
Putin-Trump Ukraine summit: What's on the cards? – DW – 08/12/2025
Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump have agreed to meet in Alaska on August 15 to discuss the war in Ukraine. The meeting was announced shortly before Trump's ceasefire ultimatum was set to expire. Although experts doubt the summit will deliver any major breakthroughs, some factors could force Putin to agree to a ceasefire.
The upcoming meeting is the first time both leaders are coming together since US President Trump's reelection. In mid-July, Trump said he was disappointed with Putin over Russia's bombing of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, but also said that he was "not done with him yet."
The White House and Kremlin announced the meeting after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff visited Putin in the Kremlin on August 6, though it is unclear what exactly will be discussed in Alaska. We do know that the talks will focus on Ukraine, but the country itself will not be represented at the meeting. Washington and Moscow are not planning for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attend the summit.
All experts DW interviewed about the upcoming summit expect it will primarily benefit the Russian president.
"Putin has always been keen to ensure that he and the US president — whoever holds that office — decide the fate of the world, and that corresponding images are broadcast around the world," Russia's former prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov told DW.
Russian exiled opposition politician Dmitry Gudkov told DW the Alaska meeting would provide a unique opportunity for Putin to shake hands with one of the leaders of the West.
"The mere fact that Putin has the chance to meet Trump is already a huge plus" for the Russian president, Gudkov said. "Trump is basically legitimizing a war criminal and allowing Putin to participate in negotiations with the West."
If it weren't for Trump, Gudkov said, no Western leader would be negotiating with Putin.
It became clear in late July that Trump was annoyed by Putin's unwillingness to end the fighting in Ukraine. Trump declared that he was no longer interested in talks with Putin and gave him an ultimatum of 50 days to find a peaceful solution to the Ukraine war, which he later shortened to just ten days. Experts told DW they believe that the realization that Trump is losing patience may have prompted the Kremlin to agree to the upcoming talks.
Kirill Rogov, a political analyst who heads the Russian-language online media outlet which publishes analyses by Russian scientists, says a number of factors may compel Putin to seek an end to the Ukraine war. Rogov points to the weakened Russian economy, the sluggish advance of Russian forces in Ukraine and secondary US sanctions that could harm Russia.
"Putin also hopes to extract the highest possible price for his approval at this moment. By the end of the year, Putin could be in an even worse position if it turns out that the Russian offensive has had little effect and the battlefield situation remains unchanged," Rogov said.
Further US sanctions could also cause Russia to lose India as a buyer of its crude oil, and force it to prepare for yet another offensive in Ukraine for the third year in a row.
Last week US news outlet published a report citing anonymous sources indicating that the Kremlin had realized that Steve Witkoff's Russia visit represented the last opportunity to reach an agreement with Trump. said the Kremlin may now offer an airspace ceasefire by way of a concession.
Gudkov, however, believes this approach, coordinated with the Trump administration, would primarily benefit Moscow rather than Kyiv. Gudkov said Ukraine has carried out "effective" counterattacks against Russia, which resulted in the temporary closure of Russian airports on numerous occasions. He said Ukraine had also struck weapons depots, military equipment and oil refineries in Russia.
This, he added, was important from a psychological point of view, making Russians understand the war is raging close to home, not far away, solely playing out on their televisions.
"If these [Ukrainian] air strikes stop, Putin will calmly continue his advance on land, where he has the advantage," Gudkov told DW.
Yet Russian President Putin may not face any serious consequences, even if both leaders fail to make any significant progress during the upcoming Alaska talks, says political analyst Rogov.
"Putin can count on Trump to be lenient with him because Trump's attitude toward Putin has always been special," Rogov told DW. "Trump always avoids situations where direct pressure is exerted on Putin. And every time pressure seems inevitable, Trump declares that a new opportunity to reach an agreement has risen and therefore no real pressure is needed." He cites talks between Putin and Trump against the backdrop of the expired ceasefire ultimatum as one such example.
Gudkov believes that there are no real means left to put pressure on Russia. For example, despite sanctions, hundreds of tankers continue to transport Russian oil across the world's oceans.
Gudkov thinks a quick ceasefire is more likely to result from domestic factors that could put pressure on the Kremlin rather than external factors. The longer the war lasts, Gudkov says, the harder it will be for Putin to sell it as a Russian victory.
