Patty Prewitt: I finally got justice, but Missouri's legal system needs major reform
On Dec. 20, only a few months ago, I was released. Outgoing Gov. Mike Parson commuted my sentence of life with no parole for 50 years. Although I'm innocent, I'll be on parole forever, paying $30 a month for the privilege. I'm still a convicted murderer in the eyes of the law. Over half of my life was wasted behind razor wire.
But freedom is a wonderful gift. I'm surrounded by loved ones, safe and warm in a beautiful home, and I enjoy every single minute of every day filled with unlimited hugs and snuggles, kisses, laughter, a soft bed, good and nutritious food, sweet dogs and cats that also are family, a bathtub, Alexa who knows all the songs, and quality time with my kids and fascinating grandchildren.
People keep asking if I'm overwhelmed. No, I'm not. Going to prison was overwhelming. Coming home is what I've been training for all these decades.
I have plenty of support, but many do not. How could I make it to parole meetings in Independence from Greenwood if I didn't have people with vehicles? I'm 75, so I don't have to find a job. How do younger parolees find work with no transportation and no suitable clothing? We need to do better for parolees who need help. I still haven't successfully signed up for Medicare. What a struggle.
Missouri needs to create a better method for applying for clemency with accountability and transparency. The current method is cloaked in secrecy and bogged down by poor organization. There were governors who not once acknowledged my clemency application or the thousands of calls, letters or emails from taxpaying citizens demanding my freedom. My successful clemency application was filed in May of 2010.
Before I experienced our justice system firsthand, I honestly believed that branch of government found and dispensed justice. The average person would be appalled at how poorly trials are conducted in America. The Midwest Innocence Project does the work that should have been done in the original court. Furthermore, our courts need to be more open to post-conviction appeals. For judges to deny DNA testing is ridiculous. What harm is a scientific test to a judge who is not paying for it?
I won't even go into how awful our prisons are in every way. I feel bad for all the good women I left behind. Most female inmates are mothers who were the primary caregivers for their children. Either a family member or the state must take responsibility for these brokenhearted children. Inmates are hidden in the shadows and our children suffer.
Now that I'm free, what am I doing now? I got my driver's license. I'm looking forward to good weather. I hope to be able to see a dentist and a primary care doctor soon. I'm studying to complete my bachelor's degree in humanities from Washington University in the fall. I'm also studying theater and literature with Prison Performing Arts in St. Louis. I'm petitioning for a pardon from Gov. Mike Kehoe, and my memoir 'Trying to Catch Lighting in a Jar,' describing my first 20 years in prison, will be published in May.
Meanwhile, I'm thankful and ecstatic to be free. I send my gratitude to everyone who supports justice, but there are still many changes that must come about to prevent others from suffering the injustice that I did.
Patty Prewitt is a native of Lone Jack and Lee's Summit class of 1967. She has four children, nine grandchildren and four great-grands.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Furious MAGA Voter's Post Breaking Down The "Ridiculous" Cost Of Their Diabetes Medicine Due To Donald Trump's Tariffs Is Going Viral
A Facebook post written by a self-proclaimed MAGA voter who says she and her partner can no longer afford their imported medications due to Donald Trump's tariffs is going viral. At the start of the post, the MAGA voter expressed her anger with President Trump and his ongoing tariff war that has increased the prices of imported goods in the US. She said, "He should take his tariffs and shove them up his ass!" She then broke down the cost of her and her partner's medications in the US, which amounts to over $500 for each of them with Medicare. She said they'd been buying their medications from Canada or the UK to save money.... But that changed when the Canadian company purportedly increased its prices by $80-100 per month to offset Trump's tariffs. "I voted for Trump, I truly wish I had not making America Great Again, but he sure is making it more expensive," she wrote. In response to the posts, people had a range of opinions, with some defending President Trump... "You can't blame the president for the high drug pricing," one person commented on the original post. "It is not Trumps fault you cannot figure this out," another wrote. While others blamed the original poster for her voting decisions... "If you cannot afford your medications, why would you vote for any Republican ever??? The Democratic platform has been lowered costs for healthcare FOR DECADES," one user questioned. "I wish I had more sympathy. That went away in Nov. They are getting exactly what they voted told them this time was different," another person wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.
