It's not just about vouchers and school funding. Here are the other Texas public education bills you should track.
Many other bills aim to reshape public education in Texas. Some offer additional resources, while others introduce new restrictions. Proposed legislation would boost funding for campus safety, support students who are falling behind in math and reading, and prohibit the use of cellphones during school hours.
Other measures have drawn more controversy. These include bills that would extend the state's higher ed ban on diversity, equity and inclusion programs to K-12 schools, require the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms, and expand teachers' authority to discipline students. Supporters say these changes will improve classroom environments, while critics warn they could harm the state's most vulnerable children.
Here's a look at some of the most significant education bills under consideration and where they stand in the legislative process.
In March, the Texas Senate approved a bill that would expand the state's DEI ban on its public colleges and universities to K-12 public schools. The measure, Senate Bill 12, is now under consideration in the Texas House.
SB 12, filed by Sen. Brandon Creighton, the Conroe Republican who chairs the Senate's K-16 education committee, would prevent school districts from taking race, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation into account in employment decisions. It would also outlaw trainings, programs and activities that reference those characteristics, unless required by federal or state law.
In addition, the bill would bar student groups centered on sexual orientation or gender identity from public schools. It would also give parents the right to file complaints about any perceived violations of the DEI ban, prompting formal investigations.
Supporters say that DEI initiatives waste instructional time and taxpayer funds, and push political ideologies onto students. During a hearing earlier this year, Creighton said DEI programs are 'using millions of taxpayer dollars meant for the classroom to fund political activism and political agendas.'
Opponents warn that eliminating DEI support could worsen inequities; increase bullying, harassment and discrimination; exacerbate mental health problems; make some students feel ashamed of their identities; limit how topics like race are discussed in classrooms; and allow racism to grow in schools.
Meanwhile, Senate Bill 13, by Sen. Angela Paxton, R-McKinney, would give school boards and parents more control over what books can be put in school libraries, as well as ban books that have 'indecent content or profane content.' Anti-censorship advocates say it could lead to the removal of books featuring gender and sexuality content from school libraries. The bill was passed by the Senate in March and is awaiting consideration in the House.
Earlier this year, the Texas Senate approved a pair of bills that would require the Ten Commandments to be displayed in classrooms and set aside time during the school day for prayer.
The measures are priorities for Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the leader of the Texas Senate, which approved them in March. They are now awaiting consideration in the House.
Supporters say the bills are an acknowledgement of the country's religious roots and would help restore traditional values. Sen. Mayes Middleton, the Republican who authored Senate Bill 11, the prayer-in-school bill, defended the legislation by saying, 'Our schools are not God-free zones.' He added, 'We are a state and nation built on 'In God We Trust.''
Senate Bill 10, the Ten Commandments bill, was met with sharp criticism from some Democratic lawmakers. Sen. Sarah Eckhardt, D-Austin, has argued the measure goes too far in promoting a specific faith. 'Most Texans are religious,' she said during floor debate in March, 'but I would venture that Texans do not want religion crammed down their throat by their government.'
Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas, also raised concerns during the debate. He read aloud a letter signed by 166 religious leaders from across the state, including Jewish, Muslim, Christian, Sikh and Buddhist representatives, who urged lawmakers to oppose the Ten Commandments bill. The letter warned against turning public schools into places of worship, arguing that such moves risk alienating students from diverse backgrounds.
As Texas struggles with a severe teacher shortage, school districts, especially in rural areas, have increasingly turned to hiring uncertified educators to fill classroom vacancies. Last year, 56% of newly hired teachers across the state were not certified, raising concerns about the quality of education students are receiving.
Senate Bill 2253, would require schools to have only certified teachers in core subjects by the 2029-30 school year. To help teachers, it would include a one-time $1,000 stipend for some untrained educators who were recently hired and get certified by the end of the next school year. The bill is awaiting a vote in the Senate.
Amid rising concerns about classroom violence, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic, Texas lawmakers are pushing legislation that would expand school districts' authority to discipline students.
House Bill 6 passed the House and is now being reviewed by the Senate K-16 Education Committee. It seeks to give schools more flexibility in handling disruptive behavior. The bill would allow administrators to suspend students for 'repeated and significant' classroom disruptions or for actions that endanger the safety of others, requiring those students to remain out of school during the suspension period.
In recent years, Texas law has limited such discipline. Students in pre-K through second grade have generally been protected from suspension unless they committed serious crimes. Similar protections have applied to homeless students, who could only be suspended in cases involving violence, weapons, drugs or alcohol. HB 6 would roll back those restrictions, giving schools broader discretion to suspend these students.
Though the bill has received strong Republican support in the House, some lawmakers say it needs more clarity. In March, Rep. Gina Hinojosa, D-Austin, urged representatives to tighten the bill's language, warning, 'we're not sending kindergarteners home to an empty apartment.'
