logo
Reform is a broken, infighting mess: it's time for the Tories to take charge

Reform is a broken, infighting mess: it's time for the Tories to take charge

Telegraph12-03-2025

Reform UK has been riding high in the polls for months, capitalising on voter frustration and positioning itself as the insurgent force on the Right. But with four years to go until the next election, the party already seems determined to self-sabotage, within a week going from talking about being the 'real opposition' to looking like a pop-up Christmas market – appearing overnight, making lots of noise and then vanishing without trace.
The movement has tapped into real anger – at immigration, net zero, and 'conservative-in-name-only' Tories. The party talks a big game about breaking the system, but Farage has always been a gambler. From UKIP to the Brexit Party, his career has been defined by big bets that pay off spectacularly – until they don't. His ability to command headlines is unmatched, but headlines don't build lasting political parties. His previous vehicles for revolution have all either collapsed or been quietly mothballed, their usefulness to the cause spent. That the latest split occurred while the party only has a handful of MPs hardly bodes well for the future.
The Tories, too, are big gamblers, but operate on a longer timescale. The past few years they've lost heavily – the election was humiliating, and Kemi Badenoch's brief honeymoon as leader is already long past– but the party has a history of bouncing back from electoral catastrophe. They always bet on their ability to outlast their opponents, and this process is again underway.
It is also very telling that Jenrick – a perfect fit for Reform – remains a staunch Tory. He has been perhaps the most enthusiastic adopter of Reform talking points – railing against the European Court of Human Rights and demanding a harder stance on immigration. Yet he remains firmly within the Conservative fold. Why? Because Jenrick, like many others, knows that Reform is a protest movement, rather than a real successor party.
Farage's gamble was that a fractured, frustrated Right would flock to his banner in numbers large enough to make Reform a permanent force. But despite the noise, the numbers don't quite stack up. As long as Reform's primary appeal remains that they are not the Tories, they'll struggle to build a lasting electoral coalition.
This is why the fight between Reform and the Tories is existential, and why, despite the crowing of the new boys, the odds remain in favour of the world's most successful political party. If someone like Robert Jenrick were to take over the Conservative leadership, the party would start to eat Farage's lunch.
In his later years, Farage's need to be loved is also a hindrance. Jenrick is pushing for policies that go beyond soundbites. He resigned from Rishi Sunak's government over what he saw as weak immigration policy, while Farage, perhaps stung from years of being called every name under the sun by Europhiles accusing his movements of racism, has softened his stance precisely as the wider electorate was coming round to his original position. Jenrick has openly called for deportations, and frequently signals his willingness to go further than Reform on border control and national security. People want that more than they want Farage to be Prime Minister, no matter how much they hate the Tories.
Reform's fate on current trajectory will likely mirror that of its predecessors. Just as UKIP was consumed by infighting after Brexit, and just as the Brexit Party vanished after achieving its singular goal, Reform will find itself struggling once its moment of protest has passed. The next general election will not be fought with Farage as the main challenger to Labour. He may enjoy the thrill of the flutter, but the house always wins in the end.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Welsh county's youngest ever councillor with a past that doesn't define him
Welsh county's youngest ever councillor with a past that doesn't define him

