Australians are voting earlier than in previous elections. Some parties have taken advantage
Applications for postal voting in the 2025 federal election close at 6pm on Wednesday.
So far, a record 2.6 million people have applied for a ballot paper via the post.
But far more have attended early voting centres across the country.
The figures point to change in voting patterns with Australians choosing to vote early in record numbers this election.
With just days to go, let's break down the numbers.
How many people have voted so far?
Pre-poll numbers show that more than 4.03 million people have already voted — a considerable jump since the 2022 election.
That's more than 22 per cent of enrolment.
At the same point in the 2022 campaign, 3.2 million voters had cast their ballots early, according to Australian Electoral Commission data.
The latest figures represent a 125 per cent increase on the previous campaign.
But why are more people voting early?
Political experts say it's not just about avoiding the long queues on May 3 but could be an emerging trend.
Professor of Australian Politics at the University of Sydney, Rodney Smith, said more people could be voting earlier to fit in with their work schedules and lifestyle.
"The greater availability of early voting centres, more knowledge among voters that they can vote early, and that it is often more convenient to do so," he said.
"[Early voting] is certainly about convenience but that is not necessarily a bad thing.
He said if early voting wasn't allowed, pre-poll voting would be "much more cumbersome".
But early voting is not new, and doesn't seem to be going anywhere, according to La Trobe University's Phoebe Hayman, whose research focuses on political participation.
"It's really escalated at this election, but it has been a trend that we've been seeing pop up in a number of elections now," she said.
Has early voting changed election campaigns?
Ms Hayman said political parties had changed their campaign trails to target early voters.
"[The early voting trend] is one that parties have been taking into account and adapting to," she said.
Ms Hayman said many parties had now moved to the "permanent campaign" model to target more voters.
"Parties now just need to start campaigning a lot earlier, and to release major policies and their big selling items pretty early on in the piece,"
she said.
Photo shows
Five people on a beach are shown from behind running into the water as the sun rises.
A coal industry-funded group campaigning against progressive candidates in the federal election has deleted two months of social media posts after being pulled up by the Australian Electoral Commission over unauthorised content.
But Professor Smith said while the major parties launched their campaigns earlier this time around, other parties have not yet caught on.
"[Other parties] needed to get their early voting centre teams organised for a 10 to 12-day period to target early voters," he said.
"Rather than just mobilising their forces on polling day …[parties] need to get more of their policies out earlier."
Ms Hayman said smaller parties, like the Greens, had focused on community-based campaigning this time around.
"We're also seeing with the independents and in campaigns … with The Greens, that ongoing shift to community-based campaigning and on-the-ground efforts, which start months, if not years, in advance of the election," Ms Hayman said.
Postal voting hits record
While many get in early, others have opted to vote via post for many reasons.
A record 2.6 million people have applied for a postal vote for the 2025 federal election so far, according to the AEC.
But that does not necessarily mean all those who have applied will vote via post — people may change their mind and vote on the day or during pre-poll.
More than 100,000 votes have also been cast with mobile voting teams, largely in regional areas.
Electoral Commissioner Jeff Pope said it was extraordinarily difficult to service some people who applied for postal voting at the last minute, depending on their circumstances.
"If you can vote in-person, that's what you should do,"
Mr Pope said.
Stay updated:
Catch the latest interviews and in-depth coverage on
"Postal vote applications have been open for a month now and we've been consistent in encouraging people to apply as early as possible if they need a postal vote.
"Clearly most people have listened to our messages, and we thank them for that.
