New study claims the universe will start shrinking in 7 billion years
How will the world end? While some, like Robert Frost, have waxed poetic about the end of life on Earth—fire or ice—others have been looking to science to solve the mystery. Even still, others have been looking at the bigger picture, trying to figure out when the entire universe will end. Now, a new study claims that the universe itself might start shrinking within the next 7 billion years, leading to what scientists call 'the Big Crunch.'
The study was published by physicists from Cornell University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and several other institutions. Using data collected from many different astronomical surveys, including the Dark Energy Survey, the researchers have created a new model that predicts our universe will end with what scientists have long theorized will be a 'Big Crunch.' The model suggests the universe will end roughly 33.3 billion years after the Big Bang.
Today's Top Deals
XGIMI Prime Day deals feature the new MoGo 4 and up to 42% off smart projectors
Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales
Best Ring Video Doorbell deals
Using that date, the researchers then began looking backward. So far, the universe is estimated to be around 13.8 billion years old. Based on that number and the model's prediction of when the universe will end, we have roughly 20 billion years before the universe collapses in on itself. This study, and the theory of the 'Big Crunch,' challenges long held assumptions that the universe will expand forever, eventually leading to a 'Big Freeze.'
Instead, the researchers estimate that the universe will continue to expand for another 7 billion years. At that point, the universe will then begin contracting. Essentially, it will collapse in on itself until a single point remains, destroying everything. It's an interesting and somewhat terrifying theory, even if we aren't expecting it to happen in our lifetime.
One easy way to think about it is to imagine the universe as a massive rubber band. As the universe expands, the rubber band stretches. But then it eventually reaches a point where it can't be stretched anymore, forcing the band to become stronger than its expansion force. This then causes everything to snap back together.
It's a bit of a sad way for the universe to end, and I can't imagine what it would actually look like if there was any way to see it taking place. Luckily, it's not really something we have to worry about, and this research is far from actual confirmation that this is what will happen. For all we know, the theories could be incorrect, and the universe could indeed keep expanding forever.
More Top Deals
Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98
See the
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cellectis to Report Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results on August 4, 2025
NEW YORK, July 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Cellectis (the 'Company') (Euronext Growth: ALCLS- NASDAQ: CLLS), a clinical-stage biotechnology company using its pioneering gene-editing platform to develop life-saving cell and gene therapies, today announced that it will report financial results for the second quarter 2025 ending June 30, 2025 on Monday August 4, 2025 after the close of the US market. The publication will be followed by an investor conference call and webcast on Tuesday August 5, 2025 at 8:00 AM ET / 2:00 PM CET. The call will include the Company's second quarter results and an update on business activities. Details for the call are as follows: Dial in information: Domestic: +1-800-343-5172 International: +1-203-518-9856 Conference ID: CLLSQ2 Webcast Link: About Cellectis Cellectis is a clinical-stage biotechnology company using its pioneering gene-editing platform to develop life-saving cell and gene therapies. The company utilizes an allogeneic approach for CAR T immunotherapies in oncology, pioneering the concept of off-the-shelf and ready-to-use gene-edited CAR T-cells to treat cancer patients, and a platform to develop gene therapies in other therapeutic indications. With its in-house manufacturing capabilities, Cellectis is one of the few end-to-end gene editing companies that controls the cell and gene therapy value chain from start to finish. Cellectis' headquarters are in Paris, France, with locations in New York and Raleigh, NC. Cellectis is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market (ticker: CLLS) and on Euronext Growth (ticker: ALCLS). To find out more, visit and follow Cellectis on LinkedIn and X. TALEN® is a registered trademark owned by Cellectis. For further information on Cellectis, please contact: Media contacts: Pascalyne Wilson, Director, Communications, + 33 (0)7 76 99 14 33, media@ Patricia Sosa Navarro, Chief of Staff to the CEO, +33 (0)7 76 77 46 93 Investor Relations contact: Arthur Stril, Chief Financial Officer & Chief Business Officer, investors@ Attachment 20250728_Q2 2025 earnings call announcement_ENGLISHError while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Gizmodo
14 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Nuclear Winter Would Be Even Worse Than We Thought
