Poilievre to undergo Conservative Party leadership review in January
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre will face a mandatory leadership review in January, after the party failed to form government in the last federal election.
The Conservative Party's national council agreed on Saturday that the leadership review would take place in Calgary, according to CBC News sources.
The Globe and Mail first reported the story.
If a leader does not resign following an election loss, the party's constitution requires Conservative Party members to vote on whether that leader should stay on at its next national convention.
While the Conservative Party saw a boost in vote share under Poilievre with a breakthrough among new voting blocs, they failed to form government and he lost the Ottawa-area seat of Carleton — one he had held since 2004 — by more than 4,000 votes.
In May, Battle River-Crowfoot MP Damien Kurek said he would step aside to allow Poilievre to run in the Alberta riding, which is considered one of the safest Conservative seats in the country.
Poilievre was set to lead the Conservatives to a historic majority government after the party enjoyed double-digit leads for more than 18 months in national polls over the Liberals and as former prime minister Justin Trudeau's popularity waned.
But the trade war launched by U.S. President Donald Trump and Trudeau's resignation precipitated a reversal of fortunes for the Conservative Party, which won 144 seats in the recent federal election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jon Stewart Gives Furious Monologue Shaming the Right For Their Response to Killings of Minnesota Lawmakers: ‘What Blows My Mind Is Our Resignation in the Aftermath'
On this week's episode of 'The Daily Show,' Jon Stewart took an uncharacteristically furious tone as he attacked conservatives for their response to the Saturday morning murders of Minnesota lawmakers Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark Hortman. 'The only positive is that the person who perpetrated these acts has finally been caught. Finally,' Stewart said of the tragedy. 'But what I was really struck by is what seemed to be on everybody's mind in the midst of this horror.' More from Variety Jon Stewart Slams ABC News as 'So Stupid' for Firing Reporter Terry Moran Over Criticizing Trump's Chief of Staff: 'They're a F--ing Joke' Jon Stewart Calls Los Angeles 'Our Most Flammable City' Amid ICE Protests: 'Trump Happily Lights the Fuse' Jon Stewart Tackles Elon Musk's Exit From the Trump Administration: 'This Guy Has Seen Some S--' Stewart then played a series of news clips featuring several anchors across different networks deliberating over the assailant's 'motive.' They were quick to point out that he was 'a Trump supporter' while also being an 'appointee' of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the ex-running mate of former Vice President Kamala Harris. 'I mean no disrespect,' Stewart said, heating up with anger. 'I don't give a fuck why this person did it. I just don't give a fuck. I don't care whose team he's on. I don't care if he listens to NPR or Fox News. I don't give a flying fuck. What blows my mind is our resignation in the aftermath of this nonsense. 'What are you gonna do?' I don't know, put a shit ton of funding into mental health? Put a shit ton of money into illegal weapons interdiction?' Stewart continued, 'We're willing to do things about other issues. We just heard about it. Why are they attacking Los Angeles right now? Why is the right so willing to tear our cities apart in this moment?' The late-night pundit then showed another series of news clips featuring conservatives discussing immigration issues. They claim that 'dangerous criminals continue to flood our nation and kill our citizens' and that 'one' death of an American is 'too many.' Stewart then launched off on a fiery rant, calling out the hypocrisy in the Republican view on immigration by reciting a laundry list of mass shootings in the United States. He said, 'One is too many. One death. By the way, true. It's too many. Violence should never be accepted, it should never be tolerated. But that's for their issue. In the wake of Sandy Hook and Uvalde and Parkland and El Paso and Lewiston and Aurora and Buffalo and Boulder and Binghamton and Highland Park and Monterey Park and San Bernardino and San Jose and San Francisco and the Pulse night club and the Colorado Springs night club and the Little Rock night club and the Borderline Bar in Thousand Oaks and the Ned Peppers Bar in Dayton and the Waffle House in Nashville and Virginia Tech and UVA and MSU and UCSB and FSU and NIU and SMC and the Sutherland Springs Church and the Mother Emanuel Church in Charleston and the Living Church of God and the Tree of Life Synagogue and the Allen Mall and the West Roads Mall and Fort Hood and Lockheed Martin and what are we doing? What are we doing? By the way, that is a wildly incomplete list. We kept it to the last 25 years, and it's still not everything. And what's their response to all that?' Another round of news clips then played, where conservative anchors claimed that 'Democrats want to take away your guns' and 'politicize' mass shootings. Stewart added, 'Turns out, when it comes to mass shootings, one is not too many. Actually, a shit load isn't too many.' Watch the entire segment below. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar
Politico
5 hours ago
- Politico
Trump promised to break California water. So far he hasn't.
