This HP 15″ Touchscreen Laptop (64GB RAM, 2TB SSD, i7) Drops $2,600, Now 72% Off on Amazon
Save $2,600 on a 15.6" touchscreen laptop from HP designed for business professionals.
It's very complicated to find a high-performance laptop for less than $1,000 especially if you want the greatest features and the highest possible specs. Too many times, even when you've spent a lot of money, you end up getting less in memory, storage or processing power. But Amazon has now flipped the script with a killer deal a fantastic 2025 HP 15.6″ touchscreen laptop which is packed with advanced features at a price that's almost too cheap to be true.
This HP laptop is powered by a 10-core Intel i7-1255U processor (up to 4.7 GHz), boasts a vibrant 15.6″ Full HD touchscreen, 64GB of RAM,and a massive 2TB SSD for all your storage needs. You'll also get Windows 11 Pro, a lifetime license for Microsoft Office Pro and bonus accessories like a free mouse: originally listed at $3,599, it's now available for just $999 which is a huge 72% discount. With an impressive 4.8 out of 5-star rating, this offer is bound to sell out quickly. This is one of the best laptop deals of the year on Amazon.
See at Amazon
For Business Professionals
Let's talk specs. We already know this HP laptop is working with 64GB of RAM and a full 2TB SSD for storage. It's also working with Intel i7 10-core processor with 12 threads, capable of up to 4.7GHz as well as an Intel Iris X graphics card. This makes it perfect for content creators and programmers for instance. Anyone working with graphics and processing intensive workflows like Photoshop, video editing applications, and huge datasets will find this HP laptop meets the task at hand.
The screen measures in at a sizable 15.6″ displaying in FHD. It supports touchscreen controls with multi-finger control—opening possibilities for more flexibility in how you navigate your laptop. It also makes Balatro way more fun because it plays like real video poker.
The HP laptop features customized stereo speakers to provide high-quality sound. It's got support for Wi-Fi 6E to ensure you have a fast, reliable connection to your network which can allow for crazy fast download and upload speeds. Bluetooth 5.3 allows for high-speed connection to all your devices.
Plus, you also get Windows 11 Pro, Microsoft Office Pro (lifetime), and a free mouse included.
Don't miss your chance before it runs out of stock:
See at Amazon
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
34 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Landmark House v. NCAA Settlement Approved by Judge, Allowing Colleges to Pay Athletes
A federal judge in California finally approved a $2.6 billion settlement for college athletes that upends a century-old tenet of college sports—the notion that schools cannot pay the athletes that play for them. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken on Friday ushered in a new era—a professional era—for college sports by signing off on a plan for the NCAA and the five most prominent sports conferences to settle a class-action lawsuit with current and former college players. The deal will give backpay to some, as well as creating a system in which each Division I school will be able to distribute roughly $20 million a year to their athletes. Schools are poised to begin implementing the new model this fall. The decision has been months in the making, drawn out in its final weeks by the judge's insistence that the NCAA find a way to stop current athletes from losing their roster spots. The settlement would 'enable NCAA schools to share their athletic revenues with Division I college student-athletes for the first time in the history of the NCAA,' Wilken wrote in her 76-page opinion. She added that it was 'expected to open the door for Division I student- athletes to receive, in the aggregate, approximately $1.6 billion dollars in new compensation and benefits per year, with that amount increasing over the next ten years.' Each school that elects to share revenue with athletes will start by distributing more than $20 million in the coming academic year. That amount will reach about $32.9 million per school by 2034-35, the end of the injunctive-relief settlement, Wilken wrote. The settlement brings the biggest changes yet to college sports, which until recently had banned athletes from earning much more than a scholarship, room and board. It comes on the heels of years of upheaval that have included loosened restrictions on off-the-field compensation for players, liberalized transfer rules and blockbuster television deals for schools and the chaotic conference realignment that followed. Yet during all of that time, many college sports leaders had still resisted paying athletes directly from the billions of dollars in revenue they helped generate. Now, that restraint is off. Schools have been readying for months for the settlement effects to land on their athletic departments, most immediately by transforming how they recruit and manage rosters in football and basketball. 'People have been doing a lot of work on a contingent basis to try to create the infrastructure that's envisioned by the settlement,' NCAA President Charlie Baker said ahead of the final approval. 