Surge AI is latest San Francisco startup accused of misclassifying its workers
Artificial intelligence training company Surge AI has been hit with a lawsuit alleging it has misclassified contractors hired to improve chat responses from AI software for some of the world's leading tech companies.
The proposed class action lawsuit alleges that "data annotators" — hired by Surge AI to ensure that powerful AI systems run by Meta and OpenAI can properly generate text responses that are accurate and capable of mimicking human expressions — were "deliberately" classified as independent contractors, denying them benefits given to employees.
In the lawsuit filed Monday, California-based plaintiff Dominique DonJuan Cavalier II, represented by public interest law firm Clarkson, alleged he and other data annotators were made to do unpaid training and were subject to near-impossible time limits for tasks that caused their pay to be docked.
San Francisco-based Surge AI, also known as Surge Labs, and its subsidiaries "have reaped enormous profits by deliberately avoiding paying wages and benefits to those performing work that forms the backbone of Defendants' business," the lawsuit alleges.
Surge AI did not respond to a request for comment.
In recent years, AI data training companies have been accused of mistreating workers abroad in Kenya and elsewhere. But increasingly, as the AI industry balloons, workers in California and nationwide have begun to raise similar complaints.
Similar lawsuits have been filed against Scale AI, a larger AI training company that has gathered a vast workforce of contractors to train AI tools for companies, including Open AI and Google, as well as the U.S. Department of Defense.
Surge AI has raised some 25 million, according to Crunchbase.
The much larger Scale AI is seeking a valuation as high as $25 billion in a potential tender offer, Reuters reported.
Plaintiff Steve McKinney, a resident of Newbury Park who was hired by Scale AI's subsidiary Outlier AI as a 'tasker," sued the company in December alleging he was promised a pay rate of $25 per hour but was ultimately paid only a fraction of that amount.
Workers who questioned the company's payment practices in internal messaging app Slack were abruptly removed from the app, according to the suit, which was also brought by law firm Clarkson, headquartered in Malibu.
Scale AI contractors in January hit the company with a second lawsuit, alleging contractors were made to sift through graphic "depraved images" and emotionally distressing content, and dealt with post-traumatic stress disorder and other psychological issues as a result.
Scale AI did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A company spokesperson told TechCrunch in March that its work was misunderstood by regulators and others and that the company offers "flexible work opportunities" to Americans.
Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lack of documentation can be fatal when claiming expenses on taxes
One of the practical pieces of tax advice that I continuously dole out to clients, friends and family members each year is the critical importance of keeping receipts for any deductions or credits you plan to claim on your tax return. While this goes without saying for obvious items such as charitable donations and eligible medical expenses, it's perhaps even more important to keep receipts of other expenses, such as employment or business expenses, that you plan to deduct on your return to lower your final tax bill. Depending on your tax bracket, those receipts can be worth more than 50 cents on the dollar. Consider the self-employed, high-income earning Vancouver-based IT consultant who spent $1,000 in airfare to visit a client in 2025. At her top marginal tax rate of 53.5 per cent, hanging on to that receipt could save her $535 in real hard cash taxes that she otherwise would have to remit to the Canada Revenue Agency by April 30, 2026. That's why I encourage anyone who claims employment or business expenses to carefully track them and keep those receipts. That can be done 'old school,' by physically hanging on to the relevant receipts and filing them in a paper folder for tax season. Alternatively, many of us are now in the habit of taking a picture of the receipt (or scanning it) and saving the receipts in an online 'tax folder', by year, stored virtually in the cloud, so that these receipts are all together in one place come tax time. If you incur substantial business or employment expenses each year, I would go so far as to recommend a separate credit card so that you can easily segregate your work expenses from your personal expenses, especially when it comes to some retail purchases that could be either. For example, was that recent Staples purchase tax-deductible office supplies or a large back-to-school stock-up for the kids? The importance of keeping receipts to justify your expenses came up yet again in a recent decision of the Federal Court of Appeal released late last month. The issue before the appellate court was whether the lower Tax Court erred in disallowing additional deductions for motor vehicle expenses incurred by the taxpayer in connection with his employment. While it was clear that the taxpayer travelled for work and qualified for various employment expense deductions permitted under the Income Tax Act, the Tax Court concluded that the deductions should not be allowed because the taxpayer