logo
US spies said Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment

US spies said Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon. Trump dismisses that assessment

Yahoo5 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran's nuclear program earlier this year.
The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels.
But President Donald Trump dismissed the assessment of U.S. spy agencies during an overnight flight back to Washington as he cut short his trip to the Group of Seven summit to focus on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran.
'I don't care what she said,' Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was 'very close' to having a nuclear bomb.
Trump's statement aligned him more closely with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has described a nuclear-armed Iran as an imminent threat, than with his own top intelligence adviser. Trump met with national security officials, including Gabbard, in the Situation Room on Tuesday as he plans next steps.
Administration officials downplayed the inconsistency between Trump and Gabbard, saying that enriching uranium can put Iran on track to having a nuclear weapon.
Gabbard blamed the media for misconstruing her earlier testimony, asserting that 'President Trump was saying the same thing that I said."
'We are on the same page," she told CNN. Asked for comment, Gabbard's office referred to those remarks.
In her March testimony to lawmakers, Gabbard said the intelligence community 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.'
She also said the U.S. was closely monitoring Iran's nuclear program, noting that the country's 'enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.'
Gen. Erik Kurilla, who leads U.S. forces in the Middle East, recently testified to Congress that Iran could produce enough nuclear material for 10 weapons in three weeks. However, he did not say how long it would take to assemble the pieces into a bomb.
A senior intelligence official said Trump was right to be concerned because its uranium enrichment far exceeds what would be needed for domestic purposes. Another senior administration official said Iran was as close to having a nuclear weapon as it could be without having one. Both spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues.
Trump's contradiction of Gabbard echoed his feuds with U.S. spy leaders during his first term, when he viewed them as part of a 'deep state' that was undermining his agenda. Most notably, he sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2018 when asked if Moscow had interfered in the 2016 election, saying Putin was 'extremely strong and powerful in his denial.'
The latest break over Iran was striking because Trump has staffed his second administration with loyalists rather than establishment figures. Gabbard, a military veteran and former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, was narrowly confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate because of her scant experience with intelligence or managing sprawling organizations.
Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party in 2022 and endorsed Trump in last year's election, testified Tuesday before the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee in a closed session that had been previously scheduled about the budget.
Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, who is the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee but isn't on the budget panel, said he's unaware of any new information that would change the assessment of Iran's nuclear capabilities.
'Director Gabbard stated publicly in March that the Iranians were not actively pursuing a bomb,' Warner said. 'I've seen nothing in recent intelligence that contradicts what Director Gabbard said.'
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned that Iran has enough enriched uranium to make several nuclear bombs if it wants to. Iran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful.
An earlier intelligence report, compiled in November under then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, also said Iran 'is not building a nuclear weapon.'
However, it said the country has 'undertaken activities that better position it to produce one, if it so chooses,' such as increasing stockpiles of enriched uranium and operating more advanced centrifuges. The report did not include any estimates for a timeline for how quickly a bomb could be built.
Trump's immigration agenda is another place where he's split with intelligence assessments. He cited the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 wartime law, to deport Venezuelan migrants, which he justified by claiming that the Tren de Aragua gang was coordinating with the Venezuelan government. However, an intelligence assessment in April found no evidence of that.
Gabbard fired the two veteran intelligence officers who led the panel that created the assessment, saying they were terminated because of their opposition to Trump.
In response to those reports, the White House released a statement from Gabbard supporting the president.
'President Trump took necessary and historic action to safeguard our nation when he deported these violent Tren de Aragua terrorists,' the statement said. 'Now that America is safer without these terrorists in our cities, deep state actors have resorted to using their propaganda arm to attack the President's successful policies.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump bans 'negative' signage at national parks, asks visitors to snitch on unpatriotic text
Trump bans 'negative' signage at national parks, asks visitors to snitch on unpatriotic text

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump bans 'negative' signage at national parks, asks visitors to snitch on unpatriotic text

