Surgeon sues McLaren after he was left with brain injury after crash on £24,000 snowmobile safari trip
Andrew Cannestra's snowmobile crashed near Ivalo, northern Finland, on February 2 2020, during a four-night 'Pure McLaren Arctic Experience' arranged by McLaren Automotive Events.
The Florida native, 54, who specialises in spinal surgery, is alleging the company was in breach of contract and negligent after the crash left him with a trembling hand which he previously said would mean he will have to retire prematurely.
Barristers for surgeon told the first day of a trial in London that Mr Cannestra and his then-partner, Kaitlin Mealor, were given a safety briefing, but this did not include information on the layout of the track or the emergency stop button and tether cord on the snowmobile.
The motorsports group is defending the legal action, with its lawyers saying there was 'no evidence' that the briefing did not meet safety standards and that the 'irreducible risk' of the activity was 'reasonably controlled'.
Opening the trial on Wednesday, Neil Block KC, for Mr Cannestra, said his client and Ms Mealor were 'absolute novices' on snowmobiles, and that 'a duty was owed by McLaren to use reasonable care'.
He said that while Mr Cannestra's case was not 'that the track was inherently unsafe', he and Ms Mealor 'did need to receive a proper and adequate briefing, and proper and adequate guiding'.
In written submissions, Mr Block said: 'The briefing did not include any information about the layout of the track, the position of potentially hazardous bends, corners or other hazards.
'It seems to be McLaren's case that this was not required.
'It is common sense that this was required, and the failure to do so must be a breach of duty.'
Mr Block told the court that Mr Cannestra and Ms Mealor's 'couples package' cost almost £24,000 before flights, with activities including driving a McLaren car on ice, and optional events such as snowmobiling.
Mr Cannestra and Ms Mealor used a 'dedicated snowmobile track' about four kilometres long, and signed a driver declaration, a waiver and a self-liability form beforehand.
They were given a safety briefing by two guides - Arto Pitkanen and Jouni Satta - which Mr Block said lasted 'approximately five minutes', with the barrister adding: 'There is an issue about what it actually included.'
Mr Block said the Lynx Xtrim 900 snowmobiles had three modes - eco, standard and sport - with the tour beginning in eco mode, which had a top speed of 40kph.
A few hundred metres into the activity, Mr Block said the group stopped, and Mr Pitkanen approached Mr Cannestra and changed the mode, which increased its top speed and was 'not appropriate'.
Mr Pitkanen is alleged to have then set off at speeds of up to 60kph, causing Mr Cannestra to lose sight of him and speed up as he 'did not want to be on his own', Mr Block said.
Mr Cannestra then lost control of the snowmobile on a bend, with the vehicle veering off the track into deep snow and hitting a tree, leaving him with a 'very significant' brain injury and 'orthopaedic injuries'.
Matthew Chapman KC, for McLaren, said in his written submissions that the turn where Mr Cannestra crashed was 'quite safe if negotiated at an appropriate speed' and that the court 'can confidently conclude that reasonable care and skill was exercised' in organising the outing.
He continued that Mr Pitkanen changed the snowmobile's mode as Mr Cannestra was 'eager' for this to happen and that he 'explained the switch' to him.
He added that Mr Cannestra's speed was 'wholly within his control', and claims that Mr Pitkanen had driven too far in front 'cannot sensibly succeed'.
He said: 'In this case, there was a well-organised, risk-assessed activity which was delivered by well-trained and experienced guides who complied with the local standard.
'The irreducible risk was, in other words, reasonably controlled.'
While acknowledging that the content of the safety briefing was 'contentious', Mr Chapman said it included the hand signal to stop, how to use the throttle and brake, starting the engine and 'bodyweight shifting/leaning for turns'.
