Lawyers announce long march against new canals, PECA tweaks
The protest will begin today (April 17) with a rally from the Sindh High Court to Baberlo Bypass in Sukkur, where a 24-hour sit-in will be held.
At a joint press conference in City Court, leaders from various bar associations-including Karachi, Hyderabad, Malir, and Jamshoro-voiced grave concerns about the unchecked construction of canals, which they say will deprive Sindh of water and devastate agriculture. Karachi Bar Association President Amir Nawaz Warraich said the entire province stands against these projects, which are proceeding without consultation or consent.
Warraich warned that Sindh may soon face severe water shortages, and even basic water access may become unaffordable. In Karachi, a water tanker available for Rs6,000 will not be availabale for even Rs30,000. People must realise the gravity of the situation and rise up to protect their rights. Despite threats and attempts at intimidation, he said, the legal community remains resolute. "Our protest is peaceful, and we stand with the people," he stated.
Other leaders, including Faheem Anar (Jamshoro), Ashraf Khokhar (Hyderabad), and Ayaz Chandio (Malir), echoed similar sentiments, rejecting the 26th Amendment and the PECA Act, which they believe endanger press freedom and democracy. They also criticized corporate farming, alleging that land is being unfairly transferred and water resources are being misappropriated.
The lawyers have demanded immediate reversal of these policies and warned that protests will continue until their demands are met. All bar associations across Sindh have pledged unity and participation in the long march.
Waraich said that after the implementation of the PECA Act, freedom of expression will come to an end, and the media will be reduced to nothing more than state-run PTV. The government's only response to dissent is to shut it down. Referring to the case of a journalist arrested under the PECA Act, he added that they did not wish to pursue any further action after witnessing what happened with the session judge involved in that case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Govt mulls federal constitutional court
Listen to article Since the passage of the 26th Constitutional Amendment in October last year, the PML-N led federal government has remained largely successful in getting its way in courts. The most significant event is the award of convictions to 204 individuals — belonging to the PTI — in May 9 rioting cases. Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi has played a key role in expeditious trials in May 9 cases. In April, a bench led by him gave four months' deadline to anti-terrorism courts (ATCs) to complete the trials. Similarly, the Supreme Court's Constitutional Bench, which was formed by virtue of the 26th Constitutional Amendment, has also endorsed the trials of 103 May 9 rioters by military courts. Majority of convicts including PTI founder Imran Khan's nephew are behind the bar, waiting for passage of a proposed legislation for getting the right of appeal against their convictions by military courts. Despite the completion of a 45-day deadline, the government has not taken any step to give the right of appeal against military courts' decisions. The constitutional bench is also not sitting due to summer vacations. Three detailed judgements in crucial cases — related reserved seats, transfer of judges to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and military courts — are awaited. On the other hand, the government is waiting for an appropriate time to bring the 27th Constitutional Amendment. A senior government functionary admitted that the creation of a federal constitutional court is under serious consideration. Judiciary role since May 9, 2023 The judiciary's role has been vital amid the ongoing confrontation between the security establishment and the PTI, a confrontation that started after the ouster of the PTI government in April 2022. However, the establishment got disappointed, when a bench led by ex-chief justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial took up a matter related to the arrest of PTI chief Imran Khan on May 9, 2023 and directed the law enforcement agencies to present him in the court. Subsequently, the court gave relief to Imran which further upset the executive functionaries. Ex-CJP Bandial was keen to hold general elections of Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa assemblies within the 90-day period but he could not do so due to various reasons. The former PML-N led government had issued notification regarding the appointment of Justice Qazi Faez Isa as the next CJP months before the retirement of Justice Bandial. After his taking charge of the SC, Justice Isa did not disappoint the present government in any important matter. Ex-CJP Isa did not take notice of the allegations of human rights violation as well as election rigging. During his term, judgment declaring civilian trials in military courts as unconstitutional was suspended, the PTI was deprived of its election symbol ahead of the February 8 election, the party's female workers and leaders could not get bail and Imran was convicted in three cases during his jail trials. Despite all these happenings, the February 8 election results were shocking for anti-PTI elements. Ex-CJP Isa was considered a "guarantor of system" which was formed after the elections. When some judges raised concerns about agencies' interference in judicial functions, Justice Isa did not back them. Lawyers believe that Justice Isa's biggest step to facilitate the executive was the elevation of ex-Lahore High Court chief justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan to the apex court. The present government was very uncomfortable with Justice Khan on account of his bold steps to ensure fairness in litigations related to election disputes and the May 9 cases. Ex-LHC CJ was the biggest hurdle in the manipulation of trials in the May 9 matters. Soon after his elevation to the SC, different ATCs judges were transferred to the satisfaction of the executive. After six IHC judges wrote a letter to Justice Isa in March last year, the executive started working on a plan to control the superior judiciary. One section of judges had made an attempt to secure the independence of judiciary by giving July 12, 2024 decision in the reserved seats case but they could not succeed. Post 26th amendment judiciary Instead of getting united for the independence of the institution, SC judges are visibly divided into two camps. The beneficiaries of constitutional amendment in the judiciary did not disappoint the present government in any issue. The executive is completely comfortable with all high courts as well as the apex court. Majority of dissenting judges have been sidelined and not included in the constitutional bench. Even the judges who were not in the good books of the executive have been sidelined in the IHC. The government's plan has also been successful in the IHC wherein they transferred three judges from other high courts. Subsequently, Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar became the IHC CJ as per the government's plan. It is being witnessed that the executive has total dominance in the process of superior courts judges' appointment after 26th Constitutional Amendment. Post 26th amendment, the PTI could not get any substantive relief in any matter. Now questions are being raised about convictions in May 9 cases. It is learnt that two senior PTI