Church accountant sacked by Catholic diocese after 'witch hunt' for being an atheist wins £60k payout
A church accountant has successfully sued a Catholic diocese after she was discriminated against for being an atheist.
Cambridge University-educated Janet Parker, 55, fell out with her boss after she asked for leave to care for her newly adopted daughter.
When her request for flexible working was refused, she complained, adding that 'the Catholic Church does not have a blemish-free history when it comes to adopted children or children in care'.
'I hoped that this kind of prejudice had been eradicated long ago,' she said. 'Maybe I am wrong.'
Following this, Miss Parker was subjected to a 'witch hunt' investigation by managers at the Clifton Diocese for alleged professional negligence which led to her being sacked from her £60,000-a-year-role.
She has now won claims against them after a tribunal ruled the church organisation had discriminated against her, harassed her and then unfairly sacked her because she was not religious.
Miss Parker claimed the diocese's approach to her flexible working request was 'tainted by negative views of adoption, emanating from the religious beliefs of its staff'.
Details of Miss Parker's tribunal claim emerged at a disciplinary hearing conducted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants (ICAEW) into abusive messages she sent to diocese Chief Operating Officer, Lyn Murray, after her dismissal.
According to the full judgement - which has not been made public - the hearing in Bristol was told that she had worked at the Diocese - which covers the West of England and has assets exceeding £200 million - from February 2015 until her dismissal in October 2021.
Miss Parker - described by the tribunal as a 'very intelligent, articulate, and able woman' - had been a chartered accountant since 1998 and had worked in London at Deloittes and Credit Suisse before moving to the charity sector in 2009.
In 2019 her application to adopt a baby girl was approved and in January 2020 she informed Mrs Murray of her intention to take 52 weeks of adoption leave.
The tribunal heard: 'Mrs Murray did not react well, arguing that she did not believe that [Miss Parker] could 'go on leave with no notice,' as she described it, and expressed dissatisfaction that [she] would 'do that to her',
'She asked why the child could not be placed into separate foster care before it was placed with [Miss Parker] so that [she] could conduct a handover.
'Additionally, Mrs Murray asked [her] whether it was really necessary for her to take her full entitlement of 52 weeks of adoption leave.'
Miss Parker began her leave in September 2020. The tribunal heard that during her absence, her replacement flagged potential financial irregularities in the accounts she had been responsible for.
In July 2021 Miss Parker had a conversation with Mrs Murray about reducing hours and working from home as she was struggling to find childcare for her daughter.
However, her request was refused and the following month, the diocese launched disciplinary proceedings against her and put her on suspension.
Miss Parker responded by issuing a grievance against Mrs Murray.
'This behaviour is not in accordance with the professed beliefs of the Catholic Church,' she said.
'I know that the Catholic Church does not have a blemish-free history when it comes to adopted children or children in care, but I hoped that this kind of prejudice had been eradicated long ago. Maybe I am wrong.'
During the investigation into her, senior church executive Carole Lawrence mocked Miss Parker - who suffers from anxiety and depression - saying she was glad she had not had a panic attack before a disciplinary hearing, the tribunal was told.
The hearing was told the ICAEW was asked to investigate the allegations against her and eventually found there was insufficient evidence to support the complaints.
However, at the conclusion of its investigation the diocese decided to dismiss her for gross misconduct.
The tribunal heard this led to Miss Parker sending an email to Mrs Murray saying: 'There is one thing I always wanted to say to you. Now I can. F*** OFF YOU B****.' and 'Your god might forgive you but I never will. B****.'
She then put out Facebook posts saying: 'You asked for it and I'm coming for you,' and 'Nolite te bastardes carborundorum, b****s,' - meaning 'don't let the b******* grind you down, b*****s' in Latin.
Employment Judge Adam Midgley said that the way the diocese had handled the disciplinary process meant Miss Parker - as a non Catholic - had been religiously discriminated against.
'[She] has argued that from the moment she challenged the [diocese], particularly from the point at which she referenced the Catholic Church's treatment of vulnerable children, her card was marked, and [it] closed ranks to protect itself and dismiss her.'
He described the investigation that led to her dismissal as appearing like 'witch hunt' and said it was 'derisory in its depth, unbalanced and focused on establishing fault'.
