
If Trump gets his way, could iPhones made in the US really cost $3,500?
If Trump gets his way, could iPhones made in the US really cost $3,500?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
President Trump threatens Apple and EU with tariffs
President Donald Trump reignited trade tensions with back-to-back social media posts targeting the European Union and Apple.
While iPhones have always been costly, experts agree a new tariff environment and pressure from President Donald Trump to make them in the U.S. are likely to drive their prices higher.
'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhone's that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the U.S.,' Trump wrote in a social media post May 23.
Experts disagree, however, on how much of a price increase would result from tariffs and how long it could take before Apple starts manufacturing products in the U.S.
More: Trump threatens steep tariffs on European Union goods, targets iPhones; live updates
How much will an iPhone cost?
Dan Ives, global head of technology research at financial services firm Wedbush Securities, estimates iPhones could run consumers $2,300 when tariffs are taken into account – a significant increase from Apple's newest model's $1,199 price tag – but a far cry from the $3,500 he estimates it would run consumers if it was made in the U.S.
Drew DeLong, who leads the Geopolitical Dynamics Practice at Kearney, a global strategy and management consulting firm, said a price increase of $100 to $200 after tariffs is more realistic.
DeLong said, "If I put myself in Apple shoes, I would be less concerned about the reciprocal tariffs, given that they've been told that they're largely exempt from those," and more concerned with the ongoing U.S. investigation into imported semiconductors, a technology largely produced overseas and needed to make iPhones.
If Apple shifts production to the U.S., DeLong said it will have the cost and availability of energy and skilled workers to consider. In this scenario, potential tax cuts and deregulation legislation could also affect the company's margins over the next few years, he said.
Will Apple shift production to the US?
To Ives, the idea of iPhones produced in the U.S. is 'a fairy tale that is not feasible." He said it would realistically take Apple five to 10 years to shift production to the U.S.
While Apple has promised to invest $500 billion in the U.S. over the next four years, Ives said the investments are in primarily AI-driven initiatives.
"We see no chance that iPhone production starts to happen in the US in the near-term given the upside down cost model and Herculean-like supply chain logistics needed for such an initiative," Ives wrote in a note.
DeLong said it won't necessarily take Apple 10 years to bring a site online in the U.S., citing the company's plans to open a server manufacturing facility, which plays a key role in powering Apple Intelligence, in Houston, Texas, in 2026.
"I can tell you from anecdotal conversations with folks close to the administration, they want projects built in these four years," DeLong said.
During his first administration, Trump claimed Apple's CEO Tim Cook promised to build three plants in the U.S. At the time, the president granted the company tariff exemptions, but the company built zero smartphone factories in the U.S. during his first four years in office, according to multiple media outlets.
Apple did not respond to USA TODAY's request for comment.
How could Trump target Apple?
In April, the Trump administration issued reciprocal tariff exemptions for smartphones through a presidential memo clarifying an executive order and updated guidance from U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Apple had already made plans to shift some production of U.S.-bound iPhones from China to India to mitigate tariff effects. On a recent earnings call, Apple CEO Tim Cook said the company aims to have the majority of iPhones sold in the U.S. imported from India before the end of this year.
Nikolas Guggenberger, a law professor at the University of Houston, said Trump's comments on Truth Social May 23 serve as an announcement of his intention to do something, but not formal policy.
'It's just like the president could be giving a speech and announcing a new policy or intent to implement a policy,' Guggenberger said. 'He still needs to rely on formal channels.'
Perhaps the most straightforward way for Trump to make Apple pay more tariffs for their iPhones, he said, would be for the administration to drop the reciprocal tariff exemptions for smartphones all together.
But if Trump wanted to specifically target Apple, Guggenberger said the president could put tariffs only on smartphones coming from India, where Apple plans to manufacture most of its U.S.-bound product.
Both strategies would also affect other phone manufacturers.
