Musk, billionaires took over Wisconsin Supreme Court race. The joke is on us.
Imagine for a second that Wisconsin's supposedly "nonpartisan" Supreme Court race — which is likely to surpass $100 million and has been transformed into a sensational proxy war waged by national political players — is actually an elaborate ruse.
Picture waking up after today's election to discover that Wisconsinites tolerated months of crass attack ads, political mudslinging and endless fundraising emails, not because we enjoy partisan theatrics, but because we had a secret plan all along.
What if all that cash pouring into our state wasn't just evaporating into the deep pockets of media conglomerates, dark money groups and consultants with questionable fashion choices?
Instead, imagine that Wisconsin had willingly volunteered as the nation's off-cycle battleground, slyly goading billionaires into spending absurd amounts of money on this spectacle, only to divert those millions toward something meaningful — like funding a comprehensive cleanup of toxic PFAs and providing drinking water filtration systems for our most affected communities?
Now that would be an April Fools Day prank.
But that's not what's happening.
Instead, that is actually the (slightly edited) plot of Jon Stewart's mediocre 2020 political comedy, 'Irresistible.' If you subjected yourself to the terrible pronunciation of 'Wisconsin' and watched that movie, you might remember that the joke was that partisan political operatives descended on a small Wisconsin town, only to see their money wasted because — surprise, surprise! — the residents of 'Deerlaken' had actually used the consultants and their money to save their town.
At the time when I watched it, I remember being really bothered that they chose a mayoral race because in Wisconsin, our mayoral races are nonpartisan.
But that was before our record breaking nonpartisan Supreme Court race in 2023. And obviously also before our current nonpartisan Supreme Court race that is expected to double what was spent two years ago.
So the joke isn't on the out-of-state consultants or the billionaires.
It's on us.
Because all that money is being spent on us. Not for us.
Come tomorrow, that money might as well have evaporated into thin air, leaving behind a trail of division, frustrations and, frankly, nausea from having to explain to our kid, who is just trying to watch a March Madness game, what a 'rape kit' is.
Think about what real problems that much money could solve across our state. Mental health services in schools. Affordable housing initiatives. Child care support. Job training programs.
Imagine potholes getting fixed, roads and bridges improved and public transportation made more accessible and efficient.
Opinion: Elon Musk petition in Wisconsin Supreme Court races makes mockery of free speech
Imagine if it could help increase Medicaid reimbursements rates or find solutions to Wisconsin's water-quality crisis.
Instead, that much money is used to pit neighbors against neighbors and floods our screens with relentless attack ads until we are numb to them.
This election showcased the worst of politics: a nonstop circus of negativity complete with dark money groups secretly pulling strings and presidential endorsements inflaming tensions. These battles seem designed to alienate us further from our neighbors, making cooperation nearly impossible.
But brace yourselves, because we don't even get the luxury of taking a breather after this.
Editorial: Elon Musk's despicable disinformation tampers with WI Supreme Court election
We're going to have to do it all over again in 2026. And again in 2027. And 2028. And 2029.
Six consecutive years of Wisconsin Supreme Court races, and that's not even counting the regular chaos of everyday politics and the 2026 midterms or the 2028 presidential election.
We've become the perpetual battleground where sanity goes to die.
But it doesn't have to be this way. Every system in place has been imagined into being by human beings. We can imagine something new. It starts with us demanding meaningful reforms around campaign finance from our state legislators.
Opinion: I'm the father of son with Down syndrome. Using the 'R' word is never acceptable.
Wisconsinites deserve a system where judicial candidates don't owe their seats to wealthy donors or special interest groups, but instead represent the broad electorate as intended. Research consistently shows that judicial elections influence how judges preside over cases and the decisions they ultimately make, fundamentally undermining the principle of judicial impartiality itself.
Wisconsinites deserve transparency and accountability in how these races are funded. The current model of endless financial warfare benefits few and exhausts many. It's time to put people over profits and community over conflict. I can confidently say, Wisconsinites across the political spectrum are weary and have an appetite for change.
Can we dare to imagine a world where April 2 marks the start of something better — or will it simply be another frustrating day in an endless loop of costly political games?
The joke's on us, Wisconsin — but it doesn't have to stay this way.