Another bill, Senate Bill 1872, which has passed by the Senate and is under review by the House Public Education Committee, would require the expulsion of any student who assaults a teacher or a school volunteer, even if the incident happened off campus. Expelled students would be placed in the Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program, which serves students who have been removed from their original schools.
Another bill would expedite the process of referring students to truancy court when they miss out on school. Senate Bill 1925, which still hasn't received a vote in the Senate K-16 Education Committee, would no longer require schools to intervene before referring students to court. It also requires schools to notify parents if their children have three truancies in four weeks.
Meanwhile, Senate Bill 1871 would make it easier for students to get mental health help through the telehealth platforms and for those required to go to an alternative education program to participate virtually. The measure has passed the Senate and was referred to the House Education Committee.
Lawmakers are also considering increasing funding for school safety.
In 2023, a year after the Uvalde elementary school shooting, the state passed House Bill 3, mandating armed officers at every school. The law also increased schools' annual safety allotment to $10 per student, gave districts $15,000 per school for safety upgrades, and created a $1.1 billion grant program to help school districts pay for additional school safety requirements, like silent panic alerts.
Many school leaders said the measure wasn't enough to pay for those new jobs or otherwise implement the law effectively. Law enforcement shortages have also made it hard for schools to hire new officers.
One key proposal this session is Senate Bill 260, authored by Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Houston, which would give schools an additional $28 per student and $30,000 per campus each year to pay for safety upgrades. The bill has been passed in both chambers. Lawmakers will now meet behind closed doors to resolve the differences between their two versions.
Another bill, Senate Bill 598, introduced by Sen. Royce West, D-Dallas, offers a more generous funding model, proposing to give schools $100 per student and $60,000 per campus each year for school safety. The bill is currently under review by the Senate K-16 Education Committee.
Earlier this month, the Texas House approved House Bill 123, which aims to provide struggling students extra learning support as early as kindergarten, before learning gaps compound. Last month, the Senate passed a similar bill, Senate Bill 2252. Members from both chambers are now expected to reconcile differences in their proposals in a closed-door conference committee.
More than half of third graders in the state are not at grade level in reading or math, meaning they lack the key foundational skills they need to thrive as learners. Students who are behind in third grade rarely catch up, which can lead to serious consequences later in life. Research shows students who struggle to read by third grade are more likely to drop out of high school. Math proficiency is tied to economic mobility as an adult.
The legislation would require districts to use literacy and numeracy screeners to identify students who are struggling early on. The screeners would assess students three times a year between pre-K and 3rd grade on skills like phonics, vocabulary and spelling. Those who are furthest behind would get extra tutoring in small group settings.
The legislation would also expand educators' access to math and reading instructional materials. Teachers often work unpaid hours to complete training known as math and reading academies, which give them the tools to help build students' skills in those subjects. HB 123 would give districts funding to pay teachers who take those courses after their regular workday.
After several states across the country introduced strict limits on cellphone use in public schools, Texas lawmakers are considering a similar approach.
House Bill 1481, introduced by Rep. Caroline Fairly of Amarillo, the only Gen Z member of the Texas House, aims to significantly restrict the use of "personal communication devices" in public schools. This includes cellphones, tablets, smartwatches and similar electronics. Fairly said she hopes the measure will improve students' mental health and academic performance. Supporters of the bill say it could help reduce cyberbullying.
The bill would give school districts some flexibility in how to implement the restrictions. They would be able to ban the devices entirely, provide designated storage areas, or extend the ban to extracurricular activities.
