logo
China sends dual message with national flag on disputed South China Sea reef, targeting rivals and citizens

China sends dual message with national flag on disputed South China Sea reef, targeting rivals and citizens

CNA30-04-2025

SINGAPORE: China's national flag was recently unfurled on a disputed reef in the South China Sea by its uniformed troops, an act broadcast by state media in what analysts believe to be a first public display in decades of what had previously been quiet actions.
In contrast with how Chinese fishermen, maritime militia, and even civilian groups have planted flags on disputed reefs, rocks, and islands in the contentious waterway since the 1990s, observers say China's latest move is a pointed show of control aimed at reflecting its readiness to confront potential escalation amid rising tensions with the United States.
They add that the move carried out on Sandy Cay - a string of three uninhabited sandbars near a Philippine military outpost in the disputed Spratly Islands - also aims to reassure domestic audiences that Beijing remains firm on core interests such as sovereignty - and to portray strength as external pressure mounts.
Chinese state broadcaster CCTV reported on April 25 that its coast guard had landed on Sandy Cay 'as part of maritime control operations to assert Beijing's sovereignty'.
The broadcaster said the coast guard had 'implemented control' over what it refers to as Tiexian Reef, part of the Sandy Cay feature. Footage showed four personnel in black combat gear holding the Chinese national flag after arriving on the reef aboard an inflatable dinghy.
On April 28, the Philippine Coast Guard released a photo of its personnel raising the national flag on the disputed reef. It said the mission was carried out pre-dawn the day before - a move seen as a direct rebuttal to China's sovereignty claim.
The developments come amid the largest-ever joint military exercises between the US and the Philippines in nearby waters. They also follow a recent visit to Asia by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who pledged to strengthen defence ties with Manila and 'restore deterrence' in the face of what Washington views as growing Chinese assertiveness in the region.
"For now, it's mostly symbolic. It's very low level, petty provocations, from (both sides) ... It has not reached a stage where it is alarming, yet," said Adib Zalkapli, Managing Director of Viewfinder Global Affairs and a geopolitical analyst specialising in the Indo-Pacific.
But it's also a sign of China drawing a line in the sand to state its firm position over the territorial disputes and external pressures, said other analysts.
'It's a warning for the Philippines (against) further developing closer defence relations with the US … It's a signal to say, look, this is what we can do to counter you,' said Abdul Rahman Yaacob, a research fellow in the Southeast Asia programme at the Lowy Institute.
CALIBRATED CONFRONTATION
China claims nearly the entire South China Sea, a position that overlaps with those of several countries and territories, and goes against a 2016 international tribunal ruling, which rejected Beijing's entitlements over the disputed islands and waters.
Sandy Cay lies near Thitu Island, the biggest and most strategically significant outpost held by the Philippines in the Spratly Islands. It is among the island chains, reefs and rocks in the South China Sea where China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan maintain overlapping territorial claims.
On April 29, Chinese state media Global Times released images of a coast guard operation at Tiexian Reef, claiming it was part of efforts to exercise 'sovereign jurisdiction'.
The photos showed Chinese coast guard officers displaying the Chinese national flag, and clearing debris such as plastic bottles from the reef flat.
The report claimed that a group of Philippine personnel 'illegally' landed on the reef despite repeated Chinese warnings, prompting Chinese officers to 'conduct on-site verification and enforcement measures in line with the law'.
Beijing's latest move was likely timed for symbolic impact, coinciding with the ongoing Philippines-US Balikatan exercises and the approaching Philippine midterm elections, said Abdul Rahman of the Lowy Institute.
While raising a flag does not amount to a formal seizure or legal claim of sovereignty, he noted that the reef's location remains strategically important due to its close proximity to Philippine-held territory.
'If the Chinese were to build certain military infrastructure there, they could closely monitor activity on nearby Philippine islands,' he said.
