B.C. First Nation wins rights, title along Fraser River's south arm in Lower Mainland
A B.C. Supreme Court judge says in a written decision posted Friday that the Cowichan Tribes have established fishing rights on the Fraser River and title to a portion of almost 7 1/2 square kilometres of land they claimed on Lulu Island in Richmond, B.C.
The Musqueam and Tsawwassen First Nations, along with the federal and provincial governments, the City of Richmond and the Vancouver-Fraser Port Authority all opposed the claim during the 513-day trial.
Justice Barbara Young ruled that land titles grants issued by the Canadian and B.C. governments to others 'are defective and invalid' as they 'unjustifiably infringe the Cowichan Nation Aboriginal title to these lands.'
The decision says both governments owe a duty to negotiate with the nation 'in good faith' on how to reconcile its land title with what's now in the territory, including the Vancouver Airport Fuel Delivery Project property.
B.C. Premier David Eby says in a response that the province is reviewing the decision for a possible appeal and will also seek to resolve the issue by negotiating with all nations involved.
'But let me be clear: owning private property with clear title is key to borrowing for a mortgage, economic certainty, and the real estate market,' Eby says.
'We remain committed to protecting and upholding this foundation of business and personal predictability, and our provincial economy, for Indigenous and non-Indigenous people alike.'
The area where the Cowichan have established title was used by the nation's ancestors during the summer as a 'permanent post and beam village' but was never established as a reserve, resulting in B.C. giving away the land starting in 1871.
The Musqueam Indian Band — which declared in 1976 that it holds the Aboriginal title covering both the north and south arms of the Fraser River — says in a statement that it is deeply disappointed and 'fundamentally' disagrees with the court decision.
It says that it has established 'national legal precedent on Aboriginal title and fishing rights' through two major cases in the Supreme Court of Canada, and it plans to 'continue to vigorously defend these rights.'
'Musqueam is shocked the court didn't give effect to oral history and traditional governance protocols, which guide intercommunity relationships since time immemorial,' the statement says.
The Vancouver Fraser Port Authority says in a statement that it is reviewing the implications and details of the decision alongside other affected federal government departments, and further updates will be provided at an appropriate time.
The Cowichan Tribes says in a news release that it is 'celebrating a historic victory,' while honouring 'generations of leaders' in the community who fought to win the Aboriginal title on the Fraser River land.
'It is in their honour and for the well-being of our future generations that the elders, knowledge holders, and chiefs who have gone before us brought this case forward to recognize our Aboriginal title and fishing rights, as a basis for truth and reconciliation, through the courts,' it says.
Young says in the decision that while evidence shows a number of Coast Salish groups being historically located in the lower Fraser River region, some places, such as the area of the Cowichan claim, 'belonged to specific groups.'
The judge says the Cowichan 'had the capacity and intention to exclusively control their village land and some surrounding areas on the south arm of the Fraser River' before 1846, when the British Crown asserted sovereignty in the area.
'This was the Cowichan village,' the ruling says. 'It belonged to the Cowichan, and other groups respected that it was on Cowichan land.
'The Cowichan exercised effective control over their land. There is no evidence of other Indigenous groups occupying this village.'
The court recognizes that the case 'raised complex … and novel issues,' its decision says.
'The fact is, all the parties have continued interests, rights and obligations around the south arm of the Fraser River and limited resources need to be shared and preserved,' Young says in the decision.
'Now that this multi‑year journey has concluded, it is my sincere hope that the parties have the answers they need to return to negotiations and reconcile the outstanding issues.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 8, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
17 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Author urges resisting efforts to clean up ‘image routes'
Last month, city Coun. Jeff Browaty proposed banning encampments along what he called 'image routes' like the Disraeli Freeway just before Main Street, along with Pembina Highway, McPhillips Street, St. Mary's and St. Anne's roads, Kenaston Boulevard and Regent Avenue. The reason he gave for the proposal was safety, and also for esthetics — they make Winnipeg look bad. The question left hanging seemed clear: Who wants to see encampments on the side of the road on their way to work, shopping or to see a movie? David Driedger, lead minister at First Mennonite Church in Winnipeg (Mikaela MacKenzie / Free Press files) An editorial in this newspaper discounted Browaty's proposal, suggesting it was more about optics than addressing the issue of safety — out of sight, out of mind. And, if applied, all it would do is move encampments to another part of the city and make it someone else's problem. Like the editorial writer, David Driedger isn't in favour of the councillor's idea. When it comes to encampments, Driedger, lead minister at First Mennonite Church in Winnipeg's West End, doesn't think moving them to less visible locations is the solution. Instead, those tents and tarps and shopping carts should be seen because they might be showing us a way to salvation. That's the argument he makes in his new book Nothing Will Save Us: A Theology of Immeasurable Life (Pandora Press). According to Driedger, the 'nothing' he refers to in the title are those people and places often seen as being of no importance. Yet these 'nothings' in the eyes of society are people loved by God. Not only that, they can hold the key to spiritual well being for people of faith — if they only pay attention. 'I want to call us to pay attention to those who are regarded as nothing in the eyes of the world,' said Driedger, adding that he isn't trying to romanticize the poor or poverty. 