Reach Rachel Barber at rbarber@usatoday.com and follow her on X @rachelbarber_
Contributing: Reuters

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why EchoStar Bounced Back Today
EchoStar issued a press release touting its new 5G-enabled tablet. The FCC recently threatened EchoStar's spectrum holdings, alleging it hadn't been building its 5G network fast enough. Elon Musk's public spat with Donald Trump may also, believe it or not, account for the rise, since Musk's SpaceX wants EchoStar's spectrum. 10 stocks we like better than EchoStar › EchoStar (NASDAQ: SATS) shares were bouncing back today, up 10% as of 2 p.m. ET. EchoStar's shares have been under severe pressure since the beginning of the year, but especially in the past week. That's because management decided to not make two separate interest payments on its debt, as it awaits a decision from the FCC regarding its spectrum. Management has a 30-day grace period to do so before the company is technically in default. The spectrum debate has to do with the pace of EchoStar's 5G rollout, and is also indirectly linked up with Elon Musk's SpaceX. Back in May, the new Trump-appointed FCC director sent a letter to EchoStar, stating that the extension it was granted to complete its 5G network buildout by the prior administration was under review. EchoStar had purchased valuable spectrum years ago, on the terms that it would build a 5G network to increase competition in the industry. However, EchoStar's buildout has been slow, which is perhaps not surprising, given its declining legacy business in satellite TV. In an interesting wrinkle, Musk's SpaceX had led a campaign to win more satellite spectrum for its own services, including the spectrum held by EchoStar. That may have played a part in the FCC's initiation of a review, given Musk's ties to the Trump administration. However, late yesterday, EchoStar issued a press release introducing its new Boost Mobile Celero tablet, the Celero5G TAB, a low-cost tablet that takes advantage of EchoStar's 5G network. While normally not that significant, the announcement of a new 5G product could go a ways toward making EchoStar's case to the FCC that it deserves to keep its spectrum. Furthermore, it appears Musk's relationship with the Trump administration is now on the outs, given Musk's storm of posts today criticizing the administration and Republicans in Congress for the deficit expansion in the "Big, Beautiful Bill" making its way through Congress. If Musk and Trump have a falling out, then the FCC may not aggressively pursue EchoStar's spectrum on behalf of SpaceX, if SpaceX's campaign was in fact a motivating factor in initiating the review. EchoStar's stock has been punished severely, so it could make for a turnaround play if in fact it's able to deploy 5G to more areas and grow its low-cost Boost Mobile offerings. However, its high debt, declining legacy satellite TV business, and unresolved battle with the FCC remain big risks. Betting on a big recovery is a highly risky proposition, and only appropriate for speculators at this point. Before you buy stock in EchoStar, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and EchoStar wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Billy Duberstein and/or his clients have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why EchoStar Bounced Back Today was originally published by The Motley Fool


Business Insider
14 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Ford Stock (NYSE:F) Gains with Better Access to Rare Earths
One of the biggest supply chain problems for companies like legacy automaker Ford (F) is the access to rare earth minerals of the kind commonly used in electric vehicles. But a new report says that getting those rare earths out of one of their biggest sources, China, will actually be a little easier now. That news made investors breathe a little easier themselves, and shares were up nearly 2% in Friday afternoon's trading. Confident Investing Starts Here: China has brought out a set of temporary export licenses, reports note, which will offer up access to rare earths for each of the Big Three automakers, which include General Motors (GM) and Stellantis (STLA) as well. Reports note that at least some of the licenses are valid for the next six months, which should keep the lot of them in rare earths for some time to come. But it was hard not to notice that this change came just after a recent phone call between President Trump and President Xi Jinping, suggesting that that was part of some larger deal between the two. The move to restrict the supply of rare earth minerals has left many companies scrambling to fill in the supply gaps, and left many considering China a major bottleneck in the supply chain. With China producing about 90% of the world's supply, it is clear that they have the whip hand when it comes to these elements. We're All Getting Concerned About These Recalls You have likely noticed by now that the news around here, when it comes to Ford, seems to reference 'recall' a lot lately. Granted, some of these recalls have been minor to say the least; recalls that impact a handful of cars, or that are fixed with a software update. But not all of them have been so trivial, and some are starting to wonder if Ford's quality issues are starting to flare back up again. Daniel Ives, analyst with Wedbush Securities—who has a four-and-a-half star rating on TipRanks—recently noted that Ford was in a 'code-red situation…after a disaster quarter.' Rising warranty costs connected to all these recalls were hurting Ford, much as they did last year at this time. And with more recalls seeming to crop up, that could indeed prove a problem. However, bear in mind that the recalls are not all problems, especially when software is involved. So while Ford's recall count is on the rise, many of these recalls are much more simply addressed than they once were. Is Ford Stock a Good Buy Right Now? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Hold consensus rating on F stock based on two Buys, 12 Holds and three Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 16.87% loss in its share price over the past year, the average F price target of $9.71 per share implies 5.18% downside risk.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down
Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down originally appeared on TheStreet. Crypto stocks bounced back on June 7 as both President Donald Trump and Tesla (Nasdaq: TSLA) boss Elon Musk retreated from their big, ugly feud from the previous day. Strategy (Nasdaq: MSTR), which had dipped around 6% yesterday, was trading at $375.01 at press time, up 1.69% a day. Helmed by Michael Saylor, the company is the largest public Bitcoin treasury company. The largest U.S. crypto exchange Coinbase (Nasdaq: COIN) had slipped as much as 10% the day before. The stock, which made it to the much-coveted spot on the S&P 500 in May, was trading at $254.31, up 4% a day. The crypto and stock trading exchange Robinhood (Nasdaq: HOOD) dipped around 8% on the day of the feud. It was trading at $76.24, up 5% a day. The story of Bitcoin miners was no different as the two men engaged in a heated public exchange over social media and press briefings on June 6. MARA Holdings (MARA) fell as much as 7% yesterday but was trading at $15.93, up 7.02% a day. Hut 8 Group (HUT) had similarly slipped by 7% the day before but rallied an impressive 14.83% to trade at $18.74. HIVE Digital (Nasdaq: HIVE) had slid around 9% yesterday and made the same recovery of 9% today to trade at $2.0042. Bitdeer (Nasdaq: BTDR) had also slipped 9% and successfully recovered by 11% to trade at $14.07 today. Notably, the stablecoin issuer Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL) made an impressive debut on the day of the feud. CRCL was trading at $116.07 at press time, up 40% a day. Musk, who quit the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) by the end of May, has been criticizing Trump's "big, beautiful bill" since then. The disagreement escalated into an ugly public exchange the previous day that shook the markets. Stocks rally as Trump-Musk feud cools down first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio