logo
120 years of Chelsea: The BlueCo takeover and the club's future

120 years of Chelsea: The BlueCo takeover and the club's future

New York Times27-03-2025

On the latest episode of Straight Outta Cobham — the last of our three-part series celebrating Chelsea's 120th anniversary — Matt Davies-Adams, Simon Johnson and Liam Twomey looked at the club in the present day since the BlueCo takeover in 2022.
They analysed the current state of the Chelsea project, what success would look like over the next couple of years and the club's downturn in form since the arrival of the new owners at Stamford Bridge.
Advertisement
You can listen to the previous two episodes in the series here.
A partial transcript has been edited for this article. The full episode is available on the Straight Outta Cobham feed on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Matt Davies-Adams: May 30 will mark three years since Todd Boehly & co. completed their takeover of Chelsea Football Club. Liam, where do you think we are in terms of the project? Do the owners believe it's on course?
Liam Twomey: We still don't definitively know what this era is going to be. I know that will frustrate many fans who already think, 'It's on fire, it's all on fire'. There has been a lot of pain in the first two years, and everything the ownership have done in that time has been so aggressively future-focused that what is in front of us still hasn't assumed its final form yet. That's what many fans are still trying to come to terms with.
Even as journalists, and Simon can speak on this as well, it's quite hard to know exactly what we're writing about because the way Chelsea are trying to operate is unlike any other club has ever tried to operate. Investing this much in players this young hasn't been done on this scale before, all while still trying to satisfy the demands of a win-now club by its modern history, and a win-now fan base.
We know the early results have been underwhelming. And the ownership — and when I say the ownership, we have to parse that as well because it's Clearlake Capital running the club right now, and Todd Boehly is very much on the side, and that situation is not resolved — but Clearlake believe the plan is working in terms of the big picture. They believe things are moving in the right direction.
I'm sure they would point to the league position as one of the metrics, and we'll see where Chelsea finish this year. But right now they're fourth, which would be an improvement on last year. Their players are getting older, closer to their primes, and there are more young players coming down the pipeline. So that's where it is. But I do find it very difficult to talk about this era of Chelsea because it's so changeable right now based on the way they're operating, so I don't feel comfortable passing judgment. It's obviously not a success right now but I don't feel comfortable calling it a complete failure either.
Advertisement
Matt: If it's not a success right now, what would make it a success over the next couple of years? Is it purely just qualifying for the Champions League a couple of seasons in a row, or are the ambitions a little loftier than that?
Liam: The ambitions of the people running Chelsea are huge. They've marketed this to the players who have agreed to join as the most ambitious football project in the world. They want to be a world-class team that competes for the Premier League and the Champions League every year, and one that is in that inner circle of contenders.
The way they're looking to try and do it sustainably is to have this conveyor belt of young talent, continually investing more than everyone else and identifying and recruiting the best young players in the world, then helping them fulfil their potential and retaining them at Chelsea.
The difficulty is that we've seen clubs that win, and we've seen clubs that develop. But we haven't seen a club that can do both at an elite level, at scale. No one has tried to do this before, but that's what Chelsea are trying to do. They're trying to be an extremely expensive Brighton that wins the Champions League, essentially (laughs).
