
China sends dual message with national flag on disputed South China Sea reef, targeting rivals and citizens
SINGAPORE: China's national flag was recently unfurled on a disputed reef in the South China Sea by its uniformed troops, an act broadcast by state media in what analysts believe to be a first public display in decades of what had previously been quiet actions.
In contrast with how Chinese fishermen, maritime militia, and even civilian groups have planted flags on disputed reefs, rocks, and islands in the contentious waterway since the 1990s, observers say China's latest move is a pointed show of control aimed at reflecting its readiness to confront potential escalation amid rising tensions with the United States.
They add that the move carried out on Sandy Cay - a string of three uninhabited sandbars near a Philippine military outpost in the disputed Spratly Islands - also aims to reassure domestic audiences that Beijing remains firm on core interests such as sovereignty - and to portray strength as external pressure mounts.
Chinese state broadcaster CCTV reported on April 25 that its coast guard had landed on Sandy Cay 'as part of maritime control operations to assert Beijing's sovereignty'.
The broadcaster said the coast guard had 'implemented control' over what it refers to as Tiexian Reef, part of the Sandy Cay feature. Footage showed four personnel in black combat gear holding the Chinese national flag after arriving on the reef aboard an inflatable dinghy.
On April 28, the Philippine Coast Guard released a photo of its personnel raising the national flag on the disputed reef. It said the mission was carried out pre-dawn the day before - a move seen as a direct rebuttal to China's sovereignty claim.
The developments come amid the largest-ever joint military exercises between the US and the Philippines in nearby waters. They also follow a recent visit to Asia by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who pledged to strengthen defence ties with Manila and 'restore deterrence' in the face of what Washington views as growing Chinese assertiveness in the region.
"For now, it's mostly symbolic. It's very low level, petty provocations, from (both sides) ... It has not reached a stage where it is alarming, yet," said Adib Zalkapli, Managing Director of Viewfinder Global Affairs and a geopolitical analyst specialising in the Indo-Pacific.
But it's also a sign of China drawing a line in the sand to state its firm position over the territorial disputes and external pressures, said other analysts.
'It's a warning for the Philippines (against) further developing closer defence relations with the US … It's a signal to say, look, this is what we can do to counter you,' said Abdul Rahman Yaacob, a research fellow in the Southeast Asia programme at the Lowy Institute.
CALIBRATED CONFRONTATION
China claims nearly the entire South China Sea, a position that overlaps with those of several countries and territories, and goes against a 2016 international tribunal ruling, which rejected Beijing's entitlements over the disputed islands and waters.
Sandy Cay lies near Thitu Island, the biggest and most strategically significant outpost held by the Philippines in the Spratly Islands. It is among the island chains, reefs and rocks in the South China Sea where China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan maintain overlapping territorial claims.
On April 29, Chinese state media Global Times released images of a coast guard operation at Tiexian Reef, claiming it was part of efforts to exercise 'sovereign jurisdiction'.
The photos showed Chinese coast guard officers displaying the Chinese national flag, and clearing debris such as plastic bottles from the reef flat.
The report claimed that a group of Philippine personnel 'illegally' landed on the reef despite repeated Chinese warnings, prompting Chinese officers to 'conduct on-site verification and enforcement measures in line with the law'.
Beijing's latest move was likely timed for symbolic impact, coinciding with the ongoing Philippines-US Balikatan exercises and the approaching Philippine midterm elections, said Abdul Rahman of the Lowy Institute.
While raising a flag does not amount to a formal seizure or legal claim of sovereignty, he noted that the reef's location remains strategically important due to its close proximity to Philippine-held territory.
'If the Chinese were to build certain military infrastructure there, they could closely monitor activity on nearby Philippine islands,' he said.
'It would also allow them to project their presence much closer to Philippine-held territory. From a military standpoint, the reef holds clear strategic value.'
Abdul Rahman said China's latest move in the South China Sea presents an early test for US President Donald Trump's administration, which has vowed to push back against Beijing's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific with a more assertive regional posture.
The observer pointed to Manila's planned purchase of US-made Typhon missile launchers and ongoing talks to acquire F-16 fighter jets as 'among the key factors' that prompted Beijing to respond with what he described as symbolic but calibrated actions.
'China, through flexing its muscle, is sending a message to both Manila and Washington,' he said. 'It's saying: despite your new defence deals and closer military cooperation, the reality on the ground remains unchanged - and that is, Beijing can still impose its will over disputed areas.'
China's latest action at Sandy Cay may be part of a broader strategy to expand its footprint in the West Philippine Sea - the term the Philippines uses for parts of the South China Sea within its exclusive economic zone - through incremental moves, said Don McLain Gill, a Manila-based analyst and lecturer at the Department of International Studies, De La Salle University.