did not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate the amount that should be deductible. I first wrote about this case last year, so before reviewing the decision of the appellate court, here's a brief summary of the facts. The taxpayer was appealing reassessments of his 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 taxation years in which the CRA reduced or denied certain expenses claimed in each of those years. The taxpayer, a visiting registered nurse, was simultaneously employed by four separate employers in 2015 and three separate employers in 2016, 2017 and 2018. His job was to provide nursing services to individuals in their own homes or in a retirement or nursing home. During the tax years under review, he provided nursing services six days one week and four days the next week on a rotating basis. Each week included two or three seven-hour night shifts during which he was on standby for patients who required urgent care. The night before each workday, his employers would provide a schedule of the patients he was to visit the following day. The taxpayer estimated he visited between 10 and 30 patients during a day shift, and he worked an average of 40 to 45 hours per week, plus the two to three seven-hour night shifts. Each employer paid the taxpayer a fixed amount for each patient visit, regardless of the nursing services provided. He travelled daily from his south-central Ontario community to visit patients in the Greater Toronto Area. The taxpayer deducted various automobile expenses in each year, which were denied. Under the Income Tax Act, to be able to deduct vehicle expenses as an employee, you must normally be required to work away from your employer's place of business or in different places, and you must be required to pay your own automobile expenses, as certified on Form T2200, Declaration of Conditions of Employment. In addition, you must not be the recipient of a 'non-taxable' allowance for motor vehicle expenses. An allowance is considered non-taxable when it is solely based on a 'reasonable' per-kilometre rate. The taxpayer may have been entitled to claim some of these as valid expenses, but he was unable to supply any evidence to back up the expenses he had claimed. He testified he had previously provided the records to the CRA by registered mail, but the CRA never received them, and he was unable to provide any backup documentation in court. This proved to be fatal for the taxpayer's claim in Tax Court. 'Maintaining books and records is an ongoing obligation in a self-assessing system and the taxpayer's failure to do so … made it impossible for him to meet the evidentiary burden … to demolish the (CRA's) assumptions' about the denied expenses,' the lower court judge wrote, citing a prior case. The taxpayer appealed the Tax Court's decision to the Federal Court of Appeal, which heard the case at the end of May. The three-judge panel of the appellate court considered whether the taxpayer had provided sufficient evidence as to the amount of his expenses to justify a deduction on his return. The taxpayer tried to argue that, notwithstanding having any receipts or backup documentation, he was found to be a 'credible witness' by the Tax Court judge, and thus his testimony as to the amount of expenses he had incurred and claimed on his tax returns should simply be believed. The appellate court disagreed, writing, 'it was not a matter of disbelieving him; it was a matter of the (taxpayer) failing to present sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the amounts claimed were in fact deductible.' How spousal RRSPs can reduce taxes without getting you in trouble Have you made a mistake or need to change your tax return? Here's how Bottom line – you could be the most honest, believable and trustworthy taxpayer, with a perfect record of tax compliance stretching back decades. But, if you are unable to back up your tax deductions with hard evidence, you are unlikely to be successful in the face of a CRA review. Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Estate Planning with CIBC Private Wealth in Toronto. If you liked this story, in the FP Investor newsletter.
Business Wire
22 minutes ago
- Business Wire
The AI Collective Launches Globally to Mobilize Next Generation of AI Innovators and Stewards
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The world's largest grassroots AI community today formally detailed its global rebrand as The AI Collective, its official incorporation as a non-profit organization, and the launch of three foundational initiatives to cultivate a collaborative ecosystem for the responsible stewardship of AI. Formerly The GenAI Collective, the organization boasts 70,000+ members across 25+ global chapters and partners including AWS, Meta, Anthropic, Roam, and Product Hunt. AI's future depends not just on faster models—but on rebuilding trust, fostering global collaboration, and aligning progress with human values. Share This announcement builds on initial excitement sparked by a social media reveal on Monday, June 3rd ( and coincides with flagship launch events currently underway in San Francisco, New York City, and across its global chapters ( As the race to develop artificial intelligence accelerates daily, fueled by intense competition and unprecedented investment, the essential work of aligning these powerful systems with human values and societal trust is often dangerously sidelined. The AI Collective is responding directly to this critical gap, positioning itself as the essential human counterpoint in the age of acceleration by building a global community to steward AI, informing decision-makers, and supporting mission-aligned entrepreneurs. "The ground is shifting beneath us. AI's exponential progress brings immense possibility, but also profound questions about our future, our work, and our very identity – and the institutions we rely on weren't built for this velocity," said Chappy Asel, Co-Founder and Executive Director of The AI Collective. 