TikTok employees in Germanys strike over AI taking their jobs
Trade union group ver.di said that around 150 employees will be replaced by Chinese-sourced A models, which ByteDance trained on behalf of the company and external service providers.
The job cuts include the phasing out of the entire 'Trust and Safety' department, responsible for content moderation and keeping the platform safe, and the Live department, which ver.di says is responsible for contact with content producers.
The workers have also tried but failed to get ByteDance to the negotiating table, the union said.
'It is disrespectful of TikTok to shirk all social responsibility and even refuse to negotiate with us,' said Lucas Krentel, ver.di's deputy regional head of the media division.
'Today, the employees are sending a clear signal that they will not accept this,' he said in a statement.
What are workers asking for?
TikTok's employees are the first in Germany to strike against a social media company, the union added. It comes after a small group of 50 employees took to the streets last week in Berlin to raise the alarm over the layoffs, local media reported.
The employees are holding a boat tour down the Spree River and will hold a rally on land later on Wednesday.
The workers on strike are asking for a collective bargain that would include a severance package that 'recognises the difficult, vital nature of their roles,' such as prolonged exposure to highly distressing content.
That would include severance payments worth three years' salary along with an extension period of 12 months for each employee.
Germany's Dismissal Protection Act says that any employee who is being laid off due to urgent reasons should receive 50 per cent of their monthly earnings for each year that the person worked for the company.
The union says the demands are justified because of TikTok's high profits and the replacement of content moderators by AI devalues their specific training and expertise.
TikTok's moderators have in-depth knowledge of cultural and political contexts, which they need to identify problematic content. Getting rid of them increases the risk that the platform supports 'manipulative campaigns,' the union said..
The Live department workers who reach out to content creators are 'crucial for reach, monetisation and community engagement,' the union added..
The union also said that many of the affected employees are not German citizens, so losing their jobs could affect their rights to stay in the country.
If ByteDance does not come to the bargaining table, ver.di says a longer-term strike could come later this month.
Euronews Next reached out to ByteDance to confirm the incoming layoffs but did not receive an immediate reply.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sustainability Times
11 hours ago
- Sustainability Times
China Stuns the World With a "Terrifying New Weapon" That Launches Missiles at Mach 7 Using Cutting-Edge Electromagnetic Railgun Technology
IN A NUTSHELL 🚀 Chinese researchers have developed a groundbreaking electromagnetic cannon capable of launching projectiles at Mach 7. capable of launching projectiles at Mach 7. 🔧 The innovative design utilizes a cross-shaped architecture to enhance power and stability without losing precision. to enhance power and stability without losing precision. 💡 This technology aims to reduce costs and eliminate risks associated with explosive storage in military logistics. in military logistics. 🌍 The development could lead to a shift in global military strategy, raising questions about international relations and defense policies. The Chinese military is pushing the boundaries of electromagnetic technology with a groundbreaking new weapon. Researchers have developed an innovative magnetic acceleration system featuring a cross-shaped architecture. This design promises to propel heavier projectiles over strategic distances without losing power. For decades, major military powers have sought ways to launch payloads at extreme speeds without using gunpowder or explosives. The Chinese electromagnetic cannon represents a significant milestone in this pursuit. By combining electromagnetic force with a cross-architecture, this experimental weapon can potentially launch a projectile at Mach 7 without sacrificing durability or accuracy. This technological advancement challenges the limits previously imposed by heat and material constraints. Innovative Design Challenges the Laws of Physics The railgun is no longer a fringe invention. Since 2018, China has been testing a prototype installed on the Haiyangshan ship. It pushes the limits of magnetic acceleration far beyond the laboratory. Yet, a significant weakness still hampers these weapons. The intense current can melt certain parts, and sometimes the force of the magnetic fields can tear apart metal structures. To overcome this barrier, a team led by Professor Lyu Qingao at the People's Liberation Army Engineering University has envisioned a cannon that crosses two railguns in a single tube, at right angles. Each circuit is autonomous and oriented perpendicularly to the other, allowing for increased power without electromagnetic fields interfering with each other. According to the South China Morning Post, this X-shaped system could launch a 132-pound projectile at over 5,300 mph, while circumventing the destructive effects of heat and power surges. 'They're Not Supposed to Be This Fast': China's Maglev Shockingly Nears Japan's Bullet Train Speeds in High-Stakes Tech Showdown Chinese Electromagnetic Cannon Reinvents Gunpowder-Free Artillery Unlike conventional missiles or shells, this type of cannon relies neither on combustion nor chemical propulsion. The entire operation rests on the linear acceleration of a metal projectile under the influence of magnetic fields. This technology not only reduces the cost per shot but also eliminates risks related to the storage of explosives. This is a major strategic advantage in a world where military logistics must contend with drone strikes and asymmetric conflicts. According to Interesting Engineering, the new Chinese prototype aims to hit a target located 250 miles away in just six minutes, with an impact speed exceeding Mach 4. The level of precision combined with speed would make these projectiles as formidable as some cruise missiles, while being more difficult to intercept and much cheaper to produce. 'They Just Flew It in Broad Daylight': China's Secret 6th-Gen Fighter Jet Stuns Drivers as It Soars Over Crowded Highway This shift in the design of long-range weapons stands in stark contrast to Western choices. The United States ended its electric cannon program in 2021, deeming the technological challenges too costly compared to advances in hypersonic missiles. Japan, on the other hand, continues more modest trials with projectiles weighing only 0.66 pounds, according to Asia Times. From Experimentation to Battlefields of the Future While the cross-system promises unprecedented firepower, its viability in real-world conditions remains to be proven. The Chinese researchers themselves acknowledge several uncertainties. The phenomenon known as the 'proximity effect,' where two very close electrical circuits can alter each other's performance, could lead to efficiency losses or critical instabilities during firing. 