
Disrupted unity: The state of the GNU one year on
EDITORIAL: Disrupted unity - The state of the GNU one year on
The outcome of the 2024 national elections left South Africa in uncharted territory. When the ANC fell short of a majority, managing only 40% of the vote, the country was uncertain about what lay ahead.
On 6 June 2024, Cyril Ramaphosa announced that a government of national unity (GNU) would be the best way forward.
This sparked an intense period of negotiations, culminating in a historic statement of intent signed by the ANC, DA, and IFP. A few hours later, during Parliament's first sitting, Ramaphosa was elected president of the country.
However, the drama was far from over. Two weeks after this agreement - and a full month post-election - Ramaphosa unveiled his Cabinet, officially cementing the 10-party GNU as a reality.
What followed was a year of turbulence, characterised by bitter disagreements, mounting frustrations, and the coalition teetering on the brink of collapse.
In this week's Friday Briefing, analyst Mpumelelo Mkhabela takes a deep dive into what form of government has truly emerged from the GNU experiment, one year in. Can this fragile coalition withstand its many challenges? To explore this question, we have insights from News24's political editor Andisiwe Makinana, director-general in the National School of Government Busani Ngcaweni, and parliamentary reporter Jason Felix.
Parliament, too, comes under scrutiny. News24's Jan Gerber investigates how it failed to seize a golden opportunity for a much-needed reset during the past 12 months.
And for a refreshing story of resilience, News24's in-depth writer Muhammad Hussain speaks to 83-year-old Johannes Mosehla, who last weekend became the oldest person to complete the Comrades Marathon.
You can dive into the full submissions below to gain a deeper perspective.
Oxymoronic governance: Friction and rivalry in the GNU
The government of national unity lacks a joint strategy. A unique form of government, one that governs and opposes simultaneously, has emerged writes Mpumelelo Mkhabela.
You can read the full submission here.
The strains of governing: A reflection on the GNU after one year
Despite party and ideological differences that have threatened its existence, the multiparty government of national unity marks its one-year anniversary this week. Andisiwe Makinana reflects on what is needed to ensure a stable government.
You can read the full submission here.
Navigating realities: What matters in making the GNU work
The GNU is no longer an ICU patient, but one managing unique chronic conditions while progressing toward recovery. Busani Ngcaweni reflects on seven proposals to strengthen the coalition arrangement.
You can read the full submissio here.
One year of GNU: Parliament's missed chance to make use of the changing tides
As the tectonic plates of South African politics shifted during last year's elections, a new political landscape presented a much needed opportunity for Parliament to reset itself and become the bastion of democracy it is supposed to be. But, writes Jan Gerber, it has been an opportunity missed a year into the GNU.
You can read the full submission here.
Fragile alliance: ANC and DA struggle to navigate the GNU one year down the line
Since its inception, the government of national unity has been marked by challenges, tensions, and power dynamics, with the ANC struggling to adapt to coalition politics with its key partner, the DA. Jason Felix spoke to the ANC chief whip and two Cabinet ministers about the first year of the GNU.
You can read the full submission here.
Supplied
At 83, Johannes Mosehla, extended his own record of the being the oldest person to complete the Comrades Marathon. He chats to Muhammad Hussain about his unusual midnight training routine and what inspires him.
You can read the full submission here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why President Trump Will Destroy Every Member of His Cabinet
President Donald Trump is set to 'disgrace' everyone in his orbit—from Vice President J.D. Vance to Secretary of State Marco Rubio—until there's no one left to succeed him, former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci predicts. 'Nobody in Trump's cabinet is going to be Trump's successor,' Scaramucci declared on The Daily Beast Podcast. 'He's going to put them all in the wood chipper. He's going to disgrace every one of them.' Case in point: Vance, who was publicly humiliated in February when Trump flatly refused to name him as a potential successor. 'Vance is walking around without any feet because (Trump) chopped up his feet,' said Scaramucci, who served just eleven days in the first Trump administration in 2017. 'He's like the boss from hell, isn't he?' host Joanna Coles proposed. 'Everything you say, he undermines you publicly.' Scaramucci argued that everyone in Trump Cabinet is marching toward irrelevance by selling themselves out in service to a president who demands nothing less than blind loyalty: 'They go and do everything that they're told to do like a good little doggy,' he said. During his first term in the White House, Scaramucci argued there was enough internal pushback—from within the administration, as well as from 'establishment Republicans' in Congress and the Republican National Committee—to keep Trump in check. But now, 'He's like Orange Moses with the unholy tariff tablet.' One of Trump's most dependable lackeys is Rubio, who has taken on the added role of National Security Advisor after Mike Waltz became the sole Cabinet-level casualty of the Signalgate scandal. Once a fiery Trump critic who made fun of the size of Trump's hands, Rubio has pulled off an impressive political transformation—but at what cost? 'He's lost the plot, he has no principles, and he's completely disingenuous,' Scaramucci said of Rubio. So who outside of Trump's circle will take the baton from Trump in 2028—assuming he agrees to pass it on? Perhaps the Trump name will continue to dominate the GOP: Scaramucci observed that Donald Trump Jr. is 'very popular with MAGA,' and 'could get the nomination.' 'But I don't think down deep he really wants to do it,' he added. New episodes of The Daily Beast Podcast are released every Tuesday, Thursday and Sunday. Follow our new feed on your favorite podcast platform at and subscribe on YouTube to watch full episodes.


