logo
Woke barrister Jolyon will find JK Rowling a far tougher opponent than the fox he beat to death

Woke barrister Jolyon will find JK Rowling a far tougher opponent than the fox he beat to death

Yahoo28-05-2025

I could almost feel sorry for someone who has such a high opinion of themselves that they liken themselves to Gandhi but find they have feet of clay.
'I identify with the great protesters in history, people like Gandhi and Martin Luther King,' said Jolyon Maugham KC.
I say 'almost'. But not quite. Because now this man has strayed into the issue of women's toilets and trans interlopers. And inevitably, he has taken aim at JK Rowling.
Posting on the social media site Bluesky, Maugham declared that 'for JK Rowling 'sex-based rights' are not the right to be paid the same as men, to live without sexual violence or coercion, to share the burden of unpaid labour, to escape the motherhood penalty or have domestic abuse taken seriously. They are about the exclusion of trans women. Mind-blowing.'
In her response on X (formerly Twitter), Rowling countered by saying that 'the only people who consider it 'anti-feminist' to point out that a woman is a woman by virtue of her biology are those who think female-specific anatomy or bodily functions are inferior in some way, that bearing young is a lowly, worthless occupation, or that misogynist social stereotypes are a worthier measure of who's a real woman'.
If you don't live on X – and no one remotely sensible does – you may not know Jolyon Maugham. He is known chiefly for two things. He was a staunch Remainer who tried to stop Brexit by helping block Boris Johnson's prorogation of Parliament. And in Scotland and at the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg he tried, with other lawyers, to get Article 50 revoked so that we could not withdraw from the EU. This was soon overturned, and Maugham was miffed but still preening.
Yet there is something else he will be remembered for that is far more ignominious. On December 26 2019, he battered a fox to death. We know this because he tweeted about it. 'Already this morning I have killed a fox with a baseball bat. How's your Boxing Day going?' he posted. He then added that he was wearing his wife's too-small green kimono at the time. As you do. The RSPCA got involved.
Like everyone else, I wondered: 'Why on earth would you tweet that unless you needed constant attention or possibly a court case?' Maybe he thought it added to the gaiety of the nation.
Anyway, since Brexit is done, this KC, who made his fortune as a tax lawyer (which means exactly what you think it means: finding loopholes to help the very wealthy avoid tax through special schemes) and whose clients included Gary Barlow and Sir Alex Ferguson, has now become a fully fledged social justice warrior.
He set up the Good Law Project to crowdfund his various hobby horses and bring cases to court and, to put it politely, he's had mixed results. Obviously, plebs like you and I think that with court cases, winning or losing are straightforward outcomes by which to judge someone. But Jolyon is very special: 'Winning and losing is a silly metric,' he once said. 'We could win all our cases if we chose only to pursue easy ones. But that would be to sacrifice impact for vanity.' Righto.
He will also say things such as: 'We didn't lose. At a deeply technical level we lost. At every substantive level we won. It's not a good-faith assessment.' By 2022, of the 43 cases that the Good Law Project had funded with £4 million, it had won only eight.
And just as Stonewall moved into agitating for trans rights when its other objectives had been achieved, so Maugham has moved into activism on that same topic. Some of this may be driven through personal connections. But, increasingly, I would say it is driven by his absolute contempt for any woman who dares to disagree with him.
In 2023, he tried to stop the LGB Alliance, a group critical of trans activism, from becoming a charity, claiming it was funded by 'dark money'.
And what the hell is this recent fantasy? 'You are a predatory cis man and walk into the women's showers at the gym,' he mused last month on Bluesky. 'You are challenged and pretend to be a trans man. You are disbelieved because your penis is erect but you claim to be post-op and 'biologically female'. What then happens? And how does any of this protect women?'
What point does this make beyond an assertion of male privilege? He thinks about this stuff more than is healthy and the Supreme Court decision (that biological sex is a person's sex at birth) has, to use a technical term, made him even more insane in the membrane.
This thought noodle is so perplexing, I really don't think Maugham is doing trans people any favours at all either. In fact, I think he is taking their money under false pretences. The Good Law Project is challenging the Supreme Court outcome, but this cannot work.
In a now-deleted Bluesky post, he defamed Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, saying that nothing he said could be believed.
As the evidence on the harms of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones piles up, he has, in Rowling, picked on someone who has the cojones to put him in his place. He has the audacity to ask what she has done for women, trying to paint her as a transphobic bigot who cares little for women's equality. As a KC with a large number of staff, one might have thought someone would have informed him about all her decades of philanthropic work around women, children and domestic abuse survivors. Her private kindnesses and support are also legendary.
This man, though, calls her 'a billionaire cry-baby'. He won't care what I say. He blocked me a long time ago for being 'rude'. In other words, I challenged him. Still, I have had the dubious pleasure of once being at a dinner with him. We got an extra chair for his ego. He was droning on and I went out for a lot of 'smoking breaks'. (I don't smoke.)
He is now sailing close to the wind. The 'civil disobedience' that this social justice warrior is now proposing – urging trans women to ignore the Supreme Court ruling and use women's toilets – is an actual threat to women and their safety.
He equates single-sex spaces as being close to fascism. An intervention needs to be made. He needs to lie down in a darkened room for a bit. With an angry fox in it.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Biggest Mystery of Elon Musk
The Biggest Mystery of Elon Musk