Miss Parker has yet to receive compensation following the judgement as the diocese is understood to have launched an appeal.
The ICAEW issued her with a caution over the abusive messages and social media posts.
In response, Miss Parker said: 'I wasn't happy with ICAEW outcome but I suppose it was the best outcome given the situation.
'I don't think what I did was wrong and I think I just did what probably millions of people around the country want to do when they leave their jobs.
'I have been through four years of hell with this and my parents, daughter and siblings have suffered too. 'I've gone self-employed as I don't think I could ever trust an employer again.
'I can honestly say I hate the Catholic Church and think they cannot be trusted.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn
The National Trust and RSPB have joined forces with farmers to warn the government that cutting the agricultural budget could be "catastrophic" for nature and rural businesses. In a letter to food security and rural affairs minister Daniel Zeichner, exclusively seen by Sky News, a dozen of the biggest rural industry organisations say they are "deeply concerned" about rumoured cuts that will be made to the agricultural budget in Wednesday's spending review. Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out budgets for each government department for the rest of this parliament, set to end in 2029. The letter says cutting funding for existing and new environmental farming schemes will be "catastrophic" to the government's aims for the environment. "Many of the environmental features present in the countryside and enjoyed by the public will be under threat and will disappear," the letter says. "This would be a poor legacy for this government." Sir Keir Starmer's government has made getting to net zero by 2050 a key goal, already initiating several policies to restrict carbon emissions and make the UK greener since winning the election last July. However, the government shocked farmers in March when it shut down applications for the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI), which rewards farmers for managing their land in environmentally sustainable ways, with just a few hours' notice as they said a cap had been reached for the year. The rural organisations say the Environmental Land Management (ELM) scheme payments are "critical to the government's statutory targets on environmental improvement", including the main goal of halting the decline of biodiversity. 3:26 The letter states farmers and landowners are fully committed to environmental schemes, with 77,000 live agri-environment scheme agreements, according to the latest government figures, "with millions of hectares under environmental land management". "So much good has been done by these agreements, the oldest of which has run for decades," the letter says. "The unprecedented engagement in the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) is testament to the appetite of farmers and land managers to rise to the challenge and do more." The letter finishes with: "The industry would like to have your assurances that this critical work will continue to be funded at the same level." David Wilson, a farmer for 53 years, told Sky News it took many years for farmers to get on board with the environmental schemes but they are now joined up, and reducing funding could damage years of work and be a backwards step for not just the UK's environment, but the world's. "This is ultimately about sustainability. To produce good food, you need good ecology and reducing this funding could damage the UK's ecology and our food security," he added. A return to intensive farming Alex Robinson, 39, a farmer from Gloucestershire with 424 hectares, said the schemes have been "a lifeline for nature", with birds, bees and wildflowers returning - including 14 red-listed bird species, many that had not been seen in decades. His farm's soil health is improving, which means he can grow more resilient nutrient dense crops for people to eat. If funding is cut he said he "may have no choice but to return to intensive farming methods sooner than the soils are ready for", with wildflowers and field margins becoming "difficult to justify", which will put the UK's climate, biodiversity and long-term food security "in real danger". Government will be abandoning nature Signatory Victoria Vyvyan, farmer and president of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA), said: "If sustainable farming contracts are cut, government won't just abandon nature - it will abandon its own environmental and legal commitments. "The Sustainable Farming Incentive is working - for farmers, for nature, for the public, and for the Treasury. It's bringing back wildlife, cleaning up rivers, and restoring the health of our soil. "Take away the funding for nature contracts, and farmers will be pushed back to intensive methods - forced to undo years of progress. Nature will suffer as well as farmers, and on the environment, it will go against everything government claims to agree with." The letter has been signed by the heads of The National Trust, the National Farmers' Union (NFU), the RSPB, the Soil Association, the CLA, the Tenant Farmers Association, the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, the Nature Friendly Farming Network, the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers, the National Federation of Young Farmers' Clubs, the British Institute of Agricultural Consultants and the Agricultural Industries Confederation.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Legal aid lawyers face chaos following cyber attack, says representative body