SACRAMENTO, California — President Donald Trump promised to break California's water rules wide open. So far, he's mostly working within them. Five months after Trump issued a pair of directives for federal agencies to overturn state and Biden-era rules limiting water deliveries, the federal government has done no such thing. Instead, it's quietly increasing water flows following the very rules Trump once railed against — at least for now. It's a sharp contrast to Trump's otherwise confrontational posture towards California and climate policy. In just the last week, he rescinded the state's authority to phase out gas-powered vehicles and sent the National Guard into Los Angeles over Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections. It's also a sharp contrast to Trump's campaign rhetoric, when he vowed to force Newsom to reverse a lawsuit blocking his first-term effort to loosen environmental protections in the state's main water hub, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. But Trump seems mollified now, declaring victory over the state at a White House event last week. The president brought up the familiar theme of water flowing out to the Pacific Ocean instead of being used in farms and cities, called it 'ridiculous' and declared of the water: 'We got them to take it now.' What's changed? For one, California had a wet winter, which tends to smooth over political differences. And the Trump administration suffered an early headline-grabbing debacle in February when it dumped summer irrigation water from Central Valley dams in a misguided effort to send it to fires in Los Angeles. Newsom has also aligned himself more with Trump on water, as when he jilted Delta-area Democrats last month in pushing to expedite a tunnel to move more supplies from Northern to Southern California. More substantively, some of the water districts that might be expected to agitate for Trump to overturn Biden-era water rules concede that they actually allow more deliveries than Trump's version. 'Our goal really is to try and implement some of the adaptive management and other actions that are in the [Biden-era rules] that provide some flexibility to benefit water supply and the fishery as well,' said Thaddeus Bettner, the executive director of the Sacramento River Settlement Contractors, a group of municipal and agricultural water districts in the northern Central Valley. So even though Trump's January directives gave federal officials the option to redo the Biden-era rules, they haven't done that so far — avoiding both lawsuits and negative headlines. The January orders also directed federal water agencies to write a report within 90 days on how to deliver on Trump's promises, but the White House is keeping that quiet, as well, declining to release it publicly. 'Less than a month into his second term, President Trump turned on the water to prevent another tragedy like the recent California wildfires, and he has urged Democrats like Gavin Newsom to adopt policies that better maintain our nation's forests,' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in an email. 'He will continue to protect America's abundant natural resources, and updates to our water policy will come from him.' Environmental groups in the sensitive Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, however, aren't buying the quiet approach. They say the Trump administration is still violating endangered species rules, pointing to examples when federal officials pumped more water out of the Delta than state officials, killing or injuring protected species of salmon and trout in the process. 'Reclamation's behavior is cause for extreme concern for the health of the Bay-Delta and for the communities and people who care about and depend on this ecosystem,' the groups wrote in a letter last month to state water officials. (Bureau of Reclamation spokesperson Mary Lee Knecht said the agency 'continues to operate the Central Valley Project to maximize water supply and hydropower in full compliance' with the Biden-era rules.) There are a couple opportunities coming up for Trump to make more of a splash. He has yet to nominate a Bureau of Reclamation commissioner, who could sway the agency one way or the other. And on Tuesday, state and federal lawyers are due to update a judge on whether they want to continue the lawsuit Newsom lodged against Trump in 2020. Water agencies that have been mostly laudatory of Trump are still restive. Westlands Water District's general manager, Allison Febbo, called the Trump administration's latest projected increase in summer water allocations, from 50 to 55 percent, 'disappointing' given that reservoirs are filled to the brim. 'The operations quagmire that has contributed to the self-inflicted water crisis we have in this state, and reconfirmed by the Biden administration before leaving office, are still wreaking havoc on the water projects,' Johnny Amaral, chief of external affairs at the Friant Water Authority, said in a text message. 'Every minute that goes by is a lost opportunity to end the crisis, and the clock is ticking.' Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's California Climate newsletter.