However, not all lawmakers support the proposal. During a hearing earlier this year, Rep. Alma Allen, D-Houston, expressed concerns that the policy might prevent students from reaching emergency services or contacting their parents when needed.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's GOP allies warn against Ukraine entanglement
President Trump's Republican allies are putting pressure on him not to entangle the U.S. militarily in Ukraine after he signaled an openness to helping craft security guarantees for the embattled nation in its war against Russian aggression. Trump and the White House on Tuesday insisted the U.S. would not put boots on the ground in Ukraine, but floated the idea of providing air support using U.S. pilots and warplanes. That came after a meeting on Monday at the White House with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and seven other European leaders, during which they discussed security guarantees for Kyiv in lieu of allowing it into NATO, a red line for Russian President Vladimir Putin. While the summit resulted in few specifics about what those security guarantees would entail, at one point a reporter asked Trump if the U.S. would send troops to Ukraine. Trump didn't answer directly but said the U.S. would 'help them out.' That, combined with special envoy Steve Witkoff saying the U.S. could participate in ' Article 5-like protections ' for Ukraine, has set off alarm bells for some of Trump's 'America First' supporters. Top allies are warning him not to go too far, citing a key MAGA tenet of not getting involved in any lengthy conflicts or 'forever wars.' 'I'd have to look at what the responsibilities would be. We don't want another war,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told reporters at the Capitol on Tuesday. 'People in this country, they can't fathom that after 20 years of war over in the Middle East and then getting into another. I know the president's not into that, but we don't want anything to happen in terms of having to fight and lose more lives.' When asked how big of an ask that would be to constituents and voters, the Alabama senator — a top MAGA supporter — was blunt. 'It would be an impossible sell,' said Tuberville, who is currently running to become governor of his home state. 'The American people aren't going to go for it, I'm just going to tell you that right now. The people in Alabama would be definitely against it. … I know President Trump's trying to do the right thing, but people in Europe have to take responsibility for this.' 'President Trump enjoys taking over and trying to help, but he knows he can only go so far with all this. … [He's] trying to do what's right for us,' Tuberville added. 'But there's no appetite for war or us getting involved with this anyway with troops on the ground that would actually fight. We're talking about security, which might be different.' Pressed during a phone interview with 'Fox & Friends' Tuesday morning about any 'assurances' he could make that there will not be any U.S. troops on the ground in Ukraine as part of any deal, Trump sought to quell any eruption by supporters. 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president,' he said, suggesting that France, Germany, and Great Britain might do so instead. Trump's latest remarks came a day after marathon meetings with the European cohort, during which Zelensky specifically referenced progress towards a deal on security guarantees. They are among the most prominent Ukrainian demands for any deal that may include ceding territory to the Russians. Zelensky also noted that as part of a potential security guarantee agreement, Kyiv would purchase $90 billion in American weapons, including sophisticated systems for air-defense support and war planes. The U.S. would buy Ukrainian drones in return. Some of Trump's top supporters almost immediately warned him against getting involved militarily. 'Right now, it's all predicated on American cash, American arms, and now they're going to need American involvement,' former White House strategist and conservative firebrand Steve Bannon said on his radio show Monday, adding that European leaders and Senate GOP hawks cannot be trusted on this issue. Bannon said the group is 'trying to get America sucked into a deep involvement' in the region. 'These are tripwires,' Bannon said. 'This is where things go from regional conflicts to world wars.' The battle also marks the latest one where Trump has had to straddle the concerns of key MAGA figures. He has had to manage similar situations in Iran after the U.S. struck against their nuclear capabilities and backed Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Jack Posobiec, a right-wing activist and editor at Human Events, also pressed White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt about the questions about the security guarantees being discussed. 'The president understands the security guarantees are crucially important to ensure a lasting peace,' Leavitt said at Tuesday's press briefing. 'He has directed his national security team to coordinate with our friends in Europe, and also to continue to cooperate and discuss these matters with Ukraine and Russia as well.' The Ukrainians are seeking security guarantees akin to those afforded to NATO nations via Article 5, which Witkoff, Trump's envoy to the Middle East and Ukraine, floated over the weekend. That would potentially draw the U.S. into a larger conflict if Moscow attacked the peacekeeping effort. Russia has vociferously objected to security guarantees even though Trump indicated recently that Putin would be open to the idea of a peacekeeping force by NATO nations in eastern Ukraine. 'We reiterate our longstanding position of unequivocally rejecting any scenarios involving the deployment of NATO military contingents in Ukraine, as this risks uncontrollable escalation with unpredictable consequences,' said Maria Zakharova, a spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry. Trump and European leaders are expected to continue discussion in the coming days in a bid to keep up the momentum. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is set to head up a U.S.-European-Ukrainian commission to draft a proposal of potential security guarantees as part of a final accord, and Trump is seeking a meeting with both Putin and Zelensky.


Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's ‘Chinese Model' Is Making the US a Corporate Stakeholder
Donald Trump may be the leader of the Republican Party, but when it comes to the free market—the very economic foundation of the modern GOP—he appears to be headed in the opposite direction of long-held doctrine. Trump is now directly intervening in corporate matters, ostensibly to achieve his economic and foreign policy goals. This includes demanding a government cut of AI chip sales to China from Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. He's also said to be in talks to grab a 10% stake in the beleaguered chipmaker Intel. And last month, the Pentagon snapped up a $400 million preferred equity stake in a rare earth mining company.


Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
THE LAST LINE OF DEFENSE: Sen. Eric Schmitt Breaks Down The Necessity of Beating the Left's Lawfare
Senator Eric Schmitt, Republican of Missouri and author of the brand new book The Last Line of Defense: How to Beat the Left in Court (out today), joined The Guy Benson Show today to discuss why it is both good and necessary for the right to challenge the left's overreach in court. He explained why their continued grasp for control must be reined in and why true leadership requires people to stand up and fight. Schmitt also said indictments are the next step in the Russiagate collusion scandal. Finally, Sen. Schmitt stressed that Republicans must have the 'courage' to redistrict Democrats who, in his words, 'set the rules' with their gerrymandering efforts. Listen to the full interview below! Listen to the full interview below: Listen to the full podcast below: