Divorced and Facing IRS Collection? Clear Start Tax Outlines How Innocent Spouse Relief Could Save You Thousands
Clear Start Tax Explains How Divorced Taxpayers Can Escape IRS Liability for a Former Spouse's Mistakes
IRVINE, CA / ACCESS Newswire / June 6, 2025 / Divorce can be complicated enough without the added stress of IRS debt. Yet every year, countless divorced Americans are shocked to discover they're on the hook for a former spouse's tax liabilities - often for mistakes they didn't know about. According to Clear Start Tax, a leading national tax resolution firm, the IRS's Innocent Spouse Relief program can offer a powerful - and often overlooked - solution.
When Divorce Leaves Taxpayers Facing a Former Spouse's Mistakes
Many taxpayers assume that a divorce decree automatically separates their financial obligations. But under joint tax returns, the IRS can pursue either spouse for the full amount owed, including taxes, penalties, and interest. That means years after a divorce, one spouse may face wage garnishment, bank levies, or collection notices for a tax bill they had no role in creating.
"We've worked with clients blindsided by IRS letters years after their divorce," said the Head of Client Solutions at Clear Start Tax. "Innocent Spouse Relief can be a lifeline in these cases - but most people don't even realize it exists."
Who Qualifies for Innocent Spouse Relief?
Clear Start Tax explains that the IRS looks at several key factors when reviewing Innocent Spouse claims:
The tax understatement was due to the other spouse's error (such as unreported income or inflated deductions).The innocent spouse didn't know, and had no reason to know, about the issue at the time.Holding the innocent spouse liable would be unfair or create hardship.The innocent spouse applies within the IRS's filing window (generally two years from first collection notice).
Why the Right Approach Is Essential for Approval
While the program offers powerful protection, Clear Start Tax emphasizes that success depends on a careful application and thorough documentation. Missing deadlines, submitting incomplete paperwork, or misunderstanding eligibility rules can lead to denial, leaving taxpayers exposed to the full debt.
"Innocent Spouse Relief isn't just a form-it's a carefully built case," said the Head of Client Solutions at Clear Start Tax. "We work closely with our clients to present the strongest possible application, so they can move forward without being burdened by a former partner's tax mistakes."
How Clear Start Tax Helps Divorced Taxpayers Regain Control
Clear Start Tax offers a hands-on, strategic approach to Innocent Spouse claims and other tax resolution programs:
Comprehensive case reviews to assess eligibility and strengthen claimsDetailed preparation of IRS applications with supporting evidenceDirect IRS communication and negotiation on the client's behalfPost-resolution guidance to maintain compliance and peace of mind
About Clear Start Tax
Clear Start Tax is a full-service tax liability resolution firm that serves taxpayers throughout the United States. The company specializes in assisting individuals and businesses with a wide range of IRS and state tax issues, including back taxes, wage garnishment relief, IRS appeals, and offers in compromise. Clear Start Tax helps taxpayers apply for the IRS Fresh Start Program, providing expert guidance in tax resolution. Fully accredited and A+ rated by the Better Business Bureau, the firm's unique approach and commitment to long-term client success distinguish it as a leader in the tax resolution industry.
Need Help With Back Taxes?
Click the link below:https://clearstarttax.com/qualifytoday/
Contact Information
Clear Start TaxCorporate Communications Departmentseo@clearstarttax.com(949) 535-1627
SOURCE: Clear Start Tax
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EHP Inc. Launches National Affiliate Expansion Initiative to Accelerate Employer Healthcare Innovation Under Mardy Gould's Leadership
Jacksonville, FL, June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- EHP Inc., a leading provider of compliant, tax-efficient employee benefit programs, announced the launch of its 2025 National Affiliate Expansion Initiative, a strategic move aimed at scaling its transformative employer-focused healthcare model across the U.S. The initiative is spearheaded by Co-Founder and Managing Partner Mardy Gould, reaffirming the company's commitment to innovation, compliance, and growth through a robust partner ecosystem. Mardy Gould This newly launched initiative marks a pivotal step in EHP Inc.'s nationwide growth strategy, offering new opportunities for professionals and non-traditional partners to join the company's thriving affiliate network. With over 10,000 affiliates already active, the expansion initiative will provide additional training, real-time tools, and access to EHP's proprietary AI-powered compliance infrastructure, enabling partners to deliver the company's tax-smart, employee-first benefits model with confidence and scale. A Timely Expansion Driven by Founder-Led Vision The launch of the Affiliate Expansion Initiative comes amid increasing demand from mid-sized and large employers seeking effective ways to lower healthcare costs and improve employee engagement without overhauling their existing insurance. EHP Inc.'s structure, based on IRS Sections 125, 105, and 213(d), allows employers to reduce their FICA tax burden by $650 to $750 per employee annually while enhancing preventive healthcare access. 'This expansion initiative reflects our belief that smart growth starts with strong partners,' said Mardy Gould. 