'It would also allow them to project their presence much closer to Philippine-held territory. From a military standpoint, the reef holds clear strategic value.'
Abdul Rahman said China's latest move in the South China Sea presents an early test for US President Donald Trump's administration, which has vowed to push back against Beijing's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific with a more assertive regional posture.
The observer pointed to Manila's planned purchase of US-made Typhon missile launchers and ongoing talks to acquire F-16 fighter jets as 'among the key factors' that prompted Beijing to respond with what he described as symbolic but calibrated actions.
'China, through flexing its muscle, is sending a message to both Manila and Washington,' he said. 'It's saying: despite your new defence deals and closer military cooperation, the reality on the ground remains unchanged - and that is, Beijing can still impose its will over disputed areas.'
China's latest action at Sandy Cay may be part of a broader strategy to expand its footprint in the West Philippine Sea - the term the Philippines uses for parts of the South China Sea within its exclusive economic zone - through incremental moves, said Don McLain Gill, a Manila-based analyst and lecturer at the Department of International Studies, De La Salle University.
In an April 29 commentary on the Singapore-based platform ThinkChina, Gill described the act as part of Beijing's 'salami slicing' approach to maritime claims.
'Sandy Cay lies around ten nautical miles away from Subi or Zamora Reef, which China has illegally occupied and converted into a military base with an airstrip,' he wrote.
'Occupying the sand bar would allow Beijing to justify its claims over Subi Reef and eventually serve as a stepping stone to push further into Pag-asa Island, which houses Philippine military facilities and is home to about 250 Filipino residents.'
China's 'salami slicing' in the South China Sea, as described by some observers, refers to a strategy of advancing territorial claims through a succession of small, calibrated moves. Each action avoids triggering armed conflict, but together they steadily tip the balance of control toward Beijing and alter the status quo over time.
One example often cited by analysts is China's development of artificial islands, which began around 2014. Initially framed by Beijing as serving civilian and public service functions, construction activities on features such as Fiery Cross Reef in the Spratlys later expanded to include airstrips, radar installations, and missile systems.
While China maintains these are defensive in nature, the steady build-up has raised concerns about the long-term militarisation of disputed areas.
Another example often cited by analysts as part of the 'salami slicing' approach, is the use of coast guard vessels and maritime militia to reinforce claims in disputed waters without direct confrontation.
At Second Thomas Shoal, Chinese vessels have disrupted Philippine resupply missions with water cannons and close-range manoeuvres. While Beijing frames these as legitimate law enforcement within its claimed waters, analysts see them as calibrated efforts to constrain access and shift control - without provoking a direct military clash.
Gill noted that since 2017, Chinese Coast Guard vessels and maritime militia have stepped up their presence around Sandy Cay, including forming a de facto barrier to prevent Filipino fishing boats from accessing the area.
He added that in 2019, these same forces were involved in large-scale swarming operations near Pag-asa Island - actions he described as instruments of China's gradual expansionism in the region.
In a move seen as a calculated demonstration of military strength, China's aircraft carrier Shandong sailed through waters north of the Philippines twice within a week - a rare occurrence coinciding with ongoing joint military drills between the United States and the Philippines, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported on Tuesday (Apr 30).
The Shandong, accompanied by a flotilla of destroyers, frigates, and support vessels, was first detected last Tuesday about 185km northwest of Burgos in northern Luzon, the Philippines' main island.
Its transit through the Luzon Strait - a critical waterway between Taiwan and the Philippines - has been widely interpreted by analysts as a signal of Beijing's intent to assert freedom of movement and challenge US-aligned military activity in the region.
The timing, just as Manila and Washington kicked off their Balikatan exercise featuring complex combat simulations and the deployment of advanced weaponry such as anti-ship missile systems, appeared deliberate, said analysts.