'Trust is the invisible thread holding society together, and right now, that thread is fraying under the strain of misaligned incentives and rapid, uncoordinated change. We believe that in an era of exponential transformation, our greatest strength lies in each other – in creating trusted, in-person spaces to make sense of this moment, ask the deeper questions, and collaboratively shape a future where AI genuinely enhances human flourishing, not just surpasses human capability,' Asel said. The AI Collective believes that without deliberate intervention focused on trust, openness, and participation, AI's trajectory risks leaving humanity behind. Recognizing that managing this requires bridging the widening gap between technological progress and societal adaptation, the organization is launching three foundational initiatives designed to rebuild trust through action and participation: Expanding Global Community & Events: Rebuilding Trust Through In-Person Connection. The AI Collective will rehumanize innovation by launching 100 chapters across six continents by end of year. Each chapter will fuse its community's unique vision with global shared values of openness and inclusivity, curating salons, hackathons, demo nights, mentorship circles, and cross‑disciplinary mashups to deepen trust and collaboration. Their network will converge at Singularity Fest this November 2025 in San Francisco for a multi‑day, decentralized celebration attracting 10,000 pioneers across domains for hands‑on labs, purpose‑driven keynotes, thematic tracks, and community‑led activations, ensuring AI's next leaps keep humanity firmly at the center. Informing Decision-Makers: Bridging the Gap Between Frontier Insight and Responsible Governance. To counter the risks of institutional blind spots and lagging policy, The AI Collective Institute, the organization's participatory research arm, connects frontier technologists directly with policymakers, industry leaders, and the public. It translates ground-truth insights from the AI ecosystem into practical guidance through open research, equipping frontline leaders to foster responsible innovation and navigate future shock effectively. Supporting Mission-Aligned Innovation: Actively Incentivizing Human-Centric AI Development. In pursuit of a values-aligned AI ecosystem driven by the community's unique trust and insight, Collective Investments acts as a dedicated founder-investor matchmaking program under the non-profit umbrella. It identifies and supports promising founders building trustworthy, beneficial AI, connecting them with values-aligned capital allocators (VCs, grants, angels) and providing crucial support to ensure the AI future being built reflects the principles of human flourishing and responsible progress. The AI Collective is celebrating this evolution with its ongoing flagship events and global chapter celebrations. The organization invites builders, thinkers, policymakers, investors, and pioneers worldwide to join the conversation and contribute to shaping a future where technology serves all of humanity. Read the organization's foundational perspective, " Trust in the Age of Acceleration," learn more and join the community at: and follow the journey @_ai_collective on social platforms. ABOUT THE AI COLLECTIVE The AI Collective (formerly The GenAI Collective) is the world's largest non-profit, grassroots community dedicated to empowering the AI ecosystem to collaboratively steer AI's future toward trust, openness, and human flourishing. Founded in 2023, the AI Collective has rapidly grown into a global force: 70,000+ members: Comprising leading founders, researchers, investors, and multidisciplinary operators from OpenAI, Anthropic, Nvidia, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Databricks, Cohere, and more. 200+ AI startups launched or showcased at demo nights, connecting directly with investors and clients; participating companies subsequently raised $72M+ in funding. 25+ active chapters with 200+ events hosted, located in major tech hubs globally including New York City, London, Paris, Washington, D.C., Seattle, Bengaluru and more. 40+ leading partners, including Amazon, Anthropic, Andreessen Horowitz, Meta, Github, TedAI, Product Hunt, Roam, Linux Foundation, and top academic institutions. A dedicated global team of 100+ volunteer organizers committed to building authentic, impactful community experiences. Through its focus on in-person connection, participatory research via The AI Collective Institute, and support for mission-aligned innovation via Collective Investments, the organization serves as a vital hub for sense-making, collaboration, and responsible stewardship in the age of artificial intelligence.
Miami Herald
23 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Is this why Americans have hit the brakes on the #vanlife dream?