Buzz Feed
19 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
MAGA Voter Regrets Vote Due To Rising Medication Prices
A Facebook post written by a self-proclaimed MAGA voter who says she and her partner can no longer afford their imported medications due to Donald Trump's tariffs is going viral. At the start of the post, the MAGA voter expressed her anger with President Trump and his ongoing tariff war that has increased the prices of imported goods in the US. She said, "He should take his tariffs and shove them up his ass!" She then broke down the cost of her and her partner's medications in the US, which amounts to over $500 for each of them with Medicare. She said they'd been buying their medications from Canada or the UK to save money.... But that changed when the Canadian company purportedly increased its prices by $80-100 per month to offset Trump's tariffs. "I voted for Trump, I truly wish I had not making America Great Again, but he sure is making it more expensive," she wrote. In response to the posts, people had a range of opinions, with some defending President Trump... "You can't blame the president for the high drug pricing," one person commented on the original post. "It is not Trumps fault you cannot figure this out," another wrote. While others blamed the original poster for her voting decisions... "If you cannot afford your medications, why would you vote for any Republican ever??? The Democratic platform has been lowered costs for healthcare FOR DECADES," one user questioned. "I wish I had more sympathy. That went away in Nov. They are getting exactly what they voted told them this time was different," another person wrote. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump wants private assets in 401(k)s. How do everyday investors value them?
Imagine walking into a jewelry store where nothing has a price tag, the shelves are locked and you can't return anything the moment you change your mind. That's a bit like what could be coming to your 401(k)s and other workplace retirement plans under a new executive order from President Donald Trump. Amazon documentary exposes 'neglect and pain' in many nursing homes. It's only going to get worse. Medicare will test using AI to help decide whether patients get coverage — which could delay or deny care, critics warn 'I'm tired of corporate America': My wife and I have $1.65 million. I'm 61. Can I retire already? 'Stagflation is coming to the U.S.,' says this economist. Here's what it means for the dollar, bonds and stocks. 'She lives alone': My mother-in-law, 86, gets $1,300 in Social Security. Is that enough to live on? Trump this week signed an executive order that will open the doors for everyday investors to stash their retirement savings in private equity, cryptocurrency, real estate and other alternative assets — a move that echoes a shared interest for some of Wall Street's largest asset managers and private-equity firms, which for years have wanted to tap into the massive collective piggy bank of 401(k)s and other defined-contribution plans. While the move promises ordinary investors access to a potentially high-yield, low-volatility market — at least on paper — once reserved for sophisticated institutions and the ultrawealthy, it also introduces an unprecedented problem for retirement savers: It's nearly impossible to know what you really own — and what it is truly worth. See: Trump's order greenlights crypto in 401(k)s, so why isn't my job on board yet? Unlike stocks on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq, where shares of companies are openly traded, private equity involves investments in private firms that do not offer shares to the general public. And because private assets aren't traded on public exchanges, the companies and funds behind them are not legally required to disclose detailed financial information to the public. To be sure, private-equity holdings do get valued because fund managers must provide their private clients — usually pension funds, endowments and family offices — with periodic appraisals of the assets they hold. These valuations primarily rely on the so-called mark-to-model pricing method, which assigns values to assets using financial models as opposed to market trading prices. This approach also involves comparable company analysis, projected cash flows and assessments from the management themselves. As a result, the valuations are mostly estimates and often inherently subjective. David Krakauer, senior director of portfolio management at Mercer Advisors, said these valuation methods have to be taken with 'a huge grain of salt,' because investors do not know what these private-market investments are actually worth until they have to sell their positions. 'We've seen that the mark-to-model [pricing method] is very slow to mark things down and very quick to mark things up,' said Jason Kephart, senior principal of multiasset-strategy ratings at MorningStar. 