
Fate of $20 Billion US Home Solar Market Lies in GOP Senate Hands
The troubled, $20 billion US residential solar market's future rests on whether Senate Republicans will challenge their brethren in the House of Representatives and change provisions of the massive tax and spending bill that executives and analysts alike say would devastate the industry.
The bill passed by the House this week would strip away tax credits for companies that lease rooftop solar systems as well as homeowners who buy them outright. The industry is already reeling from tariffs on imported equipment, high interest rates and reduced state incentives in California, the nation's biggest residential solar market. One major rooftop solar company — Sunnova Energy International Inc. — is laying the groundwork for a bankruptcy filing, and analyst Philip Shen at Roth Capital Partners warned the bill as written would effectively shut down the industry, starting next year.
Now, solar executives' hopes rest on moderate Republican senators, some of whom have already said they don't favor gutting clean-energy incentives. But given the party's slim majority in the House, it's unclear how willing they will be to change the bill and risk alienating fiscal hardliners in the lower chamber.
'I think there are many senators that are also focused on the fact that you don't want pull out the rug,' said Mary Powell, chief executive officer of Sunrun Inc., the nation's biggest residential solar company. She called the House bill 'not workable for Americans' and warned it would 'slash consumers' access to affordable, reliable solutions.'
The industry has been struggling despite subsidies from former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. High interest rates have made it more expensive for companies to raise capital and for customers to finance solar panels. California cut the amount of money solar homeowners receive for electricity they supply to the power grid, lengthening the amount of time needed to recoup the cost of their systems.
In addition, the US International Trade Commission voted this week to move toward slapping tariffs on solar equipment from four Southeast Asian countries that provide the bulk of imported cells and panels, with levies ranging from 34% to 3,521% depending on the country and manufacturer involved. The vote was the culmination of a trade probe, and the US has already been collecting preliminary duties for months.
US residential solar installations fell 20% last year, according to BloombergNEF data. If the federal tax credits go away, the market will see a further 18% drop over the next ten years, said BNEF analyst Pol Lezcano.
The release of the House bill on Thursday sent solar shares tumbling, with Sunrun losing more than one-third of its market value. Equipment sellers Enphase Energy Inc. and SolarEdge Technologies Inc. also fell. Solar executives blasted the bill for essentially repealing much of the IRA, which President Donald Trump has called the 'green new scam.' Former Sunnova CEO John Berger, in an interview on Bloomberg Television, said ending the solar tax credits for homeowners would be 'patently unfair and un-American.'
Israel-based SolarEdge recently opened manufacturing plants in Texas and Florida, lured by the IRA's incentives. 'Removing the credits prematurely removes the business certainty necessary to continue the US investments SolarEdge has made,' a company representative said in an emailed statement.
The impact on installation companies — many of them smaller, mom-and-pop operations — could be severe, if homeowners decide they can no longer afford going solar. Leon Keshishian, CEO of Civic Renewables, called the potential loss of tax credits 'a killer' that could force him to cut staff at his company, which installs residential systems in Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida. 'It's going to be incredibly challenging,' he said.
The loss of tax credits for solar leasing could be particularly damaging, since leases account for about 70% of new solar installations, said Joseph Osha, a clean energy analyst for Guggenheim Securities. 'It's pretty dire,' he said.
Solar industry leaders vowed an aggressive lobbying push in the Senate to change legislation that they say would result in economic upheaval and hundreds of thousands of job losses.
