'Only fair' Ukraine involved in US-Russia talks on conflict
It comes after US President Donald Trump said he would meet with Vladimir Putin for upcoming talks on the Ukraine war even if the Russian leader had not sat down with President Zelensky.
The statement, which contradicted earlier reports that a Putin-Zelensky meeting was a prerequisite for the summit, came after Mr Trump gave Moscow until today to reach a ceasefire or face fresh sanctions.
But asked by reporters in the Oval Office if that deadline still held, Mr Trump did not answer clearly.
"It's going to be up to (Putin)," Mr Trump said. "We're going to see what he has to say."
Since returning to the White House in January, Mr Trump has been pressuring Moscow to end Russia's military assault on Ukraine.
The Kremlin said yesterday that Mr Putin was set to attend a summit with Mr Trump in the "coming days," but the Russian leader essentially ruled out including Mr Zelensky.
Mr Zelensky meanwhile insisted that he had to be involved in any talks.
When Mr Trump was asked if Mr Putin was required to meet Mr Zelensky before a summit, the US president said simply: "No, he doesn't."
Mr Putin has named the United Arab Emirates as a potential location for the summit, but this was not confirmed by Washington.
Next week?
The summit would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Mr Putin in Geneva in June 2021.
Three rounds of direct Russia-Ukraine talks in Istanbul have failed to yield any progress towards a ceasefire. The two sides remain far apart on the conditions they have set to end the more than three-year-long conflict.
Mr Trump and Mr Putin last sat together in 2019 at a G20 summit meeting in Japan during Mr Trump's first term.
They have spoken by telephone several times since January.
Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said that "next week has been set as a target date," adding that both sides have agreed the venue "in principle," without naming it.
However, Washington later denied that a venue or date had been set.
"No location has been determined," a White House official said, while agreeing that the meeting "could occur as early as next week."
Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its military offensive on Ukraine in February 2022.
Russian bombardments have forced millions of people to flee their homes and have destroyed swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine.
Putin has resisted multiple calls from the United States, Europe and Kyiv for a ceasefire.
At talks in Istanbul, Russian negotiators outlined hardline territorial demands for halting its advance - calling for Kyiv to withdraw from some territory it still controls and to renounce Western military support.
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, urged Mr Trump to "finally get tough on the Kremlin" and use his leverage to end the war.
"Face-to-face dialogue is important, but Mr Putin cannot be allowed yet another opportunity to delay or water down President Trump's promise of harsh sanctions taking effect tomorrow," she said in a statement late yesterday.
'Only fair' Ukraine involved
Reports of the possible summit came after US special envoy Steve Witkoff met Mr Putin in Moscow on Wednesday.
Mr Witkoff proposed a trilateral meeting with Mr Zelensky, but Mr Putin appeared to rule out direct talks with the Ukrainian leader.
"Certain conditions must be created for this," Mr Putin told reporters. "Unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions."
The former KGB agent, who has ruled Russia for over 25 years, said in June that he was ready to meet Mr Zelensky, but only during a "final phase" of negotiations on ending the conflict.
In his regular evening address yesterday, Mr Zelensky said "it is only fair that Ukraine should be a participant in the negotiations."
The Ukrainian leader spoke with French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as he called for the continent to be included in any potential peace talks.