They added that the deployment reflects China's broader strategic objective of pressing beyond the so-called 'first island chain' - a network of US-friendly territories such as Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines - seen as central to its aim to contain Beijing.
'The deployment was certainly a show of force in light of Balikatan when they are conducting drills related to anti-ship techniques, and this was meant to signal that whatever the Filipinos and Americans are doing to conduct sea denial in these passageways, the (Chinese) navy will still force its way through in a conflict,' said Collin Koh, a senior fellow at Singapore's S Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
FEAR OF FURTHER ESCALATION
Adib of Viewfinder Global Affairs noted that the prominent coverage on Chinese state media has given the incident greater symbolic weight and an air of official endorsement.
'The timing is also notable,' Adib noted.
'China is under growing pressure from the US, especially with fresh tariffs being imposed. By highlighting this act of sovereignty, Beijing is also addressing a domestic audience - reinforcing the message that, despite mounting external challenges, national interests and territorial claims remain a top priority.'
Abdul Rahman of Lowy Institute agreed that the move also plays to a domestic audience, particularly as China grapples with mounting economic headwinds.
However, he cautioned against drawing a direct link between developments in the South China Sea and Beijing's escalating trade tensions with Washington.
'States generally separate economic issues from geostrategic competition,' he said.
'Rather than being a direct response to US tariffs, this is more about reassuring the Chinese public that Beijing remains proactive in asserting its position against the Philippines in contested waters.'
The dispute over Sandy Cay has added fresh strain to already tense relations between the Philippines and China, said analysts.
While China has not seized the disputed reef in any substantive way, further unilateral actions - such as deploying troops or constructing permanent facilities - could compel the Philippines to respond, potentially heightening the risk of conflict, said Adib.
'It's important to note that China hasn't taken such steps yet, the flag-raising remains symbolic for now,' he said.
'But the fact that it was able to land on the reef shows it has the capability to take more assertive actions if it chooses to. That in itself sends a message to the Philippines.'
Abdul Rahman echoed similar concerns, pointing to fears of a repeat of the 1995 Mischief Reef episode - when China's construction of initial stilted structures triggered a sharp response from the Philippines, leading to a cycle of escalating actions between the two countries.
Asked whether the Philippines might be pushed by the US to adopt a more assertive posture in the South China Sea - potentially fuelling further escalation - Abdul Rahman said such a scenario remains unlikely.
'In my conversations with Philippine officials, it's clear their approach to the South China Sea is largely self-directed. They're cautious about appearing overly influenced by Washington,' he said.
'I don't see this as an extension of US efforts to economically contain China.'
Under the current President Ferdinand Marcos Jr administration, the Philippines has adopted a more assertive strategy to defend its territorial claims in the West Philippine Sea, according to Gill from De La Salle University.
He argued that while China has yet to establish full control over Sandy Cay, Manila must remain vigilant and sustain its presence in strategically important waters.
Coordinated and recurring joint patrols with defence partners, he added, are critical to pushing back against Beijing's attempts to unilaterally shape the status quo.
Despite China's assertive moves in the South China Sea, its broader relations with Southeast Asian countries remain largely cordial and grounded in mutual interests, noted Adib Zalkapli.
'This latest development also comes on the heels of Xi Jinping's outreach visits to Cambodia, Vietnam and Malaysia,' he said, referring to the Chinese president.
'It reflects a calibrated strategy - Beijing wants to maintain friendly ties where possible, while showing it won't compromise on what it considers its core interests, especially sovereignty over disputed waters.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Don't fall for the trap of the Taco trade
Don't fall for the trap of the Taco trade

