logo
Families of Chinook crash victims to launch legal action against MoD

Families of Chinook crash victims to launch legal action against MoD

They want a High Court judge to be able to review information which they say was not included in previous investigations, and which they believe will shed new light on the airworthiness of the helicopter.
RAF Chinook ZD576 was carrying 25 British intelligence personnel from RAF Aldergrove in Northern Ireland to a conference at Fort George near Inverness when it crashed in foggy weather on June 2, 1994.
All 25 passengers – made up of personnel from MI5, the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the British Army – were killed, along with the helicopter's four crew members.
The families of the victims, who have coalesced into the Chinook Justice Campaign, said failing to order a public inquiry is a breach of the UK Government's human rights obligations.
They were put on board an aircraft that was known to be positively dangerous and should never have taken off Solicitor Mark Stephens, for the Chinook Justice Campaign
In a letter to the Government 31 years after the crash, the group said: 'The investigations conducted to date, whether considered individually or in combination, have failed to discharge the investigative duty.'
They have also called for the release of documents that were sealed at the time of the crash for 100 years, something revealed in a BBC documentary last year.
Solicitor Mark Stephens, who is representing the families, said: 'In this case, the families of those who were killed have seen more than enough evidence to convince them, and us, that there was a failure by the MoD to apply appropriate safeguards in order to protect the passengers and crew.
'In fact, they were put on board an aircraft that was known to be positively dangerous and should never have taken off.
'That is why we are seeking a judicial review into the Government's failure to hold a public inquiry – which the families have sought for more than a year.'
We don't want to have to take legal action against the Government and MoD but we do want and need answers surrounding the circumstance of this crash Esme Sparks, The Chinook Justice Campaign
Following the crash, the Chinook's pilots, Flight Lieutenants Richard Cook and Jonathan Tapper, were accused of gross negligence, but this verdict was overturned by the UK Government 17 years later, following a campaign by the families.
A subsequent review by Lord Philip set out 'numerous concerns' raised by those who worked on the Chinooks, with the MoD's testing centre at Boscombe Down in Wiltshire declaring the Chinook Mk2 helicopters 'unairworthy' prior to the crash.
Esme Sparks, who was seven years old when her father Major Gary Sparks was killed in the crash, said: 'We don't want to have to take legal action against the Government and MoD but we do want and need answers surrounding the circumstance of this crash.
'We want to know who or what is being protected? Who made the decision to let this helicopter take off? What is being hidden? In our view, a public inquiry is key.'
Andy Tobias, who was eight when his father, Lt Col John Tobias, 41, was killed, said: 'It's clear to me that a complete lack of duty of care was given to those passengers because they got on a Chinook that wasn't fit for flight.
'And really, the government need to show their duty of candour and really be open and transparent about what's in those documents and give us the opportunity to really understand anything that's in them that could give us more answers about what happened.'
The MoD said that records held in The National Archives contain personal information and early release of those documents would breach their data protection rights.
An MoD spokesperson said: 'The Mull of Kintyre crash was a tragic accident and our thoughts and sympathies remain with the families, friends and colleagues of all those who died.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five things we learned from Trump's meeting with Zelensky ahead of Putin summit
Five things we learned from Trump's meeting with Zelensky ahead of Putin summit

Metro

time24 minutes ago

  • Metro

Five things we learned from Trump's meeting with Zelensky ahead of Putin summit

US President Donald Trump has wrapped up a virtual meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders two days before his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The call on Wednesday served as the last opportunity – that we know of – for Zelensky and several European heads to speak directly to Trump ahead of his one-on-one with Putin in Alaska on Friday. Zelensky was not invited to join his American and Russian counterparts for the high-profile meeting in Anchorage because it is being held 'at the request of president Putin', White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Tuesday. Here are five takeaways from Trump's call with Zelensky and leaders including British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and NATO chief Mark Rutte: During a press conference after the call, Zelensky said that 'there should be a ceasefire first, then security guarantees – real security guarantees'. He added that Trump 'expressed his support for that'. The Ukrainian president said that 'sanctions should be strengthened if Russia will not go for a ceasefire in Alaska'. Merz echoed Zelensky's sentiment, saying that a ceasefire must be first in any agreement and that Ukraine needs 'robust guarantees'. A day before the virtual meeting, Trump again pushed for Zelensky to agree to give up territory to Russia as part of a peace deal. Zelensky after the call reaffirmed that he will not surrender the eastern Donbas region of Ukraine. He said he has 'no right' to cede his country's land and that 'my position is not changing'. 'Any issue which deals with the territorial integrity of Ukraine cannot be discussed just like that, without looking at our constitution and the will of our people,' Zelensky said. 'As to our principles, as to our territorial integrity, in the end, will be decided on the level of leaders. Without Ukraine (at the table), it's impossible to achieve.' Zelensky insisted that Putin 'definitely does not want peace' and that 'he wants to occupy Ukraine'. 'Putin cannot fool anyone,' said the Ukrainian president. Zelensky thinks that Putin is 'bluffing' about the impact that increased sanctions have had on Russia. 'Sanctions are hitting Russia's war economy hard,' he said. Starmer said that a peace deal must have security guarantees for Ukraine. 'The Prime Minister was clear that our support for Ukraine is unwavering,' said a Downing Street spokesperson. 'International borders must not be changed by force and Ukraine must have robust and credible security guarantees to defend its territorial integrity as part of any deal.' European leaders 'thanked President Trump for his efforts in bringing Putin to the table in pursuit of a ceasefire to end to the ongoing bloodshed', the Downing Street readout continued. European leaders who joined the call shared positive feedback around it and said that the next move lies with Putin. More Trending 'We are united in pushing to end to this terrible war against (Ukraine) and achieve just and lasting peace,' wrote NATO chief Rutte on social media. 'Appreciate (Trump's) leadership and close coordination with Allies. The ball is now in Putin's court.' EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen posted on social media that the meeting was 'very good' that 'we will remain in close coordination – nobody wants peace more than us, a just and lasting peace'. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Home of 'Alligator Alcatraz' says human rights in the UK have worsened MORE: I used to be a Thomas Skinner fan – now he scares me MORE: Can you spot what David Lammy is doing wrong in this picture?