'We built EHP Inc. on the principles of compliance, transparency, and impact — and we're inviting professionals across the country to be part of a proven model that actually helps employers solve real problems.' The Employer's Choice for Modern, Tax-Advantaged Healthcare EHP Inc. stands out by offering a fully IRS-compliant model that integrates seamlessly with existing payroll systems and insurance plans. The program requires no out-of-pocket costs from employers and offers employees a suite of wellness services, including virtual primary care, care navigation, and personalized advocacy, services that are delivered in addition to any current benefits. Legal and ERISA-reviewed, the EHP structure helps employers retain talent, improve health outcomes, and achieve cost-efficiency without introducing unnecessary complexity. What Makes the 2025 Expansion Initiative Newsworthy The launch of this initiative represents a major milestone for EHP Inc. It includes: Regional Training Sessions: A calendar of in-person and virtual affiliate training sessions scheduled across major U.S. cities beginning July 2025. Enhanced Partner Tools: Access to a newly updated Affiliate Portal, with AI-powered proposal generation, real-time commission tracking, and automated compliance updates. Tiered Compensation Model: A refined affiliate earnings structure designed to accelerate success for both new and experienced partners. Turnkey Onboarding: Streamlined onboarding powered by smart automation, ensuring that affiliates can activate quickly and compliantly. These enhancements are expected to double the company's affiliate footprint by year's end and strengthen its position as The Employer's Choice in employer-driven healthcare benefits. AI-Driven Compliance and National Infrastructure Central to the success of EHP Inc.'s model is its proprietary compliance automation platform, which governs everything from onboarding and documentation to payroll analysis and partner communications. The platform uses AI to maintain IRS and ERISA compliance while minimizing administrative burden for both employers and affiliates. 'Our infrastructure isn't just scalable; it's protective,' said Gould. 'Every piece of our system is designed to safeguard our clients, our partners, and our mission.' Leadership Continuity Fuels Nationwide Momentum Unlike many rapidly growing companies, EHP Inc. remains founder-led, with its original leadership team still driving strategic direction. Mardy Gould continues to play an active role in expanding partnerships, shaping program design, and advocating for smarter employer benefits at industry forums nationwide. 'We've never lost sight of why we started EHP,' Gould added. 'Our mission was, and still is, to give employers better choices through compliant, tax-savvy solutions. This affiliate expansion is a natural extension of that promise.' About EHP Inc. Headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida, EHP Inc. is a national employer solutions provider offering tax-advantaged, IRS-compliant benefit programs under IRS Sections 125, 105, and 213(d). The company helps businesses lower payroll tax liability and redirect those savings toward meaningful, preventive care for employees. With a strong legal foundation, AI-driven compliance, and a growing network of affiliates, EHP Inc. is redefining how companies manage cost, care, and compliance. To learn more about the 2025 National Affiliate Expansion Initiative or to become an affiliate, visit EHP The Employer's ChoiceCONTACT: Media Contact: Company Name: EHP Inc. Contact Person: Alex Barret Email: info@ Phone: 904-257-6217 Country: United States Website: in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This move by Trump could be ‘disastrous' for the mortgage market and drive up costs for home buyers even more
The housing market is facing a big development that could potentially shake up interest rates on home loans at a time when would-be buyers have been waiting for rates to drop. President Donald Trump has said he wants to change the way the government handles two giants in the real-estate world, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are presently under government conservatorship. Why Goldman Sachs says high-flying tech stocks may be headed for a tough stretch 'It might be another Apple or Microsoft': My wife invested $100K in one stock and it exploded 1,500%. Do we sell? U.S. debt-limit deadlock is making this favorite asset more scarce My friend, 83, wants to add me to his bank account to pay his bills. What could go wrong? 'I prepaid our mom's rent for a year': My sister is a millionaire and never helps our mother. How do I cut her out of her will? The two government-sponsored enterprises have a significant impact on Americans' daily lives. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each back one in four home mortgages in America today. When lenders originate conventional home loans to home buyers, Fannie and Freddie repackage those loans and sell them on the secondary market to investors. Fannie and Freddie also offer a guarantee that those loans will be repaid in full should they go bad. This system ensures that investors get paid and that home loans are widely available. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac weren't always under the government's thumb. They initially traded on the public markets. Fannie Mae became a privately-held company in 1968, trading under the ticker FNMA on the New York Stock Exchange. But that changed during the subprime mortgage crisis. The two housing-finance giants collapsed in 2008 and were brought under the federal government's control. They were delisted in 2010, but they still trade over the counter. Many Republicans have advocated for releasing them from the government's conservatorship. In his first term, Trump tried to privatize the companies, but didn't, and he now appears to be trying again. Arguments for privatization include the potential to reduce taxpayer risk and cut the federal government's costs, as well as to introduce competition to the two giants. Democrats recently called on Trump to halt the re-privatization efforts. In a June 6 letter to the Trump administration, a group of Senate Democrats led by Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts expressed concern that making changes to the way the current housing-finance system operates would benefit investors while harming everyday Americans. 