logo
Hurd and CO lawmakers send letter to Dept. of Ag calling for USFS workers to be reinstated

Hurd and CO lawmakers send letter to Dept. of Ag calling for USFS workers to be reinstated

Yahoo03-05-2025

GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. (KREX) — As Colorado approaches dry season, state lawmakers penned a letter to the Secretary of Agriculture calling for the rehiring of 3,000 forest service staff.
Of those 3,000, many are 'incident qualification card holders' or red card holders that indicate they passed and completed the required training to fight wildfires.
In response, Congressman Jeff Hurd (CD-3) joined several Colorado Democrats including Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper and Reps. Brittany Pettersen, Diana DeGette, Joe Neguse and Jason Crow.
Rep. Hurd talked with WesternSlopeNow about the cuts and says 'I support the president's efforts to make government more efficient, to make government more responsive, to make government more effective. Part of that means making savings and cuts. We just need to make sure they are done in the right spot. And I think people that work in these agencies, they will tell you yes, there are places where we can realize efficiencies, we just need to make sure that we do it in the right places. So, cutting those firefighters, the red card holders, the ones that are able to help when we have wildland fires in our forest service, cutting those individuals is probably not the best place to do that.'
WesternSlopeNow also obtained statements from Reps. Petterson, DeGette and Crow and Gov. Jared Polis on the cuts. Their statements are below.
Rep. Petterson: 'The Trump administration's decision to lay off 3,000 trained employees who prevent and respond to fires right ahead of peak wildfire season is incredibly reckless. This move puts lives, homes, and entire communities at risk. The administration must reverse course immediately and restore these critical positions to protect Coloradans.'
Rep. DeGette: 'The United States Forest Service plays a vital role in the management of our public lands and protection against wildfires. Since Colorado is prone to wildfires, we depend on a strong USFS to keep us safe. These individuals shouldn't have been laid off in the first place, as many of them are specially trained and certified to fight wildland fires. Their reinstatement will help us combat these climate-related threats, and I will continue to advocate for protecting the public servants who keep Colorado's treasured public lands safe and accessible.'
Rep. Crow: 'The loss of thousands of red-card carrying U.S. Forest Service workers puts Colorado at risk. As climate change and intensifying wildfires threaten our communities, it is important to reinstate those most qualified to fight wildfires and protect our families. That's why the Trump Administration must reverse these cuts to critical Forest Service workers.'
Gov. Polis: 'In Colorado, we know the devastating impact of wildfires on our communities and outdoors, and underscore the importance of mitigation efforts in lowering risk and keeping Coloradans safe. These Trump administration cuts are shortsighted and hurt Colorado's ability to meaningfully mitigate wildfires before they happen in addition to the important outcomes this workforce provides more broadly in the care of our public lands. Governor Polis appreciates the members of Colorado's federal delegation who joined this effort to have red card-holding Forest Service members reinstated and echoes the need for urgency before it's too late, and urges other members of the delegation to join this effort.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minnesota lawmakers targeted in shooting
Minnesota lawmakers targeted in shooting

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Minnesota lawmakers targeted in shooting

A shelter-in-place order remains in effect Saturday morning in Brooklyn Park, a northern suburb of Minneapolis, after two Minnesota state lawmakers and their spouses were shot by a suspect impersonating a police officer, officials said. A mobile alert went out to Minneapolis area residents warning them to "shelter in place." Democrats Sen. John Hoffman and Rep. Melissa Hortman and their spouses were among those injured. Police have not confirmed whether the shootings took place at the same location but said the victims were specifically targeted. The extent of their injuries has not been publicly released. The suspect, described as a white man with brown hair wearing body armor over a blue uniform-style shirt and pants, remains at large and is considered armed and dangerous. Authorities are urging residents near Edinburgh Golf Course to remain indoors and call 911 with any information. Gov. Tim Walz said the State Emergency Operations Center has been activated, and that state agencies are assisting local law enforcement. The FBI and Hennepin County Sheriff's Office are also involved in the search. The shooting comes amid a rise in politically motivated threats and violence across the country. Minnesota, already a flashpoint for national debates on policing and public safety following the 2020 murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, has faced heightened tensions in recent years between officials and extremist groups. The investigation is ongoing, and officials have not released a possible motive.

