Global Ascension Studios Partners with We Identifi to Revolutionize Streaming Content in 2025
Empowering creators with uncensored storytelling, Global Ascension Studios and We Identifi redefine streaming with bold, independent content.
LOS ANGELES, April 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Global Ascension Studios (GAS) is making waves in the entertainment industry with a bold new partnership with We Identifi, an innovative streaming platform redefining digital content distribution. This collaboration marks a giant leap forward in empowering creator-driven media, promising fresh opportunities for top-tier talent to reach new heights and transformative storytelling in 2025.
Image by Global Ascension Studios
Global Ascension Studios has rapidly emerged as a powerhouse in film and television production, gaining widespread recognition with The Man You Don't Know, a documentary that captivated over 60 million viewers on X and premiered on WeIdentifi in November 2024. Building on this success, GAS is expanding its reach by developing an ambitious slate of projects across multiple formats—including films, scripted series, podcasts, live talk shows, and interactive live media—with handpicked projects exclusively for We Identifi.
'2024 was just the beginning,' said Joshua Macciello, CEO of Global Ascension Studios. 'By partnering with We Identifi, we are bringing A-list talent, including actors, musicians, athletes, comedians and influencers/podcasters, into a creator-first ecosystem where they can craft authentic content and receive the best deals possible. This is about giving artists control, embracing innovation, and ensuring We Identifi becomes the premier destination for uncensored, high-impact entertainment.'
We Identifi's groundbreaking self-serve streaming platform allows content creators to own their network and set their own monetization models using their own mix of video-on-demand, monthly subscription models, livestreaming, pay-per-view, advertising and sponsorship. Unlike traditional streaming giants that impose rigid creative and financial restrictions, We Identifi enables direct connection and engagement with audiences all in one place. This alignment with GAS's mission to challenge conventional industry norms makes the partnership a natural fit.
'Teaming up with Global Ascension Studios is a game-changer,' said Spencer Gordon, CEO of We Identifi. 'Their speed in delivering high-quality productions, combined with our commitment to creator independence, is reshaping the power and potential of streaming. The GAS-We Identifi alliance liberates all creators from the shackles of social media algorithms and the mandates of antiquated film studios and TV networks. Together, we are building a home for artists who make the content they want to make and connect with audiences on their terms—while fiercely upholding our First Amendment rights as the foundation of true creative freedom.'
The We Identifi platform, with the moniker, 'WE IDENTIFI' can be accessed for free by creators and fans on its website, weidentifi.com, and mobile app is now available for download on the Apple iOS App Store. We Identifi's website is now live in beta mode and currently undergoing improvements to enhance viewing and user experience.
The success of The Man You Don't Know, featuring exclusive interviews with Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Hulk Hogan, and key figures from Trump's inner circle, was just the first step in this partnership. Moving forward, GAS and We Identifi will develop a diverse array of programming that includes blockbuster films, thought-provoking documentaries, music specials, athletic events, and groundbreaking digital-first experiences.
With innovative industry heavyweights like director Christopher Martini and producer Frank Torchia already onboard, 2025 is set to be a landmark year. As audiences demand content that is both authentic and unfiltered, Global Ascension Studios and We Identifi are poised to lead the next evolution in entertainment.
About Global Ascension Studios
Global Ascension Studios is a trailblazing production company dedicated to producing bold, high-impact films and series that challenge the status quo. By fostering creative freedom and innovation, GAS continues to redefine the entertainment landscape.
About We Identifi
We Identifi is a cutting-edge streaming platform designed for content creators, offering full ownership rights, flexible monetization, and direct audience engagement. Built for the modern content era, We Identifi empowers artists to take control of their work, truly own their audience and own their destiny.
