Rural New England needs EV chargers to keep tourism flowing. The Trump administration is making it harder to build them.
Some businesses and municipalities in the state are looking to ramp up the construction of public EV charging stations to meet growing demand. But a recent move by President Donald Trump's administration could make doing so more difficult. On Feb. 6, the Federal Highway Administration released a
Get N.H. Morning Report
A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Reardon is the president of the White Mountains Attractions Association, which operates a visitor center in North Woodstock, N.H. Travel and tourism make up the second-largest sector in the state's economy, and most visitors arrive by car. But New Hampshire's slow approach to building public EV infrastructure could cost the state more than $1.4 billion in tourism revenue by 2031, Clean Energy NH and Ski NH found in a January 2025
Advertisement
The region that will be hardest hit is the White Mountains, which is projected to lose $353 million by 2031, according to the study, which was supported by the Environmental Defense Fund.
With EVs projected to approach 30 percent of the cars on New England roads between now and the early 2030s, the study found that New Hampshire will fall behind neighboring Vermont and Maine—its key competitors in the regional tourism market—should it continue to lag in developing EV infrastructure. For Reardon, the need is already clear. Fast chargers are in the works at the visitor center where Reardon is based, located off Interstate 93, which connects Boston to the White Mountains.
Advertisement
The memo from the Federal Highway Administration has caused confusion and concern among states and contractors hired to install projects, said Loren McDonald, chief analyst at Paren, an EV data platform tracking how states use federal funds for EV infrastructure.
'There is no legal basis and authority to do this,' said McDonald. 'It is all about creating havoc.'
The NEVI program was established by Congress under the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022. To fundamentally change the NEVI program, Congress will need to revise the law. McDonald said he expects state attorneys general to prepare lawsuits against the memo in coordination with their departments of transportation and energy, which funnel NEVI funds to projects at the local level.
In the meantime, states are pausing parts of their NEVI programs. While New Hampshire has already been awarded
A spokesman from New Hampshire's Department of Transportation confirmed to the Daily Yonder that the state will continue with phase one NEVI sites as planned. The spokesman said phase two NEVI development is 'on hold' until the state receives further guidance and direction from its federal partners.
Advertisement
Beyond phase one NEVI funding the Granite State has already invested into projects in the White Mountains and other regions, close to $30 million in federal funding has been greenlit for building public charging infrastructure along major roadways and in communities. That funding comes through the rest of the NEVI program and the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Grant Program, which was created by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
While the Feb. 6 memo from the Federal Highway Administration says that reimbursement of 'existing obligations' will be allowed, it's unclear which projects are considered to be 'obligated,' given that the memo also suspends approvals for all plans for all years of the program. This comes as all states that have submitted their annual NEVI plans have received approval and obligation for four out of the program's five years, McDonald said.
'It's a real head scratcher, because on one hand it's saying we're going to reimburse for existing obligations, but it's also saying we're throwing out the first four years of the plans,' McDonald said.
EV charging stations at Loon Mountain Resort in New Hampshire's White Mountains region.
Julia Tilton
'Here in New England, people drive'
The White Mountain Attraction Association tallies 51 charging stations in the region, most of which are located at restaurants and lodging facilities. Ski areas like Loon Mountain Resort and Cranmore Mountain Resort have also invested in EV infrastructure, which tends to be more open to the public, Reardon said.
'The North Country we often refer to as a charging desert, or 'the donut hole,'' said Jessyca Keeler, president of Ski NH, one of the organizations associated with the tourism impact study.
Advertisement
In a region known for its year-round recreational activities such as skiing, biking, and hiking, this poses a challenge for meeting visitors' needs.
'This is important for our industry because here in New England, people drive,' Keeler said.
In 2022, Massachusetts and Connecticut sent more than 4 million tourists to the Granite State out of 14.3 million total overnight visitors that year. Massachusetts sends the most visitors to the state of any place of origin, and in the winter, roughly half of all skiers come from the Bay State.