Trump knocks California on its heels: ‘He's pulling the trigger on everything all at once.'
Trump knocks California on its heels: ‘He's pulling the trigger on everything all at once.'

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump knocks California on its heels: ‘He's pulling the trigger on everything all at once.'

California Democrats have long battled Donald Trump. But they've never faced such a ferocious offensive as they did this week. Between the deployment of federal agents to Los Angeles, the gutting of climate standards and the manhandling of the state's senior U.S. senator, the state absorbed one show of force after another from the president. And in the balance of power between the Trump administration and the nation's most populous state, California was on the losing end. 'We're at DEFCON 1 in the conflict between California and the Trump administration,' said Democratic strategist Katie Merrill. 'It's orders of magnitude more than what we've seen, ever.' Democrats in this deep-blue state have spent years working to shield California from a hostile White House, dating back to his first term. But for them, the week's events registered a new low — a multifront assault that not only threatened the state's liberal values, but exposed the limits of California's ability to control its destiny when the federal government has other ideas. 'The moment we've feared,' Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a Tuesday night address, 'has arrived.' Trump's focus on California is predictable. The state was a perennial first-term target term that Republicans and conservative media allies have relentlessly portrayed as dysfunctional and lawless. It has produced national Democratic figures, like Newsom and former Vice President Kamala Harris, who have eagerly hoisted the anti-Trump banner. Elected officials spent months preparing for a second Trump administration. They studied Project 2025 and set aside money to contest Trump's agenda in court. But the scale and aggressiveness of the onslaught has still stunned them. The harrowing stretch for California Democrats began with immigration raids across the Los Angeles area. Then, when protests sprang up, Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops to the region over Newsom's objections. He then moved to eliminate California's vehicle emissions standards as his administration contemplated withholding education dollars over California's policies on transgender athletes. By Thursday, Democrats were watching with outrage a video clip of Padilla being forcibly removed from a Department of Homeland Security news conference, pulled to the ground and handcuffed. And that night, just hours after a federal judge ordered the president to end his unilateral deployment of the state's National Guard, an appeals court preserved his ability to do so, at least temporarily. It marked a major escalation of the Democratic state's long-running feud with the president to a new, existential echelon of antagonism. 'Federalizing the National Guard was in the 2025 plan, but we hoped he wouldn't do something so drastic and dramatic,' said Dana Williamson, who was Newsom's chief of staff until earlier this year. 'He's pulling the trigger on everything all at once.' Trump's decision to enlist the National Guard and Marines in his immigration agenda — and in Los Angeles, a bastion of Latino political power — has made California a globally watched test case for the limits of federal power. Hours before Judge Charles Breyer issued his decision ordering Trump to end his deployment of the Guard, Padilla strode into a press conference to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and was forcibly restrained. Images of a supine Padilla surrounded by federal agents ignited universal Democratic condemnation and came to symbolize the stakes of California's fight with the federal government. Many Democrats argued the White House had pushed California to the precipice of authoritarianism. Federal pressure on California's political luminaries extended beyond Padilla's confrontation with Noem: Officials detained prominent union leader David Huerta; Sen. Josh Hawley launched an investigation into a Los Angeles-based immigrant advocacy group; and Border czar Tom Homan threatened to arrest anyone, including Newsom, who interfered with federal enforcement. 'This is about an abuse of power. This is about a desire to cross red lines time and time again,' said California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks. 'We see that in other parts of the world,' Hicks added about Padilla. 'We don't see that here. If there weren't enough wakeup calls over the last week, that sure is one.' Padilla's treatment drew wall-to-wall coverage. But it was only one squall in the storm engulfing California. While the immigration raids plunged California into a political maelstrom, Newsom and other officials were also bracing against the threat of the Trump administration slashing funding as the president and education Secretary Linda McMahon assailed the state's policies on trans students. Then there was Trump's move to override some of California's signature climate change policies. 'They're looking to make California the punching bag,' said California Environmental Voters Executive Director Mike Young. 'We're flabbergasted and really disgusted by what's happening.' As a pillar of Democratic politics and the world's fourth-largest economy, California has long sought to mold a broader economic and political agenda. During Trump's first term, California passed a 'sanctuary' law shielding immigrants and struck an auto emissions deal that Newsom proclaimed as 'checkmate' over Trump. But it turned out to be just one move in a larger chess match. And Trump is demonstrating that he holds the most powerful pieces: a compliant Republican Congress, a conservative Supreme Court, and above all, federal supremacy over even large, wealthy states. 'The idea that the federal government can bigfoot the state government is coming to the fore,' said Loyola Law School professor Jessica Levinson. 'We are experiencing that, if you have a power struggle between the federal government and the states, chances are pretty high that the federal government wins.' While Newsom notched a victory on Thursday when a judge ordered Trump to relinquish control of the National Guard, it proved short-lived when an appeals court blocked the order for at least a few days, setting a hearing on the matter for Tuesday. The governor has walked back his threat to retaliate against withheld funding by blocking the flow of tax dollars from California to Washington. Republicans say the Constitution is squarely on their side, arguing they are rescuing California's citizens from ruinous immigration and climate policies. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement that Trump 'rightfully stepped in to protect federal law enforcement officers' when Newsom would not. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said Trump acted to squelch California's 'costly, unrealistic, and tyrannical' climate policies. 'The goal is to help California,' said GOP Rep. Kevin Kiley, who spearheaded the push to reverse Newsom's gas car phaseout, 'and unfortunately helping California means all too often fighting against or counteracting the politicians who hold power in our state.' Democrats say Trump is pushing limits of the law and regularly violating it. 'The lying has become more brazen. The overreach has become more evident,' said Xavier Becerra, the former state attorney general and former health secretary under President Joe Biden. 'They've dialed up the severity, the volatility of their actions, they've dialed up the intensity of their misrepresentations, but it's still at the end of the day the same unlawful actions the courts rejected the first time Donald Trump was president." He said, 'This president won't take no for an answer. He'll continue to try to do it his way even if it runs counter to the Constitution.' California's current attorney general, Rob Bonta — whose office on Thursday sued to block the environmental rollback and then squared off with Department of Justice attorneys over the National Guard deployment — told reporters he was on pace to bring twice as many legal actions as during the first Trump administration. That reaction is of a newly urgent necessity, he suggested. 'The speed and the volume in Trump 2.0 is materially different,' Bonta said. 'The shamelessness and brazenness of the violations — they seem more severe.'