leaders recently met CJP Yahya Afridi to express apprehensions over non adherence of Article 10-A of the Constitution during the trials. There is a strong perception that "excessive and unjustified" sentences are awarded to the majority of PTI activists and lawmakers. Now all eyes are now on the LHC, which will hear the appeals against the convictions. Generally, convicts have to surrender to court before filing appeals against their convictions. One of PTI legal team members revealed that they are considering alternate strategies to plead the case against convictions. Despite passage of several months, Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi's petitions for the suspension of sentences in the 190 million pounds case have not been decided by the IHC. It will be interesting to see which LHC bench is assigned the task to hear appeals against convictions. Lawyers fear that if the situation remains the same and the convictions are awarded without adherence to due process then people will lose complete trust in the judiciary and the ultimate loser will be the justice system. The judges, who are on the driving seat in the superior judiciary, must evolve a mechanism to end the perception that post 26 amendment judiciary is working under executive influence.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Opposition huddle
Listen to article There is a twinkle of hope for the opposition as it, at least, managed to gather under an umbrella and call out the government for its extra-constitutional actions. The assembling of the opposition conglomerate, nonetheless, was a telling tale of hide and seek, as the local administration in the federal capital went on a witch-hunt. This reflected the political intolerance that is now well-embedded within the ruling collation as it apparently believes in exterminating the dissent voices, and going solo in contravention of the essentials of a participatory democracy. The fact that the opposition alliance Tehreek-i-Tahafuz-i-Ayeen-i-Pakistan (TTAP) was able to come out with a strong narrative, after a long hiatus, and called for a grand dialogue and a new charter of democracy is a welcome sign. It should pave the way for reconciliation. The coalition of six opposition parties, of which the PTI is a component, was categorical in demanding an end to what they described as a "wave of fascism and political manipulation" in the country. It also offered its 'blanket support' for all anti-government protests, calling upon the authorities to release all political prisoners, including Imran Khan and Baloch dissidents. The opposition is now unanimous in calling for supremacy of the Constitution and Parliament, rule of law, independence of the judiciary, appointment of an independent Election Commission and fair elections. Likewise, setting up of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission was underscored to address in de jure terms the excesses that have been committed against the people, so that a new congenial order could emerge in the country. The call for repealing the 26th amendment and reforming the judiciary was at the bastion, as the alliance insisted that the fundamental spirit of the Constitution and distribution of powers among the organs of the state stood shattered, leading to erosion of public trust in the system. This definitely necessitates a grand dialogue, and the government would be well advised to lend an attentive ear, rather than scoffing at it in a knee-jerk reaction.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Bonded freedom?
Listen to article Though humankind might claim inherent individual freedom, the need for collective order imposes significant constraints on it. That is, the sustainable fulfillment of primary survival needs — which underscores the necessity of orderly collective affairs — requires individuals, both individually and collectively, to relinquish part of their otherwise unrestrained autonomy to authorities sanctioned for justly organised regulation of collective affairs. However, the questions persist: How much freedom should be given up to maintain social order? Do limits on freedom lead to more order? Does the authority that gains this freedom always act in the best interest of the public? For centuries, the notion that ordered freedom thrives under self-governance has been tested by history. The pursuit of self-rule has driven movements for self-determination, democracy and revolution and, more recently, efforts to balance freedoms with order. For instance, many countries today — such as Switzerland, New Zealand and Canada — effectively strike this balance by ensuring political freedoms through transparent democracy, free speech and inclusion, while maintaining stability through efficient and responsive governance, low corruption and low crime rates. However, most South Asian countries struggle to fully and equitably capitalise on their hard-earned freedom. Today, people in these societies face oppressive restrictions on individual and collective liberties, often justified in the name of national security or public order, without Pakistan being an exception. Interestingly enough, excessive social restrictions often have a paradoxical impact: they tend to create more disorder, which then justifies more restrictions under the guise of restoring order to the disorderly social order. This vicious cycle of paradoxical outcomes questions the legitimacy of restricting individual and collective liberties. Meanwhile, the ruling elite enjoy near-absolute impunity for their actions, systematically undermining the very freedoms they claim to protect. The founders of Pakistan had endured great hardships to enable the people to cultivate a life free from colonial oppression, slavery and suffering. The fruits of freedom, nonetheless, remained out of reach for the people and are being disproportionately reaped by the ruling elite. The Constitution and citizens' rights have long been encroached upon and exploited by our own rulers, who — through exclusive and extractive policies and practices — enforce chains that are native in name but colonial in practice, liberating in appearance but subjugating in effect. While not entirely new, authorities have imposed selective restrictions on civil liberties, political rights and justice through a series of legislation and acts. The 26th Amendment, the PECA Amendment and summary trials of civilians have accelerated the erosion of civil and political freedoms. Also, the fixed adjudication in the superior judiciary and oppressive curbs on media and civil space speak volumes about the facilitated erosion of liberty in the country. Today, the country has neither that internal freedom nor the desired order. Notwithstanding the ritualistic elections organised for the dynastically despotic elite, the entrenched influence of unrepresentative forces over government policymaking, media narratives and foreign policy, along with its near-total impunity and indiscriminate use of extralegal force, has tilted the balance toward authoritarian power. On the 14th of this month, we will cherish our beloved country's Independence Day with impassioned speeches recounting how our founders wrested freedom from British colonial rule. Yet, little thought will be given to whether the nation and its people are truly free today. Shouldn't the official theme of this year's Independence Day, more realistically, be "A Critical Reflection on Bonded Freedom, Public Resentment and Betrayed Public Hopes for A Just, Inclusive and Prosperous Pakistan?"
