
How Can I Protect My Business When I Get Divorced?
The court will ask that your business and business interests be valued as part of the financial disclosure, and there is a very real danger that your estranged spouse might think the value of your business is far greater than it is when the family's assets are being divided.
The court will ask how much the business is worth, what income it can produce, and whether it should be producing more.
You will need to disclose the last two years' accounts and the projected income. How these accounts are prepared can have a huge influence on the outcome.
Judges can look at the money in the business and whether that should be used to settle wider divorce claims; however, that money may be the funds you have set aside for expansion plans or investment in new technology.
To this end, it is essential that your needs, and the needs of your business, are treated in a fair way and seeking the advice of a law firm that fully understands both family law, as well as regularly dealing in corporate law, is vital.
While divorce often involves the sharing of assets such as the family home, savings and pensions, for couples where one spouse has significant business interests, the divorce process becomes more complex.
If you've built up a business from scratch, you don't want to see it close just because of your divorce.
Every divorcing business owner or person should look at the options available for business protection and continuity, and getting expert help as early as possible can also prevent legal problems later on.
What is the likely outcome?
Most courts often leave the business with the business owner and give the other spouse a larger share of other assets, or maintenance, instead.
This may be a favourable outcome for the business owner, but not always.
There could also be a division of shares or income from the business and in rare cases, courts can also order that a business be sold.
What should I do to protect my business?
Make the court understand your vision for the business by giving them enough detail – don't just give it the basics.
A court may not want to disrupt your plans for the business because of a divorce and will want to know why you've structured it in the way you have. Tell the judge your goals.
Also, answer these questions…
Who set up the business, and when was it established?
If it was set up before the marriage by you or your family, you could argue its value as a matrimonial asset. If your spouse has contributed to it, though, acknowledge it accurately. This combats them exaggerating or over-stating their part in your success.
Is someone else involved in it?
If so, there will be a different interpretation by the courts if taking money out of the business could damage someone else's livelihood. The sale of shares can also be limited by the Memorandum and Articles of Association or a Shareholder Agreement.
Does your business have a lot of capital or is it income-rich?
This will determine the court's approach. It will look at whether there are capital assets that can be sold without damaging the business or if they can be borrowed against. Some businesses are merely income streams, and the court can deal with this situation by a maintenance order.
Are you developing something now to sell later?
The court might track how that aspect of the business develops and look at your spouse sharing in some of the later profits.
What are your business's strengths and weaknesses?
Explain the conditions in the market but don't exaggerate problems. The court needs to see your description as credible.
Do you have a company or business pension?
If you do, what is its value?
Will you sell the business when you retire or pass it to your children?
This could strongly affect the way the court looks at the case.
These are just a handful of areas to consider, but one thing is sure, you need a law firm that understands both divorce and family law as well as corporate law.
At Peter Lynn and Partners, we not only offer both areas of law, but we have an excellent track record when representing business people to protect their family assets as well as their business assets during a divorce.
For expert advice and to arrange an initial confidential meeting, call 01792 450010 or email info@plandp.co.uk and visit https://www.peterlynnandpartners.co.uk/divorce/ for more information.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'The same country': Canada often seen as extension of U.S., Indo-Pacific experts say
OTTAWA — Ottawa's Indo-Pacific strategy has yet to give Canada adequate visibility or distinguish it from the U.S. in the region, experts have told researchers commissioned by the federal government. The Liberals launched the strategy in late 2022 to make Canada a partner of choice for some of the fastest-growing economies on the planet. In releasing the strategy, Ottawa acknowledged that it is perceived locally as having engaged only intermittently in the region over the decades. More than two years later, a report commissioned by Global Affairs Canada says regional experts see Canada as "a strategic but secondary player aligned with U.S. geopolitical priorities" that is "often perceived as an extension of U.S. foreign policy rather than an independent global actor." Global Affairs Canada hired Ipsos to write the report after the firm surveyed 45 experts between March and May on how the strategy was being perceived in five countries: Australia, South Korea, India, Indonesia and the Philippines. GAC paid roughly $199,976, including taxes, for the research, which took place in local languages and sought feedback through an invitation letter on GAC letterhead. The exercise is meant to inform the strategy's five-year evaluation in 2027. The report says that Canada lacks a strong brand in the region. "If we go down the street today (and) we ask people whether Canada and America are the same country, they probably won't be able to tell the difference," one regional expert in Indonesia told Ipsos. Ipsos went over the strategy's five stated objectives: security, expanding trade and resilient supply chains, sustainability, people-to-people ties, and Canadian engagement. The survey says Canada enjoys "a predominantly positive image" in the five countries, as a commodity-exporting country with strong democratic principles. Experts in South Korea and India told Ipsos Canada has historically been seen as an attractive place to study or live, "and this continues to