It's a massive investment development project, but they're also trying to thread the needle of being a team that can be successful. At least on par with what we saw in the Roman Abramovich era, but without the boom and bust feel of the Abramovich era. We're obviously nowhere near there right now, but that's where they're trying to get to.
Matt: Simon, you were covering the club in the Abramovich era, during the upheaval of the takeover, and now in this new era. Did you expect there to be such a downturn in form because of the upheaval the club had gone through? We forget the Champions League in 2021 maybe papered over some cracks. I remember Chelsea being called a deluxe cup team for a couple of years before the takeover happened. But even so, we've got to be surprised at just how dramatically things have fallen off in the last couple of years, haven't we?
Advertisement
Simon Johnson: I've said before there was a downturn in standards, just generally speaking, under the old regime anyway. I can imagine the outcry of people listening, and going, 'How can you say that? We won the Champions League'. It's seen as an understandable, magnificent achievement and rightly so. But Chelsea had gone their longest run without winning the title under Abramovich before he left, so there were signs of a downturn.
But there are downturns, and there's this downturn. There's going from a shoo-in to qualify for the Champions League most years, let alone compete for silverware, to the first season being an absolute calamity. Arguably the worst season in Chelsea's history in terms of expectations, talent and money spent compared to the actual results delivered on the pitch. It was that bad. It was an absolute shambles of a football club.
You had players who didn't have seats in the changing room and at team meetings — absolute bonkers. The one thing you would say about the new ownership and this era is that Chelsea are still the reigning champions of being the most bonkers football club to report on (laughs). They're the undisputed champions for the umpteenth year in a row in that regard. There's never a dull moment covering them.
But when you think of the amount of money spent, we are in season three, and yes, they can point to being fourth as we speak, but it's a very unconvincing fourth. In one of the worst Premier League seasons in terms of the top four race that I can remember, it must be said.
So it has been a disappointment, and I don't think anyone can say otherwise.
There's no way the new owners bought this club thinking, 'We'll be in season three and still not sure if we're going to be a Champions League club in season four.' There's also disappointment because there's been no silverware. Last season, they did come awfully close. Mauricio Pochettino got Chelsea to a League Cup final and outplayed Liverpool until extra time, but they didn't take their chances, unlike Newcastle recently. They also outplayed Manchester City in the FA Cup semi-final, but again didn't take their chances.
This season, they can still get that dream trophy and say, 'Chelsea have won it all,' with the Conference League. But Chelsea want to be at the top table, not dining at the kids' table and feeding off the scraps. I will say no one can accuse the owners of lacking ambition, that is the one thing I will defend them on.
We've seen an extraordinary amount of money spent, but the question obviously has to be, 'Have they spent it wisely?' And the answer is a resounding 'no'.
You can listen to full episodes of Straight Outta Cobham free on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
(Top Photo: Chris Brunskill/Fantasista/Getty Images)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rockets reportedly remain optimistic that Steven Adams wants to return
Rockets reportedly remain optimistic that Steven Adams wants to return