How to find We Identifi:
www.weidentifi.comWe Identifi Mobile AppFor media inquiries, please contact: Ophelia SoumekhOphelia.soumekh@globalascensionstudios.com818 726-6761
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/6ec1a493-4de2-4163-a1c8-6d7574503db1
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge Upholds Doxxing Claims Against TDE
The two women suing Top Dawg Entertainment for sexual harassment, assault, and negligence won an early round in court Wednesday when a judge ruled they can proceed with their doxxing claims against the prominent hip-hop label. The women first sued TDE in on Dec. 6, 2024, claiming the company and employees including high-ranking executives Anthony 'Moosa' Tiffith Jr. and Brandon Tiffith – the sons of TDE founder Anthony 'Top' Tiffith, Sr. – allowed a 'pervasive' culture of sexual harassment to run unchecked at the label for years, leading to the women's alleged abuse. More from Rolling Stone Rapper Silentó Sentenced to 30 Years in Prison for Cousin's Shooting Death Former Olympic Gymnast Mary Lou Retton Addresses DUI Arrest: 'I Make No Excuses' Macklemore's Seattle Home Robbed, Nanny Sprayed With Bear Mace The lawsuit, which referred to the women by the pseudonyms Jane Doe and Jane Roe, flew under the radar for nearly two months. The women's lawyers then issued a press release on Jan. 31, summarizing the claims. A day later, the law firm representing TDE responded with a statement identifying the women by name and calling the lawsuit a 'shakedown' for $48 million. Four days after that, the women filed an amended complaint that was triple the size of their original, filled with alleged text messages and other evidence to support their claims. They also added the doxxing claims. 'Plaintiffs cannot imagine a legitimate, non-harassing purpose behind TDE's release of their personally identifying information,' the amended lawsuit said. TDE, the label best known for guiding the careers of Grammy-winning artists Kendrick Lamar and SZA, quickly sought to block the doxxing claims. It said the women's Jan. 31 press release was so inflammatory, the company had a right to name them to 'correct false statements.' Before the judge ruled in the women's favor Wednesday, a lawyer for TDE repeatedly argued that the label's 'shakedown' statement naming the women was protected by the First Amendment. She said the women had not pursued, much less received, a court order sealing their identities when TDE named them on Feb. 1. 'There's no statute, no law, no order that was violated by the any of the contents of the defendants' statement,' TDE lawyer Allison Hart told Los Angeles County Judge Michael E. Whitaker in a courtroom in Beverly Hills. Hart said the music industry is a 'relatively small world,' and TDE identified the women by name to counter the credibility of their 'very salacious and false press release.' '[The lawsuit] implies that they had some inside, direct knowledge that there is a pervasive atmosphere of sexual harassment present within our client's organization. It was necessary to identify the plaintiffs in order to refute that statement,' Hart argued. She said the women were aware of the process for obtaining a court order sealing their names. She suggested they didn't pursue it in a timely fashion. Judge Whitaker said it didn't matter that the women hadn't yet received the court's blessing. They still had time. 'Your clients took the next step of identifying them by their names, their true identities,' the judge scolded Hart. 'The argument about whether or not they could have proceeded [with pseudonyms] was for another day. If [TDE's] press release simply said, 'We've been sued by Jane Doe and Jane Roe, and we deny all the allegations,' that would have been fine. But at that time, according to the public record, they were Jane Doe and Jane Roe.' In his written ruling, the judge said, 'publicly revealing [plaintiffs'] true identities was not a necessary part of correcting the narrative.' Parties in California civil actions are allowed to proceed to trial with pseudonyms if they can demonstrate that disclosing their real names could result in a specific harm, such as retaliatory physical or mental harm. The potential harm must be such that it creates an 'overriding interest' that outweighs possible prejudice to the opposing party or the public's interest in knowing a party's identity. After the women were named in the statement issued by TDE's law firm, they filed their amended complaint with their real names, Linda Luna and Ayah Altayri. Luna said the alleged doxxing led to a deluge of harassing messages. She said two of her clients terminated their professional relationships with her amid the firestorm. In the lawsuit, Luna alleges that while working for TDE starting in 2019, Brandon Tiffith, the company's chief marketing officer, subjected her to unwanted sexual advances. She alleges that on one occasion, he attempted to force her into oral sex, stating, 'You know this was bound to happen.' Luna further claims TDE President Anthony Tiffith, Jr. sexually harassed her repeatedly, including over text, and that TDE failed to pay her. Altayri alleges she endured multiple instances of sexual harassment and assault by other men purportedly associated with TDE while on TDE property. During one alleged incident, she was coerced into consuming alcohol while underage for the purpose of sexual exploitation, the lawsuit claims. 