logo
Al Jazeera correspondents among journalists killed in Gaza City air strike

Al Jazeera correspondents among journalists killed in Gaza City air strike

Leader Live4 hours ago
Anas al-Sharif and his Al Jazeera colleague Mohamed Qreiqeh were among those killed while sheltering outside the Gaza City Hospital complex late on Sunday.
Officials at Shifa Hospital confirmed the deaths and said the strike also killed four other journalists and two other people. It also damaged the entrance to the hospital complex's emergency building.
Israel's military described Mr al-Sharif as the leader of a Hamas cell – an allegation that Al Jazeera and Mr al-Sharif had previously dismissed as baseless.
The incident marked the first time during the war that Israel's military has swiftly claimed responsibility after a journalist was killed in a strike.
It came less than a year after Israeli army officials first accused Mr al-Sharif and other Al Jazeera journalists of being members of the militant groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad. In a July 24 video, Israel's army spokesman Avichay Adraee attacked Al Jazeera and accused Mr al-Sharif of being part of Hamas's military wing.
Al Jazeera called the strike a 'targeted assassination' and accused Israeli officials of incitement, connecting Mr al-Sharif's death to the allegations that both the broadcaster and correspondent had denied.
'Anas and his colleagues were among the last remaining voices from within Gaza, providing the world with unfiltered, on-the-ground coverage of the devastating realities endured by its people,' Al Jazeera said in a statement.
Apart from rare invitations to observe Israeli military operations, international media have been barred from entering Gaza for the duration of the war. Al Jazeera is among the few outlets still fielding a big team of reporters inside the besieged strip, chronicling daily life amid air strikes, hunger and the rubble of destroyed neighbourhoods.
The broadcaster has suffered heavy losses during the war, including 27-year-old correspondent Ismail al-Ghoul and cameraman Rami al-Rifi, killed last summer, and freelancer Hossam Shabat, killed in an Israeli air strike in March.
Like Mr al-Sharif, Mr Shabat was among the six that Israel accused of being members of militant groups last October.
Hundreds of people, including many journalists, gathered on Monday to mourn Mr al-Sharif, Mr Qreiqeh and their colleagues.
Mr al-Sharif reported a nearby bombardment minutes before his death. In a social media post that Al Jazeera said was written to be posted in case of his death, he bemoaned the devastation and destruction that war had wrought and bid farewell to his wife, son and daughter.
'I never hesitated for a single day to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification,' the 28-year-old wrote.
The journalists are the latest to be killed in what observers have called the deadliest conflict for journalists in modern times. The Committee to Protect Journalists said on Sunday that at least 186 have been killed in Gaza.
Mr al-Sharif began reporting for Al Jazeera a few days after war broke out. He was known for reporting on Israel's bombardment in northern Gaza, and later for the starvation gripping much of the territory's population.
Mr Qreiqeh, a 33-year-old Gaza City native, is survived by two children.
Both journalists were separated from their families for months earlier in the war. When they managed to reunite during the ceasefire earlier this year, their children appeared unable to recognise them, according to video footage they posted at the time.
In a July broadcast he cried on air as a woman behind him collapsed from hunger.
'I am talking about slow death of those people,' he said at the time.
Al Jazeera is blocked in Israel and soldiers raided its offices in the occupied West Bank last year, ordering them to close.
Mr al-Sharif's death comes weeks after the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists said Israel had targeted him with a smear campaign.
Irene Khan, the UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression, on July 31 said that the killings were 'part of a deliberate strategy of Israel to suppress the truth, obstruct the documentation of international crimes and bury any possibility of future accountability'.
The Committee to Protect Journalists said on Sunday that it was appalled by the strike.
'Israel's pattern of labelling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,' Sara Qudah, the group's regional director, said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Global News Podcast  Israel condemned over journalist deaths in Gaza
Global News Podcast  Israel condemned over journalist deaths in Gaza

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Global News Podcast Israel condemned over journalist deaths in Gaza