Despite happening (thankfully) just once in real life, nuclear warfare has long been a staple element of science fiction. Popular depictions of nuclear conflict—from biographic thrillers like Oppenheimer to imagined disasters like The Day After—reflect the understanding that its consequences would be irreversible and catastrophic to modern society. Unsurprisingly, nuclear warfare and its potential repercussions concern scientists as much as fiction writers. In a recent paper published in Environmental Research Letters, researchers at Pennsylvania State University examined how nuclear war might disrupt food security worldwide, focusing specifically on the global production of corn, the most produced grain crop in the world. In the worst-case scenario, nuclear weapons would wreak havoc on our atmospheric systems, gradually cutting our annual corn production by up to 87%, the study warns. For their simulations, the authors considered 38,572 locations for corn production across six different nuclear war scenarios of increasing severity. The simulations took place under nuclear winter conditions, a hypothetical climate scenario following a large-scale nuclear war. During nuclear winters, black carbon from fires triggered by nuclear detonations would fill up the sky, obstructing sunlight. The resulting drop in global temperatures could last for over a decade—long enough to decimate agricultural systems worldwide, according to the scientists. In addition to black carbon, the authors examined the potential UV-B radiation exposure to plants. The Earth's ozone usually blocks this type of radiation, but this protective layer would be weakened in the wake of nuclear war. As UV-B radiation causes DNA damage and obstructs plant photosynthesis, the researchers modeled how overexposure to this energy source could affect the soil-plant-atmosphere system that drives crop growth. The results were disturbing. First, the 'best-case scenario,' a regional nuclear war, would release enough soot into the atmosphere to reduce annual corn production by 7%—which, to be clear, would severely impact the global food system, study lead author and meteorologist Yuning Shi explained in a press release. A global-scale war, on the other hand, would inject a massive 165 million tons of soot into the atmosphere, curbing global corn production by a whopping 80%. That wasn't all; radiation damage 'would peak in years 8 and 9' following the initial detonation of the bomb, causing an additional 7% decrease in corn yields, according to the paper. 'The blast and fireball of atomic explosions produce nitrogen oxides in the stratosphere,' Shi explained. This, in combination with heat-absorbing soot, injects a fiery cycle into the atmosphere that 'rapidly [destroys] ozone, increasing UV-B radiation levels at the Earth's surface.' Thankfully, these are just simulations. They nevertheless 'force us to realize the fragility of the biosphere—the totality of all living things and how they interact with one another and the environment,' Shi said. What's more, the study acts as an early precursor to a more refined, effective response plan for potential disasters, he added. Hopefully, that disaster won't be nuclear—though it could be something like a volcanic eruption, which obstructs sunlight in a similar way and is something we can better prepare for. For example, the paper recommended preparing 'agricultural resilience kits' containing seeds for crops that can grow under cooler conditions. 'These kits would help sustain food production during the unstable years following a nuclear war, while supply chains and infrastructure recover,' said Armen Kemanian, an environmental systems expert and paper senior author, in the same release. But these kits could easily assist food security in areas affected by severe volcanic activity, he added. Natural disasters are beyond our control, save for the preparatory part. A self-inflicted environmental catastrophe and global-scale famine—that's clearly another story. When it comes to nuclear winter, the 'best approach to preventing its devastating effects is to avoid it,' the scientists wrote.
Medscape
14 minutes ago
- Medscape
Medscape 2050: Adam Rodman
Medscape 2050: The Future of Medicine There will come a day, predicts Adam Rodman, MD, a general internist and medical educator at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, when AI systems change disease. That's the day when they can not only diagnose diseases more accurately than humans, but define diseases in ways that only machines can understand. Take heart attacks, for example. Rodman hopes cardiologists will forgive him for pointing out that AI can already detect blocked coronary arteries from an EKG in ways that humans can't. In the not-too-distant future, Rodman believes, medicine will begin redefining more diseases and treatments that are simply not understandable by the human brain. That day isn't here yet, Rodman explains, because today's AI systems are still pretty similar to us. 'They're trained on a human understanding of disease,' he says, 'so even the best models are following the guidelines that we give them.' They mimic human reasoning, albeit a lot faster and using a lot more data. But as new AI models develop, we could reach what Rodman calls 'a nonhuman nosology': our clinical reasoning vs a machines-only thought process. And what happens when those disagree? What does it mean — for both doctors and patients — to trust a computer that we can't understand? Is this the day when doctors are out of a job? Rodman doesn't think so. Because medicine is about more than computation. There are relationships and procedures that can't be replaced. But certain areas of clinical practice will certainly change. 'If you have a job where you can sit down at a computer and interpret most of the data that has already been collected for you to make a decision,' he says, you should start looking over your shoulder. Medicine is going through an 'epistemic shift,' Rodman says, where the parameters of how we think are changing, so it's hard to predict what will come next. But we should all get ready.
