ECP rejects criticism after SC ruling on reserved seats
Listen to article
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) rejected on Saturday what it called 'baseless propaganda' being circulated in certain media circles in response to renewed criticism following the Supreme Court's constitutional bench's decision on reserved seats.
The criticism arose after the Supreme Court's constitutional bench dismissed the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)-turned Sunni Ittehad Council's (SIC) review petition regarding the allocation of reserved seats.
This decision allowed the ruling coalition, led by the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N), to emerge as the single largest party and to consolidate a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly.
Amid shifting political dynamics, the ECP has reiterated its constitutional role and defended the legality of its decisions, saying the claims were contrary to facts and intended to mislead the public.
In a statement, a spokesperson for ECP said that some circles in the media were engaged in baseless propaganda against the Commission following the recent decision of the top court. The spokesperson said that the Commission declares this propaganda to be contrary to facts and based on falsehoods.
The statement said that such elements were unjustifiably targeting the Commission with criticism. It added that historical facts and numerous decisions of the superior judiciary provide irrefutable evidence that the Commission has always performed its duties in light of the Constitution and law. 'The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the position of the Election Commission,' it read.
Read More: PTI loses court battle for reserved seats
For example, in the Senate elections, the spokesperson said, the Commission's stance regarding secret ballot and show of hands procedures, which was fully in accordance with Article 226 of the Constitution, was upheld by a Supreme Court bench headed by the then ex-CJP Justice Gulzar Ahmed.
In the case of the disqualification election in Daska, the official added, the Commission's decision was not only declared valid by the Supreme Court bench, led by then Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial but also recognized as a constitutional action.
The Supreme Court bench headed by then Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa had also endorsed the legal interpretation of the Commission concerning PTI's intra-party elections, the statement maintained.
Furthermore, it said, in the case of the delisting of the All Pakistan Muslim League (APML), when the Commission delisted APML for failing to conduct intra-party elections, and this decision was challenged by APML in the Supreme Court, the Court upheld the Commission's decision.
Following this, the spokesperson said, the Commission delisted several other parties that failed to comply with the law, keeping the Supreme Court's decision in mind. The Supreme Court also accepted the Commission's appeal regarding Punjab Election Tribunals, rejecting the Lahore High Court's decision and upholding the Commission's stance.
Also Read: PM extends olive branch to PTI amid reserve seats setback
Similarly, it was maintained, in the recent case concerning reserved seats of the Sunni Ittehad Council, first the Peshawar High Court and now the SC constitutional bench have upheld the Commission's position as constitutional and legal.
'All these and many other judicial decisions are undeniable proof that the Election Commission does not alter its decisions due to political pressure, public clamor, or for cheap popularity,' the spokesperson said, adding the ECP rather performs its duties solely based on constitutional requirements, legal jurisdiction, and evidence.
The ECP said that it would not be an exaggeration to say that the Commission is a constitutional institution that is not intimidated by the unscrupulous tactics of any political party or vested interest group. Therefore, it concluded, it is in no way appropriate to hold the Commission responsible for shortcomings and weaknesses.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Election Commission faces troll post-reserved seats verdict
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Saturday rejected what it called "baseless propaganda" being circulated in certain media circles following the Supreme Court's constitutional bench's decision on reserved seats. The criticism arose after the Supreme Court's constitutional bench dismissed the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)-turned Sunni Ittehad Council's (SIC) review petition regarding the allocation of reserved seats. The decision allowed the ruling coalition, led by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), to emerge as the single largest party and to consolidate a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly. Amid shifting political dynamics, the ECP reiterated its constitutional role and defended the legality of its decisions, saying the claims were contrary to facts and intended to mislead the public. In a statement, a spokesperson for the ECP said that some circles in the media were engaged in baseless propaganda against the Commission following the recent decision of the top court. The spokesperson said that the Commission declares this propaganda to be contrary to facts and based on falsehoods. The statement said that such elements were unjustifiably targeting the commission with criticism. It added that historical facts and numerous decisions of the superior judiciary provide irrefutable evidence that the Commission has always performed its duties in light of the Constitution and law. "The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the position of the Election Commission," it read. For example, in the Senate elections, the spokesperson said, the commission's