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Rockets reportedly remain optimistic that Steven Adams wants to return

Rockets reportedly remain optimistic that Steven Adams wants to return 'The Rockets are operating under the assumption (Steven) Adams wants to return, and will continue to speak with his representation about a possible extension,' The Athletic's Kelly Iko reports. In early May, Rockets general manager Rafael Stone said 'every indication' he has is that veteran center Steven Adams wants to return to Houston. Now 31 years old, Adams just finished out the final season of his previous contract, though the Rockets have Bird rights to help sign him to a new deal. Over a month later, and with the June 30 opening of the NBA's free agency negotiations about three weeks away, the Rockets reportedly remain optimistic that Adams' position hasn't changed. Per Kelly Iko of The Athletic: The Rockets are operating under the assumption Adams wants to return — and will continue to speak with his representation about a possible extension, team sources said. It's difficult to project what Adams' market value might be. On the one hand, his traditional statistics in the regular season were rather pedestrian. In an average of 13.7 minutes over 58 games, Adams averaged 3.9 points (54.5% FG) and 5.6 rebounds for the Rockets. Both minutes and appearances were limited in his first season back after undergoing knee surgery in late 2023. But even with the relatively low minutes totals, Adams' impact-based statistics were consistently excellent. And in the playoffs, with the Rockets having gradually built up Adams' health and stamina over the regular season, Houston turned the big man loose. In seven first-round games against the Golden State Warriors, Adams averaged 5.7 points (60.0% FG), 6.6 rebounds, and 1.1 blocks in 22.1 minutes per game. Should Adams want a job as a full-time starting center in the NBA, the Rockets probably can't offer that, since they have an All-Star in Alperen Sengun ahead of Adams on the depth chart. But it's unclear if such an offer will be available when considering Adams' age, injury history, and minutes totals from the 2024-25 regular season. Furthermore, even if that type of bid is made, Adams might prefer to stay in a situation where his body can be more easily load managed. With more than a decade of NBA wear-and-tear, the presence of Sengun can prevent Adams from being overly extended. Furthermore, the ability of Sengun and Adams to play together in 'double big' lineups means that even if Adams is the backup center in name, he has a path to potentially playing more minutes — especially in higher-leverage games and in the playoffs — than most backup centers. That type of arrangement could be appealing to a veteran entering his age-32 season. So, too, could Houston's status as the team with the fourth-best record (52-30) in the NBA. Even if a team was willing and able to offer Adams both a starting role and a significant salary increase, it might not be appealing for Adams to go to a losing team at this stage of his career. Adams made $12.6 million this season, and the NBA's non-taxpayer mid-level exception (NT-MLE) this offseason is expected to be in the range of a $14.1-million starting salary. Many teams have access to the NT-MLE, so a contract in that general annual vicinity would seem realistic. And from Houston's perspective, it's unlikely they would ask or expect Adams to take a paycut after an elite playoff performance. The primary questions would seem to be: If the offers are financially comparable, does Adams want to stay in Houston? Does any team with significant space beneath the 2025-26 salary cap (there aren't many) potentially bid above the NT-MLE on Adams? If so, would Houston be willing to use its Bird rights to go even higher and match? Is there any medical red flag on Adams, regarding his surgically repaired knee, that might make Houston less likely to offer the same contract length as another team? There are enough questions that an Adams return can't be viewed as inevitable. But, all indications thus far are positive, and the Bird rights available to Stone and the Rockets will allow Houston to be as financially competitive as it wants. In his article, Iko writes that getting Adams back is arguably the top offseason priority for Stone and the Rockets. However, he cautions that it is not inevitable. 'Because of his two-way production, particularly his elite offensive rebounding, the possibility of Adams being lured away by a playoff team exists,' Iko writes. 'Adams would be a natural fit for teams such as San Antonio, New York, Indiana, and both Los Angeles organizations (Lakers and Clippers).' Those teams are generally not expected to have salary cap room, so there wouldn't seem to be a financial incentive for Adams to leave Houston for one of them. It simply depends on what he wants from a basketball perspective. Teams can officially engage in negotiations with their own free agents when the 2025 NBA Finals conclude, which should be within the next one to two weeks. That could be the window for the Rockets to ideally reach an agreement with Adams that could prevent him from hitting the open market on June 30. Should Adams explore leaving in free agency, signing Milwaukee Bucks center Brook Lopez could become a backup plan for the Rockets, Iko reports. However, the preference seems to be staying the course and avoiding that scenario altogether. More: Report: If Steven Adams leaves in free agency, Rockets eyeing Brook Lopez as backup plan

Manchester United Forward Set for Exit as €60m Valuation Attracts Interest
Manchester United Forward Set for Exit as €60m Valuation Attracts Interest

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Manchester United Forward Set for Exit as €60m Valuation Attracts Interest

