Official investigation into Trump prosecutor Jack Smith launched
Smith is the justice department lawyer who oversaw two criminal investigations into President Donald Trump during the Biden administration, one into Trump's handling of classified documents, the other as to whether his actions on Jan. 6th, 2021 were an attempt to overturn the 2020 election. Both cases were dismissed.
An email reviewed by The Post states The Hatch Act Unit, which enforces a law restricting government employees from engaging in political activities, has begun reviewing the former Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice. The email was written by Senior Counsel Charles Baldis at OSC.
Advertisement
4 Jack Smith was appointed by President Biden's Attorney General Merrick Garland and resigned from his post as Special Council for the Department of Justice in January, after Trump assumed power.
AP
'I appreciate the Office of Special Counsel taking this seriously and launching an investigation into Jack Smith's conduct. No one is above the law.
'Jack Smith's actions were clearly driven to hurt President Trump's election, and Smith should be held fully accountable,' said Senate Intelligence Committee chair Sen Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) in a statement to The Post.
Advertisement
OSC opened the investigation into Smith after Cotton wrote a letter earlier this week alleging Smith took blatantly political action to undermine President Trump in his 2024 bid.
Smith, who was appointed by President Biden's Attorney General Merrick Garland, resigned from his post as Special Council for the Department of Justice in January, after Trump assumed power.
4 'Jack Smith's legal actions were nothing more than a tool for the Biden and Harris campaigns. This isn't just unethical, it is very likely illegal campaign activity from a public office,' Sen, Tin Cotton wrote.
Getty Images
4 Under Jack Smith's watch the FBI raided Trump's home at Mar-a-Lago to search for documents.
US Justice Department/AFP via Getty Images
Advertisement
Smith's actions as prosecutor have been widely criticized by Republicans who saw the prosecutions as an effort to weaponize the justice system against Trump and hobble his election chances in 2024.
In his letter to OSC, Cotton explains how Smith's actions undermined Trump's political efforts.
'Jack Smith's legal actions were nothing more than a tool for the Biden and Harris campaigns. This isn't just unethical, it is very likely illegal campaign activity from a public office,' Cotton said.
'Many of Smith's legal actions seem to have no rationale except for an attempt to affect the 2024 election results – actions that would violate federal law.'
Advertisement
4 Jack Smith investigated President Trump's handling of the 2020 election.
REUTERS
Cotton accuses Smith of blatant political actions to interfere with Trump's 2024 presidential run, including speeding up his investigation to schedule trial dates that would interfere with important political moments, such as the Iowa caucuses.
'These actions were not standard, necessary, or justified,' Cotton added. 'They were the actions of a political actor masquerading as a public official.'
Smith has not publicly responded to Cotton's allegations. During his tenure, Smith maintained that his investigations followed legal protocols and were independent of political influence. Smith didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from The Post.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump labor secretary touts ‘native-born' share of job gains
Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer touted that native-born employment increased in the latest dismal jobs report, which showed the U.S. added only 73,000 jobs in July. While calling for the Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to cut interest rates, Chavez-Deremer argued that businesses need to be able to borrow money at a lower rate so they can invest in their companies. She then pointed to the data about jobs for American-born workers. 'We've seen positive job growth. We have seen consumer confidence go up. We've seen unemployment hold steady,' Chavez-DeRemer said Friday in an interview with Fox Business. 'While we could have seen better jobs numbers, right now we're seeing American workers are being put first — native-born workers account for all of the job growth and that's key.' 'We're setting the table for a positive economy and the American worker is going to win in this occasion because the president has their back,' she told 'Varney & Co' host Stuart Varney. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) report released on Friday suggested the economy and labor market are much weaker than previously thought. The report though found that job growth among American-born individuals was 133,035,000, an increase from 131,037,000 for the same month in 2024. Among foreign-born individuals, employment declined to 30,764,000 in July from 31,001,000 a year ago. President Trump's response to the jobs report was furious. He fired BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer, accusing her, without evidence, of politicizing previous job reports in the run-up to last year's presidential election. Chavez-DeRemer praised Trump's decision, saying she agreed 'our jobs numbers must be fair, accurate, and never manipulated for political purposes,' without offering any evidence to support Trump's claim.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Statisticians blast Trump over BLS firing: ‘Dangerous precedent'