Legal aid lawyers are facing 'administrative chaos' in the aftermath of a cyber attack amid fears more providers will leave the sector, a representative body has said. The Legal Aid Agency's (LAA) digital services, which are used by legal aid providers to log their work and get paid by the Government, were taken offline following the data breach in April. Payments for the publicly funded work initially stopped and legal aid applications are not able to be formally granted at the moment. This has left legal aid law firms, often small businesses, to decide whether to take on the risk of cases and hope they will be approved and paid retrospectively. Chris Minnoch, chief executive of Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG), said that lawyers have called the representative body 'in tears' having 'sleepless nights' waiting on news and payments coming through from legal aid because of the cyber attack. 'They've been on the verge of collapse because they hadn't had payments for one or two weeks,' he told the PA news agency. 'What a cyber attack like this brings to the front of your mind is that the legal aid scheme is teetering on the precipice of collapse. 'If it goes and if lawyers just say, 'I can't do this anymore', it has profound consequences for almost every aspect of society, because we are talking about the law of everyday life.' Those eligible to apply for legal aid include domestic violence and modern slavery victims, people involved in care proceedings or at risk of homelessness, as well as people accused of criminal offences. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) previously said a 'significant amount of personal data' of people who applied to the LAA since 2010, including criminal records, was accessed and downloaded in the cyber attack. The Government became aware of the hack on April 23, but realised on May 16 that it was more extensive than originally thought, and took the system offline. Mr Minnoch said it was 'unforgivable' for an organisation of that size to not have a business continuity plan that anticipated this sort of fallout. 'You'll have a number of providers that, by the end of this digital disaster we're dealing with, won't be there anymore because they just couldn't afford to, and a number of others that just say, 'I just I can't take this anymore',' he said. 'Every time there is some sort of crisis that befalls the legal aid scheme, you end up with fewer lawyers willing to do it at the end of it.' An MoJ source had put the breach down to the 'neglect and mismanagement' of the previous government, saying vulnerabilities in the LAA's systems have been known for many years. The attack happened as the MoJ was working on replacing the internal system with a new version hoped to be up and running in the coming weeks. At the end of May, the LAA brought in a scheme for civil legal aid providers to be able to receive payments based on their average billing until the system is back online, when lawyers will then submit specific bills and applications. On June 4, payments were sent to more than 1,700 solicitors and barristers who took up the offer. Payments for criminal legal aid cases separately have also resumed, the MoJ said. Mr Minnoch added that while the civil legal aid payments should have been done two weeks earlier, they were an important step forward, effectively loaning providers cash while they cannot claim money owed to them. 'I think one of the ways they need to mitigate this is by being as flexible as possible with providers, once the situation is restored to some sort of business as usual, because they're going to be punch drunk by the end of this, they're already punch drunk,' he said. There are also concerns the move will create a backlog of providers trying to push through all their cases that need to be claimed in a short period of time when the system is back up and running, to effectively gain the income to repay the loan as quickly as possible. Jenny Beck KC, co-chair of the LAPG, said: 'There's administrative chaos in an already beleaguered and fragile supplier base. 'Nobody does it because it's a very sensible business proposition. People do it because they genuinely care about vulnerable people and they want to help them.' Ms Beck, who runs a family law practice, said her firm's workload is 60% legal aid work helping extremely vulnerable people such as domestic abuse survivors who need protection orders. She told PA a 'good proportion' of clients are reliant on legal aid to access their rights which is a 'massive access to justice issue'. Of the legal aid work, Ms Beck, who is also a member of the Law Society's access to justice committee, added: 'We'll have to supplement it with private income sources, because it's anxiety provoking to be working at risk on cases that we haven't an absolute guarantee that we're going to be paid.' 'I am going to continue to work at risk because I cannot leave my clients vulnerable. 'But I know that many other firms are very concerned about taking that risk.' Nicola Jones-King, Law Society council member for legal aid, said that while taking the risk for certain types of cases is 'okay' when it is known legal aid will be granted, there is more concern for means and merit tested applications for legal aid such as in housing or cases against police action. 'If it's a slightly more challenging or unusual case, or it's a case where you need to assess merits and means, that's more problematic obviously for the solicitor to take that on that risk,' she said. The risk also applies in cases that already have legal aid granted, but then need further approval to continue the funding at different stages in the proceedings. Stuart Nolan, managing director at DPP Law Ltd and chairman of the Law Society's criminal law committee, said his firm's criminal law department is made up of about 95% of legal aid cases and could sustain the current situation 'at a cost' for a couple of months before feeling the pinch. 'The impact is so far reaching, clogged criminal justice system, this is prospect of more delays,' he said. 'The quicker it's sorted out, the better for everyone.' A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'We understand the challenges this situation presents for legal aid providers – we are working as fast as possible to restore our online systems and have put in place contingencies to allow legal aid work to continue safely with confidence. 'These measures include setting up an average payment scheme for civil legal aid cases, resuming payments on criminal legal aid cases, putting in place processes for urgent civil application approvals and confirming that criminal applications made in this time will be backdated.'
