
6 Ways to Tell If You're a Great Leader
These six clues always predict whether or not there's strong leadership nearby. If you don't see these six things, poor leadership isn't far.
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
All successful leaders, from front-line supervisors to senior executives, constantly want to know if their leadership style is effective. Great leaders are humble enough to know it might not be, empathetic enough to care and driven enough to make adjustments so that it does.
After spending 15 years in leadership and evaluating the effectiveness of leaders at all different levels, I've learned there are a few litmus tests that always give great leadership away. Under great leadership, here's what you'll notice.
1. People are engaged
There are hundreds of ways to measure engagement, so I'll just tackle a few. When leadership is working, people are happy. They want to come to work, and they do. Teams with strong leadership have lower attrition and vacancy rates than teams that don't. There's truth in the cliché, "People don't leave their company, they leave their boss."
Under strong leadership, people aren't just happy to show up and do their jobs; they're also highly engaged. They participate and ask questions in group meetings, town halls and open forums. Silence in these settings is a dangerous sign that something is wrong. When people don't readily share their thoughts and opinions, it's usually because they don't feel secure and safe to do so, or they don't believe anyone is truly listening.
When people are willing to speak their mind, it's a sign they're paying attention to what's going on and care about the outcomes. In environments where there's great leadership, this engagement also happens proactively. When people have been led well, they don't reactively wait to be asked to contribute or step up — they willingly volunteer, all on their own.
Related: This Is the One Question I Ask My Team Every Week That Transformed Our Performance
2. People advance and/or change roles
Great leadership can also be measured by the amount of growth and development occurring. For years, as a leader, I didn't just list my own accomplishments on my resume — I listed the accomplishments of my team. I knew the specific number of direct (and indirect) reports that had been promoted into more senior or complex roles underneath me. They had been selected for advancement because they'd been well-trained, grown and developed.
Under great leadership, employees invest in their futures by going back to school, getting certifications and earning promotions. You'll find people on development plans and able to articulate what they'd like to do next or what they're working towards. When that's happening consistently, it's because strong leadership has encouraged it.
3. People spend time together
In situations where leadership is poor, people move into silos and stay there. They don't regularly (and willingly) collaborate. They don't invite other groups or teams into brainstorming sessions to solve problems together. Rather, they deal with things in a vacuum. If people are frequently by themselves — in their offices with the door closed, eating alone and skipping out on key events — that's a bad sign. Under great leadership, people join ERGs and go beyond the confines of their regular jobs to get involved and take on more.
4. People speak differently
Under great leadership, people literally talk differently. That's because they've learned to think differently. First, their language gives away a win-win mentality. Under great leaders, people will use words like "we" or "our" versus "me," "I" or "my." That's because great leaders encourage people to think globally, not locally. Under great leaders, people see themselves as part of a bigger picture. Thus, individuals don't see clients or goals as solely their own, but rather, the organization's.
Great leaders also take accountability and keep their commitments, so others do the same. Under great leaders, people don't reschedule their priorities, cancel meetings or miss deadlines. They don't feel powerless, incapable or unsure of their ability to control their own success. So instead of saying things like, "I'll try," they say, "I will." Then, they consistently follow through.
5. People innovate and fail
Under poor leadership, people are afraid to try new things for fear of making a mistake. They often feel they must be perfect and fear they'll be punished for getting it "wrong." Under great leaders, people will routinely experiment and try things that have never been done. They're confident and courageous enough to know that if they fail, it'll just be a learning experience and they'll grow stronger as a result. They don't have their identities wrapped up in perfection and this allows them to be more creative than teams under poor leadership, that focus live in the past, doing things as they've always been done.
Related: How This Crucial Leadership Style Will Increase Your Employee Retention
6. People deliver results
Great leaders always get performance. They focus on behaviors because they know they can control those. But they also ensure those actions lead to results. Teams that struggle to deliver results and perform well, especially over time, have lousy leaders. That's because great leaders practice what I call PDCA: plan, do, check and adjust. They take action, evaluate and shift course if things aren't working. They don't accept the status quo. Rather, they work hard to improve things. As Michelangelo said, "No problem can stand the assault of sustained thinking." Good leaders know this, so even though they may periodically stumble or hit a roadblock, they figure out a way around. They also teach others to do this. In general, if you've got a team of people scoring low on their annual performance reviews and unable to meet their own key objectives, you've likely got a leadership problem. Under great leadership, not only does the whole team perform as a collective, but people perform individually, too.
Over time, if you observe a team and notice these six things in place, you likely have strong, effective leadership at the helm. In instances where these things are not present, there's no doubt that it starts with the leader. If you want to know if your own leadership style is working, check for these signs (or ask someone unbiased to give you their opinion). Self-awareness is where progression can begin.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Motor Trend
32 minutes ago
- Motor Trend
China Is Way, Way Ahead in the Car Business—Can the West Catch Up?
It's tricky for Americans to appreciate the magnitude of the technology gap that has formed and continues growing between new Chinese cars and those being produced elsewhere in the developed world. That's because our market has effectively been walled off, at least from China's homegrown brands and global nameplate electric cars. MotorTrend has attempted to lead on American press coverage of this vital market, by producing a documentary on China's inroads to Mexico (and, therefore, North America), attending Chinese auto shows, and by testing more domestic-market Chinese cars than our peer publications. The West lags behind China's rapid car development due to slower innovation cycles and differing market priorities. To catch up, Western automakers must prioritize speed, adaptability, and cost-efficiency, targeting China as the main competitor, not traditional rivals. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next So we listened, nodded, and took lots of notes as Terry Woychowski—CEO of vehicle benchmarking firm Caresoft Global, addressed the Society of Automotive Analysts and the Automotive Press Association, shared his thoughts on what it might take for The West to begin closing the gap with the Chinese. The question to ask yourselves is, do we have the resolve to implement his suggestions? Speed is a Key Differentiator China seems to better appreciate that the one thing there's simply no getting any more of, whether by hard work, cunning, guile, or force: time. Once a minute's gone, there's no getting it back. Terry recounted many examples of the huge differences in vehicle development time, noting that China typically spends one and a half to two years developing a new platform, versus legacy OEMs' four to five years. That's how Xpeng developed five platforms in nine years, launching one in 2018, another in 2020, and the next three in 2024. Volkswagen, by contrast, launched its MEB architecture in 2019; announced PPE in 2019 and launched it in 2025; while SSP was announced in 2021 and is scheduled for the 2028–2029 timeframe. He presented the chart below illustrating the phases of a model development program, each of which established automakers spend three to four times as long completing. Development Cycle Times (in months) Longer Hours Terry claims his contacts in China report a 9-9-6 paradigm that, frankly, seems utterly anathema to Western sensibilities. Engineers work from 9 in the morning to 9 at night six days per week. It is a pace they become inured to growing up in China, where admission slots to the coveted engineering colleges are extremely competitive. So they reportedly study way harder and party way less throughout their secondary and higher educations. Terry serves on the College of Engineering Advisory Board at Michigan Technological University, so he took time to visit ShanghaiTech University on a weekend day while in town for the auto show. He reported the library being jammed full. Speed of Innovation The days of Chinese R&D being jokingly referred to as 'receive and duplicate' instead of "research and development" are long gone. Terry reports BYD has filed as many as 45 patents per day . To date the Chinese giant holds 15 times as many patents as Tesla. Speed of Implementation Even when they don't think up a great idea on their own, the Chinese are way faster at implementing that idea once they see it. And they put up far less resistance to outside ideas. Some examples Woychowski provided: Tesla implemented its innovative integrated heat pump and EV thermal management 'Octovalve' on the Model Y in March 2020 and Huawei developed a similar 'super-manifold' with heat-pump capability for its AVATR models by mid-2022. Tesla switched from flexible copper onboard power cables used in Model S/Y to a lighter, cheaper, easier-to-install rigid aluminum setup on the Model 3/Y. The Chinese new-energy vehicle startups adopted this practice from their inception, while the legacy EV manufacturers still mainly use copper. Tesla proposed using the Transformer AI network (large language model) in Full Self Driving in 2021. Great Wall Motor followed suit launching its Highway Pilot in mass production the same year; Nio and Xpeng in 2022; and Li-Auto in 2023. DeepSeek was developed in China by Hangzhou DeepSeek AI Basic Technology Research Co. to make it easier to implement the Transformer AI LLM into automotive platforms. According to Terry, no traditional OEM has deployed it yet. Tesla introduced Gigacastings, and already Xpeng's are lighter and stronger than Tesla's. Tesla uses 9,000-ton presses; the Chinese are developing 16,000-ton presses that may be able to make an entire half of a car. The Chinese car buyer's top-five purchase considerations are technology (digital cockpits, smart features, ADAS, etc.), connectivity (embedded cellular connection with smartphone integration and AI assistants), relational priorities (brand status and reputation, OEM-customer ownership experience, riding comfort), non-traditional values (buying smarter, with less regard for traditional brand loyalties, focus on affordability, youthfulness), and environmental priorities (electrification, willingness to pay more for greener tech). By contrast, Terry says the main North American, European, Korean, and Japanese manufacturers ' top-five priorities are acceleration, power/torque, chassis grip and handling, NVH, and fit/finish. He contends the priority gap between Chinese and global buyers may be narrowing, suggesting a realignment of priorities might be overdue in Western automakers. Good question. And maybe not. But then again, those cars sell for vastly less money when new, and the march of technological progress may render them unsalable after six or eight years anyway. In that case, maybe they just need to be highly recyclable (or perhaps the third world will soon be able to tap into a huge cache of obsolete but still drivable cars). Structural Cost Advantages The playing field is not level and may not be level-able. There's no way to put a number on the cost savings of a government regulatory framework that is established and never gets altered by changes in the political winds. But some factors that have been quantified include the general cost to acquire land, raise capital, and borrow money, which is estimated to be 7–9 percent lower for Chinese OEMs. Chinese OEMs and suppliers are each said to be about 7 percent less profitable. One practice that might suggest potential savings for the establishment is a Chinese auto industry willingness to make common certain products and specifications, sharing some parts across manufacturers and suppliers to lower the cost for all (Caresoft attributes a 7–15 percent savings to this practice). What Must American Companies Do? Change everything. Bust paradigms. Stop prioritizing features and attributes that customers aren't willing to pay for nor care about. Establish a moon-landing mission mindset and target China as the competition, as opposed to cross-town or trans-Atlantic rivals. Lobby governments in lockstep to reduce structural costs. Most of all, take full advantage of any temporary relief tariffs may afford to lower costs and accelerate development. China faces some internal headwinds, including gross overcapacity, which is driving both the national impetus to export and an expected consolidation or culling of brands in the next few years. Some suppliers are in tenuous financial shape, which the government is looking to shore up by forcing OEMs to pay suppliers more quickly. But western automakers will only catch up by accelerating their own efforts; not by waiting and hoping for internal troubles to slow China down.


Bloomberg
35 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Stock Movers: Coinbase, FedEx, General Mills
On this edition of Stock Movers: - Coinbase (COIN) shares gain after Bernstein raised the target on the crypto trading platform to $510, a Street high and 48% above Tuesday's close, from $310. The company's revenue is set to more than double by 2027 as it benefits from strong trading growth, as well as non-trading revenue lines such as staking and stablecoins, analyst Gautam Chhugani wrote in a note to clients. - FedEx (FDX) shares sank after the carrier warned that its profit would be worse than expected this quarter and declined to offer guidance for the rest of the year, underscoring the significant impact that President Donald Trump's trade war continues to have on its business. The company's shares fell 5.6% as of 9:33 a.m. in New York on Wednesday after FedEx reported quarterly results, extending their slide for the year. The shipping giant's stock was down 18% in 2025 through Tuesday's close, while the S&P 500 index rose modestly over that span. - General Mills (GIS) shares fell after the food company reported a larger-than-expected drop in 4Q organic sales, driven by a 7% decline in its North America Retail segment. GIS also projects a steeper decline in annual adjusted EPS than the current consensus estimate. 'Our full-year sales trends did not meet our expectations, driven in part by continued value-seeking orientation and weaker consumer sentiment,' CEO Jeff Harmening said.


Bloomberg
39 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Accuses Three Mexican Financial Firms of Aiding Fentanyl Trafficking
The US government designated three Mexican financial firms as potential money launderers tied to illicit opioid trafficking, as it seeks to clamp down on cartel financing. The US Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, said it issued the orders 'as being of primary money laundering concern' against CIBanco SA, Intercam Banco SA and brokerage Vector Casa de Bolsa SA, according to a statement Wednesday.