remain somewhat true." Expensive cities and strict visa requirements have undermined this reputation, the report says. "While negative impressions were minimal, some experts in India mentioned diplomatic tensions over the Khalistan movement," the report says, referring to Sikh separatism, adding "they were of the view that the situation has not significantly marred Canada's overall reputation in the country." Respondents in Australia cited Canada's continued extraction of climate-warming fossil fuels as a source of concern, while a South Korean expert said Canada's CANDU nuclear reactors produce too much radioactive waste. According to someone researchers quoted as "a key respondent from South Korea," Canada is "slow-moving and resistant to change." Another Korean expert told Ipsos Canada lacks prominent manufacturers and suggested "the best-known Canadian product is probably ice wine." Despite Canadian officials citing the decades-long footprint in the region of Canadian companies such as Manulife — which has offered insurance services in the Philippines since 1901 — the reported noted "limited awareness of Canadian brands in the Philippines." An expert in Australia told Ipsos that Canada is "just not on our radar screen at all … like almost people have forgotten about it." A Korean expert said "the Canadian embassy has seemed comparatively passive" compared to Australian and New Zealand counterparts. The report warns Canada's "limited on-the-ground visibility" makes it less likely to be seen as a partner of choice in the region. "Several experts pointed to Canada's lack of strategic communication, limited embassy presence, and minimal economic and military footprint in the region as factors hindering its engagement with the region," the report says. As for the strategy itself, experts quoted in the report recommended a publicity campaign — most of them said they'd never heard of the strategy before. Many suggested the strategy document was "a starting point for enhanced regional involvement," while some said it echoed what other countries already outlined in their own strategies. "Some experts noted that the strategy relied heavily on widely accepted diplomatic principles without clearly articulating Canada's unique impact," the report notes. "The (Indo-Pacific strategy) is seen as well-intentioned but somewhat generic, echoing similar frameworks already introduced by others. At worst, the (strategy) risks being seen as 'preachy' or as being of limited relevance." The researchers did find support for Canada playing a more prominent role, particularly "as a bridge-builder among competing powers." The report says most of the region is undertaking a "delicate balancing" act in response to the growing rivalry between Washington and Beijing. "Some regional experts saw an opportunity for Canada to evolve its positioning and demonstrate greater strategic independence from the U.S.," the report says. "There was an expectation for Canada to build on its legacy as a principled and constructive partner while balancing humility with ambition that matches the resources and capabilities at its disposal." The report says there is "significant room for growth" in security collaboration on things like cybersecurity, and in investments in regional think tanks. Canada should "consider joining" a security partnership with Australia, India, Japan and the U.S. known as the Quad, the report says. In trade, the report finds a deep desire for "joint ventures to provide opportunities for innovation," particularly in areas that will improve the lives of the average citizen, such as "critical minerals, clean energy, agri-food, and digital technologies." Ottawa this week named a high commissioner for Fiji, 32 months after promising to open a full diplomatic mission in the Polynesian country. "While the exact timing of the high commissioner's arrival in Fiji is to be determined, Global Affairs Canada has started to deploy diplomatic staff in preparation for the opening of a full diplomatic mission," said department spokeswoman Clémence Grevey. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 15, 2025. Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Freeport Unlocks Surprise Copper Cargo
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) just gave the copper market a bit of breathing room. The mining giant is offloading more ore than anyone expected after an oxygen plant problem at its PT Smelting facility in Indonesia stretched a planned four-week shutdown. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with UNH. That smelter usually processes material from Freeport's massive Grasberg copper-gold mine, but with operations on hold, the company suddenly has about 100,000 tons of copper concentrate ready to go. They're moving fast too the shipments need to clear before a short-term export license expires in mid-September. It's not a game-changer for the global copper market, but for smelters scrambling for raw material after a big jump in processing capacity worldwide, it's a welcome dose of supply. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cohere Scores $500 Million as IPO Talk Heats Up
Cohere just pulled in another $500 million, pushing its valuation to $6.8 billion as the Canadian AI startup inches closer to what's looking like an inevitable IPO. The round was led by Radical Ventures and Inovia Capital, with heavy backing from AMD Ventures (NASDAQ:AMD), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), PSP Investments, Salesforce Ventures (CRM) and a handful of new investors. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. The fresh cash will go toward ramping up its agentic AI tools software built to make businesses and governments more efficient by automating repetitive work. We're at a pivotal moment, CEO Aidan Gomez said, adding that the new funding sets the stage for the company's next phase of growth. Cohere's also bringing in serious muscle for that next chapter. Joelle Pineau, former VP of AI Research at Meta and a McGill University professor, joins as Chief AI Officer. Francois Chadwick, Uber's (UBER) ex-CFO during its IPO push, takes over as finance chief. Both bring the kind of big-league experience that could help Cohere make the leap to the public markets. For investors, the mix of fresh capital, a stronger exec team, and fast-rising valuation sends a clear message: Cohere's gearing up to play in the AI big leagues. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.