Sex chatbots show danger AI could be used to plan terror attacks, watchdog warns
Terrorists will use AI to plan atrocities with "chatbot radicalisation", a counter-terror watchdog has warned.
Jonathan Hall KC said artiticial intelligence could be used for propaganda, attack planning and spreading disinformation which may trigger acts violence. The independent reviewer of terrorism legislation said new laws may be needed to ban software designed to stir up racial or religious hatred.
Mr Hall said terrorist chatbots already exist "presented as fun and satirical models". In his annual report he said: "The popularity of sex-chatbots is a warning that terrorist chatbots could provide a new radicalisation dynamic, with all the legal difficulties that follow in pinning liability on machines and their creators."
The report pointed to the case of Jaswant Singh Chail, who climbed into the grounds of Windsor Castle in 2021 armed with a crossbow. He had conversed with a chatbot called Sarai about planning the attack.
More widely, Mr Hall said "generative artificial intelligence's ability to create text, images and sounds will be exploited by terrorists".
It comes as MPs were told that identifying extremists from their online activity is "not an exact art". Robin Simcox, the UK's Commissioner for Countering Extremism, said the internet gives an "unbelievable boon" to terror groups.
But he told members of the Home Affairs Select Committee that the internet is "not the only show in town" - with many radicalised by a combination of online and offline influences.
Lord David Anderson, Interim Commissioner of the Prevent programme - which counters the threat of extremism - said that that the average age of those referred is now 16.
Lord Anderson, who will today(WED) publish a long-awaited report into Prevent's effectiveness, said 40% of referrals are aged 11 to 15. This will examine the cases of Southport killer Axel Rudakabana and Ali Harbi Ali, who murdered Tory MP David Amess in 2021.
He told MPs his report will look at changes made to the Prevent programme in light of the horrific violence by perpetrators who had previously been referred.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's Nvidia U-turn ‘will boost Chinese military'
Donald Trump's decision to let Nvidia sell powerful artificial intelligence (AI) microchips to China has sparked fears that the technology could be used to boost Beijing's military. Charles Parton, from the think tank Rusi, said there would 'inevitably' be sales of semiconductors 'which have the possibility of military use'. 'Once exports reach China, the Communist Party can direct their use,' he told The Telegraph. Luke de Pulford, of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said: 'Given Beijing's stated policy of civil-military fusion, it has to be presumed these chips will be used for military applications, and is likely to facilitate the modernisation and expansion of the People's Liberation Army.' On Tuesday, Nvidia said it had begun filing new applications to sell its advanced chips in China again. 'The US government has assured Nvidia that licences will be granted, and [we] hope to start deliveries soon,' the company said. The decision to allow Nvidia's most advanced H20 chips to be sold to China reverses an earlier ban by Donald Trump. The US introduced new restrictions in April amid concerns the technology could be used to build cutting-edge supercomputers in China. However, a charm offensive by Jensen Huang, Nvidia's boss, appears to have prompted Mr Trump to change his position. This has included attending a $1m (£744k)-a-head dinner at Mr Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort and promising to build new factories in the US. Mr de Pulford said: 'This is a regrettable decision which suggests the US now believes it can no longer prevent China from acquiring the technology.' Theo Zenou, a research fellow at the Henry Jackson Society, said it remained a 'definite possibility' that US chips could end up in Chinese military technology. 'The danger remains, and we should expect China to try and use the chips for military applications,' he added. Under the Biden administration, the US stepped up efforts to block the sale of advanced AI microchips to China. Nvidia's processors are used to power the most advanced AI products and are being installed in their thousands in vast new supercomputers. 'Well-established concern' US security officials have long warned China could use American-made AI technology for military purposes, while thousands of processors have already been smuggled into the country. Last week, Democratic senators Elizabeth Warren and Jim Banks wrote to Nvidia's Mr Huang ahead of his trip to China, warning him of 'well-established concern' that Nvidia's chips could be used to 'support Chinese military and intelligence activities'. Mr Huang this week downplayed concerns about the use of Nvidia chips by China's military. 'They don't need Nvidia's chips, certainly, or American tech stacks in order to build their military,' he told CNBC. He told reporters in Beijing: 'We believe that every civil model should run best on the US technology stack, encouraging nations worldwide to choose America.' Nvidia's H20 chips were designed to be used by Chinese customers and swerve export controls on its most advanced technology, such as its H200, which remained banned from export to China.
