Albanese is in China and Morrison is in his head
My partner and I recently travelled by train from Geelong to Melbourne to enjoy a lunch at Southbank with family. As we walked down Spencer Street to Flinders Street we commented on the state of the footpaths, buildings, overflowing rubbish bins and general filth. More was to come.
Alighting from the tram at Flinders Street station we were disgusted with the exterior condition of the station, the footpath and a toilet facility that was flooded and filthy. More was to come.
After our lunch, we opted to walk along the Yarra and onto Southern Cross station. Empty wine bottles, discarded clothing, and general rubbish lined the walkway. On a trip to India, we were astounded at the amount of discarded rubbish we observed – Melbourne's CBD appears to running a close second. Perhaps we need Donald to ″make Melbourne Great again″.
Heather Rees, Geelong
Youth vote
Changing the voting age so younger members of the population can vote is such a good idea. Let's follow Britain's excellent example, but make it optional for 16 and 17-year-olds whilst maintaining compulsory voting for everyone aged 18 and over. Denying the vote to enthusiastic young people who follow current affairs and politics and have opinions is wrong when apathetic older people who may have little interest are required to vote. Compulsory voting is what makes our democracy, so let's open it up to eager younger people on an optional basis.
Robyn Westwood, Heidelberg Heights
The way it was
Regarding your correspondent's suggestion that we need a government-owned bank (Letters, 17/7). We had one. It was called the State Savings Bank.
My account began at age six when the nice bank people visited schools and we lined up proudly with our coins and bank books to make our deposits.
When I married 20 years later and went in with name change details, the teller said I needed my husband's written permission to have the account.
Outraged, I changed banks and became active in the fight for women's rights.
Jane Ross, San Remo
Victoria's unknown costs
Everyday Victorians know that we have to budget carefully to cover our food, clothing and other necessities.
Yet, as The Age editorial (16/7) stated, the state government is 'pouring every available dollar of capital expenditure into the Suburban Rail Loop″, even while we feel the cutbacks in health, education and other essential services.
At the same time, secrecy surrounds the planning, funding and lack of development of urgently needed projects. The SRL bores ahead while there are still no Doncaster, airport or Melton rail lines; and now we suddenly hear of the Outer Melbourne Ring Road, which is needed to take thousands of trucks off the local roads.
It is our taxpayer money which is needed for these projects, and as The Age said earlier in the year, secrecy around planning is 'eroding the public's right to know and the fabric of our democracy'. So, what are our government's plans and how do we, the taxpayers, find that money?
Elizabeth Meredith, Surrey Hills
Animal cruelty
Re the ducks of Banyule Creek swimming in a blue soup (″ Workers clean up Banyule Creek after chemical from North East Link works turns it bright blue ″, 17/7), and the alleged poisoning of hundreds of corellas in Springvale South. This suffering is not what most people want to see happen to our native birdlife. We must do better.
Debbie Lustig, Elsternwick
Changing gears
Your correspondent (Letters, 'Slap happy feet', 18/7) correctly points out the safety aspect on choosing one foot for the brake and the other for the accelerator.
As a confirmed manual driver, I use the left foot for the clutch and right foot for brake or accelerator. If I were to press the accelerator accidentally instead of the brake, the most likely consequence would be that the car would stall rather than be involved in a collision.
So my manual gear stick is both a safety feature and an anti-theft device.
Rod Watson, East Brighton
Left or right
Your correspondent (18/7) suggests the left foot for the brake, and says it is an old maxim. Any suggestion to improve road safety should be considered, but is it an old maxim? My recollection of driver training in the 1970s was that it was left foot for the clutch and right foot for the brake and accelerator. The NRMA website unambiguously recommends the right foot for braking and accelerating.
Stephen Minns, South Yarra
Take it from Jodie
I understand our PM wanting to imitate Gough Whitlam on his Great Wall walk (albeit in an unflattering figure-hugging polo shirt), but why on earth was he advertising Hawthorn FC and iiNet on the obligatory panda sanctuary tour? He needs fashion tips from stylish Jodie.