Drivers in Massachusetts and Connecticut are also adopting EVs faster than their New Hampshire counterparts. Seventy-seven percent of all EVs in New England were operated by Massachusetts and Connecticut drivers in 2023, according to the study released by Clean Energy NH and Ski NH. By 2033, Massachusetts is expected to have 1.7 million EVs on the road while Connecticut is expected to have 600,000, compared to 200,000 vehicles projected in New Hampshire, the study found.
Assuming a 'baseline scenario' where the Granite State installs 30 percent of the EV chargers needed to support tourism by early next decade, the study found that nearly 4 in 10 EV drivers and would-be tourists might not travel to the state due to 'inadequate' charging infrastructure. This shortfall is behind the projected loss of $1.4 billion in cumulative revenue that the study found could hit the state's economy by 2031.
That is equivalent to losing an entire season of tourism, said Sam Evans-Brown, the executive director of Clean Energy NH.
'Imagine if during one summer, no tourists came to New Hampshire at all,' said Evans-Brown. 'That would be the biggest headline you would see.'
Advertisement
In a state
Evans-Brown said that Massachusetts justified its program by demonstrating that public EV infrastructure would help the state reach its climate goals. New Hampshire's
If the state were to consider the number of EVs expected to be on the road in the early 2030s, Evans-Brown said the financial benefit would become clear. While the tourism impact study that Keeler and Evans-Brown worked on demonstrates how the Granite State's economy could suffer from failing to install public EV infrastructure, a comprehensive look at what the state stands to gain has yet to be done.
'You can justify these programs just on a cost basis if you do that kind of analysis,' Evans-Brown said. 'But we haven't gotten there yet.'
Loading alternative fueling station locator...
to view the alternative fueling station locator.
'You build it and they will come'
In Keene, N.H., four spots in the Monadnock Food Co-op's parking lot are now reserved for EV drivers looking to charge. The cooperatively owned grocery store installed the chargers with the help of state funding in the spring of 2024.
'It just seemed like a perfect pairing for an EV driver to be able to use these charging stations while doing some grocery shopping or getting lunch or dinner, for example,' said Michael Faber, the co-op's general manager.
The approximately $233,000 project was financed by New Hampshire's $30.9 million share of the Volkswagen Mitigation Trust. That pool of funding was established after Volkswagen
Travelers and locals alike have expressed appreciation for the chargers, Faber said, as there are not many fast-charging options in the rural Monadnock region.
'You build it, and they will come,' said James Penfold, director of eMobility Solutions at ReVision Energy, the solar and EV charger installation company that the Monadnock Food Co-op partnered with on the charging station.
Penfold, who has worked with organizations across northern New England, said that projects are often cost-prohibitive without government assistance. Level two chargers, which can fill a car to full charge in several hours, cost thousands of dollars. Level three fast chargers, which let drivers plug in for 20 to 30 minutes before driving away, start in the tens of thousands of dollars.
'Even level twos, they're relatively expensive to install, so it's really disappointing for the state right now that there are no incentives to be able to encourage them and help defray some of that cost,' Penfold said.
Evans-Brown and Keeler agree that at the state's current pace, it will not be prepared to meet the demand for chargers from EV drivers coming from both in- and out-of-state. Both said they are prepared to advocate in favor of state-level policy changes to lower barriers for building the necessary public EV infrastructure for the tourism market.
'When we're talking to our legislators in this state, it's really important to show the business case,' Keeler said. 'When you start talking dollars and cents and the economy and tax revenues and those kinds of things, people listen on both sides of the fence.'
