regulations, the opportunity should be taken to ban blinding headlights and barely visible indicator lights. Numerous surveys have shown that LED headlights are a danger to drivers of all ages, especially on country roads. A V Lofts Salcombe, Devon
The Independent
18 hours ago
- The Independent
MPs call for free bus travel for under-22s in England
MPs are calling on the Government to fund free bus travel for people aged under 22 in England. The Transport Select Committee, which made the recommendation, said it would improve young people's access to 'work and skills opportunities' and 'help embed long-term public transport use'. Free bus travel is offered to under-22s in Scotland. People aged 16-21 in Wales are entitled to a one-third discount on fares, and from next month will be able to travel for £1 per journey. Parts of England offer discounted or free bus travel for young people, such as London for 16 and 17-year-olds. People are entitled to free bus travel in England when they reach the state pension age, which is currently 66 but will rise from next year. Bus fares in England for all passengers are capped at £3 until March 2027. In a report on buses, the select committee said: 'England's patchwork of local youth concessions contrasts with national schemes in Scotland and Wales. 'A coherent national approach to ensure fair access across England is essential if the Government is serious about driving economic growth, which depends on removing barriers to education, training, and employment for the next generation.' The report described public transport as a 'major barrier to employment for young people', especially in places with limited services. It added: 'In some areas, transport is restricting opportunity rather than enabling it.' The committee urged the Government to reform the way local bus services are funded, with longer-term settlements. It also called for a national ambition for a minimum level on public transport connectivity. Department for Transport (DfT) figures show the number of bus journeys taken in England outside London fell by 22% from 4.6 billion in 2009 to 3.6 billion in 2024. Labour MP Ruth Cadbury, who chairs the committee, said: 'Those most affected by unreliable or even non-existent buses include the young, who need them to get to school, college, university and their first jobs. 'Denying young people these experiences denies them their life chances. 'We call for a universal, free bus pass for all under-22s to equalise opportunity. 'While the bus fare caps have been beneficial, the Government has yet to spell out a coherent strategy of what they aim to achieve, and whether more targeted options could produce better outcomes. 'While the Government's Bus Services Bill contains positive ideas, the Transport Committee's report says ministers should go further to get bums back on seats.' The Bill, which is going through Parliament, will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services. It will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations. A DfT spokesperson said: 'After decades of decline, we're providing a record £1 billion in multi-year funding to improve the reliability and frequency of bus services across the country. 'Our landmark Bus Services Bill will protect routes and prevent services from being scrapped, bringing buses back into local control, and will put passengers at the heart of services. 'We have also stepped in to prevent a fare hike for passengers by extending the £3 fare cap until March 2027.'