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Former defence secretary Ben Wallace makes ‘no apology' for Afghan injunction
A former Tory defence secretary has said he makes 'no apology' for applying for an injunction blocking reporting about the leak of data on Afghans who supported British forces. Thousands of people are being relocated to the UK as part of a secret £850 million scheme set up after the breach. Sir Ben Wallace said the decision to apply for the gagging order was 'not a cover-up' and that if the leak had been reported it would have 'put in peril those we needed to help out'. It came as Defence Secretary John Healey said the person involved in the leak was 'no longer doing the same job'. A dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official. The Ministry of Defence only became aware of the breach when excerpts from the dataset were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023, and a superinjunction was granted at the High Court in an attempt to prevent the Taliban finding out about the leak. Writing in the Telegraph, Sir Ben said that when he was informed of the 'error' he was 'determined that the first priority was to protect all those that might be at risk'. 'I make no apology for applying to the court for an injunction at the time. It was not, as some are childishly trying to claim, a cover-up,' he said. 'I took the view that if this leak was reported at the time, the existence of the list would put in peril those we needed to help out. 'Some may disagree but imagine if the Taliban had been alerted to the existence of this list. I would dread to think what would have happened.' Sir Ben left office shortly after the then-government became aware of the breach, having announced some time earlier that he intended to step down as defence secretary. The leak led to the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024. The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850 million. A total of around 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. It is understood that the unnamed official emailed the data outside a secure government system while attempting to verify information, believing the dataset to only have around 150 rows. However, more than 33,000 rows of information were inadvertently sent. Downing Street declined to say on Tuesday whether the official involved had faced disciplinary action or was still employed by the Government. Mr Healey later told the News Agents podcast that 'they are no longer doing the same job on the Afghan brief' and 'this is bigger than the actions of a single individual'. Pushed on whether anybody had lost their job, Mr Healey said: 'I'm actually not going to get into the personnel matters.' The injunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments. Mr Healey offered a 'sincere apology' on behalf of the Government in the Commons on Tuesday, and said he had been 'deeply uncomfortable' being unable to speak about it in Parliament. Kemi Badenoch said sorry on behalf of the Conservatives. Speaking to LBC on Tuesday evening, the Tory leader was asked whether she would apologise on behalf of the Conservatives who were in office at the time of the breach. She said: 'On behalf of the government and on behalf of the British people yes, because somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there… and we are sorry for that. 'That should not happen. And this is one of the tough things about, you know, being a minister, which is why even the Government – the Labour Government, now this didn't happen when they were in power – they are apologising as well.' Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024. However an independent review, commissioned by the Government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump, 79, forgets who is with him on Pittsburgh trip and delivers rambling speech
President Donald Trump delivered a rambling speech in Pittsburgh Tuesday, but set off alarm bells by forgetting names and telling 'facts' that were, at best, very unlikely to be true. Speaking at a Pennsylvania 'Energy and Innovation' event hosted by Senator Dave McCormick, Trump was delivering a characteristically weaving set of remarks about the permitting needed for power generation that will be required by artificial intelligence data centers when he admitted to the crowd he thought that AI was 'not [his] thing' when he first heard about it. But it was some of the president's comments that drew attention. Trump claimed that his uncle, a noted physicist who helped develop radar systems during the Second World War, taught notorious future terrorist Theodore Kaczynski at MIT, despite none of it having actually happened. The 79-year-old president also forgot names and who was with him on the trip. 'I want to introduce Dan Meuser. Dan Meuser is here,' Trump said. 'Where's Dan?' 'They all stayed in Washington,' McCormick told the president. 'Oh, they're in Washington working on our next bill? Good,' a surprised Trump said. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit, at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. There, he made several questionable statements. (REUTERS) At one point, Trump invoked his late paternal uncle, Dr. John Trump, who he often describes as the 'longest-serving professor' to ever teach at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology even though the noted physicist did not achieve that distinction despite teaching there for 37 years as a professor and another 12 as a senior lecturer after mandatory retirement. John Trump died in 1985. President Trump called the late Dr. Trump, a pioneer in cancer research who was awarded the National Medal of Science by President Ronald Reagan in 1983, a 'smart man,' citing his multiple scientific degrees, and claimed that one of his students was Theodore Kaczynski, a mathematics professor who became widely known as the Unabomber when he was arrested in 1996 for a decades-long string of letter bomb attacks on figures in higher education and other industries. 'Kaczynski was one of his students. Do you know who Kaczynski was? There's very little difference between a madman and a genius,' he said. Trump then claimed to have asked his uncle about the murderous ex-academic. 'What kind of a student was he Uncle John? He said: 'What kind of a student — seriously, good ... he'd go around correcting everybody. But it didn't work out too well for him. Didn't work out too well, but it's interesting in life,' Trump said. The crowd did not show much of a reaction to the story, and it was unclear if the president was confusing Kaczynski, who died in a federal prison in 2023, with someone else. But it's highly unlikely if not impossible that any of what he said about his uncle and the notorious murder was true. Not only did Kaczynski — whose undergraduate degree was from Harvard and earned his Masters and Doctoral degrees in mathematics from the University of Michigan — never attend MIT, but even if the president's uncle had crossed paths with the future terrorist, he could not have known that Kaczynski had been responsible for 16 bomb attacks between 1971 and 1995. The University of California at Berkeley professor turned murderous recluse was one of the country's most wanted fugitives until 1996, when his brother David Kaczynski, turned him in to the FBI after reading the now-infamous manifesto, Industrial Society and its Future, after The Washington Post published it at the recommendation of then-Attorney General Janet Reno and FBI Director Louis Freeh. The White House did not immediately respond to a query from The Independent asking for clarification on how the events Trump described could have occurred. Sen. Dave McCormick speaks with Trump at the Pittsburgh event. The president made several statements that are not supported by facts. (AFP via Getty Images) At another point in his remarks, he seemed to have trouble remembering how to pronounce the name of a longtime aide, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Michael Kratsios. Trump made the claim that he secured $16 trillion in investment in the U.S. economy - despite the total U.S. economy totalling just under $30 trillion. As the program continued after he finished speaking, Trump appeared to be growing more and more somnolent as a succession of speakers droned on about various energy investments being made in the Keystone State. Though his predecessor, former president Joe Biden, left the 2024 presidential race after a disastrous debate performance brought to the fore longstanding concerns about the then-80-year-old chief executive's age and capacity, Trump is now the oldest person to ever be sworn in as president at age 79 and will be nearly 83 when his second term ends in 2029.