Caroline Leslie, Hawthorn
Fashion statements
Fashion editor Damien Woolnough's scrutiny of Jodie Haydon's clothing (″ Perfect $599 fashion diplomacy from Jodie Haydon ″, 17/7) perpetuates the inherent sexism surrounding women in the public eye. Though favourably examined, the absence of any mention of who dressed the prime minister suggests Haydon's role is one of an accessory and not a human being.
Anders Ross, Heidelberg
AND ANOTHER THING
Politics
It would appear the Coalition hasn't learnt anything. All it does is find fault with everything Labor does, instead of working together in this time of world chaos to make Australia an example to the world.
Perry Becker, Bairnsdale
Albanese may be ″following in his footsteps″, but there's no way he could fill Whitlam's boots.
Bryan Lewis, St Helena
Furthermore
It's time for an investigation into the use of chemicals in our environment. The creek in Rosanna turning bright blue must be a wake-up call for all.
Mary Fenelon, Doncaster East
Paul O'Halloran's ″ ' My job is to root out dodgy workers. These are the warning signs to look for in childcare ‴, (17/7) is an essential piece in the puzzle of providing safe, high-quality childcare.
Trevor Kerr, Blackburn
A few letters to the editor recently have extolled the virtues of national service, all written with the enthusiasm and fervour only the (seemingly) ineligible possess.
Angus McLeod, Cremorne
If businesses really think that it costs them less to accept cash than cards, why not offer a discount for paying cash instead of imposing a surcharge for cards?
James Proctor, Maiden Gully
With the latest employment figures published, maybe the RBA could convene a special meeting prior to August to reconsider its July rate decision.
Arthur Pritchard, Ascot Vale
Driving positions
Perhaps your correspondent (Letters, 'Slap happy feet', 18/7) can explain which foot is on the clutch pedal if my left foot is on the brake pedal as I try to change down gears in my car? Maybe that is why it is an untaught maxim.
Joanne Wilson, South Melbourne
When I learnt to drive a manual car I used my left foot for the clutch while my right alternated between brake and accelerator. When I graduated to an automatic car my right foot continued to perform the same actions; my left sits idly on the little footrest thoughtfully provided for the purpose.
David Johnston, Healesville
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
3 hours ago
- The Australian
EU defends Trump trade deal facing backlash
The European Union on Monday vehemently defended its trade deal with President Donald Trump, with EU capitals and businesses sharply divided on an outcome some branded a "capitulation". "I'm 100 percent sure that this deal is better than a trade war with the United States," top EU trade negotiator Maros Sefcovic told journalists. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen clinched the framework accord with Trump Sunday after dashing to Scotland as the August 1 deadline loomed for steep levies that threatened to cripple Europe's economy. EU exports are now set to face across-the-board tariffs of 15 percent -- higher than customs duties before Trump returned to the White House, but much lower than his threatened 30 percent. The 27-nation bloc also promised its companies would purchase energy worth $750 billion from the United States and make $600 billion in additional investments -- although it was not clear how binding those pledges would be. "This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances," Sefcovic said. Full details of the agreement -- and crucially which sectors could escape the 15-percent levy -- will be known in coming days, although the EU says it has avoided steeper tariffs on key exports including cars and medicines. But the reaction from European capitals -- which gave von der Leyen the mandate to negotiate -- ranged from muted to outright hostile. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said it was a "dark day" for Europe and said the accord was tantamount to "submission". Speaking for Europe's biggest economy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz gave a warmer welcome to a deal he said had avoided "needless escalation". Industry groups in both countries made plain their disappointment however, with Germany's main auto sector body saying the 15-percent levy "burdens" carmakers while its VCI chemical trade association said the rates were "too high". Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban attacked the deal in blunt terms, saying "Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast". - 'Not only about trade' - "It looks a bit like a capitulation," said Alberto Rizzi of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). "The EU accepted a fairly unbalanced deal," he added, saying it delivered a "political victory for Trump". Von der Leyen had faced intense pressure from EU states to strike a deal quickly with the bloc's biggest partner and protect a $1.9-trillion trading relationship. Defending Brussels' approach, Sefcovic warned that a no-deal scenario -- meaning a 30-percent tariff and the prospect of further escalation -- would have risked up to five million jobs in Europe. Throughout the months-long talks, Brussels prioritised stability and maintaining good relations with Washington, over escalation. That line of thinking has support: Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, a Trump ally, said the deal had avoided "potentially devastating" consequences. Markets in Asia and Europe welcomed the certainty and rose following the announcement -- reflecting the 4.4 billion euros ($5.1 billion) worth of daily transatlantic goods and services trade that were at stake. Hanging over the negotiations was the risk to other areas of cooperation -- like Ukraine -- if the EU descended into a trade war with its closest security partner. "It's not only about the trade -- it's about security, it's about Ukraine," Sefcovic told reporters Monday. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute for International Economics acknowledged it was "clearly an imbalanced deal" if judged purely on trade terms. "But if you're trying to avoid worse national security outcomes, well then maybe the deal is not so bad," he said. - Cautious approach - The EU had sought to ramp up the pressure in the final stretch of talks, fearing a bad deal and higher levies, with countries approving a $109-billion package of counter-tariffs at the last minute. And states led by France were pushing for a more robust response including the option to deploy the trade "bazooka" known as the anti-coercion instrument. But the threat of retaliation was consistently framed by Brussels as a last resort should talks fail, and experts suggested the hardening stance may have come too late to make a real difference. "If the EU had played hardball at the very beginning, it probably could have got a better deal," ECFR's Rizzi told AFP. raz/ec/rl
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
EU defends Trump trade deal facing backlash
The European Union on Monday vehemently defended its trade deal with President Donald Trump, with EU capitals and businesses sharply divided on an outcome some branded a "capitulation". "I'm 100 percent sure that this deal is better than a trade war with the United States," top EU trade negotiator Maros Sefcovic told journalists. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen clinched the framework accord with Trump Sunday after dashing to Scotland as the August 1 deadline loomed for steep levies that threatened to cripple Europe's economy. EU exports are now set to face across-the-board tariffs of 15 percent -- higher than customs duties before Trump returned to the White House, but much lower than his threatened 30 percent. The 27-nation bloc also promised its companies would purchase energy worth $750 billion from the United States and make $600 billion in additional investments -- although it was not clear how binding those pledges would be. "This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances," Sefcovic said. Full details of the agreement -- and crucially which sectors could escape the 15-percent levy -- will be known in coming days, although the EU says it has avoided steeper tariffs on key exports including cars and medicines. But the reaction from European capitals -- which gave von der Leyen the mandate to negotiate -- ranged from muted to outright hostile. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said it was a "dark day" for Europe and said the accord was tantamount to "submission". Speaking for Europe's biggest economy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz gave a warmer welcome to a deal he said had avoided "needless escalation". Industry groups in both countries made plain their disappointment however, with Germany's main auto sector body saying the 15-percent levy "burdens" carmakers while its VCI chemical trade association said the rates were "too high". Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban attacked the deal in blunt terms, saying "Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast". - 'Not only about trade' - "It looks a bit like a capitulation," said Alberto Rizzi of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). "The EU accepted a fairly unbalanced deal," he added, saying it delivered a "political victory for Trump". Von der Leyen had faced intense pressure from EU states to strike a deal quickly with the bloc's biggest partner and protect a $1.9-trillion trading relationship. Defending Brussels' approach, Sefcovic warned that a no-deal scenario -- meaning a 30-percent tariff and the prospect of further escalation -- would have risked up to five million jobs in Europe. Throughout the months-long talks, Brussels prioritised stability and maintaining good relations with Washington, over escalation. That line of thinking has support: Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, a Trump ally, said the deal had avoided "potentially devastating" consequences. Markets in Asia and Europe welcomed the certainty and rose following the announcement -- reflecting the 4.4 billion euros ($5.1 billion) worth of daily transatlantic goods and services trade that were at stake. Hanging over the negotiations was the risk to other areas of cooperation -- like Ukraine -- if the EU descended into a trade war with its closest security partner. "It's not only about the trade -- it's about security, it's about Ukraine," Sefcovic told reporters Monday. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute for International Economics acknowledged it was "clearly an imbalanced deal" if judged purely on trade terms. "But if you're trying to avoid worse national security outcomes, well then maybe the deal is not so bad," he said. - Cautious approach - The EU had sought to ramp up the pressure in the final stretch of talks, fearing a bad deal and higher levies, with countries approving a $109-billion package of counter-tariffs at the last minute. And states led by France were pushing for a more robust response including the option to deploy the trade "bazooka" known as the anti-coercion instrument. But the threat of retaliation was consistently framed by Brussels as a last resort should talks fail, and experts suggested the hardening stance may have come too late to make a real difference. "If the EU had played hardball at the very beginning, it probably could have got a better deal," ECFR's Rizzi told AFP.