Israel is facing condemnation for the deliberate killing of a prominent Al Jazeera correspondent and five colleagues in Gaza. Israeli officials claim Anas al-Sharif was a Hamas operative, which the network denies. Al Jazeera described the killings as a blatant and premeditated attack on press freedom aimed at silencing its Gaza coverage. Also: The bones of a British man who died when he fell into an Antarctic crevasse have been formally identified, more than 60 years after the accident, and running a marathon in a shopping mall. The Global News Podcast brings you the breaking news you need to hear, as it happens. Listen for the latest headlines and current affairs from around the world. Politics, economics, climate, business, technology, health – we cover it all with expert analysis and insight. Get the news that matters, delivered twice a day on weekdays and daily at weekends, plus special bonus episodes reacting to urgent breaking stories. Follow or subscribe now and never miss a moment. Get in touch: globalpodcast@

Palestine Action founder attacks 'false' Labour claims about group
Palestine Action founder attacks 'false' Labour claims about group

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Palestine Action founder attacks 'false' Labour claims about group

Huda Ammori rejected allegations from the top of the Labour Government, made after more than 500 people were arrested under terrorism laws on suspicion of supporting the proscribed group. Asked on Monday whether the UK Government was reconsidering its decision to designate the group as a terrorist organisation following mass arrests on Saturday, the Prime Minister's official spokesperson said they were not. READ MORE: Wikipedia loses Online Safety Act legal challenge 'Palestine Action was proscribed based on strong security advice following serious attacks the group has committed involving violence, significant injury and extensive criminal damage,' the spokesperson said. Downing Street said the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre – an independent authority based within MI5 – had found the organisation had carried out three separate acts of terrorism. The UK Government further said it is unable to provide 'all of the detail at this stage' but the proscription has been made through a 'robust, evidence-based process'. 'We've said that many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation, but the assessments are very clear: this is a violent organisation that has committed violence, significant injury and extensive criminal damage,' Keir Starmer's spokesperson said. Justice Minister Alex Davies-Jones (above) said on Monday that the UK Government had 'credible reports of them targeting Jewish-owned businesses here in the United Kingdom, and there are other reasons, which we can't disclose because of national security'. Ammori said the claims Palestine Action is a violent organisation were 'false and defamatory'. She said: 'Yvette Cooper and No 10's claim that Palestine Action is a violent organisation is false and defamatory, and even disproven by the Government's own intelligence assessment of Palestine Action's activities and the Home Office spokesperson's statement outside court just a few weeks ago.' Ammori said the group does not advocate for violence against persons and the majority of its activities would not be classified as terrorism. 'Spraying red paint on war planes is not terrorism. Disrupting Israel's largest weapons manufacturer Elbit Systems by trespassing on their sites in Britain is not terrorism,' she said. 'It is the Israeli Defence Force and all those who arm and enable their war crimes who are the terrorists.' READ MORE: Labour 'must back probe into Israel's blatant killing of journalists', union says She claimed the reason the UK Government has banned the group is 'because they capitulated to the Israeli embassy, arms manufacturers, and pro-Israeli groups who lobbied them to ban us'. Meanwhile, officers from the Metropolitan Police's Counter Terrorism Command will be working over the coming weeks to put together case files in relation to the 532 arrests made at a protest in London in Saturday, the force has said. The demonstration, organised by Defend Our Juries, was held in Parliament Square, with the Metropolitan Police warning it would detain anyone expressing support for Palestine Action. The majority of those arrested, 348, were aged 50 or over, according to a breakdown published by the Met on Sunday. Amnesty International claimed that arrests 'for the type of peaceful activity that took place in London over the weekend would violate international human rights law'. Liz Thomson, the charity's acting Scotland director, urged Police Scotland and the Lord Advocate not to follow the London police force's lead. 'Similar scenes should never be replicated in Scotland,' she said. 'Some arrests have been made by Police Scotland in recent weeks, reportedly of individuals displaying messages deemed to be in support of Palestine Action without any incitement to violence. 'Police Scotland and the Lord Advocate must be clear that they have obligations under the Human Rights Act and international law to uphold the right to peaceful protest – and that carrying out arrests for peaceful expression on this issue will be a violation of international human rights law.'

