Fox News falls in line with Trump's Epstein plea — but will the rest of MAGA media comply?
Fox News has taken President Trump's plea for his allies to stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein almost literally.
But many other conservative media influencers and outlets are still heavily scrutinizing the Trump administration's decision not to release further information related to the late convicted sex offender.
'The Jeffrey Epstein story isn't going anywhere,' Megyn Kelly told listeners on Tuesday, agreeing with her Monday guest Ben Shapiro's view that attorney general Pam Bondi should hold a press conference on the matter.
Even Charlie Kirk, who raised eyebrows Monday by saying 'I'm done talking about Epstein for the time being,' said Tuesday on his radio show that 'we're not moving on.'
Get Reliable Sources newsletter
Sign up here to receive Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter in your inbox. Sounding defensive and practically shouting at times, Kirk repeatedly acknowledged the grassroots MAGA energy about Epstein. 'You are not letting this story go,' he said. 'I know that.'
Kirk reiterated his belief that his 'friends' in the administration, like FBI director Kash Patel and deputy director Dan Bongino, had digested the outrage over last week's joint Justice Department and FBI memo saying there was no evidence Epstein kept a 'client list' or was murdered in federal custody — both key claims of conspiracy theories that have long proliferated on the right.
The administration's 'just trust us' approach has offended many on the right. As a caller to Glenn Beck's radio show said Monday, 'I feel really betrayed and I feel really, really angry.'
Those emotions are also evident across right-wing social media sites, leading some of Trump's most loyal media figures to keep talking about the controversy.
It's an 'obvious giant fiasco,' InfoWars host Alex Jones said Tuesday as he expressed optimism that Trump will do a '180' and have the government release additional information.
Jones' guest, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, proceeded to speculate about Epstein's past ties to a foreign government. 'I really encourage everyone that continues to ask questions,' she said, adding, 'This has been the first fracture in MAGA, and we don't want this to happen anymore.'
Trump sought to quell the Epstein speculation with a Truth Social post on Saturday, sternly defending Bondi against criticism from his base and demanding his allies move on. Don't 'waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about,' he wrote.
Fox News hosts seemed to care last week; they were among those fanning the flames of the MAGA revolt.
But on Monday, there was a noticeable shift, with just one segment about the Epstein fallout all day long, during Bret Baier's 6 p.m. hour.
The 7 p.m. host, Laura Ingraham, did make one brief mention of the topic — in a snarky aside about 'conservative influencers eating their own.'
Ingraham, however, played a part in the turmoil last week. On Thursday, she critiqued the administration's lack of transparency, and on Friday, she goaded a Turning Point USA event crowd by asking whether they're 'satisfied' with the Epstein probe results. The room filled with boos.
According to SnapStream transcript searches, Fox has aired zero segments about the Epstein fallout on Tuesday.
Meanwhile, Newsmax, which often jockeys with Fox for Trump's approval, mentioned the Epstein fallout at least 60 times on Monday, according to the transcript search, mostly to defend Trump while continuing to chide Bondi for not releasing the alleged files.
'The MAGA base either needs the full story or a damn good reason why they can't have it,' Newsmax host Rob Schmitt said in a lengthy monologue dedicated to the topic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
KET revives Fancy Farm coverage, thanks to donation
Kentucky Educational Television has revived its plans to cover the annual Fancy Farm political rally on Aug. 2 in Western Kentucky. Shae Hopkins, executive director and CEO of KET, said in a press release a donation from the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce will make the coverage possible. 'We're grateful to the Kentucky Chamber, a longtime corporate partner and supporter of KET, for helping us to continue this decades-long tradition of bringing viewers across the state coverage of this iconic event,' Hopkins said. The release did not disclose the specific donation amount. Earlier this summer, Fancy Farm organizers announced Kentucky Chamber President and CEO Ashli Watts would emcee the event. KET previously said it planned to eliminate its coverage of Fancy Farm because of federal funding cuts. A rescission bill that stripped $9 billion in federal funding for public broadcasting, global health initiatives and foreign aid programs was given final passage July 17. Fancy Farm is a political picnic and rally held each summer in Graves County, where candidates and elected officials take jabs at their opponents before an often rowdy audience. The bipartisan event has become more Republican-heavy in recent years as Democrats have lost significant ground in the state. This year, picnic-goers can expect to hear from all three high-profile Republicans running to replace outgoing U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell: U.S. Rep. Andy Barr, former Attorney General Daniel Cameron and businessman Nate Morris. On the Democratic side, Lt. Gov. Jacqueline Coleman and state Rep. Pamela Stevenson, who is also running to replace McConnell, have declined to speak. The only confirmed Democratic speaker so far is John "Drew" Williams, who is challenging U.S. Rep. James Comer in Kentucky's 1st Congressional District race. KET will livestream coverage beginning at 2:30/1:30 pm CT Aug. 2 with host Renee Shaw and analysts Bob Babbage and Trey Grayson. The station will air highlights from the event at 8/7 p.m. Aug. 3. Reach reporter Hannah Pinski at hpinski@ or follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @hannahpinski. This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: KET revives Fancy Farm coverage, thanks to donation Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-What's in the EU's countermeasures to US tariffs?