stance regarding secret ballot and show of hands procedures, which was fully in accordance with Article 226 of the Constitution, was upheld by a Supreme Court bench headed by the then ex-CJP Justice Gulzar Ahmed. In the case of the disqualification election in Daska, the official added, the Commission's decision was not only declared valid by the Supreme Court bench, led by then Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial but also recognized as a constitutional action. The Supreme Court bench headed by then Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa had also endorsed the legal interpretation of the Commission concerning PTI's intra-party elections, the statement maintained. Furthermore, it said, in the case of the delisting of the All Pakistan Muslim League (APML), when the Commission delisted APML for failing to conduct intra-party elections, and this decision was challenged by APML in the Supreme Court, the Court upheld the Commission's decision. Following this, the spokesperson said, the Commission delisted several other parties that failed to comply with the law, keeping the Supreme Court's decision in mind. The Supreme Court also accepted the Commission's appeal regarding Punjab Election Tribunals, rejecting the Lahore High Court's decision and upholding the Commission's stance. Similarly, it was maintained, in the recent case concerning reserved seats of the Sunni Ittehad Council, first the Peshawar High Court and now the SC constitutional bench have upheld the Commission's position as constitutional and legal.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
EU plans to add carbon credits to new climate goal, document shows
BRUSSELS: The European Commission is set to propose counting carbon credits bought from other countries towards the European Union's 2040 climate target, a Commission document seen by Reuters showed. The Commission is due to propose a legally binding EU climate target for 2040 on July 2. The EU executive had initially planned a 90% net emissions cut, against 1990 levels, but in recent months has sought to make this goal more flexible, in response to pushback from governments including Italy, Poland and the Czech Republic, concerned about the cost. An internal Commission summary of the upcoming proposal, seen by Reuters, said the EU would be able to use 'high-quality international credits' from a UN-backed carbon credits market to meet 3% of the emissions cuts towards the 2040 goal. The document said the credits would be phased in from 2036, and that additional EU legislation would later set out the origin and quality criteria that the credits must meet, and details of how they would be purchased. The move would in effect ease the emissions cuts - and the investments required - from European industries needed to hit the 90% emissions-cutting target. For the share of the target met by credits, the EU would buy 'credits' from projects that reduce CO2 emissions abroad - for example, forest restoration in Brazil - rather than reducing emissions in Europe. Proponents say these credits are a crucial way to raise funds for CO2-cutting projects in developing nations. But recent scandals have shown some credit-generating projects did not deliver the climate benefits they claimed. The document said the Commission will add other flexibilities to the 90% target, as Brussels attempts to contain resistance from governments struggling to fund the green transition alongside priorities including defence, and industries who say ambitious environmental regulations hurt their competitiveness. These include integrating credits from projects that remove CO2 from the atmosphere into the EU's carbon market so that European industries can buy these credits to offset some of their own emissions, the document said. The draft would also give countries more flexibility on which sectors in their economy do the heavy lifting to meet the 2040 goal, 'to support the achievement of targets in a cost-effective way'. A Commission spokesperson declined to comment on the upcoming proposal, which could still change before it is published next week. EU countries and the European Parliament must negotiate the final target and could amend what the Commission proposes.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Noisy protest in Punjab PA budget session: Speaker bans entry of 26 opposition MPAs into house
LAHORE: The Punjab Assembly session began after a delay of three hours and 47 minutes under the chairmanship of Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan. No opposition members were present at the start of the session. A resolution was presented condemning the tragic incident at the Swat River, with calls for the resignation of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister. The Assembly also held Fateha and offered prayers for the victims, seeking forgiveness and elevation of their ranks. Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan ordered, stating that the House would not be allowed to be held hostage. While protest is a constitutional right, he stressed that it must adhere to the sanctity and rules of the Assembly. He condemned the recent budget session incidents involving vandalism, slogan-chanting, document tearing, and microphone destruction as unacceptable. Under Rules 210 and 223, action will be taken against members involved in unparliamentary and violent behavior. The Speaker warned that any member disrupting order would face consequences. Freedom of expression in the Assembly is conditional, bound by constitutional Article 19 and defined rules. Expressing regret, the Speaker noted that while the opposition was given ample freedom, it misused tolerance. Financial losses, estimated at Rs. 3 million, will be recovered from the responsible members. A violent protester threw the budget book at the Finance Minister, prompting the Speaker to