Is this why Americans have hit the brakes on the #vanlife dream? After a boom during the pandemic, Americans are no longer embracing vanlife with as much enthusiasm as they did during lockdown. Plenty of pandemic-era habits have stuck around - Zoom calls, grocery delivery, comfy pants - but living out of a van freely on the open road, it seems, has not had the same staying power. Vanlife represents the outdoorsy lifestyle centered around mobile shelters like camping trailers, recreational vehicles, and retrofitted vans. Starting in 2020, as cities emptied and remote work became the norm, thousands of people took to this relatively cheap and crowd-free way to explore the country. As they traveled, they fueled the trend by sharing their most idyllic experiences on social media with the hashtag #vanlife. However, new research conducted by Motointegrator and the data experts at DataPulse Research suggests that many people who signed on to vanlife at the height of the pandemic are now putting it in their rearview mirror. Sales of RVs - a good proxy for all kinds of camping vehicles, including custom retrofitted vans - have not only cooled off but have fallen below pre-pandemic levels, based on an analysis of sales data. What is more, the number of households that camp in RVs has also dropped back to levels not seen since the 2018–2019 period, following a rapid spike during the height of the pandemic, according to a similar analysis of RV camping activity. It turns out, when you sell a record number of campers in a few short years, there's not a lot of fresh demand left after the rush, which is the key reason why RV sales today are lower than they were even a decade ago. "The pandemic was such a massive disruption [to RV sales] that the previously observed trends were no longer applicable," a November 2024 report by the news site notes. "Indeed, had RV sales continued on the path that was established pre-COVID-19, it is estimated that there would have been continued consistent growth year-over-year." The #vanlife dream This is not to say vanlife is completely gone. Its popularity just seems to be returning to pre-pandemic norms. The #vanlife hashtag dates back to the early 2010s when a New Yorker named Foster Huntington quit his corporate job to live on the road. Along his journey, he found many others living in vans, preserving a subculture that began with the hippies of the 1960s. Huntington used the hashtag when he posted photos of his new life on social media, and, soon enough, #vanlife began to trend among a rising generation of free-spirited people who followed in his footsteps. When the pandemic hit in 2020, people around the world, freshly untethered from their office jobs, saw an opportunity to embark on their own on-the-road adventures. Across the U.S., there was a surge in RV sales, from 400,000 shipments in 2019 to 600,000 in 2021, according to the RV Industry Association. Those figures do not account for retrofitted vans, which are beloved by the vanlife community. These vans, often former work vehicles or delivery vans, exploded in popularity thanks to their budget-friendly customization options and flexibility. Unlike larger trailers or bus-like mobile homes, they are easier to drive and park while still being more comfortable than tents. However, securing one became difficult; as CNN reported in 2021, companies that retrofit vans suddenly had yearslong waitlists - and that was assuming the customer had a van to retrofit given the competition. During lockdowns, online orders for household items surged and Amazon needed to expand their fleet of van models - namely, Mercedes Sprinters, Ford Transits and RAM ProMasters - which happen to be the preferred choices for vanlifers, as well. The end of the dream Nonetheless, many Americans did succeed in landing their own recreational vehicle. The race to get (or retrofit) RVs created an influx of newbie owners. As shown by the chart below, more than half (55%) of today's RV owners are newbies who have owned their vehicle for just five years or less. The vanlife movement appears to have deflated as quickly as it ballooned in pandemic-era America. For many, the vanlife lifestyle turned out to be a detour, not a destination. As a result, many vehicles bought during the pandemic are not racking up much mileage today. Some 10 million households, or close to 8% of all households in the U.S., camped in an RV last year - and around 8 million of those campers were RV owners. That might seem like a lot, but it is down from the 15 million (nearly 12% of households) that camped in an RV at the 2022 peak. The drop in vanlifers is also evident in yearly survey data that tracks campers by experience level. The share of inexperienced campers (those who were brand new to camping or who had started "in the last few years") peaked in the years after the pandemic's onset, according to Kampgrounds of America. In 2022, people who were relatively new to camping accounted for more than 40% of all campers. After that peak though, the numbers dropped off pretty quickly. The mad rush to join the vanlife community was over, new blood was not coming into the vanlife community as quickly, and there was attrition among the vanlifers who had given it a shot. By 2024 the share of relatively new campers had dropped to 16% - levels that were typical before the pandemic hit. There are many reasons why the dream did not live long. For one, vanlife is not the "Insta-glam" life it is cracked up to be. There are difficult realities of vanlife, as New York Times essayist Caity Weaver captured in her own pursuit of the idyllic lifestyle in 2022, noting that just the act of sleeping in a van was "cramped, slovenly and bad." Vanlife also became impractical as life got back to normal. As the major waves of COVID-19 petered out, managers became less tolerant of the work-from-anywhere approach, making it difficult for most to juggle both vanlife and their careers. Still, vanlife left its mark While vanlife may have been a flash-in-the-pan for many, the overall number of people who seek outdoorsy experiences, including RVing, tent camping, or glamping, may now start to stabilize to normal growth levels. Prior to the pandemic, it was estimated that the growth would be about 2 million additional households a year. As the camping community returns to normal, it is interesting to note that a few things have, in fact, changed for good. For one, there has been "a notable increase in younger and more diverse [RV] owners compared to previous years," a RV Industry Association report notes. "Younger generations are much more engaged than they used to be." Indeed, those who have stuck around are more committed to the lifestyle. Today, owners use their RVs a median of 30 days a year, up 50% from the 20 days reported in 2021. And campgrounds have tried to accommodate them, offering more amenities like WiFi, according to Kampgrounds of America. Perhaps vanlife is now how it was always intended to be: a smaller, scrappier community that genuinely wants the open road, the early mornings in nature, and yes, the occasional headache of a flat tire in the middle of nowhere. This story originally appeared on Motointegrator, was produced in collaboration with DataPulse Research, and was reviewed and distributed by Stacker. © Stacker Media, LLC.