'We urge the Senate to reject the strident House approach and pass a reasonable energy policy for the American people,' Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, said at the trade group's annual convention in Phoenix.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is James Fishback? Doge architect steps away the moment Musk feuds with Trump; says 'it's time for Tesla CEO to apologize'
James Fishback James Fishback, the principal architect of the "DOGE checks" initiative, announced on Friday his withdrawal from the movement following Elon Musk's criticism of Donald Trump and demanded that Tesla CEO apologise to the President. "I believed in Elon Musk's vision to shrink government and make it work better for Americans. I'm proud of the DOGE Dividend proposal I developed and will keep working with the administration to return savings to taxpayers." Fishback said. "The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the President, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That's disappointing, but okay. What's not okay is his baseless personal attacks against President Trump," he added. Praising President Trump, Fishback said that he is a once-in-a-century leader. He also said that the president won the popular vote, the Electoral College, and all seven swing states by championing the priorities in his Big Beautiful Bill which Musk said that he wants to 'kill.' President Trump has shown grace and patience at a time when Elon's behavior is disappointing and frankly downright disturbing, Fishback said and demanded aplology from Musk. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2 BHKs starts at ₹ 72.6 Lakh | No Floor rise | Zero PLC Mahindra Happinest Tathawade Get Quote Undo He said, "It's time for Elon to apologize to the President and his family, cool off, and get back to work on inventing the future at Tesla and SpaceX." Who is James Fishback? The founder of the investment firm, aged 30, was raised by a bus driver and a Colombian immigrant. He left Georgetown University to start a hedge fund when he was 21, as reported by MarketWatch. According to the LinkedIn profile, in his professional journey includes working at Greenlight Capital in 2021, followed by establishing Azoria in 2023, where he currently holds the CEO position. Additionally, he leads Incubate Debate, a non-profit organisation helping secondary school students develop debating skills. Currently, he is involved in legal proceedings with Greenlight Capital. The company claims he misrepresented his position, whilst he has filed a countersuit for defamation. In December, he visited Trump's Mar-a-Lago to introduce Azoria Meritocracy ETF, which aims to invest in S&P 500 companies avoiding diversity, equity and inclusion practices. He has connections with former DOGE representative Vivek Ramaswamy and appeared on his podcast in November, Newsweek reported. Regarding the origin of the "DOGE Dividend" proposal, he revealed to Newsweek that the concept occurred to him during sleep. He stated, "It came to me in a dream. I woke up and called our Head of Research at Azoria, and we drafted the proposal during a two-hour lunch at Capital Grille." His "DOGE Dividends" concept aligns with his broader perspective of governmental rewards for citizens who identify wasteful expenditure. He stated, "... DOGE can save even more and as a result deliver an even bigger DOGE Dividend check to hard-working Americans." The proposal indicates that approximately 79 million American households could receive direct payments for reporting inefficiencies, potentially leading to increased savings. Sceptics suggest that while the plan is ambitious, it could potentially increase inflation and might be perceived as politically motivated rather than genuine financial reform. Fishback, who established a self-described "free thinking" investment company, rose to prominence amongst conservatives when he suggested distributing $5,000 stimulus payments to American taxpayers, which would be funded through DOGE's anticipated government savings. Despite never officially becoming part of DOGE, Fishback's "DOGE checks" concept received endorsement from Musk on X and caught Trump's attention, who showed interest in a "DOGE dividend." In December, Fishback introduced his anti-woke investment fund at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate.


Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Is Elon Musk floating a new political party after Donald Trump feud? Tesla CEO reveals name
Elon Musk on Thursday floated the idea of a new party and even conducted a poll to see the reaction of the people in the United States. The move came after the Tesla and SpaceX CEO's public feud with US President Donald Trump, whom he had backed in the November 2024 election. Musk posted a poll on the social media platform X, asking the public to determine whether a new party was required in America. He revealed the results on Friday, showing that 80 percent of the respondents supported the poll. 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle! And exactly 80% of people agree. This is fate," he said on X. Musk later named the new political outfit 'The America Party". It would be difficult to ascertain if Elon Musk could challenge the traditional two-party system in the United States. While it is not enshrined in the Constitution, the last time a President who was not from the traditional two parties was elected was in 1850. Elon Musk's rift with Donald Trump began recently when the billionaire criticised the Republican leader's 'Big Beautiful' spending bill, calling it an 'abomination'. Trump responded during his meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, saying that he was disappointed with Musk. The richest man in the world took to X to claim that Trump would not have won the election without him. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' the Tesla boss wrote, adding, 'Such ingratitude'. Trump threatened to tear up all the federal contracts that Musk's companies have, and the SpaceX CEO responded by saying he would decommission the Falcon rocket, a threat he later reneged on. Musk also claimed that Trump was in the 'Epstein files' and that was the reason they hadn't been made public.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
42 minutes ago
- First Post
Can Musk's businesses afford his breakup with Trump?