Raskin takes swipe at Trump over price of military parade, GOP megabill
Raskin takes swipe at Trump over price of military parade, GOP megabill

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Raskin takes swipe at Trump over price of military parade, GOP megabill

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) slammed President Trump for his Saturday military parade, which is expected to cost millions of dollars. 'As tanks roll down PA. Ave and planes streak above, remember this is all courtesy of the taxpayers,' Raskin wrote in a post on the social media platform X. 'Maybe there will be goodie bags for 14 million people who used to have Medicaid,' he added, referencing Medicaid cuts in the president's spending bill. The celebratory event held in honor of the Army's 250th birthday also coincides with the president's 79th birthday. The parade plans, which feature the public display of tanks and weapons from World War II, are expected to cost between $25 million and $45 million, according to the Army. 'It's a surprise party! Most people's spouse or family pay for theirs, but—surprise!—you're paying for Donald Trump's $45 million 79th birthday military parade,' Raskin wrote on Saturday. For months, Raskin and other Democrats have rebuked the Trump administration for the House-approved GOP spending bill that would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt while locking out some Medicaid recipients with new work requirements. Republicans have lauded the bill for its extensions to Trump's 2017 tax cuts and $1,000-per-baby investment accounts . The president has suggested that tariffs will mitigate a significant rise in the national debt while encouraging patrons to honor the country's history of servicemembers in the Army during the military parade hosted on Flag Day. 'OUR GREAT MILITARY PARADE IS ON, RAIN OR SHINE. REMEMBER, A RAINY DAY PARADE BRINGS GOOD LUCK. I'LL SEE YOU ALL IN D.C.' Trump wrote in a Saturday Truth Social post. Sixty-four percent of Americans disapprove of the use of state funds for this weekend's military parade, according to results from a NBC Decision Desk Poll.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store