BBC presenter targeted by crazed stalker who also sent her sister bizarre gifts
BBC presenter targeted by crazed stalker who also sent her sister bizarre gifts

Wales Online

time24 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

BBC presenter targeted by crazed stalker who also sent her sister bizarre gifts

BBC presenter targeted by crazed stalker who also sent her sister bizarre gifts The presenter was caused 'serious harm and distress' after being bombarded by Facebook messages Broady was caused 'serious harm and distress' BBC tennis presenter Naomi Broady was indundated with Facebook messages from a crazed stalker who also targeted her sister with a series of bizarre gifts, it has been revealed. The former player - who works as a commentator on BBC Radio 5Live and was part of the broadcaster's coverage of Wimbledon earlier this summer - was bombarded with messages from David Richardson during a terrifying 11-month campaign between January and December 2023. It came after Richardson, 39, stalked Broady's sister Emma over a three-year period. Richardson, of Stockport, Greater Manchester, appeared at Manchester Magistrates Court last month, where he pleaded guilty to the harassment of 35-year-old Naomi - who is also the brother of British No.5 Liam Broady - as well as the stalking of Emma, the Mirror reports. According to court documents, he "sent multiple unwanted images and messages via Facebook and [sent] unwanted gifts, cards and paintings," while he also caused the presenter "serious harm and distress". The court papers detail how Richardson "between 13/9/2020 and 4/12/2023 at Stockport, pursued a course of conduct, by sending multiple unwanted images and messages via Facebook and sending unwanted gifts, cards and paintings, which amounted to stalking causing Emma Broady serious alarm or distress, which had a substantial adverse effect on her usual day-to-day activities when you knew or ought to have known that your course of conduct would cause alarm or distress." They add: "Between 18/1/2023 and 4/12/2023 at Stockport, [Richardson] pursued a course of conduct which amounted to the harassment of Naomi Broady, and which you knew or ought to have known amounted to the harassment of her in that you sent various unwanted messages on Facebook." Article continues below Richardson has now been banned from contacting the sisters or visiting their homes ahead of being sentenced at Manchester Crown Court on August 18. When approached by the Mirror at his home in Stockport, Richardson confirmed he had entered guilty pleas, before explaining that he had tried to strike up a relationship with 37-year-old Emma, only for her to rebuff him and for him to start targeting Naomi instead. "I wanted to try to win her over," he said. "I wanted to ask her out.. I was a bit out of practice with the girls... I've not been in a relationship. So I just bought her a Selfridges voucher and some flowers for her birthday. And then I didn't ask her out. "But then Valentine's Day came along, so I bought her another Selfridges voucher and flowers, and then Christmas came along. You know, I sent it to her again, but she thanked me and said it really cheered her up." As a player, Naomi won one WTA Tour doubles title, as well as nine singles titles and 20 doubles titles on the ITF Women's Circuit, before retiring in 2021. It comes after fellow British tennis stars Emma Raducanu and Katie Boulter were made victims of stalking campaigns, with the former left in tears on court at a tournament in Dubai earlier this year after seeing a man who had followed her to competitions in the stands. The man, who was removed from the match and later given a restraining order by Dubai police, had given the 22-year-old a letter and asked for a photo with her in a coffee shop the previous day. Raducanu had previously been the victim of a stalker who walked 23 miles to her home and stole a shoe from her porch, with the obsessive man - 35-year-old Amrit Magar - later given a five-year restraining order and made to wear an electronic tag. Boulter, meanwhile, revealed that she has been followed by fans after tournaments, while she had received threats of violence from fans who were on site at competitions. Article continues below 'One time in Nottingham, I had someone messaging me on social media saying: 'I'm outside. I'm going to hurt you if you come outside'," she explained. "I alerted the WTA, and they found the guy, who was actually on site. 'Things like this happen all the time. Obviously we are very well protected, which makes you feel safe. The WTA does a great job of being there for you with that. I do feel like we are protected as much as possible, which at least puts your mind at ease a little bit.'