Garnacho Edges Towards Exit as Manchester United Lower Price Tag Rising Star Now On Transfer List Alejandro Garnacho's time at Manchester United appears to be drawing to a close. According to Rudy Galetti via X, the club have significantly reduced their asking price for the 20-year-old Argentina international. 'As reported over ten days ago on TEAMtalk, Napoli, AC Milan, Bayer Leverkusen, Atletico Madrid and Chelsea have recently shown interest in Garnacho,' Galetti stated, adding: 'Other clubs are now preparing to step [up for the] forward. Man Utd value him at ~€60m, a figure seen as more affordable than the January price.' Advertisement United's decision to cut the forward's price from the £60–70 million range to around £50 million (€60m) is not merely a market move, it's a message. Garnacho is no longer deemed essential to their future plans. The club want to generate capital to fund new signings, and Garnacho joins Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho and Antony on the list of high-profile attackers who could depart this summer. Undeniable Talent, Unsettling Behaviour Garnacho has always been a source of hope and frustration in equal measure. With 11 goals and 10 assists across all competitions last season, he was United's second most productive player behind Bruno Fernandes. But the flair on the pitch has been offset by immaturity off it. His response to United's Europa League final loss, calling the season 's***', and a series of poorly judged social media posts have not endeared him to the club's hierarchy. Advertisement It is, according to transfer insiders, not just the manager's decision. Fabrizio Romano reported: 'Alejandro Garnacho will leave Manchester United… the decision is made, not only on Ruben Amorim's side, but also [on the] management side.' Market Gathers Pace Interest in Garnacho is expected to intensify. Napoli had a £42m bid turned away in January, while Chelsea, Atletico Madrid and Bayer Leverkusen are all keeping tabs. For now, Chelsea seem focused on Jamie Bynoe-Gittens, but should that pursuit falter, Garnacho could re-emerge as a priority target. Romano further revealed that 'three Premier League clubs have called for Garnacho,' though only Chelsea's name has surfaced publicly. Others, believed to be in the top half of the table, are monitoring developments closely. Advertisement Leverkusen's financial position may limit their chances, while AC Milan and Napoli are also constrained unless sales are made. The Premier League, with its spending power, remains Garnacho's most likely destination, albeit in a different shade of red or blue. Photo: IMAGO Strategic Exit or Misstep? United's decision to sell Garnacho at 20 years old, just as his numbers begin to climb, reflects a broader shift in their rebuild strategy. Attitude, adaptability, and application are now prioritised over raw talent. It's a bold approach, but whether the club will regret letting such a gifted wide man go remains to be seen. Advertisement With a new regime in place and a summer of change on the horizon, Garnacho looks set to become one of the window's most talked-about departures. Our View – EPL Index Analysis For United fans, watching Garnacho walk out the door at just 20 years old will sting. There's no doubting his raw talent, his stats from last season speak volumes. He produced moments that excited fans and gave the team attacking width and directness it often lacked. However, supporters are divided. Some feel his attitude and public comments have reflected a lack of maturity, while others argue that passion is being mistaken for petulance. Still, in an era where clubs fight tooth and nail to keep their brightest prospects, seeing Garnacho sold, especially at a reduced fee, raises questions about United's long-term vision. If he thrives elsewhere, it may become yet another painful footnote in a period littered with costly missteps.

La Liga superstar reluctant to join Arsenal or Chelsea this summer
La Liga superstar reluctant to join Arsenal or Chelsea this summer

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

La Liga superstar reluctant to join Arsenal or Chelsea this summer

Arsenal have already all-but completed a deal to sign Martin Zubimendi, but he may not be the only La Liga player to make the move to north London this summer. They also have a strong interest in Nico Williams, but their chances of signing him during the transfer window looks to have reduced. Williams continues to be one of Athletic Club's star players, but because of this, he has attracted significant interest. Barcelona failed to sign him last summer, and 12 months, new names have entered the running – specifically, there has been interest shown from Arsenal, Chelsea and Bayern Munich. Nico Williams wants to stay in La Liga But the chances that any of those teams gets a deal done this summer are looking slim. As per Sport, Williams is reluctant to move outside of Spain, despite the fact that Arsenal and Chelsea would both be willing to activate the release clause in his Athletic contract. Imave via Marca / Ricardo Larreina Despite rejecting Barcelona last summer, Williams has an interest in joining the La Liga champions in 2025. But unfortunately for the Spain international, they are not considering him as an option at this stage, with Luis Diaz and Marcus Rashford being the club's primary left wing targets. Advertisement At this stage, the most likely scenario is that Williams signs a new contract with Athletic. His current deal expires in 2027, so there has been increased jeopardy about his future. But if Barcelona (or Real Madrid) do not come calling, there is a good chance that the 22-year-old extends his stay in Bilbao. Should he do this, Athletic would look to significantly increase the value of his release clause, which currently stands at €60m. If this happens, the chances of a future transfer would decrease by a considerable amount, considering that Los Leones very rarely negotiate the sales of their star players.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store