Kristin Brey is the "My Take" columnist for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: WI Supreme Court election has become billionaire playground | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller spammed social media Tuesday night in a raging display of his unwavering support for President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as it faced increasing backlash from MAGA figures, including Elon Musk. The Trump loyalist went in hard to sell the 1,038-page document that passed the House by a single vote on May 22. Miller's comments came hours after former DOGE chief Musk attacked the mega-spending bill as the legislation moves to the Senate, labeling it a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest man also threatened to 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' at next year's midterm elections. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X. Miller responded by calling Trump's bill 'the most essential piece of legislation... in generations' and 'the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House.' Miller pointedly described those on Trump's side of the argument as the president's 'closest allies.' It is unclear how much personal animus there is between Miller and Musk after the tech billionaire walked out on the administration, taking Miller's wife Katie with him. Katie Miller was hired by DOGE under the same 'special government employee' status as Musk, meaning that she was also time-limited to 130 days in office, but that has done little to quell unsubstantiated internet speculation about Musk and the Millers. She will now reportedly work for Musk full-time. Miller began his own barrage of posts on X, first by claiming Trump's bill would fund increased deportation. '[The bill] will increase by orders of magnitude the scope, scale, and speed of removing illegal and criminal aliens from the United States,' Miller wrote. 'For that reason alone, it's the most essential piece of legislation currently under consideration in the entire Western World, in generations.' 'Now or never,' the 39-year-old wrote in another post. Trump's bill is estimated to increase the budget deficit by approximately $600 billion in the next fiscal year. Miller tried to explain his take on the bill by breaking it down into three sections: 'The most significant border security and deportation effort' in history, a full 'extension and expansion' of Trump's tax cuts and finally cutting almost $2 trillion through 'the largest welcome reform in history.' 'Item 1 alone (border security + deportation),' Miller wrote, 'makes this the most important legislation for the conservative project in the history of the nation.' Critics of Trump's bill fear it would lead to millions of Americans losing health coverage by slashing Medicaid and introducing budget cuts to food assistance programs, with spending on border security and military programs increased. Some Republicans have also expressed fears about the rising cost of the bill, despite a deadline of July 4 to get the measure passed and signed into law. Miller's flurry of posts included him bragging that the bill 'was designed by President Trump and his allies in Congress to deliver on his core campaign pledges to voters and that is exactly what it does. This is the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House, and it's not even close.' 'The bill was designed by President Trump, his loyal aides, and his closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on the explicit promises he made the American People,' he wrote in another post. Miller also called out GOP Kentucky senator Rand Paul, who told Fox Business his biggest objection to Trump's bill was the addition of '$5 trillion to the debt ceiling' over the next decade. 'Why doesn't Rand ever fight this hard to deport illegals?' Miller asked in a post. Miller clarified Trump's bill would not fund the Department of Education, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or the Environmental Protection Agency. Experts have, however, warned the bill could ruin student loan borrowers and universities and will have an environmental impact through increased mining and logging of public lands to raise revenue. 'We could have never dreamed of a bill like this in 2017,' Miller posted on X. Miller's loyalty comes as other Republican senators have joined Musk in questioning the contents of Trump's bill. At least four are demanding changes, according to Reuters. They include Sen. Mike Lee and Sen. Ron Johnson. While Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority in the Senate, they cannot afford to lose support. Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene revealed she had not read a part of the bulky bill that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence systems for a decade. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of (the bill) that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' Greene posted on X. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' California Republican Jack Kimble was also critical of the bill on Tuesday. He posted on X: 'Full transparency, I did not know that the big beautiful bill was a real budget and would be used to determine spending levels. It seems to me that this is something that should have been made known to those in the House of Representative[s].' When a follower told him 'you're supposed to read the bills before you vote on them' Kimble replied 'Yeah, my bad.' Ron Johnson also agreed with Musk's 'disgusting abomination' comments on the bill. Speaking to NewsNation's The Hill on Tuesday, Johnson said, 'He's telling the truth... that's all I'm doing, too.' 'The trajectory of deficits is up, and no matter what the 'big, beautiful bill' does, it does not address that long-term prospect, it does not bend the deficit curve down. It supports it going up.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Trump was already aware of 'where Elon Musk stood on this bill' and that he would not be changing it. 'This is one, big, beautiful bill,' Leavitt said on Tuesday. 'And he's sticking to it.'