'We have the utmost respect for the court, but believe that today's decision that our clients were not allowed to disclose the plaintiffs' names was in error, and we intend to immediately appeal and continue vigorously defending against plaintiffs' bogus claims,' Hart says in a statement sent to Rolling Stone. Shounak Dharap, the lawyer who appeared in court on behalf of the women, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A trial in the case has been set for May 17, 2027. Best of Rolling Stone Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
A judge's dismissal of Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation suit is a win for Blake Lively, but it's not 'game over'
Legal experts say Blake Lively has scored a key legal win against Justin Baldoni. A New York judge dismissed Baldoni's defamation case against Lively, Ryan Reynolds, and the NYT. Still, one expert told BI it's not "game over" for Baldoni since "the judge has granted him permission to amend his claim." Blake Lively just scored a major win in her ongoing legal battle with "It Ends With Us" director-costar Justin Baldoni, but the court fight isn't over yet. Legal experts told Business Insider the dismissal of Baldoni's $400 million defamation suit is an important win for Lively and her team, especially in a case where reputation is more at stake than money. "Even though it was a New York judge, the judge applied California law, and that's important because California is one of the most First Amendment-friendly states in the country," Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and cofounder of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told BI. Although the case was filed in New York, California laws apply because the events in question took place in the state. "The fact that the vast majority of the claims were dismissed with prejudice, which means that they can't be refiled, is a huge setback for Baldoni," Rahmani added. On Monday, a New York judge dismissed Baldoni's $400 million defamation countersuit against Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and The New York Times. Baldoni argued that the parties conspired to destroy his career with false allegations after Lively filed a federal lawsuit against Baldoni, which accused him of sexual harassment and retaliation. In her complaint, Lively said that Baldoni and the producers of "It Ends With Us" orchestrated a smear campaign against her after she raised concerns about on-set conditions during the film's production. Baldoni has denied the allegations. A spokesperson for Lively said in a statement to BI that the lawsuit dismissal is "a total victory and a complete vindication" of the actor. "As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it," said the spokesperson, who added that Lively plans to seek attorneys' fees, treble damages, and punitive damages from Baldoni and his associates. US District Judge Lewis J. Liman ruled that Lively's sexual harassment allegations in her lawsuit are legally protected speech. The judge also ruled Baldoni's allegations that Lively engaged in an extortion campaign to seize creative control of "It Ends With Us" from Baldoni did not qualify as civil extortion under California law. Liman says Baldoni can refile an amended suit against Lively regarding his contract breach and interference allegations. Baldoni has until June 23 to file that amended complaint. Baldoni's camp would not confirm to BI whether they would refile, but a statement from his attorney, Bryan Freedman, suggested that the director has plans to do just that. "Ms. Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false, so let us be clear about the latest ruling. While the Court dismissed the defamation-related claims, the Court has invited us to amend four out of the seven claims against Ms. Lively, which will showcase additional evidence and refined allegations," Freedman said. Freedman added, "Most importantly, Ms. Lively's own claims are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle and look forward to her forthcoming deposition, which I will be taking." Camron Dowlatshahi of MSD Lawyers, who specializes in sexual harassment cases, told BI that the judge's dismissal is still a major victory for Lively at a very early stage of the case. "Baldoni can amend his complaint to properly allege a cause of action for defamation," said Dowlatshahi. "His amended complaint will likely face another motion to dismiss and cannot manufacture facts, so it remains to be seen whether Baldoni can get to the discovery stage of his case." Lively's lawsuit against Baldoni is still pending and could proceed to trial. Amber Melville-Brown, a media law specialist and partner at Withers, told BI there may be some hope left for Baldoni if he targets Lively's statements made outside her complaint, which may be less protected. "Libel litigation can be akin to spinning the roulette wheel or sitting down to a game of chance," said Melville-Brown. "So while Baldoni may have lost in this latest hand, it doesn't mean all bets are off. It's not necessarily game over because the judge has granted him permission to amend his claim." "That said, and I'm not a gambler myself. If he didn't play his strongest cards at the outset, it's not easy to see that he's going to come up with a winning hand second time around," Melville-Brown added. Read the original article on Business Insider
Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
A judge's dismissal of Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation suit is a win for Blake Lively, but it's not 'game over'
Blake Lively just scored a major win in her ongoing legal battle with " It Ends With Us" director-costar Justin Baldoni, but the court fight isn't over yet. Legal experts told Business Insider the dismissal of Baldoni's $400 million defamation suit is an important win for Lively and her team, especially in a case where reputation is more at stake than money. "Even though it was a New York judge, the judge applied California law, and that's important because California is one of the most First Amendment-friendly states in the country," Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor and cofounder of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told BI. Although the case was filed in New York, California laws apply because the events in question took place in the state. "The fact that the vast majority of the claims were dismissed with prejudice, which means that they can't be refiled, is a huge setback for Baldoni," Rahmani added. On Monday, a New York judge dismissed Baldoni's $400 million defamation countersuit against Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and The New York Times. Baldoni argued that the parties conspired to destroy his career with false allegations after Lively filed a federal lawsuit against Baldoni, which accused him of sexual harassment and retaliation. In her complaint, Lively said that Baldoni and the producers of " It Ends With Us" orchestrated a smear campaign against her after she raised concerns about on-set conditions during the film's production. Baldoni has denied the allegations. A spokesperson for Lively said in a statement to BI that the lawsuit dismissal is "a total victory and a complete vindication" of the actor. "As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it," said the spokesperson, who added that Lively plans to seek attorneys' fees, treble damages, and punitive damages from Baldoni and his associates. Why Baldoni's suit was dismissed US District Judge Lewis J. Liman ruled that Lively's sexual harassment allegations in her lawsuit are legally protected speech. The judge also ruled Baldoni's allegations that Lively engaged in an extortion campaign to seize creative control of "It Ends With Us" from Baldoni did not qualify as civil extortion under California law. Liman says Baldoni can refile an amended suit against Lively regarding his contract breach and interference allegations. Baldoni has until June 23 to file that amended complaint. Baldoni's camp would not confirm to BI whether they would refile, but a statement from his attorney, Bryan Freedman, suggested that the director has plans to do just that. "Ms. Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false, so let us be clear about the latest ruling. While the Court dismissed the defamation-related claims, the Court has invited us to amend four out of the seven claims against Ms. Lively, which will showcase additional evidence and refined allegations," Freedman said. Freedman added, "Most importantly, Ms. Lively's own claims are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle and look forward to her forthcoming deposition, which I will be taking." Camron Dowlatshahi of MSD Lawyers, who specializes in sexual harassment cases, told BI that the judge's dismissal is still a major victory for Lively at a very early stage of the case. "Baldoni can amend his complaint to properly allege a cause of action for defamation," said Dowlatshahi. "His amended complaint will likely face another motion to dismiss and cannot manufacture facts, so it remains to be seen whether Baldoni can get to the discovery stage of his case." Liman is weighing whether to dismiss Lively's lawsuit against Baldoni or let it proceed to trial. Baldoni's fight isn't over, an expert says Amber Melville-Brown, a media law specialist and partner at Withers, told BI there may be some hope left for Baldoni if he targets Lively's statements made outside her complaint, which may be less protected. "Libel litigation can be akin to spinning the roulette wheel or sitting down to a game of chance," said Melville-Brown. "So while Baldoni may have lost in this latest hand, it doesn't mean all bets are off. It's not necessarily game over because the judge has granted him permission to amend his claim." "That said, and I'm not a gambler myself. If he didn't play his strongest cards at the outset, it's not easy to see that he's going to come up with a winning hand second time around," Melville-Brown added.