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

Don't fall for the trap of the Taco trade

[SINGAPORE] At first, it was ominous. Then, it became obvious. There's a new trade in town called the Taco trade, or Trump Always Chickens Out. Here's how it works: When US President Donald Trump announced his Liberation Day tariffs on Apr 2, the S&P 500 index tanked by more than 10 per cent in days. His tariff threat lasted less than a week before he backed down, pausing the implementation of higher tariffs for 90 days. In response, the index jumped by 9.5 per cent in a single day. And just like that, the Taco trade was born. Despite the initial pause, underlying trade tensions re-emerged when the US raised tariffs on China and engaged in a tit-for-tat tariff battle, raising US import levies to as high as 145 per cent at its peak. Amid the war of words between the superpowers, the stock market was unsettled. Then on May 12, the US and China called a truce for 90 days with the US reducing tariffs to 30 per cent for Chinese imports, and China lowering its import levy to 10 per cent for American goods. Once again, the S&P 500 index rallied on the news; last Friday (Jun 6), it closed at just a stone's throw from its all-time high. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up By then, traders had started taking notice of the emerging pattern. Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined the term Taco trade, an acronym that quickly spread all over Wall Street. Second guessing the Taco trade If you have noticed the Taco trade pattern, you're not alone – and that's a big problem. The truth is if everyone is thinking the same way, then no one has an edge over anyone else. Furthermore, if every trader anticipates a market recovery after Trump backs down, then the competition turns into one in which the fastest fingers to enter a trade wins. That's a race, not a strategy. Trying to second guess when the stock market will change course is no different from timing the market. Here's the rub: According to Hartford Funds, if you missed the 10 best days (read: gains) in the stock market over the past 30 years, your returns would be less than half the amount from staying fully invested over the same period. In other words, mistiming your entry and exit will have a severe impact on your investment returns if you miss even a tiny number of days. Like walking on a tightrope, a minor misstep could have major consequences. So, don't try your luck. History has not been kind to trendy trades History hasn't been favourable to formula-based investment strategies – for good reason. Take the Dogs of the Dow (DD), a methodology popularised in 1991. The DD formula suggested that investors can maximise their investment yield by buying the top 10 highest-paying dividend stocks from the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) at the start of every year. But alas, it was not to be. Research from the NYU Stern School of Business showed that when an investment strategy becomes popular, the masses try to front-run the strategy, pre-emptively piling into the shares and driving up their stock prices. With a higher starting price at the beginning of the year, the DD group will inevitably find it hard to outperform the market. Therein lies the paradox: Even a proven formulaic strategy will fail if the masses pile into the stocks. Ironically, the simplicity that helps popularise the strategy eventually leads to its demise. But if that's the case, where does this leave investors? It's the business, not the acronym If acronym-laden trades don't work, then why have the original FAANG stocks been profitable to shareholders over the past decade? While Taco and FAANG are acronyms, the similarity stops there. The Taco trade is subject to the whims of Trump, which can change at any moment. FAANG stocks, however, are made up of growing US tech businesses. Coined in 2013, the original acronym FANG consisted of Facebook (now Meta Platforms), Amazon, Netflix and Google (now Alphabet). Apple was added in 2017. Here's the difference for FAANG: Over the past decade, the average return from FAANG stocks was over 900 per cent or 10x in returns. Tellingly, these gains are largely backed by growth in the quintet's free cash flow (FCF) per share. The best example is Alphabet. Over the past decade, its shares grew by 640 per cent. In terms of FCF per share, the gain was 643 per cent, which closely matches its stock price increase. The main reason the FAANG group's share prices have risen over this period lies in the solid gains in their free cash flow. Unlike the Taco trade, FAANG's gains were not dependent on the whims of a US president. The long-term difference Here's the twist: Buying a group of stocks such as FAANG does not guarantee great returns. The key to turning a great stock into great returns is time. Simply put, the average 10x return the FAANG stocks delivered was only possible when there was enough time for the businesses to demonstrate their ability to grow. For investors, patience is paramount. Sadly, many investors invariably lose their nerve along the way and sell too soon. The truth is, holding a stock for a decade is not as easy as it looks. Wealth manager Ben Carlson provided two telling statistics. First, the good news: if you look at the rolling 10-year periods since 1950, the S&P 500 index has delivered positive returns 93 per cent of the time. That is, you have a high chance of getting good returns if you hold for a decade. That's the reward for patient investors. Then, there's the unfortunate news. The probability of a bear market (an index decline of 20 per cent or more) during these same 10-year periods is 95 per cent. When you put the two together, the message is clear: Volatility is the price of admission. It's the toll booth you have to pass to get the returns you want. Get smart: It's a marathon, not a sprint There's no doubt that the allure of making a quick buck is strong. That's why trends such as the Taco trade are popular. Clever branding plays a role. But the reason the FAANG strategy has worked has not been because the five company names lined up to form a catchy acronym. The real insight was about giving great businesses enough time to run. For investors, the real trick is about cultivating the iron gut of a long-distance runner, not just picking the right stocks. As the numbers from Ben Carlson clearly show, the real game-changer isn't about timing your entry or exit, but in not exiting too soon. Because when the market inevitably tests your resolve, that unwavering patience, not some trendy trade, will be the real differentiator between success and failure to get what you want. So, choose great businesses over stock prices, endurance over speed, and above all, patience over quick trades. In the long run, the road less travelled is the most rewarding, in my eyes. The writer is co-founder of The Smart Investor, a website that aims to help people to invest smartly by providing investor education, stock commentary and market coverage

