logo
Hogg's Democratic Party shakeup should model Ocasio-Cortez, not Trump

Hogg's Democratic Party shakeup should model Ocasio-Cortez, not Trump

The Hill24-04-2025

In ' Avengers: Age of Ultron,' Quicksilver, who moves at the speed of light, protects the powerless Hawkeye from a spray of bullets, quipping, 'You didn't see that coming,' before collapsing onto the floor.
'Democrats, you didn't see that coming,' was my initial response when I read that newly elected Democratic National Committee Vice Chair David Hogg would raise the dough to support progressives challenging failing Democrats in the primaries.
Hogg, 26, was selected by members of the Democratic Party to represent young people's voices. Those who elected Hogg believe the only way out of Donald Trump's reign, currently wreaking havoc on our democracy and government systems to benefit the few, is to fill the room with young people.
They are not wrong. But…
While Hogg viewed his rise in the DNC ranks as an opportunity to challenge those in power, remember that he also bore witness to a school shooting that left friends murdered, his community scared and lasting trauma that I'm certain he relives daily.
It's not shocking then that he may view his role as the person to sacrifice himself for a larger calling — to ensure that young people who are losing faith regain it.
Hogg argues through his actions that the party needs someone to bring those young people back, someone from within to course-correct, and history supports him. Former Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton furiously wrote our founding documents in his late 20s.
In that regard, Hogg's boldness is right on time, yet old guard strategists recoil at his youthful exuberance for change.
James Carville, the architect of former President Bill Clinton's campaign and someone who is handed a microphone every time a producer can't find Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) or Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), called Hogg a ' twerp ' and then said, 'His strategy is the most insane thing I've heard.'
Honestly, Carville, you're proving Hogg's point.
What he chose to ignore when going public with his media-catching dismay at Hogg's decision to influence Democratic primaries is that Hogg is rejecting the Carvilles of the world, who remain steadfast in being gatekeepers, deciding who gets in and who stays out of the Democratic Party.
Bottom line: You don't elect fresh faces to sideline their youthful energy and ideas. Even someone like me, who has been involved in politics for 20 years and now possesses relationships across all sectors of government, sees Hogg's abandonment of DNC norms to remain neutral in primary elections for what it is: action.
Hogg isn't wrong in his assertion that young people are being ignored. Footage from the Association of State Democratic Chairs 2024 winter meeting — one month after Trump was reelected — captured a conversation between the organization's leaders, who asserted that understanding the chartered and unspoken rules of party politics takes time.
We latch onto this belief in systems, processes and experience, relegating fresh ideas to the wings instead of center stage because, you know, dues have to be paid.
I'm 43, and it's comforting to go into a DNC meeting and see the same people, who elicit my favorite political memories, but that doesn't mean I'm growing.
Growth is critical, but it's about more than young people maturing into political systems. It's about the old guard being willing to let go of what they know and inviting new ideas into the mix.
Real leaders embrace a young person's growth because then everyone else will thrive. Stunt it, and you get the same.
Hogg also has something to learn from this. He orchestrated a media rollout in The New York Times for his big reveal that he would challenge the DNC practice to stay out of congressional primaries. He ran it by a few Democrats, for sure, who probably warned him against it. Instead of seeing their advice as counsel, he probably viewed the moment as something he had to do.
But the DNC members who elected Hogg weren't asking him to blow up the institution: They were asking him to fix it.
His move feels Trumpian to me: promising one thing, but going in another direction. It shows a lack of strategic acumen and paints him as someone more eager to grab a mic than to develop the meaningful relationships needed to convince party chairs, elected officials, party leaders and local organizers that his ideas are worth investing in and advocating for.
You know how I would know? I've had my moments where I put myself first, especially when a reporter called me, looking for an idea to 'shake things up.'
Been there, bruh.
My self-absorption taught me, though, that it's a lot harder to organize 57 states and territories. It takes patience to believe your work will translate into systemic changes.
Hogg is showing publicly that he is more willing to spend his time with the press, creators and donors than on the ground with those worried about paying their bills, staying in their homes or caring for their families.
Hogg experienced great tragedy, but if that moment is fueling his strategic decision-making, if he believes a national splash is better than working with others, then he needs to take a look around.
Unlike Carville, who cares only about the media attention he receives, Hogg has a community of people who believe in his move to challenge primary Democrats. But from the outside, it looks like a media move to bolster his profile.
It would behoove Hogg to look at someone like Ocasio-Cortez, a willing student who is turning her progressivism into bridge-building and working with others instead of going solo, all while landing right hooks in Republican arguments. And she's organizing.
Ocasio-Cortez is learning and leading, not blowing things up in the name of shock and awe. She's not behaving like Trump, and neither should Hogg.
Michael Ceraso is a Democratic strategist who served on four presidential campaigns, including those of President Barack Obama, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Pete Buttigieg. He is the founder of the communications firm Winning Margins, as well as Community Groundwork, a nonprofit supporting two-year students interested in civic careers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kelly Evans: Musk, Trump, and "the Bill"
Kelly Evans: Musk, Trump, and "the Bill"