'Economists have warned that reprivatizing the enterprises could have disastrous effects on the mortgage market, driving up costs for homebuyers even further,' the senators wrote. 'For example, some experts have estimated that mortgage rates could increase by up to 1% in the first year of privatization alone.' The main issue is that it is unclear exactly how Fannie and Freddie would be privatized. Unsettled questions include: Are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac going to be relisted on the stock market? Are they still going to be rescued should they fail — meaning, will the government give the financial markets a guarantee should that happen? Will investors believe that the government will save them if they fail? Will Congress come up with a plan to provide an explicit guarantee to the two companies, which themselves guarantee trillions of dollars in mortgages? 'There are a lot of questions here,' Jim Parrott, a housing-finance analyst, told MarketWatch. Parrott was an economic advisor in President Barack Obama's administration. In response to MarketWatch, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said that the Trump administration is 'committed to strengthening the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) to advance the president's mission of restoring the dream of homeownership for all Americans.' He added that 'any actions under consideration will be carefully evaluated in a safe and sound manner.' Depending on how the government proceeds, the average home buyer could be impacted. Here's how. Depending on what path the Trump administration takes, there are several factors that would determine whether mortgage rates would go up as a result, Parrott said. Mortgage rates are already high and have been a barrier to many people's plans to buy a home. The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 6.95% as of June 9, according to Mortgage News Daily, and has remained close to 7% over the past few years. On the same date five years earlier, when Trump was last president, the average 30-year rate was 3.09%. One key variable is whether the financial markets expect the federal government to rescue Fannie and Freddie if they collapse again. Investors are worried about the 'extent and depth of the government's guarantee,' Parrott said, and that could impact how they view mortgage-backed securities that Fannie and Freddie create. If investors feel uncertain about the guarantee, they could demand a higher risk premium on such securities, and if they do that, that could flow to the average borrower in the form of higher mortgage rates, he explained. 'While both [government-sponsored enterprises] are now better capitalized and highly profitable, any release without clear terms around a government guarantee could drive up mortgage rates and destabilize the housing market,' said Alanna McCargo, former president of Ginnie Mae, which like Fannie and Freddie, also backs mortgages. Ginne Mae backs mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Fannie and Freddie back conventional mortgages. Mat Ishbia, president and chief executive of United Wholesale Mortgage UWMC, one of the country's biggest mortgage lenders, said he shares that sentiment, broadly speaking. 'Rates going up would be tied to the implicit versus explicit backing of the federal government,' Ishbia told MarketWatch. 'This could cause interest rates to rise, which we hope doesn't happen.' Trump has tried to reassure the market that the government could provide an 'implicit guarantee' to bail out the companies if needed. That could assuage some fears among investors, Parrott said, but there is no certainty that future presidents would do the same. Trump 'can't give them any assurance that the next president would make the same decision,' Parrott continued, 'so until Congress weighs in with an explicit guarantee, there will always be this little bit of uncertainty for investors.' Borrowers with lower credit scores could also see higher mortgage rates than they do today, Parrott said. The current housing-finance system is set up to charge lower-risk borrowers more and higher-risk borrowers less, to increase the number of people who can afford a mortgage. The principal beneficiaries of this cross-subsidy have been home buyers with 'modest incomes,' those who have lower credit scores and those with higher loan-to-value ratios, meaning those whose down payments are smaller, according to a report by the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan think tank. 'They keep mortgage rates lower than they would otherwise be for [borrowers with] somewhat higher credit risk,' Parrott said. If the Trump administration pushes for 'more risk-based pricing … [and] they're not providing that cross subsidy, then you would see those with higher credit risk seeing their mortgage rates go up even further,' he said. The wrinkle in this issue is that the Trump administration wants lower mortgage rates. The mortgage industry and real-estate agents also want lower rates, because home sales have stalled. Housing affordability has worsened significantly over the past few years as home buyers have been priced out by high interest rates and record-high home prices. For that reason, the administration may not even proceed with the privatization plan, UWM's Ishbia said. 'If rates go up because of this change, or this change happens and rates go up, that would be bad for everyone,' Ishbia said in a video last week. Ishbia praised actions that Federal Housing Finance Administrator Bill Pulte has taken at Fannie and Freddie recently, and suggested the enterprises could remain under conservatorship. 'Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac acting more private, but still being in conservatorship might be the best of both worlds,' he said in the video. 