The trial before Mr Justice Ritchie, which is only dealing with the issue of liability, is expected to conclude this month, with a written judgment expected at a later date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Two of Barbie's leading designers are killed in horrific head-on road smash in Italy after 82-year-old drove the wrong way down motorway
Two of Barbie's leading designers were killed in a horrific head-on collision on an Italian motorway after an 82-year-old made a U-turn and travelled seven kilometres down the wrong lane. Artistic duo Mario Paglino, 52, and Gianni Grossi, 48, were travelling in an SUV on the Turin-Milan highway near Mesero when the elderly man driving a Peugeot 207 collided into them, with both vehicles travelling at approximately 130 km/h. Four people were killed in the incident including the 82-year-old driver, Egidio Ceriani, designers Paglino and Grossi, as well as a 38-year-old banker who the pair were travelling with, Amodio Giurni. Giurni's wife, Silvia Moramarco, 37, who was also a passenger in the SUV, was the sole survivor and was airlifted to Niguarda Hospital in Milan in critical condition. The elderly man realised he missed the toll booth on the Turin-Milan highway, so turned around and re-entered the motorway in the wrong lane, before colliding with the SUV at high speed, according to traffic police officers. Barbie's official Instagram account paid tribute to the visionary designers, who in 1999 founded the Magia2000 company that creates custom Barbie dolls inspired by art and pop culture and often collaborates with Mattel. 'The Barbie team is heartbroken by the loss of Mario Paglino and Gianni Grossi, two treasured creators and Mattel collaborators who brought joy and artistry to the world of Barbie as Magia 2000,' the tribute said. 'As passionate and talented designers and lifelong collectors, their spirit and love for the brand turned every creation they touched into a masterpiece. Beyond their remarkable talent, they shared an energy that lit up every space they entered.' Both residents of Novara, northwest Italy, Paglino and Grossi were the first ever non-American artist duo to ever design a souvenir Barbie doll manufactured by Mattel USA - the 2006 Barbie Film Noir doll - produced for the National Barbie Convention that same year. At the 2015 National Barbie Convention, one of their creations was sold for charity for €15,000 (£13,000). The pair design one-of-a-kind dolls inspired by famous paintings, from Van Gogh's Irises and Piet Mondrian's Composition with Red, Blue and Yellow to Frida Kahlo's The Two Fridas. In 2016, they were honoured with the prestigious Barbie Best Friend Award by American fashion designer Carol Spencer, for their dedication to the promotion of Barbie culture throughout the world. In 2011, Magia2000 founded the Italian Doll Convention, which the designers described as 'the largest fashion dolls event in Europe, promoting the passion for Barbie and all fashion dolls'. This year in June, to mark the brand's 25th anniversary, the duo unveiled the centerpiece for the National Barbie Doll Collectors Convention: the ICON Barbie, complete with a pink sequined dress, and 25 'special dolls' available only at the annual event for doll enthusiasts. Paglino and Grossi revealed the playful meaning behind their brand name in a interview with gtGdollwear, saying: 'It's quite simple, Magia means 'Magic' in Italian and we built it with our names. 'It's the anagram of the initials of our two names. MA-rio and GIA-nni, MA+GIA and the game is done, MAGIA.' Paying tribute to the dollmakers, the mournful post on Barbie's Instagram account continued: 'Whether leading the Italian Doll Convention in Milan or showcasing their talents and love for Barbie at doll shows all over the world, their presence brought warmth, laughter and a sense of belonging.' Following the horrific head-on car crash on Sunday at 11:08 am on the border between Lombardy and Piedmont, the Highway Police investigation lasted approximately six hours, with the motorway closed and long queues for members of the public heading to Milan and Malpensa Airport, reported La Repubblica. Firefighters, ambulances and an air rescue arrived at the scene to extract the bodies from the vehicles, but 37-year-old Moramarco was the sole survivor. The designers were travelling with friends and were reportedly on their way to the Lombardy capital or to the lakes for a day trip, the newspaper added.