"While we appreciate that for some people in-person voting isn't an option for their circumstances, Australia does have some of the best in-person voting options in the world with thousands of venues available," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Karl Stefanovic calls for investigation after Channel Nine reporter Lauren Tomasi hit with rubber bullet covering LA protests
Television host Karl Stefanovic has called for a "proper investigation" after a fellow Channel Nine journalist was shot while covering the Los Angeles immigration protests. The network's United States correspondent, Lauren Tomasi, was filming a cross during chaotic scenes in the downtown area between hundreds of police and demonstrators. The reporter, who had her back towards a line of officers, had just finished her sentence when one of the police turned in her direction and fired a rubber bullet. A projectile struck the calf of Tomasi who could be heard wincing in pain. It is not known what had happened in front of the Channel Nine journalist that led to the officer firing the rubber bullet or whether she was the intended target. Stefanovic on Tuesday told Today show viewers it may be one of three reasons. "A moment where an LA officer so thought his life was in danger he needed to discharge his weapon, an incompetent warning shot, or the act of a coward," he said. The Today host said whatever the reason, it had to be "properly investigated" given it was clear Tomasi was a reporter as she was holding a microphone in front of a camera. "Lauren is a hard-working, tenacious reporter who is always determined to be fair and balanced. She's also the best of us. You will not meet a kinder person," he said. "I get that it's dangerous to cops, too. What's happened to them in the line of duty and the position they are in is horrendous. But how is it okay for your police force to be firing at unarmed Australian journalists? If Albo (Prime Minister Anthony Albanese) is looking for a place to start with Donald Trump - as an Australian, I might start there." Appearing on a panel to talk about the day's headlines, Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth said her thoughts were with Tomasi. "I'm not aware of what will and will not be in conversations," she said, after being asked by Stefanovic about whether Mr Albanese will raise it with President Trump, as the world's leaders prepare to meet in Canada for a two-day G7 summit this weekend. "I understand she's okay and she wasn't seriously injured, but Australia absolutely believes in the freedom of journalists to do their job and to do their job safely, and that journalists should be protected. And so this is obviously a very difficult circumstance... but it's a principle of press freedom that we hold dear as Australians." Tasmanian Greens Senator Nick McKim described the footage as "shocking" which "looked deliberately done", as he also urged for an investigation into the incident. "This does need to be raised at the highest levels," he said. "The fact that you've got someone in uniform who appears to take a deliberate pot shot at a journalist, that is completely unacceptable and it needs to be raised at the highest levels, whether that's the PM or the President or the Foreign Affairs Minister level. "The United States needs to understand that that is just not okay." Tomasi posted to X several hours after the incident on Monday (local time). "Hey there. Thanks for all your messages - I'm a bit sore, but I'm okay," she wrote. "Important we keep on telling the stories that need to be told." The US military has also confirmed it will deploy 700 Marines to Los Angeles ahead of a fourth consecutive day of protests, which had turned violent. Streets in LA descended into chaos on Friday (local time) after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers made dozens of arrests across the city over allegations of immigration violations as part of the administration's crackdown. Protesters clashed with police and agents as they attempted to carry out arrests, leading to law enforcement to use flash bangs and pepper spray to quell the crowd. About 300 Californian National Guards of the 2,000 deployed by President Trump have arrived to the city. Marines are due to arrive in the next 24 hours. Protests on Monday (local time) have reduced in size and are peaceful.


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Sydney preacher taken to court over alleged anti-Semitic speech
A Muslim preacher is being sued by Australia's peak Jewish body over alleged anti-Semitic speeches in which he allegedly described Jewish people as 'vile' and 'treacherous'. Wissam Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, is being taken to the Federal Court by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) over a series of lectures he gave in November 2023. A three-day hearing in Sydney's Federal Court is set to begin on Tuesday. Recordings of the speeches made at the Bankstown centre, which allegedly included derogatory generalisations about Jewish people, such as descriptions of them as 'vile' and 'treacherous' people, were uploaded online. The proceedings have been brought by ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim AM and deputy president Robert Goot AO SC, who claim Mr Haddad breached the Racial Discrimination Act 1975. Mr Wertheim said they previously attempted 'in good faith' to resolve the matter through the Australian Human Rights Commission, but a conciliated resolution could not be achieved. 'Accordingly, we have commenced proceedings in the Federal Court,' he said. 'Australia has long enjoyed a reputation as a multicultural success story where people of many different faiths and ethnic backgrounds have for the most part lived in harmony and mutual respect.' Mr Wertheim added that all Australians were 'free to observe our faith and traditions within the bounds of Australian law'. 'Maintaining and strengthening social cohesion is the role of governments and government agencies, but lately they have failed us,' he said. 'It should not fall on our community, or any other community, to take private legal action. However, in the circumstances we feel we have no alternative.'


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Preacher trial over alleged hate speech
A Muslim preacher is being sued by Australia's peak Jewish body over alleged anti-Semitic speeches in which he allegedly described Jewish people as 'vile' and 'treacherous'. Wissam Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, is being taken to the Federal Court by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) over a series of lectures he gave in November 2023. A three-day hearing in Sydney's Federal Court is set to begin on Tuesday. Wissam Haddad is being sued over a series of alleged anti-Semitic speeches delivered at a Bankstown religious centre. NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Recordings of the speeches made at the Bankstown centre, which allegedly included derogatory generalisations about Jewish people, such as descriptions of them as 'vile' and 'treacherous' people, were uploaded online. The proceedings have been brought by ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim AM and deputy president Robert Goot AO SC, who claim Mr Haddad breached the Racial Discrimination Act 1975. Mr Wertheim said they previously attempted 'in good faith' to resolve the matter through the Australian Human Rights Commission, but a conciliated resolution could not be achieved. 'Accordingly, we have commenced proceedings in the Federal Court,' he said. He is being taken to the Federal Court by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. Supplied Credit: Supplied 'Australia has long enjoyed a reputation as a multicultural success story where people of many different faiths and ethnic backgrounds have for the most part lived in harmony and mutual respect.' Mr Wertheim added that all Australians were 'free to observe our faith and traditions within the bounds of Australian law'. 'Maintaining and strengthening social cohesion is the role of governments and government agencies, but lately they have failed us,' he said. 'It should not fall on our community, or any other community, to take private legal action. However, in the circumstances we feel we have no alternative.'