In his ongoing war on "woke,' President Trump has instructed the National Park Service to scrub any language he would deem negative, unpatriotic or smacking of 'improper partisan ideology' from signs and presentations visitors encounter at national parks and historic sites. Instead, his administration has ordered the national parks and hundreds of other monuments and museums supervised by the Department of the Interior to ensure that all of their signage reminds Americans of our 'extraordinary heritage, consistent progress toward becoming a more perfect Union, and unmatched record of advancing liberty, prosperity and human flourishing.' Those marching orders, which went into effect late last week, have left Trump opponents and free speech advocates gasping in disbelief, wondering how park employees are supposed to put a sunny spin on monuments acknowledging slavery and Jim Crow laws. And how they'll square the story of Japanese Americans shipped off to incarceration camps during World War II with an 'unmatched record of advancing liberty.' At Manzanar National Historic Site, a dusty encampment in the high desert of eastern California, one of 10 camps where more than 120,000 Japanese American civilians were imprisoned during the early 1940s, employees put up a required notice describing the changes last week. Like all such notices across the country, it includes a QR code visitors can use to report any signs they see that are 'negative about either past or living Americans or that fail to emphasize the beauty, grandeur, and abundance of landscapes." An identical sign is up at the Cesar E. Chavez National Monument in Kern County, a tribute to the struggle to ensure better wages and safer working conditions for immigrant farm laborers. Such signs are going up across the sprawling system, which includes Fort Sumter National Monument, where Confederates fired the first shots of the Civil War; Ford's Theater National Historic Site in Washington, D.C., where Abraham Lincoln was assassinated; and the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historic Park. So, nothing negative about John Wilkes Booth or James Earl Ray? In response to an email requesting comment, a National Park Service spokesperson did not address questions about specific parks or monuments, saying only that changes would be made "where appropriate." The whole thing is "flabbergasting,' said Dennis Arguelles, Southern California director for the nonprofit National Parks Conservation Assn. 'These stories may not be flattering to American heritage, but they're an integral part of our history. 'If we lose these stories, then we're in danger of repeating some of these mistakes,' Arguelles said. Trump titled his March 27 executive order requiring federal sign writers to look on the bright side 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.' He specifically instructed the Interior Department to scrutinize any signs put up since January 2020 — the beginning of the Biden administration — for language that perpetuates 'a false reconstruction' of American history. Trump called out signs that 'undermine the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light.' He specifically cited the National Historical Park in Philadelphia and the Smithsonian Museum in Washington, D.C., as bowing to what he described as the previous administration's zeal to cast 'our Nation's unparalleled legacy of advancing liberty, individual rights, and human happiness' as 'inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed.' His solution? Order federal employees and historians to rewrite the "revisionist" history with language that exudes "patriotism." 'It all seems pretty Orwellian,' said Kimbrough Moore, a rock climber and Yosemite National Park guide book author. After news of the impending changes began circulating in park circles, he posted on Instagram a sign he saw in the toilet at the Porcupine Flat campground in the middle of the park. Across from the ubiquitous sign in all park bathrooms that says, 'Please DO NOT put trash in toilets, it is extremely difficult to remove,' someone added a placard that reads, 'Please DO NOT put trash in the White House. It is extremely difficult to remove.' Predictably, the post went viral, proving what would-be censors have known for centuries: Policing language is a messy business and can be hard to control in a free society. 'Even the pooper can be a venue for resistance,' Moore wrote. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Advisory group says no — at least for now — to another Wichita school bond
Advisory group says no — at least for now — to another Wichita school bond

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Advisory group says no — at least for now — to another Wichita school bond