Paul Laverty: Why I'm wearing this T-shirt to my Edinburgh events
Paul Laverty: Why I'm wearing this T-shirt to my Edinburgh events

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Paul Laverty: Why I'm wearing this T-shirt to my Edinburgh events

It's truly mind boggling that hundreds may have been arrested, and some face terrorism charges for wearing this shirt. Before we examine these seven words, can I just make two points. Firstly Israeli Finance Minister Smotrich (below, right) said: 'We are leaving Gaza as piles of rubble with total destruction. This has no precedent. And the world isn't stopping us.' He taunts us all. And he's right. Nobody is stopping them. Secondly: The prestigious medical journal The Lancet has pointed out that the deaths in Gaza are likely to massively underestimated. They say that in conflicts like this, there should be a multiplier of between three and 16 of direct deaths (now at 61,599) to cover the indirect deaths too. Edinburgh University Professor Devi Sridhar estimated there could have been over 335,500 direct and indirect deaths, and that was at the end of 2024. We may never know because the Israeli state bans investigators, bans international journalists, and so far has targeted 237 journalists inside Gaza. Now to the first three words of the infamous T-shirt: 'Genocide in Palestine'. At least three UN bodies, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Medicins Sans Frontier, the brilliant report by Forensic Architecture and many more including Israeli Holocaust expert Amos Goldberg have all said the Israeli state is carrying out genocide. Now to the next four words: 'Time to Take Action'. The Genocide Convention came into force in 1951. It was signed by 153 States, including our own. Article 1 states that all signatory states must actively prevent and punish genocide. It states that individuals can be punished as private individuals or as public officials. 'Complicity in Genocide' is explicitly addressed in Article III (e) which includes 'direct assistance' (weapons or arms) and 'indirect assistance' (political and diplomatic support) and crucially 'failure to act'. The demand to take action is not just a a political and moral position, it is an international obligation. READ MORE: Questions on UK spy plane 'over Gaza as Israel killed journalists' There must be an argument that 22 members of the British Cabinet, who have collective responsibility for the great decisions of state (including our own Secretary of State for Scotland, Edinburgh MP Ian Murray) have colluded with genocide in terms of Article 3. No doubt they will have teams of legal experts to argue otherwise. But in the court of public opinion who will ever forget Starmer's very first interview justifying the cutting off food and water to the entire population of Gaza? Who will forget Foreign Secretary Lammy at the despatch box denying that genocide was happening in Gaza, and Starmer too? It is vital to remember that the Labour Government did not revoke any arms licences to Israel until September of 24, long after tens of thousands of innocents had been bombed. Now you can see the Cabinet scramble for cover as the full horror unfolds in front of our eyes. Ian Murray's letter to his constituents is a case in point. Of course he refers to the revocation of some arms licenses, but he also justifies the exception to the F-35 components which go to a 'global pool'. It takes some untangling from his convoluted explanations but it seems that some UK parts for the F-35s go to Nato and also Israel. He states in his letter of August 11: 'I understand it is not possible to suspend all F-35 licenses to the global pool without undermining the global F-35 supply chain that is crucial for the security of the UK and our allies.' 'I understand', you say? In the face of genocide, and the obligations under Article III, what due diligence did you carry out, what independent investigation did you ask for? Where did you get your understanding Mr Murray – from the arms manufacturers, military figures, the head of Leonardo's arms factory in Edinburgh? I suspect a semi-competent monk administrator in the middle ages could organise a system where one recipient did not receive materials from a pool if the will was there. And here we are in the 21st century with AI and barcodes and sophistication beyond our wildest dreams and you can't separate Israel from a global pool? Murray's letter reveals that the RAF fly over Gaza – not to spy, but to help find the hostages. Murray can swallow that, but a full=grown crocodile would struggle. I see no word of looking for the tens of thousands of starving children. He reveals the UK is still training IDF, but it is an insignificant amount of just 10. Remember Clinton's quote: 'It's the economy, stupid.' We could draw a parallel here of the UK to the Israeli state: 'It's the approval, stupid.' Starmer knew how to give a nod and a wink from the very beginning that they would have the Israeli state's back, and the Cabinet has fallen into line. In another letter Murray lists their great achievements to challenge Netanyahu. It would be comic if it were not so tragic, from their summoning of the Israeli ambassador for a ticking off, to an 'unprecedented joint statement' with other countries 'to express our strong opposition ..." How Smotrich and Netanyahu must be trembling. READ MORE: Israel must be banned from World Cup, says Ross Greer Anything with bite is missing. Nothing this UK Government does, even with its revocation of arms licences, impinges on the genocide machine as it continues to murder the starving. Critically, there is no mention of support for the Boycott and Divestment Campaign which could make a difference. And shamefully, not one UK Cabinet member can say seven simple words: 'Genocide in Palestine, time to Take Action.' One day, when it all comes out, as it will, we will look back in horror and ask how it all unfolded. Western collusion will haunt us. The conscience is on the streets. Paul Laverty is an award-winning Scottish screenwriter

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store