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
As the Army celebrates its 250th birthday, officials say the military's apolitical nature is at risk
As the US Army prepares for its 250th birthday celebration with a major parade of military hardware in Washington, DC, which just happens to coincide with President Donald Trump's birthday, former officials are growing increasingly concerned about how the military is being pulled into the political arena, multiple former and current officials told CNN. The parade, which will feature several million pounds of military hardware including tanks, Bradley and Stryker fighting vehicles, and culminate in a speech from Trump, comes at a tense moment. This week, roughly 4,000 National Guardsmen were mobilized in Los Angeles, along with a full battalion of US Marines in response to civil unrest. Thousands of National Guardsmen have also been mobilized in Texas. And on Tuesday, uniformed US soldiers were seen on-camera cheering the president as he delivered a political speech at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, reminiscent of those he delivered on the campaign trail – an event which serves as a microcosm of the concerns around a larger trend of the politicization of the military. Current and former military officials told CNN that the event at Fort Bragg is being viewed within some corners of the Army as a public relations fail, since the military has strict regulations regarding political activity and is typically hyper-sensitive to any perception it is taking a political stance. Multiple officials said the Army had little control over the event; once the president is involved, they said, the White House takes over. And a defense official with direct knowledge of the event emphasized it was not the Army's intention for the troops to appear political. Sometimes, they said, the situation is out of their hands. 'I would say I never want to see a political piece of paraphernalia on a military installation, period,' the official said, adding that it's 'not the military that's trying to be political, it's people trying to use the military – which tends to poll very positively – for political gain.' Current and former officials speaking to CNN had varied levels of concern regarding the trajectory the military is on in regard to being seen as political. Some, for example, maintained that Saturday's parade was about celebrating the Army, while others acknowledged heartburn among leaders that while the Army may see it as celebrating the service, the public could associate the parade, which has been a goal of Trump's since his first term, with a celebration of his presidency. One current defense official remarked that it's not so much a matter of reminding soldiers what their 'left and right limits' are with political activity, because 'we don't know what the left and right limits even are, anymore.' 'The actions that were once rightfully criticized or rightfully labeled as partisan activity, or not appropriate, are now celebrated,' the official said. The official also pointed to multiple instances in the Biden administration and under Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin that they felt were political, emphasizing that the issue of politicizing the military has been building for years. Indeed, there have been a number of political events or social media posts over the last several years involving the military and service members that have drawn criticism. In 2022, President Joe Biden was criticized for having two Marines flank him during a speech in Philadelphia, in which he spoke about the threats to 'equality and democracy' posed by former President Donald Trump. Various political hopefuls have released campaign imagery and videos that appear to violate DOD policy. In 2020, the Army Reserve said it would discipline the supervisor of two Army Reserve soldiers who appeared in uniform during a Democratic National Convention video. Trump's address at Fort Bragg this week was far from the first time a political leader from any party has delivered a speech to or around US service members, but many officials who spoke to CNN were struck by the outwardly partisan behavior of many of the soldiers on-camera behind Trump. The Pentagon has strict regulations for political activity in uniform, stating that active-duty service members 'will not engage in partisan political activities and all military personnel will avoid the inference that their political activities imply or appear to imply DOD sponsorship, approval or endorsement of a political candidate, campaign or cause.' On Tuesday, the soldiers at Fort Bragg booed and cheered along with Trump's remarks, booing the media, former President Joe Biden, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. Social media posts from the event on Tuesday viewed by CNN also showed photos of 'Make America Great Again' hats and necklaces being sold by vendors, and in some photos, soldiers donned the gear while in uniform. The same official said the soldiers, many of them young and relatively inexperienced, were caught up in the moment – enjoying the day of celebration and excited to be so close to the commander in chief – and that there were people in the crowd trying to get the soldiers to cheer at certain moments of Trump's speech. Col. Mary Ricks, spokeswoman for the 18th Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg, said in a statement that the event 'was planned in cooperation with America 250, a nonpartisan organization created to support the U.S. Semi quincentennial Commission established by Congress in 2016.' 'The Army remains committed to its core values and apolitical service to the nation,' Ricks said. Still, current and former officials voiced concern that the event could contribute to damaging public trust in the military as an institution, which is crucial to military leaders; it feeds into their ability to recruit new service members, and to get funding for various efforts and projects. 'It's a slippery slope when you use very aggressive rhetoric against a political opponent and use the backdrop of military personnel …. using them as a validation for your political agenda, that's where people get upset,' a former senior Defense Department official said. Trump's speech at Fort Bragg came just a couple of weeks after he delivered the commencement address at the US Military Academy at West Point, wearing a bright red MAGA hat amid the sea of grey and white West Point uniforms. One recently retired Army general officer told CNN that the West Point and Fort Bragg addresses show 'a complete disregard for the centuries old civ-mil non-partisan interaction with the military.' The former senior DOD official told CNN that while Trump's language at Fort Bragg was more aggressive against his political opponents than other presidents have done, political leaders have 'always pushed their agendas in front of the troops.' 'It always made us a little anxious,' the official said, 'but they all do it.' 'Should the Army put out something that says hey, we maintain order and discipline, and in according with regulation X, we refrain from blah blah blah? Yeah,' a defense official said. 'We should. But we aren't going to.'


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Why Fico Sees Uzbekistan as a Model for Europe
Welcome to the weekend issue of Brussels Edition, Bloomberg's daily briefing on what matters most in the heart of the European Union. Join us on Saturdays for deeper dives from our bureaus across Europe. BRATISLAVA — Slovakia's prime minister has some advice for fellow EU leaders striving to navigate the current turmoil: Politics is overrated.