'When markets sell off, the model is slower to react or not as reactionary in general, but when things are doing well, then you'll see prices marked up a bit quicker.' That illiquid nature of private assets is another major challenge, as there's no readily available buyer or seller at any given moment. So even if investors have a valuation and trading prices on paper, they can't quickly convert the investment into cash whenever they want to exit their position. That lack of price transparency and liquidity is exactly what makes private assets tricky for 401(k) investors — who are used to logging in and seeing up-to-the-minute price updates for their holdings, and are able to adjust their portfolio allocations accordingly. Private markets are often known for their relatively low volatility and higher returns compared to public markets — but that is largely because of their illiquid nature, and it doesn't necessarily imply lower risk, according to portfolio managers. The supposedly superlow volatility of private assets does create 'an illusion of diversification, which comes from the valuations not really changing or only changing in a positive direction,' Kephart told MarketWatch in a phone interview on Friday. 'But the small standard deviation of these funds is in no way indicative of the amount of risk investors are taking,' he added. To be sure, Trump's executive order doesn't immediately change policy, but rather serves as directional guidance for government agencies. His order instructs the Labor Department to re-examine its guidance to employers and consult with the Treasury Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as other federal regulators, to determine what regulatory changes need to be made to facilitate the goal of expanding private-markets access to 401(k)s. Benjamin Schiffrin, director of securities policy for Better Markets, a nonprofit financial-market watchdog, said Trump's executive order exemplifies the administration's determination to prioritize the interests of Wall Street over the interests of retail investors. 'Let's be clear: Neither 401(k)-plan sponsors or 401(k)-plan participants — regular, hardworking Americans — are asking to replace stocks and bonds in their 401(k)s with risky private assets,' Schiffrin said in a statement shared with MarketWatch on Thursday. 'Instead, the private-funds industry needs a way to get its hands on the $12 trillion in Americans' retirement accounts to boost its profits and make up for the fact that institutional investors are fleeing the private markets due to mediocre returns, higher fees and more risk,' he added. A survey of Americans with retirement accounts found that among those not investing in alternative assets, the leading barrier is 'fear of fraud or scams,' according to data compiled by Lansons, a financial and strategic communications consultancy. Other cited barriers included concerns about the viability of investment platforms, the belief that alternative assets are too new and lack a track record, and not knowing credible companies to invest with. However, more than half of the respondents still thought alternative investments offer an opportunity for larger returns than traditional assets, and they saw 'diversification potential' in alternatives. See: Private-credit ETFs are here. Why your retirement account may be their next target. To be sure, the push to add private securities to 401(k) menus has long been a priority for some of Wall Street's largest asset managers. BlackRock Inc. BLK, the world's largest asset manager, is preparing to offer a 401(k) target-date fund with a 5% to 20% allocation to private investments in the first half of 2026, the company said in a press release in June. Jaime Magyera, head of BlackRock's U.S. wealth-advisory and retirement businesses, told MarketWatch on Friday that 'the access to investments long out of reach' will help ensure millions of Americans build stronger, more diversified portfolios designed to increase savings. Another retirement giant, Empower CA:GWO, which manages around $1.8 trillion in retirement accounts for nearly 19 million Americans, said in May that it would begin offering access to alternative investments — including private equity and private credit — through the retirement plans it oversees. Other retirement-plan providers such as State Street Corp. STT and Voya Financial Inc. VOYA have also announced similar moves this year. It's still uncertain how these private-equity investments will actually function within 401(k) plans when it comes to pricing and trading. But MorningStar's Kephart said there's a lot of 'real-world friction' between what plan sponsors and 401(k) fiduciaries are accustomed to, in terms of fees and transparency — so it could take years before private assets ultimately enter retirement accounts. 'Things are getting tougher': I'm struggling with $145,000 in debt. Should I refinance my 3.5% mortgage? Trump wants private assets in 401(k)s. How do everyday investors value them? My late husband's employer is forcing me to take 10% 401(k) distributions. Help! Millions of student-loan borrowers have no idea how much they're supposed to pay 'This scam stuff is going to get worse': A man approached me in my car — he had a crazy story Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
