logo
Front-line NATO allies say landmines are now fair game in a new warning to Russia

Front-line NATO allies say landmines are now fair game in a new warning to Russia

Yahoo18-03-2025

Four front-line NATO allies are pulling out of a treaty banning landmines, citing Russian aggression.
The Ottawa Convention was a post-Cold War effort to prohibit the production and use of anti-personnel mines.
Landmines have seen widespread and aggressive use in the Ukraine war.
Four NATO members that share a border with Russia and its ally Belarus are backing out of an international treaty and lifting a ban on anti-personnel mines.
The move, they said, is intended to send a message to Russia that they'll use "every necessary measure" to defend themselves.
The defense ministers of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland announced the decision on Tuesday, stating that since the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, or Ottawa Convention, was ratified, the security situation in the region have deteriorated and threats to the countries bordering Russia and Belarus have increased.
"We believe that in the current security environment it is of paramount important to provide our defense forces with flexibility and freedom of choice of potential use of new weapon systems and solutions" to defend, the four members said.
The decision, they added, sent a clear warning to Russia. Despite the decision to withdraw, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland said they remained committed to respecting international humanitarian law, including protecting civilians in wartime.
The Ottawa Convention dates back to 1997 and was created to effectively end the production, use, and sale of deadly anti-personnel landmines worldwide, as well as the destruction and removal of any stockpiled ones. As of last fall, it had over 160 parties. The US, Russia, and China are notable non-signatories.
Landmines are relatively cheap, highly effective, and easily concealed weapons that have seen extensive use in the Ukraine war. During Ukraine's largely unsuccessful 2023 counteroffensive, Russia laid widespread swaths of explosives, slowing down Ukraine's advances as they worked to clear them. Russia has also been accused of planting mines near cities and civilian centers, such as leaving booby traps in Kherson when its forces pulled back.
Ukraine has used landmines, too, and the US, under former President Joe Biden, authorized sending the explosives to Ukraine.
Ukraine is now recognized as the most heavily mined country in the world; estimates suggest it will take decades and billions of dollars to neutralize them, assuming they can be completely cleared at all.
The work of clearing landmines is painstaking and dangerous. Ukrainian soldiers have often used atypical approaches to locate and destroy the explosives, such as fiberglass rods, and ropes and hooks. They also use drones and other robotic systems.
Throughout the Ukraine war, NATO countries closest to Russia have bolstered defense investments. Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia are spending more on defense than the alliance's suggested 2% of GDP. They've also looked at reinstating conscription.
They've also raised concerns that should Russia see its efforts in Ukraine as successful, it will rearm and could invade NATO members on its borders, triggering a war.
NATO allies in Europe are grappling with questions about US involvement and support as the Trump administration steps back from some of the European security commitments that it has previously taken on.
While campaigning for the 2024 election last year, Trump suggested he'd "encourage" Russia "to do whatever the hell they want" to NATO allies who aren't hitting the spending target. How that plays out remains to be seen, but Europe is beginning to take a hard look at its own security and defenses, especially the more vulnerable countries near Russia.
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US spies said Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment
US spies said Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US spies said Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment

WASHINGTON (AP) — Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran's nuclear program earlier this year. The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels. But President Donald Trump dismissed the assessment of U.S. spy agencies during an overnight flight back to Washington as he cut short his trip to the Group of Seven summit to focus on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. 'I don't care what she said,' Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was 'very close' to having a nuclear bomb. Trump's statement aligned him more closely with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has described a nuclear-armed Iran as an imminent threat, than with his own top intelligence adviser. Trump met with national security officials, including Gabbard, in the Situation Room on Tuesday as he plans next steps. Administration officials downplayed the inconsistency between Trump and Gabbard, saying that enriching uranium can put Iran on track to having a nuclear weapon. Gabbard blamed the media for misconstruing her earlier testimony, asserting that 'President Trump was saying the same thing that I said." 'We are on the same page," she told CNN. Asked for comment, Gabbard's office referred to those remarks. In her March testimony to lawmakers, Gabbard said the intelligence community 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.' She also said the U.S. was closely monitoring Iran's nuclear program, noting that the country's 'enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.' Gen. Erik Kurilla, who leads U.S. forces in the Middle East, recently testified to Congress that Iran could produce enough nuclear material for 10 weapons in three weeks. However, he did not say how long it would take to assemble the pieces into a bomb. A senior intelligence official said Trump was right to be concerned because its uranium enrichment far exceeds what would be needed for domestic purposes. Another senior administration official said Iran was as close to having a nuclear weapon as it could be without having one. Both spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues. Trump's contradiction of Gabbard echoed his feuds with U.S. spy leaders during his first term, when he viewed them as part of a 'deep state' that was undermining his agenda. Most notably, he sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2018 when asked if Moscow had interfered in the 2016 election, saying Putin was 'extremely strong and powerful in his denial.' The latest break over Iran was striking because Trump has staffed his second administration with loyalists rather than establishment figures. Gabbard, a military veteran and former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, was narrowly confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate because of her scant experience with intelligence or managing sprawling organizations. Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party in 2022 and endorsed Trump in last year's election, testified Tuesday before the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee in a closed session that had been previously scheduled about the budget. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, who is the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee but isn't on the budget panel, said he's unaware of any new information that would change the assessment of Iran's nuclear capabilities. 'Director Gabbard stated publicly in March that the Iranians were not actively pursuing a bomb,' Warner said. 'I've seen nothing in recent intelligence that contradicts what Director Gabbard said.' The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned that Iran has enough enriched uranium to make several nuclear bombs if it wants to. Iran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful. An earlier intelligence report, compiled in November under then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, also said Iran 'is not building a nuclear weapon.' However, it said the country has 'undertaken activities that better position it to produce one, if it so chooses,' such as increasing stockpiles of enriched uranium and operating more advanced centrifuges. The report did not include any estimates for a timeline for how quickly a bomb could be built. Trump's immigration agenda is another place where he's split with intelligence assessments. He cited the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 wartime law, to deport Venezuelan migrants, which he justified by claiming that the Tren de Aragua gang was coordinating with the Venezuelan government. However, an intelligence assessment in April found no evidence of that. Gabbard fired the two veteran intelligence officers who led the panel that created the assessment, saying they were terminated because of their opposition to Trump. In response to those reports, the White House released a statement from Gabbard supporting the president. 'President Trump took necessary and historic action to safeguard our nation when he deported these violent Tren de Aragua terrorists,' the statement said. 'Now that America is safer without these terrorists in our cities, deep state actors have resorted to using their propaganda arm to attack the President's successful policies.'

Spain rejects NATO's anticipated defense spending increase as ‘unreasonable'
Spain rejects NATO's anticipated defense spending increase as ‘unreasonable'

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Spain rejects NATO's anticipated defense spending increase as ‘unreasonable'

MADRID (AP) — Spain has rejected a NATO proposal to spend 5% of GDP on defense needs that's due to be announced next week, calling it 'unreasonable.' In a letter sent Thursday to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said that Spain 'cannot commit to a specific spending target in terms of GDP' at next week's NATO summit in The Hague. Most U.S. allies at NATO are on track to endorse U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that they invest 5% of gross domestic product on their defense and military needs. In early June, Sweden and the Netherlands said that they aim to meet the new target. Spain was the lowest spender in the 32-nation military alliance last year, directing less than 2% of its GDP on defense expenditure. In April, Sánchez said the government would raise defense spending by 10.5 billion euros ($12 billion) in 2025 to reach NATO's previous target of 2% of GDP. After Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, NATO's 32 allies agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on their military budgets. But NATO plans for defending Europe and North America against a Russian attack require investment of at least 3%. The aim now is to raise the bar to 3.5% for core defense spending on tanks, warplanes, air defense, missiles and hiring extra troops. A further 1.5% would be spent on things like roads, bridges, ports and airfields so armies can deploy more quickly, as well as preparing societies for possible attack. Rutte had been due to table a new proposal on Friday aimed at satisfying Spain. European allies and Canada are keen to finalize the spending pledge before the summit, and not leave it open for any heated debate that might drag the meeting out. Poland and the Baltic countries — Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania — have already publicly committed to 5%, and Rutte has said that most allies were ready to endorse the goal. A big question still to be answered is what time-frame countries will get to reach the new spending goals. A target date of 2032 was initially floated, but Rutte has said that Russia could be ready to launch an attack on NATO territory by 2030.

Spain rejects NATO's anticipated defense spending increase as ‘unreasonable'
Spain rejects NATO's anticipated defense spending increase as ‘unreasonable'

Hamilton Spectator

time37 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Spain rejects NATO's anticipated defense spending increase as ‘unreasonable'

MADRID (AP) — Spain has rejected a NATO proposal to spend 5% of GDP on defense needs that's due to be announced next week, calling it 'unreasonable.' In a letter sent Thursday to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said that Spain 'cannot commit to a specific spending target in terms of GDP' at next week's NATO summit in The Hague. Most U.S. allies at NATO are on track to endorse U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that they invest 5% of gross domestic product on their defense and military needs. In early June, Sweden and the Netherlands said that they aim to meet the new target. Spain is the lowest spender in the 32-nation military alliance, directing less than 2% of its GDP on defense expenditure. In April, Sánchez said the government will raise defense spending by 10.5 billion euros ($12 billion) to reach NATO's previous target of 2% of GDP. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store