The Australian
3 hours ago
- The Australian
The Open 2024: Adam Scott reveals details of Trump White House meeting
When the doors slam shut on the Oval Office and it's just United States President Donald Trump in his natural habitat, what's he really like? Funny? A little bit mad? Completely outrageous? Just like he is on whatever social media platform is his go-to for the day? 'I think what you see in the media in his press is like a slightly toned-down version of him, believe it or not,' Scott smiles. 'I think he's actually trying to tone it down. He's a mile a minute, exactly (as you would expect).' The day Scott walked into the White House with Tiger Woods and commissioner Jay Monahan as part of a PGA Tour delegation to end the infighting in men's professional golf, Trump's aides started placing the United States and Israel flags in position as their meeting wrapped up. Scott knew whatever issues there were in golf were of little importance. It's just a sport. Still, Anthony Albanese would crave the kind of access Scott has had to Trump this year. Months on, and Scott's golf game is getting better and the PGA Tour-LIV Golf impasse only seems to get worse. Or at least going nowhere fast. It's been more than two years since they announced an agreement to work on a solution to end global golf's civil war, and there's still nothing meaningful. LIV Golf is back in for rankings points, the PGA Tour is back to doing what it has always done, albeit with some tweaks. 'What I took out of that visit was the amount of energy that (Trump) was putting into everything he does. It was noticeable,' Scott says. 'I think ultimately (professional golf) will all come together, but I don't know when that is.' It would have been natural to think Scott, who celebrated his 45th birthday on Wednesday with fans singing to him at one point as he played a practice round at Royal Portrush, would see his game regress as he focused more on the business side of the PGA Tour. It's been the opposite. This week at The Open, he's playing his 97th consecutive major, a remarkable feat beaten only by Jack Nicklaus (146) in professional golf history. 'I think he's played every major since (The Open) in 2001, which to me is absolutely mind blowing,' said world No. 9 Ludvig Aberg in an ambassadorial appearance for Mercedes-Benz. 'It means he's good enough to qualify for the events and he's been healthy and fit, never been hurt. He's obviously taken good care of himself. Those things are really important and really impressive. 'If I can do somewhat along those lines in my career, I'll be happy.' Says Scott: 'I've played a lot, but I've won one. My strike rate's not good. So, if I was a young guy, playing a lot's good, but winning a lot would be good too. 'I've worked hard to keep myself in this spot and I really don't have any results to show for how good I feel like I've played this year, which is part of golf and frustrating. I hope I can do this for another 10 years, but it only gets harder and harder. 'So, this week's my best opportunity to win a major. The last two majors I've been in contention with a few holes to play and it'd be nice to be in a similar position this week.' Scott was in the final group at the US Open last month, but after a lengthy last round weather delay at Oakmont in treacherous conditions, crashed on the back nine to finish tied-12th. It was such a good week, and such a deflating week. He played 'old man par golf' for so much of it, and at the end of it just had to accept defeat (Trump might have claimed victory, though). Arguably, Scott is the best hope of the nine Australians in the field this week in Northern Ireland. Cameron Smith is trying to break out of a majors funk. Jason Day is still hoping his body will be 100 per cent healthy. Min Woo Lee admits he didn't quite process his maiden PGA Tour win in the United States properly. The list goes on. Like Trump, Scott just wants a second run at it – when everyone else wonders whether he's past his best. Read related topics: Donald Trump Golf Loaded with nostalgia, golf, sporting, music and movie star cameos and heartwarming homages to the fallen, Happy Gilmore 2 takes a big swing, but does it land like the original? Nation He's kicked popularity goals thanks to major sporting events as SA Premier. But Peter Malinauskas' obsession with LIV golf could prove an albatross around his neck as his government seeks re-election.