Donald Trump and Elon Musk's partnership appears to have reached its end. The US president has threatened to end the tech mogul's government contracts and subsidies for his companies. Tesla is already staring at challenges, with the Thursday spat sending its shares plummeting 14 per cent followed by a recovery later. Will Musk suffer if Trump's ire befalls his businesses? read more US President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House, May 30, 2025, in Washington. File Photo/AP Donald Trump and Elon Musk's public meltdown has glued the world to their phones. Their ugly online brawl seems far from over, with the United States president refusing to speak to the tech billionaire on Friday (June 6). Amid the row, Trump threatened to end Musk's government subsidies and contracts. As the spat escalated on Thursday, Tesla shares went into freefall and Musk's net worth plunged. Once a powerful political alliance, the relationship between Trump and Musk appears to have come to its end. But will the businesses of the world's richest person bear the brunt of the public fallout with the president of the United States? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Let's take a look. Tesla takes a hit What began as a disagreement over US President Donald Trump's signature spending bill soon turned into an explosive row. The Republican leader and the Tesla CEO traded barbs on their respective social media platforms. As the animosity grew, Trump said the tech billionaire had gone 'crazy' and threatened to cut Musk's government contracts and subsidies for his companies. Musk responded, 'Go ahead, make my day.' The high-profile falling out saw Tesla's shares plummeting 14 per cent on Thursday, losing about $152 billion in market value — the largest single-day plunge in the company's 15-year history on the public market. Tesla's stock rebounded on Friday, rising four per cent after the steep fall. Musk continues to be the world's richest person; however, his net worth declined by $34 billion, as per Bloomberg's Billionaires Index. There are also reports that Trump is mulling selling the Tesla – a red Model S – he purchased in March to show solidarity with Musk amid anti-Tesla protests. A Tesla vehicle is parked on West Executive Avenue near the White House and the Eisenhower Executive Office building in Washington, DC, US, June 5, 2025. Reuters Tesla contributes to most of Musk's wealth. However, the company's shares have been on a rollercoaster this year after the stocks rose about 29 per cent following Trump's US presidential election victory in November. Musk spent nearly $300 million to bring Trump back to the White House. The Republican leader rewarded him by giving him a major role in his administration. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But Tesla suffered because of Musk's actions as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge ). 'Musk hasn't done Tesla any favors by taking extremely unpopular actions in his time at Doge, and globally the business is struggling from other decisions, like focusing on the Cybertruck instead of releasing more new practical models that consumers actually want,' John Helveston, a professor at George Washington University who studies the electric vehicle industry, told NPR. 'In the European Union, sales are down heavily from the political damage, and sales in China are down from intense competition of very competitive Chinese EVs.' Musk's frustration with Trump's 'one, big beautiful bill', which he called a 'disgusting abomination', stems from the legislation's proposal to cut funding for electric vehicles and related technologies, which would hurt the Tesla CEO's businesses. The bill slashes the electric vehicle tax credit and federal funding for charging stations. Tesla is America's biggest electric vehicle company and also controls the country's largest charging network. If Trump's plan to chop subsidies on new electric vehicles is implemented, Tesla's full-year profit could decrease by $1.2 billion, Bloomberg reported, citing JP Morgan analysts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking to NPR, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, an associate dean at the Yale School of Management, said further challenges for Tesla could eventually hit Musk's wealth. 'Tesla is hugely reliant on federal largesse for the build-out of EV charging infrastructure, not to mention federal regulatory approval for his continued autonomous driving and robotics experiments,' he said. 'His wealth is highly precarious,' Sonnenfeld said, adding: 'The reality is that Musk's position is far weaker than many realise.' Tesla was already facing challenges before the feud between its CEO and the US president. After the company's stocks peaked at $428 in January, its shares declined by nearly half in March as investors got spooked by Musk's role in the Trump administration. A rift with the Trump administration could affect government support for Tesla as well as tariff exemptions that the company is seeking to buy Chinese parts for its Cybercab robotaxi and Semi electric truck. The 'schoolyard fight' between Trump and Musk underscores how 'Tesla's weak accountability measures and poor governance threaten not only the company's financial stability and shareholder value, but also the future of homegrown EV production,' New York City Comptroller Brad Lander told CNBC in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to The Washington Post analysis in February, Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits. However, the breakup with US President Trump may not be the end of the road for Musk and his companies. According to Paul Levinson, a professor at Fordham University, there could be more short-term stock market falls for Tesla and a hit to Musk's riches. However, even if some federal funding to the billionaire's businesses stops, it is unlikely to impact the tech billionaire in the long run. 'Musk has ample resources to sustain those losses, reshuffle and rebuild his companies and holdings, and come out ahead and on top,' Levinson said to NPR. 'Bottom line: if all the Trump government does in its feud with Musk is attack his financial interests, Musk is very likely to not only survive but continue to thrive.' SpaceX, Starlink may be safe from spat The US government's space ambitions are intricately linked to Musk's SpaceX. As the public row with Trump escalated on Thursday, the 53-year-old former adviser to the US president threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. However, Musk soon seemingly backtracked when an X user suggested he 'cool down'. The billionaire wrote, 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD SpaceX's Crew Dragon is currently the only US spacecraft certified to ferry crew to the International Space Station (ISS). The US Defense Department and the Nasa space agency have given more than $22 billion in contracts to SpaceX since 2000. 'While their political partnership appears to be at an end, it is difficult to imagine the government cancelling SpaceX contracts anytime soon,' Dan Grazier, senior fellow and programme director at the Stimson Center think tank, told NPR. 'It will be some time before any of the company's competitors will be able to take up the slack, so it looks like the president and the tech mogul will have to find a way to get along,' he said. SpaceX's Starlink internet satellite company could also be safe from Trump's ire. It is part of the US federal government's effort to provide internet access to underserved parts of the country. So, tearing up Pentagon contracts with Starlink could be a loss for both Musk and Trump. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While they might not like it, the duo have to rely on each other. With inputs from agencies