Gaza's children need Britain's support now
Gaza's children need Britain's support now

New Statesman​

time2 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

Gaza's children need Britain's support now

RAFAH, GAZA - MARCH 29: A child runs among debris following Israeli air strikes on March 29, 2024 in Rafah, Gaza. Despite warnings from US President Biden, Israeli forces have targeted the city of Rafah which is currently home to an estimated million Palestinian refugees. According to Gaza's Ministry of Health, more than 32,000 Palestinians have been killed, and over 74,000 wounded in Israel's ongoing bombardment of Gaza starting on October 7. (Photo by) After months of moral contortions, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said that his government would recognise a Palestinian state sometime within this parliament. Not today, not tomorrow, but soon, well, soon-ish. The announcement notably came with a heavy dose of 'unless Israel' – grounding the position of the UK firmly in the realm of theory. But the timing of this rhetorical pivot is not coincidental. It follows a second, more immediate shift: the UK's announcement that it will evacuate over 100 critically ill and injured Palestinian children from Gaza to receive NHS treatment. A move campaigners, medics and charities such as ours have long demanded and one that arrives months – indeed, years, too late. Still, after months in which Gaza's children suffered under a siege in which starvation was strategy not side effect – whilst the British government clung to the safety of ambiguity – this feels like movement. Movement graded on a curve set by years of inaction. For Gaza's children, many of whom my colleagues at Children Not Numbers have been treating, it's less a breakthrough and more an indication that Britain may potentially, maybe, consider a late delivery on a stack of broken promises. As the situation begins to spiral out of control, Gaza's children are making a stand. S and S are among three critically ill children at the centre of a potential landmark legal challenge against the UK government. The two siblings are suffering from cystinosis – a rare, progressive disorder that severely damages kidney function. Amidst Israel's all out assault on healthcare facilities, the medication they urgently need is entirely unavailable in Gaza; without it, both face complete renal failure. Their case demonstrates that the government's rationale for denying medical evacuations – a preference for supporting treatment on the ground, is no longer tenable. Last month, with the support of Children Not Numbers, the siblings decided to act. The children initiated legal proceedings, sending a pre-action letter to the Foreign Secretary and Home Secretary. This marks the first formal attempt to hold the British state accountable for failing to establish a medical evacuation pathway for children in Gaza. The letter argues that ministers have breached their Tameside duty of inquiry – a legal requirement to properly inform themselves before making decisions – by failing to seriously assess the overwhelming evidence of medical necessity and humanitarian urgency before choosing inaction. Like so many others facing down a complex life-threatening condition, both brothers are malnourished. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Since the blockade began in mid-March 2025, we've recorded a 30 per cent increase in the death rate amongst children under our care. Alongside this devastating development, starvation is spreading like wildfire through the besieged enclave, leading to 70 per cent of the children we treat now being at risk of malnutrition. The crippling hunger gripping Gaza's children means the UK cannot afford to wait a moment longer. The shame is in the contrast: while the UK moved at lightning pace to welcome Ukrainian medical evacuees in 2022, Gaza's children have been met with bureaucratic fog and political equivocation. This disparity is now under legal scrutiny – the law, unlike politics, has a low tolerance for hypocrisy. If in Starmer's statehood plans, peace, even an unjust peace, can delay recognition, the legal challenge brought by the three children suggests the inverse might also be true: that properly filed paperwork can force principle to the surface. Questions abound as to the precise details of the proposed pathway and the question of recognition is likewise, up in the air. Officials say they'll assess 'progress' in September, which is Westminster-speak for: the red lines are written in pencil. One thing is certain, the ministerial press releases and soundbites that have long been failing Gaza's children are now failing the Prime Minister. Instagram humanitarianism will no longer suffice amidst the mounting legal challenges and hefty political premium on inaction. With Gaza's hospitals in ruins and its children starving on camera, the dam is cracking. The moral ambiguity that once cloaked our policy in the fine mist of 'complexity' is evaporating under the glare of mass civilian suffering. What we're left with is not just a humanitarian crisis, but a mirror: reflecting a British foreign policy that has, for years, outsourced its ethics to perceived strategic interests, PR management and the enduring fiction that some human lives are worth less than others. Dylan Stothard is the Policy and Advocacy Coordinator for Children Not Numbers Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store