'Everyone is created by God, and we can see God in everyone and everything.' Through the book, which is aimed at Christians, Driedger argues that these 'nothing' places are where people can encounter God, discover truth and see how some structures of society are set up in such a way that some people, despite their best efforts, simply can't move forward or get ahead. Citing the Old Testament prophets who 'proclaimed that every king, regardless of his actions, caused the people to sin,' Driedger says structural sins like the old regulations that required Indigenous children to be sent to residential schools continue to have consequences that can be seen on the streets of Canadian cities today. Driedger's challenge to Christians is to not only support charities like food banks and soup kitchens, but to also think about how laws and structures that disadvantage and oppress certain segments of society can be changed. This includes laws that impact sex workers. When Driedger asked to meet with some, they were at first surprised a pastor wanted to talk with them. During the meeting, they spoke about the dangers of criminalizing their work, the lack of police protection and the Church's tendency to either 'rescue' or condemn them, instead of listening to them. In the book, Driedger compares their experiences to the women in the Gospel of Matthew's genealogy of Jesus. They were also women who transgressed social and sexual norms — people like Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba — in order to survive, but who are not discounted when it comes to telling the story of Jesus. Driedger goes on to wonder if Christians today can find ways to not discount women caught up in sex work, but to hear their voices and stories instead of judging them. The book is rooted in Winnipeg, using Winnipeg examples. For Driedger, that's also a good illustration of what he means about being overlooked and underestimated. 'Winnipeg seems neither small town nor big city, often discounted as nothing by insiders and outsiders alike,' he said. Weekly A weekly look at what's happening in Winnipeg's arts and entertainment scene. The same goes for the West End, where he lives and which he loves. 'Like many discounted neighbourhoods and their real challenges, there remains something welcoming and inclusive about the West End, resisting the measures of the upwardly mobile,' he said. Overall, the book is a reminder to Christians to take seriously what the Apostle Paul writes in the second chapter of Philippians. That's where he says that although Jesus was in the very nature of God, he did not use that to his advantage but rather 'made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant.' (New International Version.) Similarly, Driedger said, Christians should also 'empty themselves' of their preconceived ideas and stereotypes about people who are poor and marginalized in order to truly see and hear those who are seen as 'nothing' in this world. And, for him, that would include resisting efforts to clean up 'image routes' in the city of Winnipeg. faith@ The Free Press is committed to covering faith in Manitoba. If you appreciate that coverage, help us do more! Your contribution of $10, $25 or more will allow us to deepen our reporting about faith in the province. Thanks! BECOME A FAITH JOURNALISM SUPPORTER John LonghurstFaith reporter John Longhurst has been writing for Winnipeg's faith pages since 2003. He also writes for Religion News Service in the U.S., and blogs about the media, marketing and communications at Making the News. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
CTV News
5 hours ago
- CTV News
Island Lake First Nations demand fire prevention overhaul
First Nations leaders are speaking out and calling for a comprehensive plan to address wildfires and evacuations. CTV's Harrison Shin reports. The Chiefs of the Island Lake First Nations are demanding solutions from the perspective of fire prevention, not reactiveness. On Friday, leadership members of the Island Lake First Nations held a press conference in Winnipeg, demanding five solutions. 'This is not an emergency system; this is a cycle of failure. Our Chiefs and Anisininew Nations are saying to Canada, 'The cycle ends now,'' Grand Chief Alex McDougall of Anisininew Okimawin said. 'Leaders called for a national Indigenous fire strategy because of chronic lack of firefighting, fire prevention and emergency services in First Nations was a recipe for disaster,' McDougall added. In a media release, the Anisininew Okimawin leadership is demanding five action items, addressing future-proof measures and the current wildfire situation. 'We don't need to fund more evacuations—we need fund on staying home,' Chief Raymond Flett of St. Theresa Point Anisininew Nation said. Six leaders of the First Nations drew their statements based on a 2022 Auditor General of Canada report. '$646 million in response, and $182 million on prevention. That's unacceptable—this should be the other way around,' Chief Willie Moore of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs said. The Canadian Red Cross said the organization is working extremely hard to provide support, in an email statement. 'As of August 6, the Red Cross has registered more than 31,000 people from more than 12,000 households evacuated due to wildfires in Manitoba. This includes people from more than 7,000 households on behalf of Indigenous Services Canada, and more than 5,000 households on behalf of the Province of Manitoba. 'This is a fast-moving and evolving response and the Red Cross is working with community leadership, the Government of Manitoba and Indigenous Services Canada to provide support to people impacted, as requested and directed by the community,' the statement said. Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) said the department operates multiple programs to support First Nations, in an email response. 'Since April 1st, 2025, ISC has also provided $58.9 million in advance payments to support immediate response to First Nations in Manitoba experiencing displacements due to wildland fires. 'We are actively engaging with First Nations and Manitoba to discuss improvements based on lessons learned from the current wildfire season, particularly through the development of multilateral emergency management service agreements that include First Nations as full and equal partners in governance, planning, and delivery.' The federal department said it's open to working closely on long-term plans with communities and provincial governments that wish to build all-season roads. 'While the building and maintaining of permanent off-reserve roads falls under provincial jurisdiction, ISC will continue to engage the provinces and impacted First Nations on longer-term transportation plans.' For the First Nations affected, they said their future is at stake. 'We can't live like this for another 60—maybe 50—years,' Chief Walter Harper of Wasagamack Anisininew Nation said.