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cuts to care: The price mothers and children will pay
HONOLULU (KHON2) — Congress continues to discuss possible cuts to Medicaid and many in Hawaii are concerned about the potential impacts. Some officials warn pregnant women and children could be hit the hardest. Those who rely on the service for themselves and their children also fear the worst. On Aug. 8, 2023, wildfires rip through the Lahaina community forcing thousands to flee. Mairey Garcia, then 10 weeks pregnant with her second child, made it out alive with her husband and daughter. Wanted man arrested after 'crime spree' leads to officer-involved shooting 'We live in Maui, for almost 16 years,' she said. 'Thinking and looking back after the fire, I don't want to think about it anymore.' They lost everything. Uprooting her family and relocating after the devastation on Maui she dealt with so many stressors and the added responsibility of another baby on the way. Garcia said having Aloha Care medical coverage was a huge weight off her shoulders. 'It's the only thing I have that time to support my babies and my family as well, because I can't afford to get a medical,' she Feb. 23, 2024 she gave birth to a healthy baby girl. 'Aloha Care has been there for me from the very start. It's been a blessing for me,' Garcia said. She is not alone. According to Aloha Care CEO Francoise Culley-Trotman, 1,500 moms delivered babies last year covered by Aloha Care. With 70,000 members it's the states second largest medicaid-medicare health plan. But if a bill to cut more than $600 billion in funding for Medicaid passes congress in the coming weeks, many will lose that lifeline. Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news 'The Republican tax bill makes the biggest cuts to Medicaid in history, meaning many people on Med-QUEST will lose coverage and hospitals and clinics may be forced to reduce services or close altogether,' U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz said in a statement. 'These cuts will disproportionately impact pregnant women and children.' 'This issue goes beyond just our membership or even the Quest recipients to what happens to our state and our ability to take care of people,' Culley-Trotman explained. She said cuts this extreme will increase preterm births and impact the long term health of mothers. 'Just an overall worsening of maternal and infant statistics in our state,' she added. For Garcia, it's personal. She worries about what will happen to her family and had this message for lawmakers. 'Please don't pass the bill,' she said. 'Because a lot of people need help and and rely on this program.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State budget rolls through Republican-led Senate
It took four hours of debate over 20 amendments, but a $15.4 billion two-year state budget proposal easily cleared the state Senate Thursday. Senate Finance Committee Chairman James Gray, R-Rochester, said his committee's proudest achievement is the reversal of more than $160 million in unpopular cuts made by the House of Representatives to Medicaid providers and those relying on community mental health and developmental disability services. 'We made some tough choices with limited resources,' Gray said. Relying on rosier estimates for future state revenues, the Senate proposal spends nearly $250 million more than the House's. Senate Democratic Leader Rebecca Perkins Kwoka of Portsmouth praised the Senate Republicans for making those changes, but she said working families are hurt in other parts of the budget, which imposes new health care premiums for some families on Medicaid, raids an eight-figure surplus in the state's renewable energy fund and fails to include any new spending for housing. Perkins Kwoka said the state's fiscal problems are the result of Republican governors and legislators voting for repeated cuts in business and unearned income taxes that robbed the state treasury of money it could now use to pay for programs. 'Let's be clear: This is not magically a tight budget year,' Perkins Kwoka said. The Senate passed the spending bill (HB 1) on a 15-9 vote with only Sen. Keith Murphy, R-Manchester, breaking ranks to oppose the measure along with the eight Senate Democrats. Fellow Manchester Republican Sen. Victoria Sullivan joined Murphy and all the Democrats opposing the trailer bill to the state budget (HB 2) that makes the necessary changes in state law to implement the budget; it passed the Senate, 14-10. Senate President Sharon Carson, R-Londonderry, said Senate Democrats had proposed $168 million in higher spending with no corresponding cuts in other parts of the budget. 'This isn't a perfect budget; we have never had a perfect budget, but this is a budget that works for the people of New Hampshire,' Carson said. Democrats targeted EFAs Nearly half of the amendments Senate Democrats tried to make Thursday would have eliminated the expansion of Education Freedom Accounts. If signed into law, the measure would remove income restrictions on eligibility for these taxpayer-paid grants for private, religious, alternative public or home school programs. Sullivan said her family has used EFAs since the Legislature created the program in 2021 and she expressed doubt that the very wealthy would bother seeking what critics call school vouchers. 'There is the middle-class families that are usually not mentioned … the ones who pay all the bills for the state and municipalities and get nothing back,' Sullivan said. 'They do all the paying and this allows them to use their taxpayer money for their own children's education.' Senate Deputy Democratic Leader Cindy Rosenwald said other states that made these vouchers universal ended up with large budget deficits. YDC settlements The Senate rejected an attempt to increase by $50 million spending on settlements for victims of alleged sexual or physical abuse at its youth detention centers. The House set aside $20 million more to the $165 million that lawmakers have already directed to the settlement fund. The Senate budget adds $20 million as well but also would earmark for the fund the proceeds from the sale of the Sununu Youth Services Center in Manchester. State officials estimate that could raise $80 million. Senate Deputy Democratic Leader Cindy Rosenwald said the state can't sell the Sununu Center until construction is complete on a new, treatment-oriented replacement on the grounds of the former Hampstead Hospital. Chuck Miles, a Youth Development Center abuse survivor who works with Justice for YDC Victims, an advocacy group, said the Senate budget falls short. 'The budget passed by the Senate would be devastating for the YDC Settlement Fund and would break the promises made to the victims of horrendous abuse while in the care of the state,' Miles said. 'Survivors came forward with courage, opting for a settlement process over the courtroom to seek closure, accountability and justice, but by falling woefully short on funding and removing the fund's independence, the state is essentially telling victims 'see you in court,'' he said. Landfill regulation The Senate voted 14-9 against an amendment from Sen. David Rochefort, R-Littleton, that tried to remove from the trailer bill changes to the landfill law that will allow a site evaluation committee to declare a 'public benefit' for a new or expanded commercial landfill in the state. 'The potential with this language is to undo local control,' Rochefort said. Sen. Denise Ricciardi, R-Bedford, joined Rochefort in voting for the amendment while Sen. David Watters, D-Dover, joined the rest of the Republicans voting against it. What's Next: The House and Senate next week will name members to a conference committee to be charged with working out differences between their competing budget bills. Prospects: This issue is far from resolved as it's unclear if the GOP-led House will be willing to accept a final compromise that spends much more money than it budgeted. klandrigan@