"At some point, Russians won't care whether Ukraine is in NATO or how this war ends — they will only care about it ending," Gudkov said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
16 minutes ago
- DW
Ukraine updates: Zelenskyy, Starmer meet in London – DW – 08/14/2025
The two leaders are following up on a virtual meeting hosted by Germany, which they attended with President Trump. He warned of 'very severe' consequences if Putin does not end the war. Follow DW for the latest updates. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is in London to meet British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, as European leaders prepare a unified stance on Ukraine ahead of US President Donald Trump's Friday summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump has warned his Russian counterpart of "very severe consequences" if the latter fails to agree to stop the war in Ukraine after their Friday summit in Alaska. Meanwhile, Russian forces said they intercepted and destroyed 44 Ukrainian drones summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will be held at a US military base in the Alaskan city of Anchorage. The venue has symbolism for both countries, with a shared history and strategic proximity. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US President Donald Trump is set to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is in London on Thursday to meet British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, as European leaders work to present a unified stance on Ukraine ahead of the summit. Starmer greeted Zelenskyy with a hug and handshake on the steps of 10 Downing Street. Zelenskyy arrived in the British capital from Germany, where he took part in a Berlin-hosted virtual meeting Wednesday with European and NATO leaders and Trump Trump said his talks with Putin would aim to "set the table" for a timely follow-up that would include Zelenskyy. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Trump said. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskyy and myself, if they'd like to have me there." Starmer on Wednesday called the summit "hugely important." He said there was finally a chance for a solution to the conflict "because of the work that the president [Trump] has put in." The British prime minister added that he was prepared to support further sanctions on Russia if the Kremlin fails to engage. US President Donald Trump has warned his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, of "very severe consequences" if he fails to agree to end the war in Ukraine following their summit Friday in Alaska. Trump stopped short of specifying what those consequences might be. His remarks came after a virtual meeting hosted by Germany that included leaders from Ukraine, the United Kingdom and France. During the meeting, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Putin was "bluffing" about seeking peace. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is in London this morning, meeting British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. European leaders are working to present a united front in support of Kyiv ahead of Friday's much-anticipated summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. We expect to get more details of that meeting today. Zelenskyy, for his part, has accused Putin of 'bluffing.' Stay with this blog for the latest on summit preparations and updates from the battlefield in Ukraine.


DW
16 minutes ago
- DW
Germany updates: Border checks cost over €80 million – DW – 08/14/2025
Germany's heightened border checks to curb irregular migration come with a price tag. Meanwhile, it's another day of sweltering temperatures as a European heatwave continues. DW has the latest. The German government has implemented heightened border checks since September of last year to fight irregular migration and crime. Now, German newspapers are reporting that the border checks have cost €80.5 million since they were introduced last year. Meanwhile, it's another hot day in Germany with temperatures expected to be as much as 37 degrees Celsius (98.6 degrees Fahrenheit) in the southwestern parts of the country. Tuesday and Wednesday of this week also experienced scorching temperatures, as a European heatwave continues. Germany faces another day of high temperatures on Thursday, after earlier facing scorching heat on Tuesday and Wednesday. In parts of southwestern Germany, temperatures as high as 37 degrees Celsius (98.6 degrees Fahrenheit) are expected, according to the German Weather Service (DWD). In the major western city of Cologne, high temperatures of 33 degrees C are expected. Parts of northern Germany will see less brutal temperatures, with Hamburg witnessing a high of 26 degrees C. Temperatures are also peaking in other parts of Europe. On the island of Cyprus, temperatures are expected to be as high as 45 degrees C. Germany's heightened border checks with its neighboring countries have cost the government at least €80.5 million ($93.4 million) so far, the German Funke Media Group of newspapers reported on Thursday based on German Interior Ministry data. The border checks began on September 16, 2024 under previous center-left Chancellor Olaf Scholz's government. These checks have continued under his successor, Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who took office on May 6. According to the Funke Media Group reports, the most expensive part of the border checks is the compensation for police officers who are performing the inspections. The cost of overtime work for the officers from September 2024 to June 2025 was €37.9 million. On a quarterly basis, the border checks cost between €24 to €29.1 million. The German Interior Ministry said from April to June of this year, €2.6 million was spent on "working at inconvenient times." The officers at the checkpoints are working 24/7, which means they have to be paid for more costly night and Sunday shifts. Around €8 million was spent on hotels and catering for officers employed in the border checks from April to June. The operation of the border stations cost a little under €2 million during that same time frame. Border checks within Europe's free movement Schengen Area are only expected to be temporary. Germany has implemented the checks to combat irregular migration and crime, with Merz's government seeking to use the checks to turn back migrants at the German borders. As many as 14,000 German federal officers are employed at the border checkpoints across the country. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany borders several major European economies, such as France, Poland and the Netherlands. The border checks have made life more complicated for daily commuters who go back and forth between Germany and other European countries for work or to study. German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, a member of the conservative Bavaria-based Christian Social Union (CSU) party, wants to extend the border checks beyond September. Members of the opposition socialist Left Party and environmentalist Green Party have criticized Germany's European border checks as "illegal" and have called for them to end. from the Bonn online news team and welcome to our daily blog covering current affairs in Germany. Today we are taking a look at how much it costs the German government to carry out border checks with its neighboring countries, such as Poland, Austria and France. The move, which was implemented last September, has caused headaches for commuters and sparked criticism from the political opposition. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video We are also observing another day of hot temperatures in Germany and Europe. Stay tuned for not only the latest news pertaining to Germany, but also analysis, on-the-ground insight from DW correspondents and multimedia content on Europe's biggest economy.