Lutnick says US-China trade talks going well on second day
Lutnick says US-China trade talks going well on second day

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Lutnick says US-China trade talks going well on second day

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese vice premier He Lifeng pose for a photo with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, and China's International Trade Representative and Vice Minister of Commerce Li Chenggang, in London, Britain June 9, 2025. United States Treasury/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY Media members stand outside the Lancaster House, on the second day scheduled for trade talks between the U.S. and China, in London, Britain, June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Toby Melville Officials arrive at Lancaster House, on the second day scheduled for trade talks between the U.S. and China, in London, Britain, June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Toby Melville U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick waves as he arrives at Lancaster House, on the second day scheduled for trade talks between the U.S. and China, in London, Britain, June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Toby Melville Lutnick says US-China trade talks going well on second day LONDON - U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday trade talks with China were going well as the two sides met for a second day in London, seeking a breakthrough on export controls that have threatened a fresh rupture between the superpowers. U.S. and Chinese officials are trying to get back on track after Washington accused Beijing of blocking exports of rare earth minerals that are critical to its economy, straining ties after they struck a preliminary deal in Geneva last month to step back from a full-blown trade embargo. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said on Monday that the U.S. was ready to agree to lift export controls on some semiconductors in return for China speeding up the delivery of rare earths and magnets. "(Talks went on) all day yesterday, and I expect (them) all day today," Lutnick told reporters. "They're going well, and we're spending lots of time together." Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. But markets have made up much of the losses they endured after Trump unveiled his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs in April, aided by the reset in Geneva between the world's two biggest economies. The second round of U.S.-China talks, which followed a rare phone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping last week, comes at a crucial time for both economies. Customs data published on Monday showed that China's exports to the U.S. plunged 34.5% in May, the sharpest drop since the outbreak of the COVID pandemic. While the impact on U.S. inflation and its jobs market has so far been muted, tariffs have hammered U.S. business and household confidence and the dollar remains under pressure. DISCUSSING DISAGREEMENTS The talks have been led by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, with the Chinese contingent helmed by Vice Premier He Lifeng. The talks ran for almost seven hours on Monday and resumed just before 1000 GMT on Tuesday, with both sides expected to issue updates later in the day. The inclusion of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the U.S., is one indication of how central rare earths have become. He did not attend the Geneva talks, when the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors, and its decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended global supply chains and sparked alarm in boardrooms and factory floors around the world. Kelly Ann Shaw, a former White House trade adviser during Trump's first term and now a trade partner at the Akin Gump law firm in Washington, said she expected China to reaffirm its commitment to lift retaliatory measures, including export restrictions, "plus some concessions on the U.S. side, with respect to export control measures over the past week or two". But Shaw said she expected the U.S. to only agree to lift some new export curbs, not longstanding ones such as for advanced artificial intelligence chips. In May, the U.S. ordered a halt to shipments of semiconductor design software and chemicals and aviation equipment, revoking export licences that had been previously issued. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

From visas to jets, US and China are finding new trade leverage
From visas to jets, US and China are finding new trade leverage

