Fieldays: Farmers expected to come on board as methane science advances
Photo:
Eloise Gibson
The Prime Minister's new chief science adviser believes farmers will come around to technologies that cut their emissions.
Some farming groups oppose inventions like methane vaccines, but John Roche says farmers will accept change once they see the products work.
For a long time, one of the main concerns for farmers about tackling climate change was the lack of new technologies to lower emissions, without hurting productivity.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon listen to a speech in the Farmers for Science tent.
Photo:
RNZ / Eloise Gibson
Now emissions-cutting products are close to being launched, and some farmers are saying they don't want them.
Groups such as Beef + Lamb say methane emissions shouldn't be priced because it would force farmers to use products such as methane vaccines and other technology when they shouldn't have to.
Groundswell recently released a survey saying its members did not want to use methane-cutting products (called inhibitors) and didn't believe action on emissions should affect their access to overseas markets.
Fonterra, by contrast, has signed up to reduce dairy emissions to secure what it says are higher value exports to customers such as Nestlé.
Roche said although there was a noisy segment that still needed a little convincing he was confident most farmers will come round.
"New Zealand farmers have always adopted technologies that improve their efficiency, that improve the saleability of their products," he said.
"I think it will be the same here, and they will adopt the technologies as they come on board, as they become more affordable and importantly as they see other farmers use them and see that they work."
Roche splits his time between his new role as Christopher Luxon's chief science adviser and being the chief science advisor for the Ministry for Primary Industries.
John Roche has a split role.
Photo:
Supplied
He helped arrange a tent called Science for Farmers at Fieldays, where farmers could speak to researchers working on scientific innovations, including emissions-cutting products.
One stall housed rectangular planter boxes of lush pasture - not your typical ryegrass and clover, but diverse mixtures of up to seven species including the herb plantain.
Danny Donaghy from Massey University said these pasture mixtures should better withstand droughts and/or floods, and contribute less to the problem of global heating by releasing less nitrous oxide from the soil and methane from the animals that eat them.
Research funding group the Ag Emissions Centre was also there, sharing research showing dairy cow daughters inherit low-methane traits from their fathers. It said that paved the way for lower-methane breeding bulls from late 2026.
Less advanced, but moving quickly, was Lucidome Bio's methane vaccine, currently being trialled in Palmerston North.
Chief executive David Aitken said the company was aiming for a 20-30 percent reduction in methane from sheep and cattle lasting for about six months - and to have it on farms within five years.
"The vaccine stimulates antibodies in the saliva of the ruminant. The antibodies are then transported into the rumen, where they bind onto the methanogens that produce methane, inhibit the growth and reduce the amount of methane."
Over time the company hopes to get a productivity gain from the vaccine, since methanogens steal some of the animal's energy.
"But at the minimum we are looking at a solution that's neutral on productivity so we get the climate benefits without losing profitability or productivity."
At another stall in the tent, farm software company FarmIQ was explaining how its software can estimate changes in profits, production and emissions from changing various aspects of a farm.
Chief executive Gavin McEwen said farmers can already reduce emissions by one to five percent through measures like using less nitrogen fertiliser and reducing stocking rates, often without sacrificing production.
But bigger-hitting technologies are coming soon, like slow-release boluses that animals swallow to lower emissions.
Head of sales Russell MacKay, a fifth generation farmer, says good financial times should help farmers buy new climate tech.
"When the farmers are making money that means there more cash for...products, more money for fencing off waterways and bringing in new technology to help the environment."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
New Zealand signs new agricultural trade deal with Indonesia
Minister of Agriculture/Trade and Investment Todd McClay and Indonesian Minister of Agriculture Andi Amran Sulaiman sign a new bilateral arrangement on agricultural cooperation in Jakarta, 7 August, 2025. Photo: Supplied New Zealand and Indonesia have signed a new agricultural trade agreement, as part of the government's bid to double export values in 10 years. The minister overseeing both agriculture and trade, Todd McClay, said the deal would create new commercial opportunities for farmers and agribusinesses in both countries. He signed the new bilateral arrangement in Jakarta on Thursday, alongside Indonesian Minister of Agriculture Andi Amran Sulaiman. "This new agreement will make it easier for our agricultural sectors to collaborate, share expertise and open doors for trade and investment," McClay said. "It provides a framework for stronger cooperation in areas like livestock development, smart agriculture, biosecurity, agricultural research, and streamlined trade processes." The arrangement would also see a dedicated 'Consultative Forum' established to coordinate both countries' regulations and reduce red tape for exporters. The forum would hold its first meeting within a year. "This is about building long-term commercial partnerships. It will help more New Zealand businesses connect directly with Indonesian partners, support our farmers to get their high-quality products into market, and encourage ... investment in agriculture from both sides," McClay said. "Agreements like this one help to grow the value of our exports, lift returns to the farmgate, and unlock future growth for the entire economy." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Season 3 Episode 15: Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick on homelessness, energy poverty, Gaza, and electoral law changes
Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick says National MPs she's spoken with want to support a stronger stance on sanctions against Israel but are too terrified to take on their party leadership. The sanctions are prompted by Israel's 22 month bombardment of Gaza and its refusal to allow aid to flow freely into the occupied region. Swarbrick lodged a member's bill in December and argues with all opposition parties backing it, the support of just six backbench government MPs would mean it could skip the "biscuit tin" ballot and be brought to Parliament for a first reading. She told Mata with Mihingarangi: "All we need is six of 68 government MPs to get it on the floor of the House ... I've spoken to a number of National MPs in particular and ... they're telling me, and look I'll be crystal clear about this, they're telling me that they're terrified about the future of their career because the indication that they've got from their leadership is that if they were to stick their neck out and do the right thing here they would be losing their place on the pecking order. "And my question, that I've put back to them is: What the hell is the point of your job?" Standing Order 288 allows MPs who are not ministers or under-secretaries to indicate their support for a member's bill. If at least 61 MPs get behind it, the legislation skips the "biscuit tin". If six government MPs indicated their support for this bill it would be the first time this process was followed. Late last month Foreign Minister Winston Peters called for a ceasefire in Gaza in a statement delivered in Parliament, but stopped short of promising further aid funding, or promising to join efforts to prevent weapons being sold to Israel. His speech coincided with New Zealand supporting a joint statement with 27 other countries calling for a ceasefire, and condemning the "drip-feeding of aid , and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children". A week later the coalition government signed an additional joint statement with 14 other countries expressing a willingness to recognise the State of Palestine as a necessary step towards a two-State solution. After 22 months of a devastating Israeli military campaign Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick says there's a need for more than speeches and statements. "Gazans can't eat empty words, and this government has, for the better part of two years now, said that they're doing everything they can as they make statements and sit on their hands. "The very least that we could possibly do is apply the same standard that we did to Russia for its unlawful invasions into and occupation of Ukraine. "That's why we drafted the Unlawful Occupation of Palestine Sanctions bill which, after a year plus of waiting for the government to do something we put into the biscuit tin to remove any of the excuses. "The other important thing to note about the process we initiated by putting this into the biscuit tin is that we no longer need Winston Peters, Christopher Luxon or that other guy. We just need six of 68 government MPs to say that they are willing to stand by their conscience and do the right thing in the face of a genocide being live streamed to each of us 24/7 on our phones."

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Treasury briefing points finger at government spending during Covid-19 pandemic
The Treasury briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Photo: FANATIC STUDIO / SCIENCE PHOTO L The previous government spent too much during the Covid-19 pandemic, despite warnings from officials, according to a briefing released by the Treasury. The Treasury's 2025 Long Term Insights Briefing said debt had risen in recent decades, partly because responses to adverse shocks were not met by savings between those shocks. The higher debt meant less capacity to respond to future shocks, like natural hazards, weather-related risks and biosecurity risks. Treasury estimated the total cost of the pandemic was $66 billion over the 2020-26 financial years and about 20.4 percent of GDP. The IMF and OECD estimated it was among the largest Covid-19 responses globally. The agency releases a briefing every three years, with this one looking at the role of fiscal policy through shocks and business cycles. The briefing said the Covid-19 response showed the challenges of using fiscal policy to respond to shocks and cycles. Initially, Treasury recommended "strong fiscal stimulus" at the start of the pandemic, which was cited as "perhaps" causing the economy to be much stronger than expected by the end of 2020. The wage-subsidy scheme in particular was seen as making an important contribution to the strong initial recovery, limiting the increase in the unemployment rate and enabling economic activity to resume when restrictions relaxed. Treasury then moved away from recommending broad-based stimulus, preferring more targeted and moderate support. Its post-election advice to the then-Finance Minister in late 2020 highlighted "the importance of controlling ongoing spending and ensuring it was high value to meet the medium-term fiscal challenge." By August 2021, with the Delta lockdowns coming in, Treasury recommended any decisions to provide support to businesses "should take account of macroeconomic trade-offs". It recommended against any further stimulus from Budget 2022 onwards. Wage subsidies and similar schemes during lockdowns made up about 35 percent of the costs of the response. A further 18 percent came from health-system costs, like vaccination, contact tracing, and managed isolation and quarantine. The remaining "nearly half" was made up of a wide range of initiatives that Treasury said had "varied objectives". Some were aimed at directly responding to the impacts of Covid-19, others were aimed at providing fiscal stimulus or "achieving social or environmental objectives". They included "tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches". Programmes within the fiscal response that were not tied to the shock were seen as having "a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years". The report suggested cyclical management was best left to monetary policy, run by an independent central bank. It also suggested governments set out clearly when fiscal policy will be used ahead of time, including pre-defining responses. Ideally, this would have cross-party agreement. An independent fiscal institution, which could scrutinise and report on the sustainability of fiscal policy, was also suggested. The previous government had considered setting up a watchdog to cost election policies, but it could not get cross-party support. National then changed its tune, with current Finance Minister Nicola Willis supporting such a measure, but New Zealand First and ACT were opposed to the idea. Willis jumped on the report's release, saying Treasury's language was "spare and polite", but its conclusions were "damning". She said the briefing showed the challenges of using "big spending measures" to respond to one-off shocks. Willis singled out the briefing's focus on the money spent on initiatives not directly tied to the Covid-19 response. "That is a very diplomatic way of saying New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach, initially intended for a pandemic response," she said. RNZ has approached Labour for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.