"Ukraine is an integral part of Europe - we are already in negotiations on EU accession. Therefore, Europe must be a participant in the relevant processes," Mr Zelensky said on social media.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
17 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Putin-Trump summit: what we know so far
US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, are set to hold talks in a bid to end the war in Ukraine, triggered by Russia's February 2022 invasion. Mr Trump has spent his first months in office trying to broker peace - after boasting he could end the war in 24 hours - though multiple rounds of peace talks, phone calls and diplomatic visits have failed to yield a breakthrough. Here is what we know about the summit so far: When? Both sides have confirmed preparations for a summit are underway and that a meeting could take place next week - though no firm date has been set. Mr Trump said Wednesday that a face-to-face meeting with Mr Putin could occur "very soon". "They would like to meet with me, and I'll do whatever I can to stop the killing," he then said yesterday, speaking of both Mr Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Mr Putin said yesterday, "both sides showed interest" in a US-Russia top-level meeting, while Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said "next week has been set as a target date." Will Zelensky be involved? Mr Zelensky is pushing to make it a three-way summit and has frequently said meeting Mr Putin is the only way to make progress towards peace. Mr Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, proposed a trilateral meeting when he held talks with Mr Putin earlier this week, but the Russian leader has appeared to rule out meeting his Ukrainian counterpart. "I have nothing against it in general, it is possible, but certain conditions must be created for this. But unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions," Mr Putin told reporters yesterday. At talks in Istanbul in June, Russian negotiators said a Putin-Zelensky meeting could only take place at the "final phase" of negotiations, once the two sides had agreed terms for peace. Asked if Mr Putin had to meet Mr Zelensky as a prerequisite for their summit, Mr Trump said: "No, he doesn't." Where? There is no confirmed venue yet. The Kremlin's Mr Ushakov said both sides have agreed the place "in principle", but did not name a host, while Washington rejected reports that a venue had been agreed. Mr Putin named the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as a potential contender, calling the Gulf state "one of the quite suitable places". Turkey - which hosted three rounds of Ukraine-Russia talks this year - is also in the running, as is Saudi Arabia, where US officials held separate talks with Russian and Ukrainian diplomats in February and March. China has been mentioned in media reports as a possible venue, amid speculation both Mr Trump and Putin could travel there in early September, with Xi Jinping playing host. The Kremlin last month did not rule out such a meeting. Ukraine's allies and NATO members - like Finland, where Mr Putin and Mr Trump met for a summit in 2018 - are seen as unlikely candidates. The International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant for Mr Putin, which obligates members to detain the Russian leader if he visits their country, could also restrict possible venues. Negotiating positions Despite the flurry of diplomacy and multiple rounds of peace talks, Russia and Ukraine appear no closer to agreeing an end to the fighting. Mr Putin has rejected calls by the United States, Ukraine and Europe for an immediate ceasefire. At talks in June, Russia demanded Ukraine pull its forces out of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, demanded Ukraine commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv wants an immediate ceasefire and has said it will never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged it would have to try to secure the return of land captured by Russia through diplomacy, not on the battlefield. Kyiv is also seeking security guarantees from its Western backers, including the deployment of foreign troops as a peacekeeping contingent to enforce any ceasefire.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump deadline for Russia arrives
Ukrainian soldiers have expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war with Russia, as Donald Trump's deadline for the Kremlin to stop the killing arrived and he eyed a possible meeting with Vladimir Putin to discuss the conflict. The US president's efforts to pressure Mr Putin have so far delivered no progress. Russia's bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armour while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace. Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 620-mile front line from north-east to south-east Ukraine. It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them The Pokrovsk city area of the eastern Donetsk region is taking the brunt of punishment as Russia looks to break out into the neighbouring Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine has significant manpower shortages. Intense fighting is also taking place in Ukraine's northern Sumy border region, where Ukrainian forces are engaging Russian soldiers to prevent reinforcements being sent from there to Donetsk. In the Pokrovsk area, one commander said Moscow is not interested in peace. 'It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them,' Buda, the Spartan Brigade commander, told the Associated Press. He used only his call sign, in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military. 'I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that, it does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them,' he said. In the southern Zaporizhzhia region, a howitzer commander using the call sign Warsaw, said troops are determined to thwart Russia's invasion. 'We are on our land, we have no way out,' he said. 'So we stand our ground, we have no choice.' Donald Trump is hoping for a meeting with Vladimir Putin (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP) Mr Trump said on Thursday that he would meet Mr Putin even if the Russian president will not meet his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky. That has stoked fears in Europe that Ukraine could be sidelined in efforts to stop the continent's biggest conflict since the Second World War. The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said: 'Putin remains uninterested in ending his war and is attempting to extract bilateral concessions from the United States without meaningfully engaging in a peace process. 'Putin continues to believe that time is on Russia's side and that Russia can outlast Ukraine and the West.' Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Friday that Europe should take the lead in efforts to end the conflict. He said the leaders of Germany and France should go to Moscow 'to negotiate on behalf of Europe', or 'we will be sidelined in managing the security issues of our own continent'. Mr Orban, who is a harsh critic of the European Union to which his country belongs, said Europe's concerns that a Trump-Putin summit might not address the continent's interests meant it should seize the diplomatic initiative. 'This war cannot be ended on the front line, no solution can be concluded on the battlefield,' he said. 'This war must be ended by diplomats, politicians, leaders at the negotiating table.'