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

From visas to jets, US and China are finding new trade leverage

From higher education to jet engines, the scope of connections that the US and China are weaponising is much broader than before. FILE PHOTO: REUTERS From visas to jets, US and China are finding new trade leverage US President Donald Trump brought many of the same grievances to his second trade war against China, but the economic battleground that has emerged since then is making it harder to avoid a rupture this time around. While tariffs kicked off the dispute, it is the new trade weapons being unsheathed by both sides that have come to define the latest standoff. And if the damage done so far is any indication, the scars will prove more enduring – no matter the outcome of trade talks in London that will continue into a second day on J une 10 . From higher education to jet engines, the scope of connections between the world's two biggest economies that they are weaponising – or threatening to use as leverage in negotiations – is also much broader than last time. That could also make a deal more complex to navigate. 'The US side has bundled together too many problems with the trade and economic agenda,' said Dr Sun Chenghao, a fellow at the Center for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University in Beijing. 'I don't believe that achieving a comprehensive package agreement through just one or two rounds of dialogue is realistic.' Here are all the ways the US and China are trying to gain leverage: US visas One tool the US has wielded this time is the threat of pulling the visas of the 270,000 Chinese students studying in the US. Late in May , Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Chinese students' visas would be 'aggressively' revoked, including for people with connections to the Communist Party or studying in critical fields. Future applications from China and Hong Kong will also face heightened scrutiny, he said. Following the call with President Xi Jinping last week, Mr Trump then said it would be an 'honour' to have Chinese students in the US, although it is far from clear what that will mean in practice. Jet engines, chip design software Before Mr Trump returned to the Oval Office, the US had already imposed increasingly wide-ranging sanctions on various Chinese people and companies. It was also stepping up its bans on exports of both semiconductors and the tools to make them, including by pressuring allies such as Japan and the Netherlands to do the same. Building on those controls, the US Commerce Department rolled out a recent spate of measures targeting chip design software, jet engine parts, chemicals and nuclear materials, even as the details are not all public. The department also stated that using a new chip made by Huawei anywhere in the world could violate US export controls, although it subsequently changed that language. The Trump administration expects that 'after the handshake' in London, 'any export controls from the US will be eased and the rare earths will be released in volume' by China, Mr Kevin Hassett, head of the White House's National Economic Council, told CNBC on June 9 . Mr Hassett's comments from Washington were the clearest signal yet that the US is willing to offer such a concession, though he added that the US would stop short of including the most sophisticated chips made by Nvidia Corp used to power artificial intelligence. Ethane The US administration is increasing barriers for exporters to sell the chemical ethane to China, in what looks to be an attempt to leverage a product where the US is as dominant as China is in rare earths. Thanks to the shale gas revolution, the US is the largest producer of ethane, which is used for making some plastics. China is its top customer, with US supply making up over 99 per cent of the ethane it bought in the first four months of 2025. It was so important that China quietly exempted ethane from the tariffs announced earlier in 2025 . Even so, the Commerce Department has already indicated it plans to deny permission to export to at least one firm. That could make life harder for the vast constellation of plants along the eastern seaboard that Chinese firms built to take advantage of cheap US gas. Taiwan arms sales Another area where the US might put pressure on China is by stepping up sales of arms to Taiwan, which is claimed by Beijing. Underscoring the prominence of the issue is the specific mention of Taiwan in the call between Mr Trump and Mr Xi, according to the Chinese readout afterward. Two US officials familiar with the matter said they expect US approvals for arms sales to Taipei over the next four years to surpass those in Mr Trump's first term, according to a Reuters report late i n May . Those sales could further inflame tensions between the US and China. Mr Trump's first term was marked by 22 military sales notifications for Taiwan valued at almost US$19 billion (S$24 billion) , including backlogged cases and funding for maintenance of existing systems, according to a 2024 report from the Cato Institute, compared with about US$8.7 billion during the Biden administration. Chinese export controls Beijing has learned from the effectiveness of US export controls, setting up its own system to limit and curb sales of 'dual-use goods' that can have both civilian and military applications. That effort intensifie d in 2025 , with Beijing ordering exporters to start applying for licences to ship seven different rare earth elements and products made from them, including high performance permanent magnets that are essential for production of cars and tech products. Chinese state media this week denied that the new controls were an attempt to use China's dominance in the element's production as leverage against the US. But the measures were announced at the same time as a package of sanctions aimed at the US in response to tariffs. China is also using the same licensing regime for other key minerals such as gallium, germanium and antimony, widening that to others including bismuth, tungsten and some rare earths earlier in 2025 . Some exports fell after licencing was required and eventually grew again but have not reached levels seen before they were added to the control list. After the call with Mr Xi, Mr Trump said he expected no problems with the supply of magnets. China does seem to be issuing licences faster, although there is no indication that it will remove the requirement to get a licence, meaning it could slow or stop issuing them again at any time. Jet deliveries One new tool that Beijing used was to order a halt to deliveries of Boeing Co. jets, prompting at least one Chinese airliner to return a plane. While the ban was lifted later, with the company sending a 737 Max jet to China last week, the tensions have left the first major aircraft order from China since 2017 in limbo. Boeing had expected to deliver another 50 planes to China when the latest trade spat erupted in April, with Beijing countering Mr Trump's new levies by hiking tariffs that priced the US-made jets out of the market for Chinese carriers. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store