CTV News
5 hours ago
- CTV News
B.C. First Nation wins rights, title along Fraser River's south arm in Lower Mainland
The Law Courts building, which is home to B.C. Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal, is seen in Vancouver, on Thursday, Nov. 23, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck VICTORIA — A Vancouver Island First Nation has won back fishing rights and title for part of the land its ancestors used as a summer home in the Lower Mainland, despite opposition by two other Indigenous communities. A B.C. Supreme Court judge says in a written decision posted Friday that the Cowichan Tribes have established fishing rights on the Fraser River and title to a portion of almost 7 1/2 square kilometres of land they claimed on Lulu Island in Richmond, B.C. The Musqueam and Tsawwassen First Nations, along with the federal and provincial governments, the City of Richmond and the Vancouver-Fraser Port Authority all opposed the claim during the 513-day trial. Justice Barbara Young ruled that land titles grants issued by the Canadian and B.C. governments to others 'are defective and invalid' as they 'unjustifiably infringe the Cowichan Nation Aboriginal title to these lands.' The decision says both governments owe a duty to negotiate with the nation 'in good faith' on how to reconcile its land title with what's now in the territory, including the Vancouver Airport Fuel Delivery Project property. B.C. Premier David Eby says in a response that the province is reviewing the decision for a possible appeal and will also seek to resolve the issue by negotiating with all nations involved. 'But let me be clear: owning private property with clear title is key to borrowing for a mortgage, economic certainty, and the real estate market,' Eby says. 'We remain committed to protecting and upholding this foundation of business and personal predictability, and our provincial economy, for Indigenous and non-Indigenous people alike.' The area where the Cowichan have established title was used by the nation's ancestors during the summer as a 'permanent post and beam village' but was never established as a reserve, resulting in B.C. giving away the land starting in 1871. The Musqueam Indian Band — which declared in 1976 that it holds the Aboriginal title covering both the north and south arms of the Fraser River — says in a statement that it is deeply disappointed and 'fundamentally' disagrees with the court decision. It says that it has established 'national legal precedent on Aboriginal title and fishing rights' through two major cases in the Supreme Court of Canada, and it plans to 'continue to vigorously defend these rights.' 'Musqueam is shocked the court didn't give effect to oral history and traditional governance protocols, which guide intercommunity relationships since time immemorial,' the statement says. Musqueam Chief Wayne Sparrow said in an interview that the land in question is in the heart of the nation's territory and double the size of the Musqueam reserve. 'We're disappointed, but not surprised. We've been down this path many times before,' he said. 'We've had decisions that the lower courts go against us, and we brought them to the higher courts and were successful there. And those are the options that we're going to be looking at in the next week or so.' All parties have 30 days to decide if they will appeal. The Vancouver Fraser Port Authority says in a statement that it is reviewing the implications and details of the decision alongside other affected federal government departments, and further updates will be provided at an appropriate time. The Cowichan Tribes says in a news release that it is 'celebrating a historic victory,' while honouring 'generations of leaders' in the community who fought to win the Aboriginal title on the Fraser River land. 'It is in their honour and for the well-being of our future generations that the elders, knowledge holders, and chiefs who have gone before us brought this case forward to recognize our Aboriginal title and fishing rights, as a basis for truth and reconciliation, through the courts,' it says. Young says in the decision that while evidence shows a number of Coast Salish groups being historically located in the lower Fraser River region, some places, such as the area of the Cowichan claim, 'belonged to specific groups.' The judge says the Cowichan 'had the capacity and intention to exclusively control their village land and some surrounding areas on the south arm of the Fraser River' before 1846, when the British Crown asserted sovereignty in the area. 'This was the Cowichan village,' the ruling says. 'It belonged to the Cowichan, and other groups respected that it was on Cowichan land. 'The Cowichan exercised effective control over their land. There is no evidence of other Indigenous groups occupying this village.' The court recognizes that the case 'raised complex … and novel issues,' its decision says. 'The fact is, all the parties have continued interests, rights and obligations around the south arm of the Fraser River and limited resources need to be shared and preserved,' Young says in the decision. 'Now that this multi‑year journey has concluded, it is my sincere hope that the parties have the answers they need to return to negotiations and reconcile the outstanding issues.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 8, 2025. The Canadian Press