Top Gear
8 hours ago
- Top Gear
Hot or not? Here's what designer Frank Stephenson thinks of the Yangwang U9
Opinion Yangwang's thrown the book of design at the U9, but does the McLaren P1 designer think it's been a successful throw? Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Frank Stephenson is a car designer with more hits than the Beatles, including the Escort RS Cossie, first BMW Mini, Maser MC12, numerous Ferraris and the McLaren P1. These days he runs his own consultancy – Frank Stephenson Design. Here he shares his views on Yangwang's U9 with Top Gear A new wave of Chinese car design is upon us. While traditional European and US marques play it safe, Yangwang has thrown the rulebook out of the window. The Chinese are not merely catching up, they're looking further ahead, charting a future in which they define the direction of aesthetics and performance. Advertisement - Page continues below The U9's design is unapologetically extrovert. Rather than conforming to European or US tastes, the U9 shows how the Chinese design language is evolving, without any heritage or baggage from the past holding them back. But the U9 is far from visually harmonious. The convergence of edginess and the abundance of design elements are something closer to a Fast & Furious fantasy than an attempt at timelessness. There is energy, but aesthetic overload has been the route taken to achieve it. As a result, while the U9 will turn heads, it will struggle to earn the kind of enduring respect reserved for the supercar greats. You might like Still, there's something thrilling about the audacity. Yangwang isn't playing it safe – whether you love or question the result, that in itself is a sign that the balance of power in automotive design is shifting. Headlamp treatment screams of aesthetic overload! Thoughtfully placed aero and cooling elements. Advertisement - Page continues below Clean and minimal greenhouse design. Split 'T' graphic for rear lights. Split 'T' graphic repeated for rear diffuser. Material break element seems unnecessarily complicated. Verdict: NOT Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
BBC News
9 hours ago
- BBC News
Does FIA need to rethink approach to wet race conditions? - F1 Q&A
Oscar Piastri led Lando Norris to a McLaren one-two at the Belgian Grand Prix, extending his drivers' championship lead by 16 points. Formula 1 heads to Hungary for round 14 next weekend before the summer break. BBC Sport F1 correspondent Andrew Benson answers your latest questions. In both races this weekend, it almost seemed to be a disadvantage to qualify on pole because of the slipstream on such a long straight. Is there anything that can be done on this specific track to ensure pole is actually an advantage? - TomIt's true that both the pole winners at the Belgian Grand Prix last weekend lost the lead on the run up to Les Combes on the first lap, and that lost the them the race - Oscar Piastri to Max Verstappen in the sprint, and Lando Norris to Piastri in the Grand though, they were two different sprint was a standing start in the dry. Piastri did all he could, but Verstappen followed him through Eau Rouge and slipstreamed past him up the knew before the race that this was a likely eventuality. That's partly because of the layout of the track, but also partly because Verstappen was running lower downforce than Piastri and so had an advantage on the straight was visible thereafter in the sprint, when Piastri, despite a quicker car and a significant advantage in the middle sector of the lap, could never get close enough to have a go at Grand Prix was different. It was wet, and it was a rolling start. That should have made it a lot easier for Norris to keep the there are questions about his restart, which were even raised by McLaren team principal Andrea Norris went early, and Piastri went with him, so Norris did not have the lead over the start line that would have been helpful in keeping his Norris made a mistake at La Source and that allowed Piastri to get even closer, which pretty much guaranteed Norris was a sitting duck. Piastri then guaranteed he'd pass by going as fast as he dared - faster than Norris dared - through Eau Rouge."Oscar deserved it," as Norris it's not a given that the pole-winning driver will lose the lead at Spa at Les Combes - Charles Leclerc managed to retain it last year, for example. It depends on the for the remark about pole, yes, it's meant to be an advantage conferred on a driver as a reward for qualifying fastest. But it's no more than that. It does not mean the driver who secures it has a divine right to lead at the end of the first lap. Of course they don' why should anything be done about this at Spa in particular? Doing so would mean changing a historic, charismatic and demanding layout. And no one wants to lose