An advisory group told Wichita school leaders Wednesday that the district needs to clarify its message and rebuild trust in the community before seeking another bond issue. District leaders wanted the financial oversight committee to recommend putting a bond issue to voters by March 2026. But committee members rejected that plan, saying the state's largest district has not made a clear case for why it needs a bond or precisely how it would use the money to rebuild and repair schools. 'I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but everyone I talked to said, 'What are you doing?' And angrily,' said Thomas Rose, a senior vice president for Commerce Bank and a member of the oversight committee. 'I honestly do not believe a bond issue will pass, even in March.' The group opted to not recommend any bond proposal to the Wichita school board for its July 7 meeting. Members recommended that the district transfer all year-end cash savings into its capital budget to pay for building repairs and upgrades. Earlier this year, voters narrowly rejected a $450 million bond issue to rebuild and repair Wichita's school facilities. Since then, the Wichita district has been searching for a plan to address aging buildings and declining enrollment. District leaders formed the financial oversight committee in response to the failed bond issue. Last month, members were directed to gauge community sentiment on three alternative bond plans. All three proposals were similar to the original bond, and all were linked to the district's facility master plan, which the school board approved last summer. Addi Lowell, chief financial officer for Wichita schools, recommended a new bond election either this coming November or March of 2026. That's because Wichita property owners are currently paying for a 2008 bond issue, and 7.5 mills for the bond and interest will come off of tax bills next year. Any bond issue after next spring would require a tax increase rather than 'zero rate change,' a tax-neutral argument supporters used during the last campaign. 'Once we lower the mill, it is very difficult to get it back up. Increasing property taxes is unpopular,' Lowell told the committee. 'No one likes paying bills … whether you support public education or not.' Lowell and two other district administrators on the committee — Deputy Superintendent Gil Alvarez and Chief Communications Officer Rachel Bell — leaned toward the March 2026 date because they said November wouldn't give the district time to craft its message. 'We didn't want to do another sprint to the finish,' Alvarez said. 'We want to make sure that we are addressing any lack of trust or transparency and really get the word out.' Several committee members said voters lost trust in the district after the 2008 bond issue, when several projects were scaled back or ditched altogether because of reduced state and federal funding. Among them: two new comprehensive high schools and a K-8 school in Bel Aire. 'What I've heard from folks: Accountability and transparency were not completely addressed in the most recent bond issue,' said Lindsay Poe Rousseau, chief financial officer for Sedgwick County. 'Even the folks who voted yes, the question is: What has changed? Why do we think that people will change their vote now? And there's still a reluctance by them to vote for another bond issue right now.' Trish Hileman, a parent who serves on the oversight committee, surveyed more than 100 district residents and said trust and transparency were common themes. She said the vast majority of people she talked to also opposed special elections for bond issues, which traditionally have much lower turnout than primary or general elections. 'They were like, 'Just put it on the general or shut up. Stop manipulating us,'' Hileman said. 'People are tired of being strategized.' Hileman said voters also wonder whether the district could rethink its overall master plan and scale down the next bond issue. 'It's important that what we put out we can get a 'yes' to,' she said. 'And if that means we make it smaller so that we can get a 'yes' and build on that … People want to say yes, so let's give them a really easy, clear path to say yes.' Sarah Amador, a parent and education consultant, agreed the district should consider a scaled-down bond issue. After voters in Kansas City, Kan., rejected a $420 million bond in April 2024, the district came back with a $180 million bond, which voters approved in November. 'You have to make it as small as possible, and you have to show them, 'Say yes to me here, and here's your result,'' Amador said. 'If we cannot do that, you're going to jump off a cliff. And the reality is very dire.' Lowell, the district CFO, said the district learned from the February bond campaign and plans to change its tactics. 'There's no way we could have known the distrust and the things that people were going to bring up in the election without doing the election,' she said. 'So, we learned a lot, and our communication strategy will look completely different this time.' Bell, the communications director, said any new campaign would take time. 'We didn't know that there was so much distrust surrounding the 2000 and the 2008 bonds. So understanding what those concerns are, so that we can address them, just takes a little bit of time,' she said. When they meet in July, school board members could decide to pursue another bond election despite the committee's reluctance. But board president Diane Albert, who serves on the committee, said the group's message was clear. 'There are real facility needs within the district that we have to address. But when we are using taxpayer dollars, we have to address that trust and transparency issue first,' Albert said. 'I think we can build trust and transparency, but we need to use this committee to do that and not just immediately start talking about another bond issue.' This story was originally published by KMUW

Carney to Unveil Plan to Help Tariff-Hit Canada Steel Sector
Carney to Unveil Plan to Help Tariff-Hit Canada Steel Sector

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Carney to Unveil Plan to Help Tariff-Hit Canada Steel Sector

(Bloomberg) -- Prime Minister Mark Carney will announce steps to support Canadian steel and aluminum producers whose exports to the US have been pummeled by US President Donald Trump's 50% tariffs. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Carney is scheduled to hold a news conference in Ottawa at 1:30 p.m. Ottawa time. He'll outline new measures to keep the sectors afloat while Canada tries to work out a deal with the Trump administration, according to people familiar with the matter, asking not to be identified as the plan is not yet public. The prime minister and Industry Minister Melanie Joly have indicated the plan may include requirements for government-funded projects to use Canadian-made steel and aluminum, as well as restrictions to guard against dumping from foreign producers such as China. Steel-producer and worker groups will also hold a separate news conference later Thursday. (Updates with new time for press conference.) Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store