In an April 29 commentary on the Singapore-based platform ThinkChina, Gill described the act as part of Beijing's 'salami slicing' approach to maritime claims.
'Sandy Cay lies around ten nautical miles away from Subi or Zamora Reef, which China has illegally occupied and converted into a military base with an airstrip,' he wrote.
'Occupying the sand bar would allow Beijing to justify its claims over Subi Reef and eventually serve as a stepping stone to push further into Pag-asa Island, which houses Philippine military facilities and is home to about 250 Filipino residents.'
China's 'salami slicing' in the South China Sea, as described by some observers, refers to a strategy of advancing territorial claims through a succession of small, calibrated moves. Each action avoids triggering armed conflict, but together they steadily tip the balance of control toward Beijing and alter the status quo over time.
One example often cited by analysts is China's development of artificial islands, which began around 2014. Initially framed by Beijing as serving civilian and public service functions, construction activities on features such as Fiery Cross Reef in the Spratlys later expanded to include airstrips, radar installations, and missile systems.
While China maintains these are defensive in nature, the steady build-up has raised concerns about the long-term militarisation of disputed areas.
Another example often cited by analysts as part of the 'salami slicing' approach, is the use of coast guard vessels and maritime militia to reinforce claims in disputed waters without direct confrontation.
At Second Thomas Shoal, Chinese vessels have disrupted Philippine resupply missions with water cannons and close-range manoeuvres. While Beijing frames these as legitimate law enforcement within its claimed waters, analysts see them as calibrated efforts to constrain access and shift control - without provoking a direct military clash.
Gill noted that since 2017, Chinese Coast Guard vessels and maritime militia have stepped up their presence around Sandy Cay, including forming a de facto barrier to prevent Filipino fishing boats from accessing the area.
He added that in 2019, these same forces were involved in large-scale swarming operations near Pag-asa Island - actions he described as instruments of China's gradual expansionism in the region.
In a move seen as a calculated demonstration of military strength, China's aircraft carrier Shandong sailed through waters north of the Philippines twice within a week - a rare occurrence coinciding with ongoing joint military drills between the United States and the Philippines, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported on Tuesday (Apr 30).
The Shandong, accompanied by a flotilla of destroyers, frigates, and support vessels, was first detected last Tuesday about 185km northwest of Burgos in northern Luzon, the Philippines' main island.
Its transit through the Luzon Strait - a critical waterway between Taiwan and the Philippines - has been widely interpreted by analysts as a signal of Beijing's intent to assert freedom of movement and challenge US-aligned military activity in the region.
The timing, just as Manila and Washington kicked off their Balikatan exercise featuring complex combat simulations and the deployment of advanced weaponry such as anti-ship missile systems, appeared deliberate, said analysts.
They added that the deployment reflects China's broader strategic objective of pressing beyond the so-called 'first island chain' - a network of US-friendly territories such as Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines - seen as central to its aim to contain Beijing.
'The deployment was certainly a show of force in light of Balikatan when they are conducting drills related to anti-ship techniques, and this was meant to signal that whatever the Filipinos and Americans are doing to conduct sea denial in these passageways, the (Chinese) navy will still force its way through in a conflict,' said Collin Koh, a senior fellow at Singapore's S Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
FEAR OF FURTHER ESCALATION
Adib of Viewfinder Global Affairs noted that the prominent coverage on Chinese state media has given the incident greater symbolic weight and an air of official endorsement.
'The timing is also notable,' Adib noted.
'China is under growing pressure from the US, especially with fresh tariffs being imposed. By highlighting this act of sovereignty, Beijing is also addressing a domestic audience - reinforcing the message that, despite mounting external challenges, national interests and territorial claims remain a top priority.'
Abdul Rahman of Lowy Institute agreed that the move also plays to a domestic audience, particularly as China grapples with mounting economic headwinds.
However, he cautioned against drawing a direct link between developments in the South China Sea and Beijing's escalating trade tensions with Washington.
'States generally separate economic issues from geostrategic competition,' he said.
'Rather than being a direct response to US tariffs, this is more about reassuring the Chinese public that Beijing remains proactive in asserting its position against the Philippines in contested waters.'
The dispute over Sandy Cay has added fresh strain to already tense relations between the Philippines and China, said analysts.
While China has not seized the disputed reef in any substantive way, further unilateral actions - such as deploying troops or constructing permanent facilities - could compel the Philippines to respond, potentially heightening the risk of conflict, said Adib.
'It's important to note that China hasn't taken such steps yet, the flag-raising remains symbolic for now,' he said.
'But the fact that it was able to land on the reef shows it has the capability to take more assertive actions if it chooses to. That in itself sends a message to the Philippines.'
Abdul Rahman echoed similar concerns, pointing to fears of a repeat of the 1995 Mischief Reef episode - when China's construction of initial stilted structures triggered a sharp response from the Philippines, leading to a cycle of escalating actions between the two countries.
