Madras HC stays Tamil Nadu amendments on vice-chancellor appointments despite state's objection
A vacation Bench of Justices G R Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan issued the interim order after a marathon hearing that stretched until 7 pm, rejecting the state's request to defer the matter until after summer vacation. The ruling came in response to a PIL filed by K Venkatachalapathy, a practicing advocate from Tirunelveli and a Bharatiya Janata Party leader.
The PIL challenged the constitutional validity of the state amendments to 10 university Acts on 56 grounds, primarily arguing that the changes were repugnant to Regulation 7.3 of the University Grants Commission (UGC) Regulations, 2018, which prescribe the process for Vice-Chancellor appointments. The petitioner contended that the legislation compromised the autonomy of universities and allowed for excessive political interference.
Appearing for the petitioner, senior counsel Dama Seshadri Naidu asserted that the role of the Governor—as Chancellor of State universities—ought to remain apolitical, much like the Speaker in a legislature. 'Universities must be insulated from political power,' he said. 'The chancellor, being above politics, should continue to guide the academic institutions free of government overreach.'
The court's interim stay sparked strong objections from the state government. Advocate-General P S Raman and senior counsel P Wilson, representing the Chief Secretary and Higher Education Secretary, argued there was no urgency warranting a hearing during the court's vacation. 'Only the process for appointments has begun. The last date to receive applications is June 5. The apprehension that something will happen tomorrow is unfounded,' the AG said.
They pointed out that the state had already filed a transfer petition in the Supreme Court, seeking to consolidate all similar PILs challenging the amendments. The apex court, according to Wilson, had orally instructed the state to inform the HC about the pending transfer plea. 'The Supreme Court has taken cognizance of the broader issue. For the High Court to press ahead despite this is judicial impropriety,' Wilson told the Bench. 'We are being compelled to argue here even as the matter awaits consideration before the CJI.'
The Higher Education Secretary, C Samayamoorthy, also submitted a memo asserting that the petition was politically motivated, filed by a functionary of the opposition party. He argued that there was no grave urgency and that the State ought to have been allowed sufficient time to file a comprehensive counter-affidavit addressing the 56 points raised.
Wilson went further, alleging 'forum shopping' by the petitioner, suggesting that the choice of approaching the second vacation bench was deliberate. 'Havens are not going to fall. This is a move designed only to stall the process. There is no urgency,' he said. He also noted that the amendments received de facto assent from the Governor following the intervention of the Supreme Court in earlier proceedings.
Defending the legality of the amendments, the AG argued that laws enacted by the State legislature prevail over UGC regulations, so long as they do not contravene a central law. 'A state legislation can only be stayed when it is glaringly unconstitutional or manifestly arbitrary. Neither is the case here,' he said, adding that the UGC lacks the authority to constitute search committees for vice-chancellor appointments. Despite these arguments, the Division Bench held firm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Did Trump's Defence Secy just call for repealing US women's voting rights? See Pete Hegseth's post
US President Donald Trump's high-ranking official Pete Hegseth stirred a controversy as he reposted a video that says women should not have the right to vote. The controversial repost on X shows a video of a Christian nationalist church where various pastors say women should not be allowed to vote. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth shared the video on Thursday night, illustrating his deep and personal connection to a Christian nationalist pastor who has extreme views on the role of religion and women. The Trump official commented on an almost seven-minute-long report by CNN, examining Doug Wilson, cofounder of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, or CREC. The report featured a pastor from Wilson's church who is seen batting for the repealing of women's right to vote from the Constitution. Another pastor can be heard saying that in his ideal world, people would vote as households. The video also featured a female congregant saying that she submits to her husband. 'All of Christ for All of Life,' Hegseth wrote in his post that accompanied the video. Hegseth's post received more than 12,000 likes and 2,000 shares on X. Some users agreed with the pastors in the video, while others expressed alarm at the defense secretary promoting Christian nationalist ideas. Doug Pagitt, pastor and executive director of the progressive evangelical organization Vote Common Good, said the ideas in the video are views that 'small fringes of Christians keep' and said it was 'very disturbing' that Hegseth would amplify them. Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell told The Associated Press on Friday that Hegseth is 'a proud member of a church' that is affiliated with CREC and he 'very much appreciates many of Mr. Wilson's writings and teachings.' In May, Hegseth invited his personal pastor, Brooks Potteiger, to the Pentagon to lead the first of several Christian prayer services that Hegseth has held inside the government building during working hours. Defense Department employees and service members said they received invitations to the event in their government emails. 'I'd like to see the nation be a Christian nation, and I'd like to see the world be a Christian world,' Wilson said in the CNN report.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC stays operation of UP govt's Banke Bihari temple ordinance, forms panel led by ex-HC judge
The Supreme Court has stayed the operation of Uttar Pradesh government's Banke Bihari temple trust ordinance, which rests administrative control of the shrine with the state, till the high court decides its validity. The bench, however, clarified that its interim direction will not preclude the state from ratification of the Ordinance in the state assembly.(HT Photo) A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi refused to entertain the challenges made to the Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025, and said the affected parties can approach the high court. "At this stage, we are reminded of the fact that the petitioners' challenge to the Ordinance will doubtlessly take some time in proper adjudication. We, therefore, deem it fit to stay operation of the Ordinance's provisions in the interregnum, only to the extent they grant the state powers to constitute a Trust for managing the temple's affairs," the bench directed. The top court said consequently, the constitution of the Shree Bankey Bihar Ji Temple Trust, as defined in Section 3 of the Ordinance and its composition, as contained in Section 5, shall be kept in abeyance till the question of validity of the Ordinance (or any Act in relation thereto subsequently passed by the state legislature), is finally resolved by the high court. The bench, however, clarified that its interim direction will not preclude the state from ratification of the Ordinance in the state assembly, but such an exercise will be subject to the outcome of the proceedings for which the affected persons and the petitioners have been relegated to the high court. The top court in its detailed order uploaded on Saturday also constituted a 12-member high-powered committee headed by retired Allahabad High Court judge Ashok Kumar to look after the day-to-day affairs of the iconic temple. It said, "We are equally mindful that the sum of our directions shall effectively leave the management of the subject temple in limbo yet again, since the ad-hoc arrangement of temple management has been wholly ineffective and inefficient in discharging its duties over the years. "We are pained to observe that the previous administerial deadlock(s) and in-fighting have only worsened the problems plaguing the temple, causing much distress to the pilgrims – who are left without any amenities or redress." The bench said the material on record indicates that despite the substantial donations received by the temple running into hundreds of crores, no tangible steps appear to have been taken by the successive managements for providing essential facilities to the scores of devotees visiting the temple, and the Goswami Shebaits remain divided into factions and continue to litigate before the civil courts, further contributing to administrative inaction. "We are, therefore, satisfied that a high-powered managing committee headed by an impartial person with considerable experience and ability is required to be constituted to run the day-to-day affairs of the temple, apart from undertaking some of the initiatives, which we are illustratively mentioning in the latter part of this order. "There is no gainsaying that the sanctity of safe religious pilgrimage shall never be unjustly denied to all the citizens of this country," the top court said. It also lauded the state government for taking a "fair stand" over the constitution of the committee for the management of the affairs of the temple, and said the panel may deal with a variety of issues for the proper functioning of the temple, including the provision of essential amenities for the devotees. The top court also modified its May 15 order, which gave the go-ahead to the state's scheme to develop the Shri Banke Bihari Temple Corridor at Vrindavan in Mathura, and allowed the government to use temple fund to acquire five acres of land for developing it as a holding area for the devotees. "It seems to us that the order passed by a coordinate bench requires certain modifications/clarifications. That order purportedly directs for the redevelopment of the temple's vicinity through the employment of temple funds. "However, we find that such directions suffer from a foundational procedural infirmity -- the principal affected parties, including the Shebait Goswamis, who have been administering the temple, were not heard prior to the passing of the said order," it said. The bench further said to allow substantive directions on a matter of such significance to be issued in collateral proceedings, especially in absentia of the necessary stakeholders, may not be in conformity with procedural fairness and judicial best-practices. "That apart, we note that the high court, vide its judgment dated November 8, 2023, had expressly declined the state's prayer to utilise temple funds for land acquisition as part of the proposed redevelopment plan. "That judgment has attained finality, having never been assailed by the state in any appropriate appellate proceedings. In these circumstances, this court could not have, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, effectively set aside the high court's judgment without any formal appeal or challenge being placed before it," the top court said. While directing for modification of the May 15 order, the bench ordered for restoring the legal position to status quo ante.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Constitution has always embodied principles of secularism & socialism: Justice Chelameswar
Kochi: Former judge of the Supreme Court, Justice Jasti Chelameswar, stated on Saturday that the Indian Constitution and its structure have embodied the principles of secularism and socialism from the very day it was enacted, even before the terms were inserted into the Preamble. Justice Chelameswar was inaugurating a law lecture series conducted by the Ernakulam Govt Law College Old Students' Association (ELCOSA) as part of the sesquicentennial celebrations of legal education in Kerala and Govt Law College, Ernakulam. Speaking on the topic 'Clamour for Removal of Secularism and Socialism: Whether Justified', Justice Chelameswar discussed various aspects of the principles of secularism and socialism, including their historical evolution. "The Constitution is a continuous process; it is not something that falls from heaven overnight but comes from the experience of life. Don't read the Constitution as a document written on paper with ink. Please read it as a document written in the blood of martyrs in Jallianwala Bagh. Then you understand what the Constitution exactly conveys," he said. Justice Chelameswar further noted that while it is legally permissible to amend the Preamble of the Constitution to change the terms 'secularism' and 'socialism,' the real question is what necessity there is to change them. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 3–6 BHK luxury residences at Address by GS S3 Raymond Realty Learn More Undo "We human beings make the nation. It is for us, collectively, to determine whether we should live in a truly secular society, one in which we are willing to see all human beings simply as human beings and not define them by their cultural practices. The ultimate question is, would you like to live in a country where you have no freedom of conscience and no liberty," he observed. Justice K M Joseph, former Supreme Court judge, in his presidential address, said that any attempt to remove the word 'secularism' from the Preamble would be an act of mischief. The problems arise not from religions but from the practice of politicians using religion to gain power, he added. Minister for law and industries P Rajeeve, was the special guest at the event. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Raksha Bandhan wishes , messages and quotes !