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

The Biggest Mystery of Elon Musk

Must any pair of would-be great men of history always find a path to conflict? Ask Caesar and Pompey, Octavian and Antony, Lennon and McCartney. But the specific thing they fight about is less predictable. I would not have guessed, six months ago, that Elon Musk and Donald Trump's version of the Battle of Actium would be fought over the budget deficit. That's because six months ago I understood Musk's interest in politics, his long march away from Obama-era liberalism and his reinvention of himself as the prince of the very online right, as reflecting two key goals: his newfound desire to defeat cultural progressivism, rooted in the experience of his child's gender transition, and his long-term, career-shaping desire to get human explorers to Mars. These interests reinforced each other. Musk was already moving rightward on cultural issues when his purchase of Twitter, a particular Rubicon, led him to shed the leftward political alliances that once yielded Democratic patronage and support. This strengthened his financial incentives to go all in for Trump and the Republicans, because it was clear that a Kamala Harris administration would be unremittingly hostile to his technological projects. He had already been willing to make all kinds of wild business gambles for those projects, the dream of Mars-bound rockets above all, so placing a stark political bet was second nature. Given that reading of his intentions, I assumed that Musk's role in a second Trump administration would be some combination of first technologist, deregulator in chief and anti-woke crusader — a space and tech focus with a side of culture war. But that isn't what happened. We did get the third role to some extent in some of the ideological justifications for the DOGE campaign against U.S.A.I.D., but Musk wasn't really the point man for the White House's anti-woke battles. Nor did Musk assume a leading role in the administration's deregulatory efforts. That seemed to be part of the initial plan for DOGE, but it went into abeyance when Musk forced out Vivek Ramaswamy. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

The advice Elon Musk's lawyer gives his high-profile clients in times of crisis
The advice Elon Musk's lawyer gives his high-profile clients in times of crisis

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

The advice Elon Musk's lawyer gives his high-profile clients in times of crisis

High profile attorney Alex Spiro has one key piece of advice for clients wading through tricky times: Don't panic. The words of wisdom were shared as one of his most high-profile clients, Elon Musk, is in the midst of a public feud with President Donald Trump. It's unclear if or how the attorney is guiding him through this particular debacle. The lawyer, who has also represented Alec Baldwin, Mayor Eric Adams, and Jay-Z, through muddy legal waters, shared the advice he gives to clients during times of crisis at the Forbes Iconoclast Summit on Thursday. "You got to get people to take a breath and not panic," Spiro said, adding that it's easier for some people to do so more than others. A source close to Spiro got more specific. Those who know him know that his No. 1 piece of advice is to "have an ice-cream cone." In other words, step away from the keyboard and cool off. "Nothing is better than chocolate ice cream," the source close to Spiro said. The attorney isn't certain whether clients listen to the advice, but they at least pretend to, the source said. Spiro, who spends a good chunk of his time on risk mitigation, told the Iconoclast Summit attendees that he tries to get clients to put their situation into perspective and focus on the facts and evidence in front of them. "The sky is not falling," Sprio said. "The things that we think are a big deal today won't be a big deal in a month." While most CEOs aren't publicly blasting the president on social media, many are navigating global and economic uncertainty, from looming tariffs to market volatility. Spiro said the best CEOs and CFOs he knows know how to take a "methodical" approach to uncertainty, which in the case of tariffs, would involve looking into their supply chains and preparing for what may happen next. "I try to follow and steal the best ideas from the smartest people I know and then tell others about it," Spiro said. "That works out usually." Musk is one of those people. Spiro said on Thursday that Musk likes to cut costs during times of uncertainty because it leaves organizations more nimble on the other side. The billionaire is most recently known for doing so in the government, where he led efforts to slash about 20,000 federal employees, or about 1% of its workforce. Musk also laid off 10% of Tesla's workforce in waves last year and cut Twitter's workforce in half after he purchased it in 2022.