By Julia Payne BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The European Union could hit the United States with counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) worth of U.S. goods if the two sides fail to reach a trade deal by Washington's August 1 deadline for imposing import levies. The European Commission has prepared two sets of possible counter-tariffs, which would be combined into one and submitted for approval to EU members. They would not be imposed until August 7. Here is a breakdown of the two packages: EU COUNTERMEASURES TO STEEL, ALUMINIUM TARIFFS * EU members agreed a first package in April, but the measures were immediately suspended. * The package hits imports of U.S. goods worth 21 billion euros and is designed as a response to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminium. * The package sets a 25% tariff on most of the imports, but some goods like diamonds would be hit by a lower duty of 10%. * The products include a range of agricultural goods: poultry, beef, fruit, cereals such as wheat, barley and oats, vegetable oils, corn (maize), rice and orange juice. * Other goods include home appliances such as dishwashers and vacuum cleaners, sanitary products like toilet paper and dental floss, and larger items like motorcycles and motor boats. * Soybeans and almonds are on this list, but would not be impacted until December 1. EU COUNTERMEASURES TO BASELINE, CAR TARIFFS * The second package is designed to respond to so-called "reciprocal" baseline tariffs, which U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to raise from 10% to 30%, as well as to tariffs on cars and car parts, currently set at 25%. * The proposal was reduced to additional import duties on 72 billion euros of U.S. goods from an initial 95 billion euros. * No tariff level has been set. * The package targets 6.4 billion euros of agri-food products and 65.8 billion euros of industrial goods. * Industrial items in the package include aircraft and aircraft parts, cars and car parts, machinery, chemicals and plastics, medical devices and electrical equipment. * Food items in the package include bourbon, other spirits, wine, farm animals, bees, tobacco and pet food. * 159 items were deleted from the initial list after a public consultation, according to a Reuters comparison of the two lists. * Industrial products removed include all gas turbines, most magnets, all laboratory reagents, some photographic film, musical instrument strings, and some equipment related to semiconductors and data storage. * Removed food products include soya bean seeds, pure-bred breeding horses and bovine semen. ($1 = 0.8530 euros) Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
French president Macron sues influencer over claim France's first lady was born male
(Corrects Brigitte Macron's age in third paragraph to 72 from 52) (Reuters) -French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte filed a defamation lawsuit in the U.S. on Wednesday against right-wing influencer Candace Owens, centered on her claim that France's first lady is male. The Macrons said in a lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court that Owens has waged a lie-filled "campaign of global humiliation" and "relentless bullying" to promote her podcast and expand her "frenzied" fan base. The Macrons said the lies included that Brigitte Macron, 72, was born under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, the actual name of her older brother. "Every time the Macrons leave their home, they do so knowing that countless people have heard, and many believe, these vile fabrications," the complaint said. "It is invasive, dehumanizing, and deeply unjust." Owens did not immediately respond to emailed requests for comment. Macron's office declined comment. The 22-count complaint seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages. Wednesday's lawsuit is a rare case of a world leader suing for defamation. U.S. President Donald Trump has filed multiple defamation lawsuits, including against the publisher of The Wall Street Journal last week. To prevail in U.S. defamation cases, public figures like the Macrons and Trump must show defendants engaged in "actual malice," meaning they knew what they published was false or had reckless disregard for its truth. Solve the daily Crossword