DW
an hour ago
- DW
Bayern Munich and Rwanda: A strategic climbdown? – DW – 08/14/2025
At first glance, Bayern Munich's decision to end its commercial deal with Rwanda appears a rare moment of football morality. But dig a little deeper and the club's motivations seem not so straightforward. For a significant section of their fans and many human rights activists, Bayern Munich had a moral obligation to end its commercial dealings with Rwanda. Last Friday, the German champions did just that. But, rather than mentioning misgivings about human rights or the ongoing bloody war in DR Congo (DRC), Bayern spoke of a "strategic evolution." It was a move forced by fans and media, according to sports sponsorship expert Phil Lipperson. "I believe that the external pressure led to the changes in the deal because in Germany, I think that the clubs are pretty exposed to criticism from the fan base. Fan bases in Germany are quite traditional and not open to commercial deals," he told DW. Though it will no longer display the branding of the government tourist board "Vist Rwanda" Bayern will still maintain a relationship with the country, which is widely accepted to be funding M23, a rebel group who have captured territory, often in brutal fashion, in eastern DRC. This will be through what Bayern describe as a "dedicated partnership focusing on football development in Rwanda through the expansion of the FC Bayern Youth Academy in Kigali." Lipperson, who works for German agency, DO IT!, which handles a number of sporting brands including Bundesliga 2 side Schalke, argues that this, more than the €5 million ($5.85) a year that Visit Rwanda reportedly paid Bayern, was key in understanding why big European clubs hitch their reputation to nation states with questionable reputations. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "I think it's the strategic expansion to emerge in different markets outside of Europe. In recent years we've seen it in Asia — India, Japan, China — and also North and South America but Africa is still really a market not realized commercially for the big European clubs," he said. For Mohamed Keita, senior policy director for Africa at the Human Rights Foundation, Bayern's motives are clear. "I don't believe that human rights or anything like that are the major driver behind this. If the club was, in fact, concerned about human rights, it would not be canceling part of the deal with Rwanda, while signing a new deal with the Emirates Airlines two days earlier," Keita told DW. Keita and Lipperson shared some level of surprise that Germany's most successful, and richest, club would sign a deal with another country with a poor human rights record, given the negative PR associated with Rwanda and a previous deal with Qatar Airlines, which ended in 2023. Keita also pointed out the internal politics have looked bad for Bayern, given that the father of coach Vincent Kompany was born in Congo and went on to become the the first Congolese mayor in Belgium and a member of the Belgian parliament. In a speech earlier this year, Pierre Kompany made his position clear, saying his sympathies lay with children in Congo, whose parents and siblings were dead, lost or "buried in holes," with "severed heads." This is the day "we erase beliefs like ," he continued with tears in his eyes as the parliament passed a motion condemning Rwanda's actions in the conflict, which is currently in an uneasy, US-brokered, ceasefire. "It's a completely crazy situation. It's like having a having a club promote Visit Russia with a coach that is half Ukrainian. This is the kind of situation that the club put their manager in," Keita said. While Bayern have a considerable and well-earned financial advantage over the rest of the Bundesliga's clubs, German football ownership laws — which stipulate that club members must maintain overall voting control — and the active fan scene, which is generally anti-commercialization and globalization, mean Bayern may have some concerns about keeping up with English clubs and their enormous TV deals or state-owned clubs like European champions Paris Saint-Germain, who are owned by Qatar. But Bayern are not alone in such deals. Earlier this week, Barcelona announced a partnership with DR Congo while Arsenal, Atletico Madrid, PSG still have commercial deals with Rwanda. None of the last three clubs responded to questions from DW about whether Bayern's decision made them reconsider their own positions. Given that recent World Cups have been hosted by Russia and Qatar and that the game's governors, FIFA, are cosying up to US President Donald Trump ahead of the 2026 tournament and Saudi Arabia ahead of 2034, perhaps none of this should come as a surprise. Bayern's softening of the Rwanda deal is a welcome move for many, but it's difficult to escape the impression that this came as a result of outside pressure and PR, rather than any question of morality.