KCPS staff, city leaders join in rally for ‘yes' on school bond vote
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Teachers, students and parents were joined by city council members and Mayor Quinton Lucas on Saturday to rally in support of a 'yes' vote on Tuesday's upcoming Kansas City Public Schools bond vote.
If approved, the bond would send $474 million to KCPS to update buildings districtwide.
'When you get a chance to visit our schools right now,' said Kansas City, Missouri Mayor Quinton Lucas.
'You see, our infrastructure is not where it needs to be.'
What to know about Kansas City's early voting sites ahead of election
Teachers and administrators at James Elementary said that their 110-year-old building needs a makeover.
'It's not ADA accessible in any way; we have wonderful high ceilings in classrooms, but we are rocking the original wood floors from the original construction of the school,' said Marjorie Mayes, principal of the elementary school in Kansas City's historic northeast neighborhood.
'It's just not fit for the 21st century.'
Instructional Coach Elizabeth Warwick says that a pipe burst in the building earlier in the year.
'The point of schools is to be there to learn. So, it's incredibly disruptive,' she said.
Lucas and Warwick both pointed out that other districts are better equipped than KCPS.
'I have been a public school educator for 13 years, I came from the Chicago Public Schools,' Warwick said.
'And the schools in Chicago don't look like this.' Lucas agreed.
'The strongest school districts in our entire region are the ones that invest in great facilities and great opportunities for their kids. Do you want that for us or do you not?'
The question on Tuesday's ballot says that the city will pay for the renovations by levying a new property tax. An additional $0.61 tax per every $100 on your valuation. Someone with a property worth $500,000 would pay an additional $3050 in property taxes, should the bond pass.
KCK doctor got paid by health care companies to commit fraud
Folks rallying and canvassing on Saturday said they think the vote is worth it.
'If we want to be a city that's going to be fully arrived in the year 2025 and beyond, we have to address the needs of our schools,' Mayes said.
'Kansas City, you know, we're growing and known for great sports teams or the streetcar,' said Laura Wallner, who was canvassing on Saturday morning. 'We're investing in so many things; we should invest as much in our kids and their futures.'
The school bond vote will be on Tuesday, April 8.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Missouri Senate passes stadium funding bill overnight
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The Missouri Senate worked into the early-morning hours Thursday to pass a trio of bills, one of which will provide funding for stadium projects for both the Kansas City Royals and the Chiefs. The vote for Senate Bill 3 came in at 2:30 a.m. with 19 voting for it and 13 against it. Getting to this point hasn't been easy, and that theme continued. Download WDAF+ for Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV The tension from the regular session has carried over into the special session. But with time working against them, state lawmakers managed to find enough common ground to vote through the Show Me Sports Investment Act. The bill sets the framework for which the Royals and the Chiefs could use to pay back some of the costs for new and renovated venues. Construction bonds would be paid back using tax money generated at the stadiums and would cover up to 50% of the cost to build it. The teams would have to qualify to have access to that money. The stadiums would need to be built for football or baseball, have more than 30,000 seats and cost at least half a billion dollars. Missouri news: Headlines from St. Louis, Jefferson City and across the Show-Me State Senate Bill 3 does not have the words 'Royals' or 'Chiefs' in it, but a big reason for the calling of this special session was to find a way to keep both teams in the state and counter the plans of Kansas lawmakers. Nearly a year ago, the Kansas legislature approved a bill to utilize STAR bonds to cover stadium construction costs. The Missouri Senate has adjourned and is expected to convene again June 16. The Missouri House is set to vote on bill next. Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas issued the following statement hours after the vote Thursday via X: 'I thank the Missouri Senate for its work in special session, passing proposals supporting disaster relief in Eastern Missouri, funding key education and health initiatives for our future, and competitiveness for sports and entertainment retention and attraction in Missouri. I am grateful for the attention and investment of time to be provided next by the Missouri House on this important bipartisan work building a responsible future and opportunity for our state and its people.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Elsmere city councilwoman resigns after alleged misconduct and missed meetings