Wales Online

timean hour ago

  • Wales Online

Welsh county's youngest ever councillor with a past that doesn't define him

Welsh county's youngest ever councillor with a past that doesn't define him The Reform UK member was voted in at a by-election earlier this year Councillor Owain Clatworthy of Bridgend (Image: Lewis Smith ) A shock council by-election result has made a small piece of history in one part of south Wales with the area's youngest ever member being elected. Reform UK councillor Owain Clatworthy, aged just 20, was voted in as councillor for Bridgend County Borough in May of 2025, for the Pyle, Kenfig Hill and Cefn Cribwr ward, following the resignation of former Labour councillor Mike Kearn. ‌ He clinched the win with a narrow margin of only 30 votes on the night, edging out the second placed Labour candidate Gary Chappell. ‌ His election came just weeks before the leader of Reform UK, Nigel Farage, visited the nearby town of Port Talbot to kick-start the party's Senedd election campaign, claiming they expected to not only win seats, but to also win enough to govern Wales. The latest council vote now makes Owain the youngest ever member in the borough of Bridgend since it was formed in April 1996, where he says he is eager to represent residents of his local ward to the best of his ability. He also says that living in care for more than 10 years of his life proved that your past doesn't define your future. Article continues below Speaking with the Local Democracy Reporting Service in a recent interview, Cllr Clatworthy said: "I was born and raised in Kenfig Hill during my early childhood up until the age of six when I was moved in to social services, living all over in different foster placements as well as at a children's home in Porthcawl. "Just three years ago I was on Universal Credit living in a young persons' supported accommodation, trying to figure out where to get a food bank voucher from so I'm incredibly humbled and proud to be where I am now. "A lot of young people who go through the care system end up in cycles of being out of work or with drug and alcohol problems, so I really want to champion these issues and show what can be done. ‌ "Of course it's taken time, but I was able to find a job as a support worker, which is something I'm very passionate about, along with some volunteering work at the Porthcawl food-bank and that has led me to this point. "I was living a peaceful life about three months ago but then I was looking at the news and thinking I couldn't just stand back any more, and I could either moan and complain about things or go out and get involved. "I came in to politics because I want to make a change and serve members of the public in a way that makes a difference - not just to talk about it, but to actually take action. ‌ "I'm not a career politician with scripted answers, I'm just me and I think that's what people want. I'm sure some will stereotype me because I'm young but I've got life experience and I think we need more young people involved in politics to have a mix of new ideas with experience." Bridgend County Borough Council Civic Offices (Image: Bridgend County Borough Council ) Councillor Clatworthy has also been joined by other Reform Councillors across Wales in the months since his election, with a by-election win in Llanelli as well as in Merthyr where two independent councillors defected to the party. ‌ When it comes to Bridgend, Owain added that he is also optimistic the party could take more seats in the authority at the 2027 local council elections. He said: "As I'm on my own at the moment people know that I can't promise the world to do this or that, but I can be a voice for those who have felt ignored over the years and hold the council to account. "Local issues I heard on the doors focused on council tax increases as people feel they are paying more out but getting less in return, but mainly they want to know where their money is going. Article continues below "I'll be working on that from now until 2027 when the auditors will be shipped in to look at where the waste is and how we can better manage our money. Momentum is definitely on our side and I really believe we will win this council in 2027." For the latest Bridgend news sign up to our newsletter here.

Will Reform's Britannia Card tax plan win back the super-rich?
Will Reform's Britannia Card tax plan win back the super-rich?

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Will Reform's Britannia Card tax plan win back the super-rich?