Politico
6 hours ago
- Politico
Trump's quiet truce on California water
With help from Eric He and Alex Nieves NOT SO SPLASHY: President Donald Trump promised to break California's water rules wide open. So far, he's mostly working within them. Five months after Trump issued a pair of directives for federal agencies to overturn state and Biden-era rules limiting water deliveries, the federal government has done no such thing. Instead, it's quietly increasing water flows following the very rules Trump once railed against — at least for now. It's a sharp contrast to Trump's otherwise confrontational posture toward California and climate policy. In just the last week, he rescinded the state's authority to phase out gas-powered vehicles and sent the National Guard into Los Angeles over Newsom's objections. It's also a sharp contrast to Trump's campaign rhetoric, when he vowed to force Gov. Gavin Newsom to reverse a lawsuit blocking his first-term effort to loosen environmental protections in the state's main water hub, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. But Trump seems mollified now, declaring victory over the state at a White House event last week. The president brought up the familiar theme of water flowing out to the Pacific Ocean instead of being used in farms and cities, called it 'ridiculous' and declared of the water: 'We got them to take it now.' What's changed? For one, California had a wet winter, which tends to smooth over political differences. And the Trump administration suffered an early headline-grabbing debacle in February when it dumped summer irrigation water from Central Valley dams in a misguided effort to send it to fires in Los Angeles. Newsom has also aligned himself more with Trump on water, as when he jilted Delta-area Democrats last month in pushing to expedite a tunnel to move more supplies from Northern to Southern California. More substantively, some of the water districts that might be expected to agitate for Trump to overturn Biden-era water rules concede that they actually allow more deliveries than Trump's version. 'Our goal really is to try and implement some of the adaptive management and other actions that are in the [Biden-era rules] that provide some flexibility to benefit water supply and the fishery as well,' said Thaddeus Bettner, the executive director of the Sacramento River Settlement Contractors, a group of municipal and agricultural water districts in the northern Central Valley. So even though Trump's January directives gave federal officials the option to redo the Biden-era rules, they haven't done that so far — avoiding both lawsuits and negative headlines. Environmental groups in the sensitive Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, however, aren't buying it. They say the Trump administration is still violating endangered species rules, pointing to examples when federal officials pumped more water out of the Delta than state officials, killing or injuring protected species of salmon and trout in the process. 'Reclamation's behavior is cause for extreme concern for the health of the Bay-Delta and for the communities and people who care about and depend on this ecosystem,' the groups wrote in a letter last month to state water officials. (Bureau of Reclamation spokesperson Mary Lee Knecht said the agency 'continues to operate the Central Valley Project to maximize water supply and hydropower in full compliance' with the Biden-era rules. The White House did not provide a comment by publication time.) There are a couple opportunities coming up for Trump to make more of a splash. He has yet to nominate a Bureau of Reclamation commissioner, who could sway the agency one way or the other. And on Tuesday, state and federal lawyers are due to update a judge on whether they want to continue the lawsuit Newsom lodged against Trump in 2020. Water agencies that have been mostly laudatory of Trump are still restive. Westlands Water District's general manager, Allison Febbo, called the Trump administration's latest projected increase in summer water allocations, from 50 to 55 percent, 'disappointing' given that reservoirs are filled to the brim. 'The operations quagmire that has contributed to the self-inflicted water crisis we have in this state, and reconfirmed by the Biden administration before leaving office, are still wreaking havoc on the water projects,' Johnny Amaral, chief of external affairs at the Friant Water Authority, said in a text message. 