that. Safety should and will be always be paramount in F1, but do you feel the FIA needs to recalibrate how to manage wet race conditions? Do you think the FIA's overly-conservative approach is hampering F1 drivers truly demonstrating their all-weather driving abilities? - HarjThere was a feeling after the Belgian Grand Prix that the race director had erred on the side of caution a little too much in deciding when the race should be Verstappen said he felt the race could have been run on schedule at 3pm local time, and that there was no need to red-flag it if they had just let the cars run for a couple more laps to clear some water from the he had a vested interest because Red Bull had changed his car to have more downforce than the McLarens and Leclerc's Ferrari exactly because they were anticipating Lewis Hamilton said he felt that even after the delay they could have started all the drivers acknowledged that they had asked race officials not to start a wet race too early, after an incident at Silverstone where they after a safety-car restart, Racing Bulls' Isack Hadjar smashed into the back of Kimi Antonelli's Mercedes at Copse simply because he could not see it before he hit also have to factor in the dangers of Spa, and the incidents that killed Anthoine Hubert in 2019 and Dilano van t'Hoft in 2023 in junior category of them crashed and then bounced back on to the track, where they were hit at high speed by another car, suffering fatal Piastri put it after the race: "Maybe we could have done one less formation lap. But in the grand scheme of things, if that's one lap too early, is it worth it? No." Is Lewis Hamilton's drop in performance caused by trying too hard and overthinking everything in the whole organisation? Surely there's only so much one person can do? - EdLewis Hamilton's Belgian Grand Prix weekend was actually an anomaly in what had been an encouraging run of form in recent a difficult start to the season, his average qualifying deficit to team-mate Charles Leclerc has been just 0.05 seconds since the Miami Grand Prix in May, and he had out-qualified Leclerc in three of the previous four by Hamilton's own admission, his driving in both qualifying sessions in Spa was "unacceptable".There were, though, extenuating circumstances. There were new braking characteristics on his car in Spa which Leclerc had been running since Canada, and Hamilton had chosen not to until Belgium. And Ferrari introduced a new rear suspension aimed at allowing them to run the car changes to car behaviour caught Hamilton out when he braked hard for the Bus Stop chicane in sprint also had a new data engineer, someone he had previously worked with at Mercedes, last weekend."It's not easy to switch engineers within the middle of a season," Hamilton said. "It's someone that I've known for years. He was actually on my previous team with me. But not in that position. So we're getting used to each other. Having to learn super, super quick."The changes that we had really caught both of us out."And he simply made a misjudgement in just exceeding track limits at Raidillon in qualifying for the grand prix. There was nothing wrong with his pace - he was within a smidge of Leclerc on that lap before it was nothing bigger behind the events of last weekend than that. If Red Bull's new engine next year is clearly down on performance and not likely to be a front-runner that season, how long will Max Verstappen hang around? When will we be able to form an impression of what next year's engine might be able to give him? - GeoffThe first thing to say here is that there is simply no way for anyone to know whether Red Bull's 2026 engine is "clearly down on performance".What can be said is that the F1 grapevine suggests Mercedes have a small advantage over the other manufacturers on their internal combustion engine performance for 2026 so manufacturers are working in isolation, and they will reject any suggestion they might be behind, figures creep out in various even if that's true, next year is not just about internal combustion engine performance. There is the electrical part of the engine, which provides about 50% of the total power output, and the new sustainable fuels, which will also have a significant relative performance levels will only become apparent next are also questions about Red Bull's car design group, of course, after their slump in form in the past 18 months following Adrian Newey's for Verstappen's future, you can pretty much take it as read that he will be staying at Red Bull in 2026. My sources tell me he doesn't want to leave, for a whole raft of given the above explained uncertainty, the logical decision anyway is to stay. That way, Verstappen can see how the land lies in 2026, and if Red Bull are struggling it will be contractually easier to move in that case as well.