'They Can See Us Even in Silence': China's New Magnetic Wake Tech Shatters Submarine Stealth in Shallow Waters Like the Taiwan Strait Furthermore, no operational condition tests have yet been conducted. The prototype remains confined to laboratories and recently filed patents, such as one titled 'X-Frame Electromagnetic Cannon.' However, if these limitations are overcome, this weapon could change how conflicts are conceived and anticipated. The uniqueness of the Chinese electric cannon lies in its ability to combine power, speed, and low cost while avoiding the vulnerabilities of conventional systems. This approach, which focuses on reusable and scalable technology, contrasts with the hesitation of competing powers. By betting on this breakthrough, China is forging a new path in the history of modern artillery. Military Implications and Global Reactions The development of the Chinese electromagnetic cannon could have profound implications for global military strategy. As nations worldwide assess the potential of this technology, questions arise about its impact on international relations and defense policies. While some countries may rush to develop similar capabilities, others might seek to establish treaties limiting their use. The balance of power could shift as nations with advanced electromagnetic weaponry gain a strategic advantage. This might lead to an arms race focused on electromagnetic technology. The potential for these weapons to reach targets with unprecedented speed and precision raises ethical and logistical questions. How will this influence future conflicts, and what measures will be necessary to ensure responsible use? As the Chinese electromagnetic cannon continues to evolve, the world watches closely. Its potential to reshape military dynamics cannot be understated. The path forward will require careful consideration of technological, ethical, and geopolitical factors. Will the international community find ways to harness this technology responsibly, or will it lead to heightened tensions and conflict? This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies. Did you like it? 4.4/5 (20)
Fashion Network
16 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model
Vogue US sparked major debate when it ran a Guess ad featuring artificial intelligence–generated visuals in its August 2025 issue. The campaign stirred widespread backlash from readers, image professionals, and content creators, who see it as a warning sign for creative industries. The double-page spread showed a blonde model with light eyes and full lips wearing a sky-blue top and a black-and-white patterned dress. Vogue included a footnote confirming the images came from AI, but readers flooded the magazine's social platforms with criticism. Social media users and TikTok creators expressed frustration with the decision, citing Vogue's legacy of groundbreaking photographers like Irving Penn, Lee Miller, and Erwin Blumenfeld. Critics argued that AI contradicted the magazine's artistic foundation. Although Vogue stated that the ad came from its advertising department, not its editorial team, many readers still saw it as a symbolic turning point. The placement raised bigger questions about the industry's reliance on human creativity. Seraphinne Vallora created the AI visuals Marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora designed the campaign. The company has promoted its synthetic models across Elle, Grazia, Harper's Bazaar, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. On Instagram, the agency showcases its AI-generated visuals and promotes its ability to replicate real-life models through digital scans. Brands like H&M have already used these AI body doubles, allowing real models to fulfill contracts without attending photo shoots. These avatars save time and reduce production costs. U.S. laws such as the 'right of publicity' protect personal features like a model's face or voice. Companies must obtain consent before using AI likenesses. But disputes still occur. Scarlett Johansson, for instance, accused OpenAI of using her voice without permission—sparking another legal controversy. Although the U.S., the UK, and the EU enforce laws to regulate AI-driven use of personal identity, industry professionals continue to raise concerns about the impact on makeup artists, stylists, photographers, and production crews. Creative professionals push back Many journalists and artists now use AI to streamline repetitive tasks, but this Guess campaign reignited fears that companies will use AI to replace—not support—creative professionals. On Newstalk Tech's TikTok account, correspondent Jess Kelly said, 'This puts people out of work. And creatively, a photoshoot isn't just about the model—it involves photographers, lighting crews, and an entire team working behind the scenes.' Governments and unions act on copyright To protect human-created work, unions and lawmakers are stepping in. The European Union adopted the AI Act in April 2024 to regulate synthetic media. This legislation, rolling out through 2027, requires companies to disclose AI-generated content, publish training datasets, and respect intellectual property—even when using open-source tools. In journalism, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) published formal recommendations in January 2025. 'AI cannot replace human journalists,' the report stated, 'and its production should not be considered journalism unless it undergoes proper human oversight.' INA, the French audiovisual institute, published a report outlining AI's risks and benefits in the newsroom. It praised AI for boosting speed, format diversity, and translation—but warned that it also encourages content standardization, audience detachment, and unchecked data mining. The authors argued that publishers risk prioritizing cost over quality. AI won't affect every media role equally Despite industry anxiety, some roles may adapt instead of disappearing. A 2025 report by consulting firm BearingPoint examined how generative AI could impact broadcast journalism jobs. The study flagged roles like documentalists, subtitlers, motion designers, editors, and translators as highly automatable. But BearingPoint identified other roles—such as reporters, web editors, data journalists, and community managers—that could shift toward supervising AI output, managing quality control, or using AI as a creative partner. In short, the firm believes that many image and information professionals can evolve with the technology rather than get replaced by it. Still, the reaction to Vogue's Guess ad shows that industry players view AI as a serious threat to creative labor. As Condé Nast navigates this backlash, it faces a critical choice: either establish clear rules for advertisers—or risk weakening the very ecosystem that defines its brand legacy.