Asked whether the Philippines might be pushed by the US to adopt a more assertive posture in the South China Sea - potentially fuelling further escalation - Abdul Rahman said such a scenario remains unlikely.
'In my conversations with Philippine officials, it's clear their approach to the South China Sea is largely self-directed. They're cautious about appearing overly influenced by Washington,' he said.
'I don't see this as an extension of US efforts to economically contain China.'
Under the current President Ferdinand Marcos Jr administration, the Philippines has adopted a more assertive strategy to defend its territorial claims in the West Philippine Sea, according to Gill from De La Salle University.
He argued that while China has yet to establish full control over Sandy Cay, Manila must remain vigilant and sustain its presence in strategically important waters.
Coordinated and recurring joint patrols with defence partners, he added, are critical to pushing back against Beijing's attempts to unilaterally shape the status quo.
Despite China's assertive moves in the South China Sea, its broader relations with Southeast Asian countries remain largely cordial and grounded in mutual interests, noted Adib Zalkapli.
'This latest development also comes on the heels of Xi Jinping's outreach visits to Cambodia, Vietnam and Malaysia,' he said, referring to the Chinese president.
'It reflects a calibrated strategy - Beijing wants to maintain friendly ties where possible, while showing it won't compromise on what it considers its core interests, especially sovereignty over disputed waters.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump says China will supply rare earths, US to allow Chinese students
President Donald Trump says the US is 'getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%' in a social media post. PHOTO: REUTERS Trump says China will supply rare earths, US to allow Chinese students WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said on June 11 the US deal with China is done, with Beijing agreeing to supply magnets and rare earth minerals while the US will allow Chinese students in its colleges and universities. 'WE ARE GETTING A TOTAL OF 55% TARIFFS, CHINA IS GETTING 10%. RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT!' Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social without elaborating. A White House official said the agreement allows the US to charge a 55 per cent tariff on imported Chinese goods. This includes a 10 per cent baseline 'reciprocal' tariff, a 20 per cent tariff for fentanyl trafficking and a 25 per cent tariff reflecting pre-existing tariffs. China would charge a 10 per cent tariff on US imports, the official said. Mr Trump said the deal is subject to final approval by him and Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'FULL MAGNETS, AND ANY NECESSARY RARE EARTHS, WILL BE SUPPLIED, UP FRONT, BY CHINA. LIKEWISE, WE WILL PROVIDE TO CHINA WHAT WAS AGREED TO, INCLUDING CHINESE STUDENTS USING OUR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN GOOD WITH ME!),' Mr Trump said. US and Chinese officials said on June 10 they agreed on a framework to get their trade truce back on track and remove China's export restrictions on rare earths while offering little sign of a durable resolution to longstanding trade tensions. At the end of two days of intense negotiations in London, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the framework deal puts 'meat on the bones' of an agreement reached in May in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that reached crushing triple-digit levels The Geneva deal faltered over China's curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls of its own preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. Mr Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump says China will supply rare earths, US to allow students
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump gestures while he poses for a picture at the presidential box at the Kennedy Center, in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 17, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo Trump says China will supply rare earths, US to allow students WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the U.S. deal with China is done, with Beijing to supply magnets and rare earth minerals while the U.S. will allow Chinese students in its colleges and universities. "WE ARE GETTING A TOTAL OF 55% TARIFFS, CHINA IS GETTING 10%. RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT!" Trump wrote on Truth Social without elaborating. Trump said the deal is subject to final approval by him and President Xi Jinping. "FULL MAGNETS, AND ANY NECESSARY RARE EARTHS, WILL BE SUPPLIED, UP FRONT, BY CHINA. LIKEWISE, WE WILL PROVIDE TO CHINA WHAT WAS AGREED TO, INCLUDING CHINESE STUDENTS USING OUR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN GOOD WITH ME!)," Trump said. U.S. and Chinese officials said on Tuesday they had agreed on a framework to get their trade truce back on track and remove China's export restrictions on rare earths while offering little sign of a durable resolution to longstanding trade tensions. At the end of two days of intense negotiations in London, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the framework deal puts "meat on the bones" of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that had reached crushing triple-digit levels The Geneva deal had faltered over China's curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls of its own preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
At G-7 summit, S. Korea's President Lee faces delicate balance in US-China rivalry