'We'll see what happens, but … if rates go up because of it, that's a negative, and I don't think that's going to happen.' The Trump administration has acknowledged concerns about privatization potentially pushing up mortgage rates. In a May interview with Bloomberg, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the Treasury Department is 'doing a great deal of studying' of privatizing the GSEs, 'because the one requirement… for this privatization is that they are privatized in such a way that mortgage spreads — they do not widen,' Bessent said, referring to the difference between the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage and the 10-year Treasury rate. One other outcome of the privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could be higher fees for mortgage lenders, which could then get baked into mortgage rates, Parrott said. If the Trump administration wants Fannie and Freddie to earn a higher return — either to make it easier to bring them out of conservatorship or to make more money for the government — one way to do that would be to increase fees charged to lenders. Fannie and Freddie guarantee the payment of principal and interest on the mortgage-backed securities and they also charge lenders a fee for that. And that in turn could be passed on to the average borrower in the form of higher mortgage rates, Parrott said. But if the two entities remain under the government's control, it's unclear whether Fannie and Freddie will charge higher so-called guarantee fees, or g-fees, or keep them at their current levels. Ultimately, the question of whether to bring Fannie and Freddie out of conservatorship isn't controversial. 'The current administration is right to reopen this conversation after 17 years of conservatorship,' McCargo, the former Biden official, said. If Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac start acting like private companies, people may see 'more products, more options and more affordability across the board,' UWM's Isbhia said, 'which is a win for consumers.' But how the government handles the process is important, McCargo added. 'I think both the Treasury secretary and the FHFA director understand the stakes and the importance of pursuing any reform in a way that safeguards the housing market — an essential sector of the economy that makes up nearly 18% of U.S. GDP,' McCargo said. 'This is a big deal and must be approached with caution, careful deliberation, and purpose.' What personal-finance issues would you like to see covered in MarketWatch? We would like to hear from readers about their financial decisions and money-related questions. You can fill out or write to us at . A reporter may be in touch to learn more. MarketWatch will not attribute your answers to you by name without your permission. 'The situation is extreme': I'm 65 and leaving my estate to only one grandchild. Can the others contest my will? I bought my mother-in-law a condo — and she took out a $30,000 car loan. Now she refuses to get a roommate. How do I make sure my son-in-law doesn't get his hands on my daughter's inheritance? My life partner is 18 years my senior. He wants to leave his $4.5 million fortune to me — not his two kids. Do we tell them? Value investing is finally excelling again in 2025 — but there is one catch for Americans Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US to order evacuation of Iraqi embassy amid fears of Iran deal collapse
American embassies in the Middle East are preparing to send home non-essential staff and families owing to heightened risks in the region. According to a string of American and local security sources, the embassy in Baghdad, Iraq, is planning what officials called an 'ordered evacuation,' withdrawing non-essential staff. It was already operating at reduced staffing levels. But facilities in Bahrain and Kuwait are also to send home family members. The move is being considered as the prospect of the US signing a nuclear deal with Iran appears less and less likely. Details emerged hours after Aziz Nasirzadeh, Iran's minister of defence, said that Tehran would strike US bases in the region if nuclear talks failed, and tensions escalated with Washington. 'President Trump is committed to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad,' a State Department official told The Telegraph. 'In keeping with that commitment, we are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies. Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq.' Mr Trump said he was growing 'less confident' in the likelihood of signing a nuclear deal with the country. Speaking to the New York Post's Pod Force One podcast, Mr Trump said: 'I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more less confident about it,' when asked by the host if he thought Iran would agree to shut down its nuclear program. The UK maritime agency issued a warning earlier on Wednesday that increased tensions could trigger a military escalation with a knock-on effect on critical waterways. It advised vessels to use caution while travelling through the Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Straits of Hormuz, which all border Iran. Iraq, a rare regional partner of both the United States and its arch regional foe Iran, hosts 2,500 US troops and has Tehran-backed armed factions linked to its security forces. Tensions inside Iraq have heightened since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023, with Iran-aligned armed groups in the country repeatedly attacking US troops. Mr Trump has been under pressure from Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, to allow the country to strike Iran. So-far, Mr Trump has blocked strikes. He told reporters in the Oval Office last month: 'I told [Mr Netanyahu] this would be inappropriate to do right now because we're very close to a solution now. 'That could change at any moment.' The US president has also threatened to strike Iran if stalled talks over its nuclear programme failed. Iran's mission to the United Nations posted on social media that 'threats of overwhelming force won't change the facts'. 'Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon, and US militarism only fuels instability,' it said. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