Fashion Network
16 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model
Vogue US sparked major debate when it ran a Guess ad featuring artificial intelligence–generated visuals in its August 2025 issue. The campaign stirred widespread backlash from readers, image professionals, and content creators, who see it as a warning sign for creative industries. The double-page spread showed a blonde model with light eyes and full lips wearing a sky-blue top and a black-and-white patterned dress. Vogue included a footnote confirming the images came from AI, but readers flooded the magazine's social platforms with criticism. Social media users and TikTok creators expressed frustration with the decision, citing Vogue's legacy of groundbreaking photographers like Irving Penn, Lee Miller, and Erwin Blumenfeld. Critics argued that AI contradicted the magazine's artistic foundation. Although Vogue stated that the ad came from its advertising department, not its editorial team, many readers still saw it as a symbolic turning point. The placement raised bigger questions about the industry's reliance on human creativity. Seraphinne Vallora created the AI visuals Marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora designed the campaign. The company has promoted its synthetic models across Elle, Grazia, Harper's Bazaar, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. On Instagram, the agency showcases its AI-generated visuals and promotes its ability to replicate real-life models through digital scans. Brands like H&M have already used these AI body doubles, allowing real models to fulfill contracts without attending photo shoots. These avatars save time and reduce production costs. U.S. laws such as the 'right of publicity' protect personal features like a model's face or voice. Companies must obtain consent before using AI likenesses. But disputes still occur. Scarlett Johansson, for instance, accused OpenAI of using her voice without permission—sparking another legal controversy. Although the U.S., the UK, and the EU enforce laws to regulate AI-driven use of personal identity, industry professionals continue to raise concerns about the impact on makeup artists, stylists, photographers, and production crews. Many journalists and artists now use AI to streamline repetitive tasks, but this Guess campaign reignited fears that companies will use AI to replace—not support—creative professionals. On Newstalk Tech's TikTok account, correspondent Jess Kelly said, 'This puts people out of work. And creatively, a photoshoot isn't just about the model—it involves photographers, lighting crews, and an entire team working behind the scenes.' Governments and unions act on copyright To protect human-created work, unions and lawmakers are stepping in. The European Union adopted the AI Act in April 2024 to regulate synthetic media. This legislation, rolling out through 2027, requires companies to disclose AI-generated content, publish training datasets, and respect intellectual property—even when using open-source tools. In journalism, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) published formal recommendations in January 2025. 'AI cannot replace human journalists,' the report stated, 'and its production should not be considered journalism unless it undergoes proper human oversight.' INA, the French audiovisual institute, published a report outlining AI's risks and benefits in the newsroom. It praised AI for boosting speed, format diversity, and translation—but warned that it also encourages content standardization, audience detachment, and unchecked data mining. The authors argued that publishers risk prioritizing cost over quality. AI won't affect every media role equally Despite industry anxiety, some roles may adapt instead of disappearing. A 2025 report by consulting firm BearingPoint examined how generative AI could impact broadcast journalism jobs. The study flagged roles like documentalists, subtitlers, motion designers, editors, and translators as highly automatable. But BearingPoint identified other roles—such as reporters, web editors, data journalists, and community managers—that could shift toward supervising AI output, managing quality control, or using AI as a creative partner. In short, the firm believes that many image and information professionals can evolve with the technology rather than get replaced by it. Still, the reaction to Vogue's Guess ad shows that industry players view AI as a serious threat to creative labor. As Condé Nast navigates this backlash, it faces a critical choice: either establish clear rules for advertisers—or risk weakening the very ecosystem that defines its brand legacy.