In its latest stab at policymaking, Reform UK has come up with the 'Britannia Card'. It sounds like a kitsch gimmick from a building society, but it is actually the party's attempt to recast tax policy to attract 'wealth creators' to the UK. The policy supposedly offers a bonus to workers with the lowest incomes in the country, funded entirely from the one-off fees charged to non-doms – billed fancifully as a kind of Robin Hood tax. What's the deal with the Britannia Card? It is not completely clear, and much depends on how many very rich people come to Britain in response to the offer. In principle, it works a bit like this: someone very rich pays HM Revenue and Customs a one-off 'landing fee' of some £250,000. For that modest (to them) sum, they are free of all UK tax on their income and wealth from overseas. That means no income tax, dividend taxes, and no capital gains taxes on such foreign income, indefinitely. As well as that, they get a 'Britannia residency permit' that gives free entry and exit from the UK, renewable every 10 years – but not automatic UK citizenship (this is Reform UK, after all). This new breed of 'non-dom' - they'd no longer have to prove even a tenuous previous family or business link to the UK – would only have to pay tax on their UK income, such as it is, and their spending – stamp duty on their estates and mansions, VAT and other tax on luxury cars, employers' national insurance for the butler, that sort of thing. Where does the Britannia money go? To the poor! All of it! That's the magic – the lowest 10 per cent of all full-time workers would get a payment directly from the HMRC, depending on how many Britannia cards are sold per annum. Reform UK suggests that if 10,000 plutocrats decided to relocate to Britain every year, this policy would raise £2.5bn annually, equivalent to £1,000 per lower-paid worker. Sounds great. Are there any catches? Yes. One is that Reform's calculations ignore that some of the sought-after wealthy would actually lose out under its non-dom system compared to the current Labour regime; for example highly-paid professionals with savings back home are currently free of UK income tax for the first four years they're in the UK and only have to lay a fee of £30,000 or £60,000 a year. Under the Reform policy, they'd be whacked with a £250,000 fee immediately, plus full tax on any UK income. What would Reform's cost? A great deal. The Britannia Card scheme suffers from a common economic phenomenon called the 'free rider' effect. Thus it represents a huge tax cut for the mega-rich who are already here and plan and wish to stay here even under the changes the previous Labour and Tory administrations brought in, and whatever Rachel Reeves ends up doing. For them, £250,000 will be a windfall. Of course, some others may be attracted, on the same grounds, but HMRC would still lose out. Tax experts put it at £34bn over five years. It would make Kensington (in London, not Liverpool) even more expensive but not that much would trickle down. That means more spending cuts or borrowings to pay for a tax cut predominantly destined for some of the wealthiest people on earth. Any other benefits? Reform says it would mean 'wealth creators' would come and start businesses and revitalise the UK economy. Their policy paper contains impressive looking numbers about how much these types' 'investments in the UK' amount to – some in the tens of billions. However, how much of this is simply expensive real estate, collections of art and classic cars, shares in foreign companies listed in London, and US Treasury bonds is less clear. Super-rich non-doms might splash cash on lawyers, estate agents and tax advisers but their wealth-creating benefits for the nation can be exaggerated. They're not about to finance a new blast furnace for Port Talbot. Aren't we losing wealth and talent? Yes, but not necessarily enough to lose the benefit of a tougher FIG tax regime. Reeves and HMRC seem acutely aware of the trends in multi-millionaires and billionaires moving to Dubai or America, and have already started to ease some of the changes she made in her first budget, such as on trusts used to avoid inheritance tax. Will it work? The quirky old non-dom regime – unique to the UK and Ireland and not to be confused with 'non-resident' tax status – miraculously managed to survive for a century before it was seriously reformed, and now the tax system for the top echelons of society is much more changeable, and undeniably less attractive, to the footloose global rich. Reform says it can make its Britannia Card a contractual arrangement, protected from such political interference, but the fact is all governments love to mess about with the tax system, and no parliament can bind its successors. The costly Britannia Card rules could be abolished by an act of parliament passed in a day, and would probably have to be.

New student housing ban possible
New student housing ban possible

Edinburgh Reporter

timean hour ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

New student housing ban possible

Options for bringing in a ban on the development of new student accommodation units In Edinburgh are set to be brought before councillors later this year City officers have been asked to explore options for a ban on controversial purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA) projects, and present them to the city's Planning Committee in September for a decision. A majority of councillors backed the motion calling for a ban to be explored, which was proposed by SNP councillor Danny Aston. But 10 opposed it, with one saying a ban would be 'premature'. At the meeting, Cllr Aston said: 'It seems to me that developers aren't taking the changing circumstances into account. 'My concern is that if the council doesn't step in as the state body responsible as the planning authority to rein in the market here, our city may be left disfigured by white elephant PBSA developments that no-one wants.' PBSA projects often draw significant protest from the communities they are built in. One recent development in Jock's Lodge, which went on to be approved, drew over 1,000 public objections. Opponents say that PBSA projects add strain to, and harm the character of, local communities, as well as taking up development space for housing for the wider public. Additionally, the rents in the developments are often higher than students can find on the private residential market, with rooms in shared flats within Edinburgh PBSA developments often starting at £800 or £900 per month. But PBSA developments are rarely pushed back by councillors. They are usually compliant with planning regulations, which means there is often no legitimate reason for them to be rejected. Glasgow City Council had its own moratorium on PBSA developments between 2019 and 2021, with new projects still effectively banned in parts of the city by planning regulations. Conservative councillor Joanna Mowat filed an amendment that said a ban should not be implemented now. Instead, it says that any decision on restricting student housing should be made as a part of creating the city's new Local Development Plan, which must be implemented by May 2026. She told the council on Thursday: 'The main point of this is that we are going through a process to look at student housing, examining those numbers. And I think that whilst that is being undertaken, it's premature to ask for a moratorium.' 'The reality is we are supposed to have this information later this year, and I think asking planners to do another report into this, at this point, when they're undertaking that work for the new Local Development Plan is overburdening them. 'I think the points Cllr Aston makes are good ones, but I just want to try and get what we need to do done rather than having extraneous reports that I think will be difficult to accomplish.' Councillors voted for Cllr Aston's motion over Cllr Mowat's amendment by 46 to 10, with the Conservative group voting against the motion. By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store