'It'll definitely be rocky and kind of messy coming out of the gate, because big things are that way.' Private equity has already been circling college sports, pledging to inject capital into schools but also to advise them on how to grow their sports business. And athletic departments are openly wrestling over what the ruling means for the future of Olympic sports on campus. Most of these sports do not generate much revenue, but American campuses serve as the primary Olympic training ground for Team USA. The settlement largely immunizes the NCAA against similar claims, a provision the association considered essential as it seeks to move past decades of court battles over payments for players. But it will almost certainly not end litigation over the shape of college sports. It isn't clear whether the money needs to be distributed equitably in accordance with Title IX, the federal statute that requires publicly funded institutions to provide equal opportunities to male and female athletes. Aside from preparing for schools to distribute roughly $20 million a year to athletes, the settlement didn't specify how exactly much should be allocated to each sport. The majority will likely go to football, the financial engine of most athletic departments, as well as men's basketball. Female athletes have raised questions over the payouts they are set to receive and what fair compensation looks like for them going forward. 'This settlement doesn't come close to recognizing the value I lost,' LSU gymnast Livvy Dunne said in an unsuccessful attempt to object to the settlement. There's also the open question of whether athletes getting paid by their institutions are working for them—a distinction that could open up schools to more legal challenges. But even without employee status, the settlement will transform the relationship between players and schools. Write to Louise Radnofsky at Laine Higgins at and Rachel Bachman at
CNN
35 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as 'March Madness' or 'Roll Tide.' It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are. The list of winners and losers is long and, in some cases, hard to tease out. A rough guide of winners would include football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, which will devote much of their bankroll to signing and retaining them. For instance, Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood's NIL deal is reportedly worth between $10.5 million and $12 million. Losers will be the walk-ons and partial scholarship athletes whose spots are gone. One of the adjustments made at Wilken's behest was to give those athletes a chance to return to the schools that cut them in anticipation of the deal going through. Also in limbo are Olympic sports many of those athletes play and that serve as the main pipeline for a U.S. team that has won the most medals at every Olympics since the downfall of the Soviet Union. All this is a price worth paying, according to the attorneys who crafted the settlement and argue they delivered exactly what they were asked for: an attempt to put more money in the pockets of the players whose sweat and toil keep people watching from the start of football season through March Madness and the College World Series in June. What the settlement does not solve is the threat of further litigation. Though this deal brings some uniformity to the rules, states still have separate laws regarding how NIL can be doled out, which could lead to legal challenges. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been consistent in pushing for federal legislation that would put college sports under one rulebook and, if he has his way, provide some form of antitrust protection to prevent the new model from being disrupted again.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amazon.com (NasdaqGS:AMZN) Announces US$5 Billion AWS Expansion in Taiwan
recently announced the launch of its AWS Asia Pacific Region in Taipei, marking a significant $5 billion investment targeting technological expansion. This, along with ongoing investments in data centers in North Carolina and Chile, highlights Amazon's commitment to enhancing its cloud service capabilities. The stock's 12% rise over the past month aligns closely with the broader tech market's positive sentiments, reinforced by the general economic confidence shown by a strong May jobs report. The company's expansion efforts in AI and cloud infrastructure undoubtedly contributed positively to market performance, mirroring broader sector gains. Buy, Hold or Sell View our complete analysis and fair value estimate and you decide. Uncover the next big thing with financially sound penny stocks that balance risk and reward. The recent announcement of Amazon's AWS expansion in Taipei, alongside its significant investments in North Carolina and Chile, enhances the company's cloud infrastructure. Over the past three years, (NasdaqGS:AMZN) has achieved a robust total return of 79.00%, reflecting strong investor confidence. This is in contrast to the tech industry, where Amazon's one-year performance matched the broader US Multiline Retail industry at a 13.3% return, showcasing its resilience in a competitive market. The AWS and AI expansion initiatives are likely to fuel future revenue and earnings growth, with analysts projecting revenue growth at 8.9% per year. The focus on operational efficiency in fulfillment services is expected to bolster margins, positively impacting profitability. However, significant investments may present cost challenges, affecting earnings forecasts if these ventures do not yield projected outcomes. Amazon's current share price of US$185.01, compared to the analyst price target of US$239.33, indicates potential upside, with a 22.7% gap to the target. Analysts voice varied expectations, highlighting the necessity for investors to align these insights with their own assumptions. Maintaining confidence in Amazon's capacity to innovate and expand effectively will be crucial in realizing projected financial outcomes. Gain insights into historical outcomes by reviewing our past performance report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NasdaqGS:AMZN. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