This story was originally published by the
, which provides news, commentary, and analysis about and for rural America. It is republished here with permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
39 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Immigrant protests, unrest in LA reverberate in Mexico
MEXICO CITY - The action may be on the streets of Los Angeles, but fallout from the immigrant protests is roiling politics in Mexico at a delicate moment - days before Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum is expected to meet President Donald Trump in their much-anticipated inaugural face-to-face encounter. Sheinbaum has been on the defensive since Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem - at an Oval Office event in Trump's presence - accused the Mexican president on Tuesday of "encouraging violent protests." While Sheinbaum has assailed the U.S. immigration raids and backed immigrants' rights to protest, there is no public record of her ever having backed violence. A day before Noem's accusation, she said the exact opposite and called on Mexicans in Southern California to act peacefully. Nonetheless, Mexican opposition figures have embraced Noem's charges and enthusiastically sought to amplify them. Critics also have seized upon Sheinbaum's comments last month - weeks before the L.A. protests - calling on Mexicans in the United States to "mobilize" against a planned U.S. tax on cash transfers to Mexico. An opposition senator, Lily Téllez, posted a video on X last week accusing Sheinbaum of emboldening compatriots in the U.S. to "violate the law without consequences, as if it were Mexico," an assertion echoed by other critics. The barrage of accusations has put Sheinbaum in a delicate position: She is obliged to defend immigrants in the United States, as Mexican leaders have always done, but cannot be seen as inflaming bilateral tensions. Still, she has lashed out at her domestic critics as "anti-patriotic." "How is it that Mexicans dare to say I promoted violence in the United States? With what objective?" the president asked Friday. "So that there's not a good relationship between Mexico and the United States? Or, worse, that the United States does something to Mexico? They are willing to have something bad happen to the country just to indulge their hypocrisy or hate." News coverage of the protests has transfixed Mexico, where reports have heavily sided with the immigrants against U.S. efforts to detain and deport them. Commentators have largely condemned the Trump administration actions, while the airwaves and social media are filled with mostly sympathetic accounts and video from immigrants and advocates on the ground in Southern California. Sheinbaum, elected to a six-year term a year ago in a landslide vote, has a 70% public approval rating, polls indicated. Her ruling Morena bloc dominates state legislatures and the Mexican Congress. She has little to fear politically from the ire of reeling opposition parties. But, in the era of social media, the Sheinbaum-as-agitator narrative has gained traction among some U.S. conservative commentators. They have depicted her as a kind of master manipulator scheming violent resistance from her perch in Mexico City. "This woman, the president of Mexico, is talking about leading an uprising in the interior of America," Charlie Kirk, a far-right talk-show host, declared June 9 in a video posted on X, where he has more than 5 million followers. "And she has a lot to work with because she has a lot of sleeper cells here." In comments last week, Sheinbaum has embraced nonviolence as a daily mantra, citing the legacies of Mahatma Gandhi, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela and Cesar Chavez. "Any demonstration has to be peaceful," she told reporters Friday. "We are always seeking, diplomatically, the defense of Mexicans outside the country." And, while Sheinbaum is a regular on X - where she has 4.3 million followers - she urged people not to "make politics" on the social media forum, where much of the polemics about her purported role in the immigrant protests has played out. Helping to fuel the controversy are the proliferation of Mexican flags at the Los Angeles protests. Sheinbaum has neither endorsed nor criticized the flag-waving, but she has expressed dismay at one widely distributed image - of a shirtless L.A. protester brandishing a Mexican flag as he stands atop a burned-out car. She has called the photo a "provocation," hinting of dark motives, but has failed to clarify her suspicions. The image, Sheinbaum said Friday, "doesn't fit with the millions of Mexicans who contribute to the economy of the United States and are the best of people." In their broadsides against Sheinbaum, her opponents also have cited the president's animated calls for Mexicans in the United States to "mobilize" against a completely separate issue - the Trump administration's plans to impose a 3.5% tax on foreign remittances, part of the massive White House spending bill pending in Congress. That proposed levy has met universal condemnation in Mexico, where the cash transfers support tens of thousands of poor families and are a $64-billion-a-year economic linchpin. In an address last month in the northeastern state of San Luis Potosí, Sheinbaum called on U.S. residents