CNBC

time44 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Kelly Evans: Musk, Trump, and "the Bill"

As absolutely delicious as the personal drama between Elon Musk and Donald Trump is--and as much as it may escalate into everything from robotaxis to SpaceX and national defense--let's not lose sight of the deficit fight that's at the heart of it. Musk's beef with Trump after he was dismissed from service first erupted over the "One Big Beautiful Bill." A "disgusting abomination," Musk called it on X this week. "Shame on those who voted for it." He went on to repost tons of old tweets from Trump, along with current Senate and Congressional Republican leaders, calling out their hypocrisy for criticizing past debt levels and deficits even as they now support a bill that would raise the debt ceiling by trillions and increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Yesterday, when asked about Musk's criticism--which could sink the entire bill, if enough Senate Republicans like Ron Johnson and their constituents turn against it--the president chalked it up to sour grapes over the bill's failure to extend EV tax credits. But Musk insists that's not the case, and few really expected the credits to be continued anyway. No, it seems Musk's real beef, assuming this isn't just a convenient way for him to reposition himself with the broader public, seems to be over the cost of Trump's megabill. But here's the rub. This isn't just any old stimulus act, or grab-bag of political preferences. There is a ticking time bomb hanging over the economy this year, because Trump's first-term tax cuts are going to expire at year-end. The cost of this bill isn't over new stuff they want to do--it's mostly just extending the status quo. That alone costs $4 trillion over the next decade. So while it's a very attractive argument that Musk is making--I'd love to know what exactly he would propose doing instead. Would he prefer that taxes go up on households and businesses next year? Fine, if so; that's the Democratic party's position. But I have yet to hear him embrace that either tactically or philosophically. This is where the issue of "SALT" comes in. It would cost $377 billion over the next decade, according to Heritage, to quadruple the cap--and this would be new tax relief. But again, this is a small percentage of the overall cost. And it could be the difference between Republicans keeping their tiny majority in the House, or not. House Speaker Mike Johnson made this clear on Squawk Box this morning. "If we don't deliver on this [bill], and we don't deliver a little bit on SALT relief, then we're not going to have the House majority," he said. "And if the Democrats take over, they will impeach Donald everything will go to chaos. So this team has to stay in power." He also implied Democrats would deliver even worse fiscal outcomes. But perhaps none of that matters to Musk, who would practically seem to be leading the impeachment drive, the way things are going this week. Perhaps he disagrees that Democrats would be worse for the fiscal situation. Or perhaps he senses that party would now be much more sympathetic to his EV and robotaxi ambitions. Point being, if Musk blows up the budget bill, and takes a hard fiscal line on any subsequent negotiations, the GOP isn't going to turn around and gut Medicare or Medicaid--which it's struggling to pare back at all right now--in order to balance the budget. No, it just means that taxes are going up at year-end. See you at 1 p.m! Kelly Twitter: @KellyCNBC Instagram: @realkellyevans

Jessica Ramos — who compared Cuomo to a bumbling Biden — to endorse ex-gov for NYC mayor
Jessica Ramos — who compared Cuomo to a bumbling Biden — to endorse ex-gov for NYC mayor

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Jessica Ramos — who compared Cuomo to a bumbling Biden — to endorse ex-gov for NYC mayor