South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung and his wife Kim Hye-kyung (left) at the Seoul National Cemetery on June 6. PHOTO: REUTERS – As South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung gears up for his international diplomacy debut at the Group of Seven (G-7) summit next week, all eyes are on whether he will be made to pick sides in the Sino-American rivalry. Mr Lee has acknowledged that the South Korea-US alliance remains the foundation of South Korea's diplomacy and security, and has pledged to strengthen the alliance along with the trilateral partnership with Japan. But he has also said South Korea should not be made to choose between the United States and China and 'put all our eggs in one basket'. Mr Lee was elected with a 49.42 per cent mandate in a snap election on June 3 after his predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law bid saw the former leader deposed by the country's Constitutional Court. Mr Lee's win under the liberal flag, which traditionally prioritises relations with China and engagement with North Korea, has Washington watching his foreign policy directions closely, said Dr Lee Seong-hyon, a senior fellow at the Washington-based George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations. The previous conservative administration under Yoon had antagonised Beijing by openly taking sides with the US, and also seeding rife speculation of Chinese espionage and interference in South Korean domestic politics. During his election campaign, Mr Lee had taken a more centrist stance by repeatedly emphasising a non-committal 'pragmatic diplomacy' to maximise South Korea's national interests. Amid growing rivalry between the two superpowers, however, Mr Lee's vision, which requires a delicate balancing act between its biggest security ally, the US, and its largest trading partner, China, will likely be put to the test. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth had earlier cautioned allies against playing both sides by 'seeking both economic cooperation with China and defence cooperation with the United States', during his speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue, an annual defence and security forum, on May 31 in Singapore. Mr Hegseth had also urged allies to increase their defence spending as regional deterrence against China. Seoul's share of the defence cost-sharing for US troops stationed in South Korea has been a major bugbear of US President Donald Trump, who has said that 'money machine' South Korea can afford to pay much more. Recent leaked plans about the possibility of the US redeploying its forces stationed in South Korea to other parts of the Pacific to exercise 'strategic flexibility' in its plans to contain China, also called into question the commitment of US security in the region. South Korea's participation as an observing country at the G-7 summit on June 15-17 in Vancouver is, thus, seen as important. Issues related to China, Russia and North Korea are expected to feature high on the meeting agenda. Besides the US, other members of the political and economic forum are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United Kingdom. Seoul is also pushing hard for a face-to-face meeting between Mr Lee and Mr Trump on the sidelines of the meeting to ride on the momentum of the first phone call between the two leaders that took place on June 6. The 20-minute courtesy call had ended with an agreement to meet in person at the earliest possible opportunity for more in-depth talks. The call had taken place later than usual – three days after Mr Lee was elected – causing concern when it had not happened. Past South Korean presidents had traditionally spoken to their biggest ally either on the day of their election or the day after. A cryptic congratulatory message issued by the White House after the election had affirmed the 'ironclad alliance' between the US and South Korea , before going on to express concern over 'Chinese interference and influence in democracies around the world'. That had fuelled speculation that the message was a hint for the new Lee administration to distance itself from Beijing. While Washington does not expect Mr Lee's administration to 'diverge significantly from the established US-South Korea alliance framework', it will, nevertheless, be keenly watching any potential policy reversals, such as weakening ties with Japan while gravitating towards China and resuming inter-Korean engagement, Dr Lee told The Straits Times. Research fellow Lee Dong-gyu, from the Asan Institute for Policy Studies in Seoul, said the broaching of the idea of a US troop drawdown could be a diplomatic signal to South Korea to step up and play 'an augmented role' to contain China. 'But if the new government under Mr Lee pursues a revitalisation of South Korea-China relations, then it may result in the erosion of the US' containment efforts,' he said. While it is clear that President Lee's priority is in forging ties with Mr Trump and to iron out tariff negotiations before the July 9 deadline, rising tensions over Chinese-built structures in the South Korea-China Provisional Maritime Zone in the West Sea will also be an immediate test of his diplomacy tight-rope act, said international politics professor Mason Richey from Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. He added that Seoul needs to be prepared to respond strategically, and 'to be clear with China that even though they are economic partners, South Korea will not be easily bullied'. After his first phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping on June 10, Mr Lee has called China an important partner to South Korea 'in all aspects, including economy and security' and that he looks forward to developing relations between Seoul and Beijing. Mr Lee has also asked China to play a constructive role for the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula, to which Mr Xi replied that promoting peace and stability on the peninsula was a matter of mutual interest to both South Korea and China. Carnegie Mellon Institute for Strategy and Technology's non-resident fellow, Dr Troy Stangarone, told ST that while the new administration's repairing of relations with China is a priority after the deterioration of ties under the previous Yoon administration, it will need to 'take a realistic view of the relationship'. He believes that Mr Lee would likely have a bit more time before being made to pick sides between the US and China at the G-7 summit, as South Korea is ultimately not a member country but just an observer. However, he warns that 'geostrategic shifts and US-China rivalry may create limits to improving relations with China'. 'The Lee administration should focus its efforts on maintaining good economic ties while also working to bring China back as a constructive partner for dealing with the North Korean nuclear issue,' he said. Wendy Teo is The Straits Times' South Korea correspondent based in Seoul. She covers issues concerning the two Koreas. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.