Statisticians railed against President Trump on Friday following his decision to fire Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner Erika McEntarfer for 'inaccuracies' and ' incompetence ' after presenting a low job growth report for the month of July. Former BLS chief William Beach slammed the 'totally groundless' rebuke alongside the Friends of BLS, an organization that advocates on behalf of the agency which he co-chairs. 'The totally groundless firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer, my successor as Commissioner of Labor Statistics at BLS, sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau,' Beach wrote in a Friday post on the social media platform X. The Friday job report from the agency lowered May and June job growth numbers by the initial 258,000 positions reported. The organization also published a strongly worded statement condemning the shift in leadership at BLS, denying Trump's accusations that McEntarfer deliberately reported 'fake' numbers to tarnish his administration's standing. 'This baseless, damaging claim undermines the valuable work and dedication of BLS staff who produce the reports each month,' a Friday statement on the organization's website reads. 'This escalates the President's unprecedented attacks on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system. The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news,' they added. 'The Commissioner does not determine what the numbers are but simply reports on what the data show.' Regardless, the president on Friday remained skeptical of the adjustments made to the two previous BLS job reports. 'No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' he added. Democrats said the president fired McEntarfer with political motives to skew data while investors with a similar view weighed heavily on the market. As of Saturday morning, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 542 points, Nasdaq Composite dropped 2.3 percent and the S&P 500 decreased 1.6 percent of its value. 'Just absolutely insane, absolutely nuts. The economy is tanking and he's terrified and he's acting like a dictator,' Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) said in reference to Trump's dismissal. A chorus of Democrats in the upper chamber chimed in. 'That's some weird Soviet s‑‑‑,' Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) said. 'Blaming the messenger? Nothing's ever his fault.' 'Speaks for itself,' he said.
Los Angeles Times
18 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: Kamala Harris would've been the governor to protect California's future
To the editor: I'm sorry former Vice President Kamala Harris decided not to run for governor of California ('Kamala Harris says she is not running for California governor,' July 30). She is the only Democrat who has the total package to protect California's future. Harris has the character; the state, local and national political skills; and the necessary experience, expertise and leadership to fight President Trump and the tactics he's trying to use to get California to bend the knee. Harris is a statesman respected by leaders around the world, where character, trust, integrity, truth and commitment matter. And in her presidential bid to lead the country, she had a solid domestic agenda that Trump dismissed with lies about his own abilities. California needs 'Gov. Harris,' a governor who would know about our struggles with the homelessness crisis, high home-buying costs, high costs of living and how to protect our economy and people from being attacked by the Trump administration. Hopefully, Harris will reconsider her decision not to run for governor and recognize her leadership is necessary here. Donald Peppars, Pomona .. To the editor: Harris has nothing to prove to anyone. Her record speaks for itself. She served California with distinction as attorney general and senator. Her service as vice president of the United States has only amplified that impact on a national and global scale. Speculation or political noise, the truth is clear: She's already made history and more importantly, she's made a difference. She ran an inspiring campaign for president and the masses are now realizing the kind of leadership we missed. Whatever her next steps may be, her voice, experience and advocacy are needed and appreciated. Conrad Angel Corral, Cathedral City .. To the editor: It was mildly surprising to note that Harris will not seek the California governor's seat. One would have thought she would see it as a stepping stone to the presidency. But on the front page of the California section, the apparent reason comes to light with a story about how a 2026 governorship would interfere with the timeline for the next presidential nomination cycle ('By scrapping bid for California governor, Harris boosts White House prospects — if she runs,' July 30). Columnist Mark Z. Barabak posits that she wouldn't want to enter the presidential cycle as a sitting governor if she won. Really? As Barabak points out, other governors have. The Democrats would be insane to even consider her for their nomination after the results of the 2024 election. But don't underestimate them. Joseph A. Lea, Mission Viejo .. To the editor: Two words for Harris regarding her option to run for president: please don't ('Run for president? Start a podcast? Tackle AI? Kamala Harris' options are wide open,' July 31). We need new leadership, someone who can demonstrate understanding and empathy for both parties as well as offering solutions that meet a wider variety of needs. A reaction to the current administration is not what's needed. A new vision that includes both parties is. Dan Brumer, Encino