of Mexican ancestry - both immigrants and those born in the United States - to send letters, emails and social media messages to Congress urging lawmakers to vote against the remittance tax. "If necessary, we are going to mobilize," declared an animated Sheinbaum, raising her right fist, the image recalling her youthful days as a left-wing student demonstrator. Sheinbaum never called for street protests, much less violence. But she also never clarified whether "mobilize" referred to organizing rallies, bolstering diplomatic pressure or some other strategy to help thwart the remittance tax. The clip of Sheinbaum urging people to "mobilize" has bounded across the internet. It's Exhibit A for those accusing her of fomenting violent protests. Some online versions have been dubbed so that Sheinbaum speaks in a heavily accented English. Since Trump took office, Sheinbaum has won wide acclaim for deftly handling sensitive bilateral issues such as tariffs and drug trafficking. As the immigrant protests spread across the United States, the Mexican president will be again walking a fine line with her U.S. counterpart in their first meeting at the Group of Seven summit, which started Sunday in Canada. Sheinbaum confirmed Saturday that she planned to meet with Trump in coming days and would raise the recent treatment of Mexicans in the U.S. "We are going to defend Mexicans with dignity," she told a crowd outside Mexico City. The Mexican leader has made it clear that she disputes the administration's view of immigrants as "invaders" and of L.A. demonstrators as insurrectionists. "We don't agree with the treatment of honest Mexicans who work every day for the good of the United States and pay their taxes," Sheinbaum said on Friday. "Eighty percent of their earnings remain in the United States, in consumption, in taxes. And they are people who are integrated into life there." And Sheinbaum, who did doctoral studies for four years at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, added: "California would not be what it is without Mexicans." --------- -Times staff writer Kate Linthicum and special correspondent Cecilia Sánchez Vidal contributed to this report. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
The Hill
40 minutes ago
- The Hill
The Trump-Musk feud shows Republicans are in a prison of their own making
President Trump has a Tesla he would like to sell to you. That is only a minor consequence of the spectacular fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk in recent weeks. Their exchanges on their respective social media platforms certainly did not lack entertainment value. Last week, there were signs of reconciliation, with Musk saying, 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.' But that was after much damage had been done. Among the bitter recriminations was Musk's endorsement of Trump's impeachment and his replacement with Vice President JD Vance. He then wrote that it was 'time to drop the really big bomb. @realDonald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT.' Musk later deleted this tweet and put out his remorseful statement. Trump, who never ignores an insult, quickly responded in kind: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Trump's threat was no idle one. The Washington Post estimates that Musk's business empire is built on a staggering $38 billion in federal contracts. Still, the threat to his business empire caused Musk in the moment to take the gloves off. Writing on his social media platform X, Musk accused Trump of ingratitude, claiming: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election. Democrats would control the House, and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' It was Musk's opposition to Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill that had sparked his initial outburst. 'I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote to his 220 million followers on X. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' It wasn't just the projected $2.4 trillion deficits that Trump's legislation would create that angered Musk. It was also Trump taking direct aim at one of Musk's most prized companies, Tesla, by eliminating the tax credits contained in Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act that reduced the cost of these expensive vehicles. But the Trump-Musk feud represents something more than pettiness between two bilious billionaires with gigantic egos. Today, Trump, Musk, the Republican Party and even Trump's supporters find themselves locked in an elaborate prison which each has helped construct. Deconstructing this prison would be an impossible task. For example, any tearing apart of Musk's intertwining web of financial and security relationships with federal agencies poses its own security risks. SpaceX, to take one example, received $3.8 billion in federal contracts in 2024. Ending that relationship would jeopardize the Pentagon's ability to conduct classified missions and provide support for NASA's astronauts. Musk also has his own hold on the Republican Party. At one point, he threatened to create and fund a third party, which he dubbed 'America's Party,' that he claimed would 'represent 80 percent in the middle.' For Republicans, any third-party effort sponsored by Musk could spell the difference between victory and defeat. But Musk represents not merely a threat to Trump but to the long-term interests of the Republican Party. As Musk wrote on X: 'Some food for thought: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years.' For his part, Trump countered that any funds Musk might contribute to Democratic candidates would have 'serious consequences.' Still, the threat remains. The feud also highlights the imprisonment in which congressional Republicans find themselves. While Musk is highly disliked by the general public, substantial majorities of Republican voters approve of both men. Not surprisingly, Republicans called for a truce. Rep. Beth Van Duyne (R-Texas) posted: 'WE ARE STRONGER TOGETHER!! CEASE FIRE FOR GOD'S SAKE.' Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) likened the situation to a bitter divorce 'where you're just saying, 'I really wish mommy and daddy would stop screaming.'' Ironically, Trump finds himself locked in his own form of self-imposed imprisonment. While Trump's core supporters share his grievances, no deviation can be tolerated. For example, when Trump bragged in 2020 that his Operation Warp Speed produced a 'miracle' with the development of the COVID-19 vaccine, Trump urged his supporters to get it. But Trump's supporters resisted. In 2021, Trump was booed (in Alabama of all places) when he urged his rallygoers to become inoculated. By 2024, Trump opposed virtually all vaccine mandates, telling his incoming Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to 'go wild' on health, a comment sure to please his most devoted supporters. The Republican Party's acceptance of the alternative universe created for it by Trump means that any chance of executing a jail break is unlikely to succeed. Discomfort with the facts and adherence to founding principles are to be avoided at all costs. In 1962, John F. Kennedy highlighted our uneasiness with the truth. Addressing the graduates of Yale University, Kennedy said: 'The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie — deliberate, contrived and dishonest — but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.' He continued: 'Too often we hold fast to the cliches of our forebears. We subject all facts to a prefabricated set of interpretations. We enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.' Trump and his acolytes have constructed a comfortable imprisonment. Any discomfort created by an electoral loss is comforted by a belief that elections are stolen. The discomfort of nominating a convicted felon is comforted by a belief that the judicial or prosecutorial system is controlled by a corrupt 'deep state.' Any discomfort of losing the popular vote is comforted by an unwieldy electoral college that skews in the Republican Party's favor. And any discomfort elected Republicans show toward Trump in private is comforted by their continued hold on power. John Kenneth White is a professor emeritus at the Catholic University of America. His latest book is titled 'Grand Old Unraveling: The Republican Party, Donald Trump, and the Rise of Authoritarianism.'
New York Times
41 minutes ago
- New York Times
Watchdog Finds Trump Administration Broke Law by Withholding Library Funds
The Trump administration broke the law when it withheld funding for the nation's libraries, a nonpartisan government watchdog said on Monday, a finding that inches the White House another step closer to a legal showdown over its powers to reconfigure the country's spending. The decision by the Government Accountability Office was the second time in two months that oversight officials have found fault in the ways that President Trump and his top aides have tried to circumvent lawmakers in their quest to reshape the federal budget so that it conforms with their political views. The inquiry concerned the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which serves as the federal government's primary source of funding for libraries, museums and archives. In March, Mr. Trump sought to sharply curtail the agency as part of an executive order focused on the 'reduction of the federal bureaucracy,' prompting legal challenges from states, librarians and other opponents. The accountability office, an arm of Congress that keeps watch over the nation's spending, concluded on Monday that the library agency ultimately 'ceased performing' its functions after the president's directive, and withheld funding that lawmakers had previously appropriated to carry out its mission. Ethics officials ultimately classified the interruption in aid as an illegal impoundment, which is prohibited under a 1970s law meant to restrict the president and his ability to defy Congress on spending. The White House maintains that those limits are unconstitutional, and the president and his top budget aide, Russell T. Vought, have sought to test that theory as part of their dramatic and chaotic reorganization of the federal government. Earlier this year, the accountability office revealed that it had opened more than three dozen investigations into Mr. Trump's spending activities. It announced the first of those findings in late May, concluding that the administration violated the law when it withheld money under a $5 billion program to expand electric vehicle charging stations. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