Donald Trump Reacts to 'Epstein Files' Claim by Elon Musk
Donald Trump Reacts to 'Epstein Files' Claim by Elon Musk

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Reacts to 'Epstein Files' Claim by Elon Musk

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Donald Trump has reacted after Tesla CEO Elon Musk claimed the president's name appears in the files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier and convicted sex offender. Musk wrote in a post Thursday on X, formerly Twitter: "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" He added: "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." Why It Matters There has been a high-profile fallout between Trump and Musk, who have engaged in a bitter public dispute. The feud began when Musk expressed criticism of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, labeling it "outrageous" and "pork-filled." Trump later said he was "disappointed" in Musk's negativity toward the budget reconciliation bill, which now sits with the Senate. Since then, the feud has escalated, with Musk claiming Trump is named in the Epstein files. Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary, has called the CEO's claim "an unfortunate episode." From left: Donald Trump attends a meeting at the White House in Washington, D.C., June 5, 2025; and Elon Musk looks on in the Oval Office there, May 30, 2025. From left: Donald Trump attends a meeting at the White House in Washington, D.C., June 5, 2025; and Elon Musk looks on in the Oval Office there, May 30, 2025. AP What To Know On Friday, Trump shared a post on Truth Social written by Epstein's former lawyer David Schoen on X, which claimed that his client "had no information to hurt President Trump." "I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died. He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!" Schoen wrote. He briefly represented Epstein shortly before the financier's death in 2019. Thousands of pages of records that named people with ties to Epstein, who died while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges in 2019, have been released over the years. But there is no evidence to suggest Trump is mentioned in any unreleased files related to Epstein. And while the president is mentioned in some of the previously released court documents on Epstein, he has not been accused of wrongdoing. Meanwhile, Musk's claim taps into suspicions among conspiracy theorists and online sleuths that incriminating and sensitive files that the government possesses about Epstein's case have yet to be released. Trump has promised to release more government files related to Epstein, a move that gained attention after Attorney General Pam Bondi teased new disclosures earlier this year—though most released materials were already public. Trump and Epstein were previously acquaintances, with the Republican once calling the financier a "terrific guy." However, Trump later said the pair had a falling out about 15 years before Epstein's 2019 arrest. The president's name appears in flight logs for the disgraced man's private jet, mostly documenting trips in the 1990s between Palm Beach and New York. Epstein's former pilot testified that Trump and other public figures flew on the plane, but said he never witnessed any sexual misconduct on board. Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein or his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of sex trafficking. One Epstein accuser, Johanna Sjoberg, mentioned being with Epstein at Trump's Atlantic City casino in 2016 testimony, but did not say she met Trump or allege misconduct. A Trump spokesperson told Newsweek in January 2024 that claims about Trump's connection to Epstein had been "thoroughly debunked" by the release of related documents. What People Are Saying White House press secretary Karolina Leavitt told Newsweek on Thursday: "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." President Donald Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Thursday: "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" The Democrats account on X wrote in a post alongside a picture of Trump with Epstein: "What is Trump hiding? Release the Epstein files." What Happens Next The Trump administration is expected to face growing pressure over the delayed release of additional files related to Epstein. After releasing an initial batch of documents in February, the administration pledged that more would follow. Bondi addressed concerns about the delay, saying the FBI is still reviewing a substantial volume of evidence. Democratic Representatives Stephen Lynch and Robert Garcia have demanded answers. In a letter first reported by Axios, they urged Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel to "immediately clarify" whether recent claims made by Elon Musk about the case are accurate. Lynch and Garcia are also seeking a detailed timeline for the Justice Department's declassification and public release of all remaining Epstein documents. The lawmakers asked for an explanation of why no new records have been released since February, what role Trump is playing in the review process, and a list of personnel involved. They also requested clarification on why previously released documents contained "significant redactions."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store