highlight that countries like France and New Zealand also take strict action against such behavior. The dignity of the Assembly is paramount, and the Speaker announced firm measures against any future unconstitutional acts. The ruling applies equally to all members, regardless of political affiliation. Freedom of expression does not override other fundamental rights. Punjab PA budget session turns chaotic as treasury, opposition members trade barbs Referring to the Faizabad sit-in case and other judicial precedents, the Speaker stated that illegal protests are intolerable. No member can infringe upon another's right to speak, and maintaining order is essential. Upholding laws is the foundation of democracy, and turning the Assembly into a battleground betrays public trust. Speaker Malik Muhammad Khan stated that he has always strived to run the House in accordance with the Constitution and traditions. Unfortunately, opposition members violated his rulings, forcing him to take strict action. He imposed a ban on 26 opposition members from entering the Assembly. To ensure the democratic functioning of the House, all constitutional and legal measures will be taken. The opposition had torn copies of the agenda and chanted inappropriate slogans in the previous session. Among the suspended members under Rule 226 are Malik Fahad Masood, Syed Riffat Masood, Karimullah Khan, Zulfiqar Ali, Ahmad Mujtaba Chaudhry, Khayal Castro, Shahbaz Ahmad, Imtiaz Sheikh, Ijaz Shafi Muawang Zeb, Shoaib Amin, and others. The Speaker asserted that neither government members nor past precedents, such as those of Pervez Elahi, would dictate his actions. As a democratic leader, he follows democratic traditions. He warned that if protests occur in the Assembly, the armed sergeant would be summoned. Referencing past struggles, he noted that while leaders have faced imprisonment or even execution, such hardships do not justify disrupting the Assembly. Provincial Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Mujtaba Shujaur Rehman, while addressing the assembly, stated that this house has witnessed two tenures of a defensive government and two of a defensive opposition, but never an opposition like this. He remarked that the Speaker made sincere efforts to guide opposition members, but all attempts proved futile. Despite the chaos, the Chief Minister reaffirmed her commitment to Punjab's development in line with her vision. The pace of progress set by the Chief Minister indicates that work is now being done in the province. Rehman emphasized that if Nawaz Sharif's nine-year tenure is excluded, no major projects can be seen in Pakistan. During Nawaz Sharif's era, motorways were built, nuclear tests were conducted, and load-shedding was eliminated. Today, Nawaz Sharif's daughter serves as Punjab's Chief Minister, and his brother is Pakistan's Prime Minister, both serving the nation. He criticized the opposition leader for promising to elevate the dignity of the green passport but instead diminishing its value. Responding to allegations of Form 47, Rehman questioned how the 2018 elections were stolen, while the 2024 elections were orchestrated by remnants of General Faiz. He welcomed yesterday's Supreme Court decision and questioned how reserved seats could be allocated to a party that did not even contest elections. He praised the current Speaker for ending the negative traditions of Pervez Elahi and Sibtain Khan, adding that opposition members in standing committees were provided vehicles and other facilities. Rehman stated that even opposition members have mothers and sisters at home, but they crossed all limits. Government member Ahsan Raza remarked that the ruckus during the Chief Minister's speech was unprecedented, adding that there is a limit to tolerance. He argued that opposition members involved in misconduct should not just be suspended but disqualified, calling the Speaker's decision correct and stating that the opposition is unfit to sit in the assembly. Punjab Information Minister Azma Bokhari, addressing the assembly, highlighted the tragic incident in Swat where people called for rescue for two hours but received no help. She noted that tourists from across Pakistan visit the Swat River, yet no safety measures are in place. She condemned the opposition leader for refusing to denounce the incident or question Ali Amin Gandapur. Bokhari praised local youth Muhammad Hilal for his rescue efforts, noting that while rescue teams were present, they lacked resources. The Tiger Force was deployed, but locals protested when rescuers admitted they could not swim. She demanded accountability for the deaths of 10 innocent people, calling it a matter of humanity, not politics. She criticized the opposition leader for ignoring the province's progress, stating there is no benefit in engaging with him. She accused the opposition of corruption, referencing those who embezzled 190 million pounds in Adiala Jail, warning that disrespect will be met with disrespect. She condemned the opposition's vulgar language against the Prime Minister and Punjab Chief Minister, stating that she had to resort to unparliamentary slogans to make them understand. Respect, she said, must come from both sides. The Speaker, while discussing the Swat River tragedy, noted that those trapped in the river could not be rescued for 150 minutes. He expressed confusion over reports that the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister claimed he would have gone with a tembo (inflatable tube). PPP Parliamentary Leader Syed Ali Haider Gilani supported the Speaker's ruling, hoping it would restore order in the house. He noted the opposition's absence, suggesting they were ashamed to attend. He pointed out that the Chief Minister repeatedly mentioned South Punjab, indicating its priority in development plans. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