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Intel investors can't catch a break
Lip-Bu Tan was hired earlier this year to lead the struggling chipmaker out of its years-long morass, drawing applause from Wall Street and sending the stock price climbing. But just five months into his tenure as Intel's chief executive officer, he's drawing the ire of US President Donald Trump, who called for Tan's resignation on Thursday due to what he called conflicts of interest. In response, Tan said he's got the full backing of the company's board and has reached out to the White House to clear up what he called 'misinformation' about his track record, he said in a letter to staff posted on Intel's website. 'I fully share the President's commitment to advancing US national and economic security,' he told employees. 'We are engaging with the Administration to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts.' On Thursday, Trump posted a call on Truth Social for Tan to resign over what he called conflicts of interest, injecting fresh turmoil at a company already struggling to stem losses and eke out relevance in the artificial intelligence age. The post came after Republican Senator Tom Cotton asked the chairman of Intel's board this week to answer questions about Tan's ties to China, including investments in the country's semiconductor companies and others with connections to its military. 'There has been a lot of misinformation circulating about my past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems,' Tan wrote. 'I want to be absolutely clear: Over 40+ years in the industry, I've built relationships around the world and across our diverse ecosystem – and I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards.' While Trump offered no evidence to support his accusation, the attack casts fresh doubt on Tan's turnaround effort focused on targeted product development, cost cuts and asset sales that shareholders have embraced after years of disappointments. 'Things like this make the road going forward a little more steep,' said Tim Ghriskey, senior portfolio strategist at Ingalls & Snyder. 'There's been a lot of bad luck, one thing after another.' Intel's shares fell just 3.1% on Thursday following Trump's comments, before rising in premarket trade Friday — a sign that investors aren't anticipating Tan will be leaving Intel anytime soon. Intel and Tan are 'deeply committed to advancing US national and economic security interests and are making significant investments aligned with the president's America First agenda,' the company said in a statement released late Thursday. Still, the president has shown that he's willing to push companies to bend to his will. Just this week Apple Inc. committed $100 billion for domestic manufacturing in another bid to appease Trump, who for months has rebuked the iPhone maker over the overseas production of its devices. The move appears to be working for Apple investors. In comments from the Oval Office on Wednesday, Trump, flanked by CEO Tim Cook, said companies like Apple that are investing in the US will be exempt from his sweeping tariffs. Apple shares have rallied more than 8% in the last two days, the most since April. Intel, on the other hand, finds itself in an uncomfortable position. While Tan's appointment in March sparked a 25% rally in the days following the announcement, that euphoria quickly faded. The stock is on track for back-to-back annual declines, something that hasn't happened in at least 40 years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Investors looking to Intel's second-quarter earnings last month for updates on the path to profitability were left with more questions. Tan's comments on the earnings call criticizing investments initiated by his predecessor, Pat Gelsinger, raised concerns that he's more focused on reducing costs than developing cutting-edge products to compete with rivals Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. A key part of Gelsinger's plan for Intel to make chips for outside customers was moving toward a more advanced production technique called 14A. But on the earnings call, Tan signaled that Intel will only roll out that technology when he's convinced enough customers are committed to using it. Trump's involvement is a distraction for Intel when the company has so many important issues to focus on, according to Dave Mazza, chief executive officer at Roundhill Investments. 'Investors were already skittish after their recent gloomy outlook sent the stock lower, so swapping CEOs now would only deepen the uncertainty around a turnaround that's still in its early innings.' Bloomberg