Hours before her fate as a council member was set to be determined at a June 4 meeting, an Elsmere city councilwoman resigned from her position effective immediately, according to an email sent to The Enquirer and other city council members. Serena Owen, who was serving her second term on Elsmere's city council submitted her letter of resignation after months during which she was accused of misconduct and missed meetings. "I am writing to formally submit my resignation from my position as a Councilwoman for the City of Elsmere, effective immediately," Owen wrote. "This decision has not been made lightly but is necessitated by the escalating challenges that have profoundly impacted my ability to serve effectively and safely," Owen said her resignation comes as a result of her fear of being shot at a public meeting by a man she claims has harassed her online, and her "repeated and justified requests for a minimal inexpensive ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) hybrid video teleconference accommodation to attend council meetings virtually (free Zoom/Teams link)" being dismissed. In March, the six-member Elsmere City Council unanimously voted to begin proceedings to remove Owen from office. Since then, they've announced seven charges against her including willful negligence and misconduct. A public meeting was set to be held June 4 from 6-7 p.m. to discuss the removal of Owen from her position on the council. The Enquirer reached out to the City of Elsmere's city clerk Katie Hehman, who declined to confirm the resignation. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Northern Kentucky councilwoman resigns from her position
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use
A lawsuit seeking the development of in-home psilocybin services for individuals with disabilities in Oregon will continue after a U.S. district court denied a motion to dismiss on May 30. The case could set an important precedent for future drug laws and accessibility for all Americans, including those with disabilities. In 2020, 56 percent of Oregonians voted in favor of the Oregon Psilocybin Services Act (Measure 109), which directed the Oregon Health Authority to license and regulate psilocybin products and services for individuals aged 21 and older. While a handful of cities in the U.S. had previously decriminalized psilocybin, Oregon was the first state to both decriminalize and create a legal regulatory framework for its supervised use. After two years of rule drafting, the OHA began accepting applications in 2023 for licensed psilocybin service centers, which are regulated facilities where psilocybin can be administered. Rather than focus on selling a product, service centers are geared toward health and wellness and are designed to offer support before, during, and after psilocybin use by licensed service facilitators. This model opened up psilocybin use for most Oregon residents but makes accessing psilocybin services impossible for individuals unable to leave home because of a disability. To fix this oversight in the law, four practitioners licensed by the state to guide people through psilocybin experiences have alleged that the current OHA process fails to reasonably accommodate those with disabilities as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Cusker et al v. OHA was filed after the OHA denied the plaintiffs' request for a process to be developed for in-home psilocybin services to people with disabilities who are unable to visit service centers. In response to the request, state attorneys argued that "there is no legal pathway to make accommodations for psilocybin to be consumed outside of a licensed service center" and that Measure 109 "would need to be amended for accommodations to be permitted." Although the measure only allows the use of psilocybin under facilitator supervision at a service center—which has to comply with specific location requirements, including stipulations prohibiting a center from being located within "the limits of an incorporated city or town" or in areas "zoned exclusively for residential use"—others believe the OHA has the authority and flexibility needed to interpret the language consistent with ADA requirements. But the OHA has declined to address the issue through rule making. The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon since the claim revolves around the OHA violating the ADA, a federal law. While psilocybin was decriminalized and legally regulated under Oregon law, it remains classified as a Schedule I controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act. The OHA filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that the federal court lacked jurisdiction to decide the case because plaintiffs were asking the court to violate both state and federal law. The federal court would have to order the OHA to break federal law if it required the agency to produce, possess, or administer a Schedule I drug. The OHA also argued that the court would have to order a violation of Oregon's Controlled Substances Act if it required the agency to dispense psilocybin outside of a service center. Ultimately, the court denied the OHA's motion to dismiss, relying on case law involving a non-ADA-compliant marijuana dispensary. In Smith v. 116 S Market LLC (2020), Michael Smith, who is paraplegic, encountered difficulty accessing a dispensary due to a lack of accessible parking spaces, uneven ground between the parking lot and entry, and a noncompliant ramp. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Smith, granting him $4,000 in statutory damages for each encounter, under the rationale that the decision did not force the dispensary owner to distribute a Schedule I drug but merely required ADA compliance—which does not violate federal law. By adopting this reasoning, Cusker will be able to move forward. The post New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use appeared first on