'Every minute that goes by is a lost opportunity to end the crisis, and the clock is ticking.' — CvK Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! SENATE SOFTENING: The Senate Finance Committee on Monday scaled back some of House Republicans' sharpest cuts to clean energy tax credits in their version of the Republican budget reconciliation bill, POLITICO's Kelsey Tamborrino, Josh Siegel and James Bikales report. The bill would soften the House's onerous 60-day timeline for starting construction of wind and solar projects, but would still phase their tax credits out by 2028 — more quickly than for nuclear, geothermal and hydropower projects. It also appears to omit language that would create new registration fees on electric vehicles and hybrids of $250 and $100, respectively, as Sam Ogozalek writes. SUPPORT FOR WHO?: The Imperial Valley is still years away from having a full-fledged lithium extraction industry, but tensions between community organizers and local officials are already high. A California Energy Commission workshop on Friday to discuss transportation needs for supporting a new industry in one of the state's most remote and impoverished regions at times got testy, as organizers raised concerns that residents around the Salton Sea — who live near large lithium deposits that could hold the key to California's battery storage needs — are an afterthought. 'We need paved and well-maintained roads to access our job sites, reliable public infrastructure and public transportation that not only serves industry, but also the workers and residents in the county,' said Jacob Rodriguez, the Imperial County Organizer for Jobs to Move America. Controlled Thermal Resources, Berkshire Hathaway Energy and EnergySource Minerals are attempting to extract lithium directly from hot water pumped from deep underground, with the goal of opening commercial-scale facilities in 2027 or 2028. The companies and state and local officials say that can only happen if roads, bridges and railroad infrastructure are improved to handle the influx of heavy-duty trucks. Local groups like Comité Cívico del Valle, which sued CTR and Imperial County over approval of one project's environmental mitigation plan, say they're supportive of the industry, but that residents have not received assurances they'll benefit from new economic activity. 'I'm sorry to say this, but the county has turned their back on the north end,' said April Ochoa, a community organizer with Comité Cívico del Valle, arguing that nearby cities like Bombay Beach and Niland lack basic public transportation and health care. Imperial County Supervisor Ryan Kelley, who attended the workshop at Imperial Valley College, took that criticism personally. 'I'm sorry you took that into a personal attack on me,' Kelley said. 'I've answered your calls, and I've done things to help you and the town of Niland. So I'm injured. I'm sorry you feel that way.' — AN LABOR SOUNDS OFF: The fight over school HVAC funding is heating up. A broad coalition that includes labor, environmental and education groups is blasting Newsom's budget proposal to shift money intended for school energy upgrades to broader energy conservation programs. Newsom, who last fall issued an executive order aimed at addressing rising electric bills, included trailer bill language in his May budget plan that would target the more than $190 million remaining funding in the CalSHAPE program, which funds upgrades to heating, air conditioning and ventilation systems in schools. Lawmakers have targeted the pot of money before, most recently earlier this year, when Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris sought to send the money back to ratepayers as a bill credit. Newsom's proposal would divert the funding to grid reliability programs instead. United Steelworkers, the California Labor Federation, the California Teachers Association, the Sierra Club and other groups contended in a letter Monday that the proposal will 'cause a wide variety of harmful and potentially fatal conditions among students and education workers.' Mitch Steiger, legislative advocate for the California Federation of Teachers, called the proposal 'unconscionable' and that there are few funding alternatives for schools to access HVAC repairs. — EH CAUTION, TURNS AHEAD: Six months ago, Congress pumped $8 billion into emergency road repairs — just in time for the Los Angeles fires to add to the growing backlog of federal disaster costs. Now, Trump's budget proposal would allocate just $100 million. It's a feast-and-famine pattern local officials have been used to since at least the 1970s, writes Mike Lee of POLITICO's E&E News. But with the pace of disasters increasing, cities and environmental advocates are arguing the repair program needs more muscular and sustainable funding. 'With the number of unprecedented disasters happening, Congress should be focused on refilling our emergency funding,' the National League of Cities said in a statement. — Follow a Los Angeles Times reporter into a prescribed burn with California officials in the Trump era. — Lake Tahoe's famed blue depths aren't getting any easier to see, particularly in the summer, UC Davis researchers find in their annual report on the lake's clarity. — Meet Mark Ellis, a former Sempra Corp. executive turned consumer advocate now railing on utility profits.