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Nine Hobbycraft stores to shut in DAYS as part of huge restructuring – and they've launched closing down sales
HOBBYCRAFT will shut nine stores in days with huge closing down sales launched. Sites across Bristol, Dunstable, Borehamwood and Basildon are all set to close on June 21, The Sun can reveal. 1 A further two sites in Essex and one in Gloucestershire are also set to close, with a site in Kent closing earlier this year. The impacted stores are part of at least nine Hobbycraft stores that have been earmarked for closure this year. News of the closures has come as a blow to locals in the area, with Bristol residents describing it as a "shame". While another said the store would be missed and they needed to find another "rainy day activity". A Kent local said: "Oh noooooo it's the only one I go to regularly as the rest are too far away!". Another resident said they would "need therapy" following news of the closure. Closing down sales have also been launched across the stores, with up to 70% off on some items. It comes as new owner Modella Capital is launching an overhaul after buying Hobbycraft in August last year. Modella also agreed to purchase WHSmith's high street business earlier this year. The move is set to impact between 72 and 126 jobs. Popular retailer to RETURN 13 years after collapsing into administration and shutting 236 stores It is said the shake-up will help secure the future of 99 stores and around 1,800 jobs across the arts and crafts business. You can check out the full list of stores earmarked for closure below. Canterbury, Kent - closed Basildon, Essex - June 21 Borehamwood, Hertfordshire - June 21 Bristol, Imperial Retail Park - June 21 Dunstable, Bedfordshire - June 21 Epping Forest, Essex - June 21 Lakeside Shopping Centre, Essex - June 21 Cirencester, Gloucestershire -June 21 Bagshot, Surrey - June 21 OTHER STORE CLOSURES Hobbycraft is not the only retailer facing hard times. Up to 11 Original Factory Shops stores are to set to close this month, including sites across Worcestershire, Durham and Cumbria. Meanwhile, another five stores across Nairn, Market Drayton, Troon, Blairgowrie and Castle Douglas have been put up for sale. It comes as part of a major restructuring carried out by new owner Modella Capital with a number of loss-making stores having to close as result. You can see the full list of store closures here: Milford Haven, Pembrokeshire - June 26 Perth - June 28 Chester Le Street, County Durham - June 28 Arbroath, Angus - June 28 Kidwelly, Carmarthenshire - June 28 Pershore, Worcestershire - June 28 Normanton, West Yorkshire - June 28 Peterhead, Aberdeenshire - June 28 Shaftesbury, Dorset - June 28 Staveley, Cumbria - July 12 Middlewich - TBC The following stores are also up for sale: Nairn Market Drayton Troon Blairgowrie Castle Douglas It comes after pivate equity firm Modella bought The Original Factory Shop back in February and has since launched a restructuring effort to renegotiate rents at 88 TOFS stores. At the end of April, Modella drew up plans to initiate a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) for TOFS. Companies often use CVAs to prevent insolvency, which could otherwise result in store closures or the collapse of the entire business. They allow firms to explore different strategies such as negotiating reduced rent rates with landlords. RETAIL PAIN IN 2025 The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs will cost the retail sector £2.3billion. Research by the British Chambers of Commerce shows that more than half of companies plan to raise prices by early April. A survey of more than 4,800 firms found that 55% expect prices to increase in the next three months, up from 39% in a similar poll conducted in the latter half of 2024. Three-quarters of companies cited the cost of employing people as their primary financial pressure. The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year. It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year. Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025." Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector. "By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."