State Sen. Jessica Ramos — one of the fiercest critics of mayoral frontrunner Andrew Cuomo — will endorse the ex-governor Friday morning, effectively ending her struggling run for the seat. The progressive Queens senator will throw her weight behind Cuomo at an 11 a.m. event at the District Council of Carpenters Headquarters, her campaign confirmed. The backing is a sharp about-face from her critical public criticism of the former governor, who resigned in 2021 amid a series of sexual harassment allegations. 'People may want to be courteous to Cuomo's face but they don't forget the people he sent to die, the women he touched or the people he left in our streets needing mental health care and housing,' Ramos, 39, wrote on social media in late March. Jessica Ramos to back the ex-gov on Friday. YUKI IWAMURA/POOL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Ramos has been one of the harshest critic of Cuomo. AP In April, she also told The Post's editorial board that people in political circles have been talking behind closed doors about Cuomo's mental acuity. 'I don't think the City of New York can afford a Joe Biden moment,' Ramos, referencing the president's noticeable decline, said. 'I think that there are real reasons why he's not answering questions. Even when he went before Congress, he just can't remember details about what he did.' 'His mental acuity is in decline,' Ramos repeated when pressed to clarify her allegation against the 67-year-old Cuomo. In response, the Cuomo campaign insinuated the lawmaker was a drunkard. 'You can quote me rolling my eyes – this is a desperate attack from a desperate extreme left socialist who is in debt and polling at 3 percent,' Rich Azzopardi said. 'Was she sober when she said it?' Ramos's bid for the Democratic nomination never really got off the ground — even though she polled well earlier this year, despite name recognition. The campaign has struggled to raise money, only able to bring in just under $300,000, and failed to reach the low threshold to unlock the city's 8-to-1 public matching funds. She currently has just $9,000 on hand.

House Democrat' bill would combat LGBTQ elder abuse
House Democrat' bill would combat LGBTQ elder abuse

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

House Democrat' bill would combat LGBTQ elder abuse

Legislation introduced Friday, during Pride Month, by more than a dozen House Democrats would help combat abuse against elderly LGBTQ Americans. The Elder Pride Protection Act would establish a task force within the Department of Justice to study the 'increased incidence of elder abuse' against LGBTQ seniors and develop best practice solutions to be implemented by state and local law enforcement, according to a copy of the bill, shared first with The Hill. 'No one, especially our vulnerable seniors, should ever be mistreated because of who they are or who they love,' said Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), who introduced the bill Friday alongside Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.), who recently launched a bid to replace retiring Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) in the Senate next year. In November, Gottheimer announced he would run for governor of New Jersey. Craig, who is gay and one of 13 openly LGBTQ members of Congress, said the measure would help shield seniors from abuse and discrimination 'as we continue the struggle for LGBTQ+ rights.' 'LGBTQ+ seniors led the fight for so many of the rights LGBTQ+ Minnesotans enjoy today, and now it's our turn to fight for them,' she said in a statement. LGBTQ older adults are at heightened risk for adverse health and social outcomes compared to their cisgender and heterosexual peers, according to the Center for Health Care Strategies, a New Jersey nonprofit. SAGE, an advocacy group for LGBTQ elders that has endorsed Gottheimer and Craig's bill, has said LGBTQ seniors are more vulnerable to abuse and neglect. Comprehensive data on elder abuse is lacking, though the Justice Department estimates that more than 10 percent of Americans age 65 and older experience some form of elder abuse each year. In limited data, LGBTQ seniors, who are at higher risk of isolation, report elevated rates of abuse, according to SAGE. 'These are challenging times, and now more than ever, LGBTQ+ elders deserve to age without fear of elder abuse,' said Aaron Tax, SAGE's managing director of government affairs and policy advocacy. The bill, which has 14 Democratic co-sponsors, stands little chance of passing the GOP-controlled House. Republicans and President Trump have denounced initiatives that prioritize diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), claiming they stoke divisions and promote 'woke ideology.' A National Center on Elder Abuse webpage previously dedicated to 'advancing justice for LGBTQ elders' appears to have been deleted this year in the administration's purge of government websites following Trump's executive orders targeting DEI and 'gender ideology.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store