Is Labor Day almost here? When is it? Will the mail be delivered? What to know
The unofficial end of summer, Labor Day means a relaxing three-day weekend for some in honor of American workers. Here's what you should know.
Monday, Sept. 1, 2025, is Labor Day. The holiday is held annually on the first Monday in September.
You can thank organized labor groups for getting Labor Day on the national calendar, just like you can thank them for enshrining an eight-hour workday as opposed to toiling 12 hours a day for pennies on the dollar.
"Labor activists pushed for a federal holiday to recognize the many contributions workers have made to America's strength, prosperity, and well-being,"according to the U.S. Department of Labor.
Oregon gets credit for recognizing Labor Day first in 1887. Twenty-three states soon followed and in 1894, then-President Grover Cleveland signed a law making the first Monday in September Labor Day.
Story continues after photo gallery.
Yes, Labor Day is a federal holiday, meaning state, local and federal offices will be closed.
Schools, courthouses, banks the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles and the U.S. post office will be closed on Labor Day.
Nope, there will be no mail delivered Monday, Sept. 1. The United States Postal Service will be closed.
UPS and FedEx also do not deliver on Labor Day.
Most grocery and big box stores, including Target and Walmart, will be open for Labor Day. Costco, however, will be closed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here's What's Concerning About Paramount Skydance's (NASDAQ:PSKY) Returns On Capital
Explore Paramount Skydance's Fair Values from the Community and select yours When researching a stock for investment, what can tell us that the company is in decline? More often than not, we'll see a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining amount of capital employed. Trends like this ultimately mean the business is reducing its investments and also earning less on what it has invested. So after glancing at the trends within Paramount Skydance (NASDAQ:PSKY), we weren't too hopeful. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It? Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Paramount Skydance: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.061 = US$2.2b ÷ (US$45b - US$8.7b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2025). Thus, Paramount Skydance has an ROCE of 6.1%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Media industry average of 9.4%. View our latest analysis for Paramount Skydance In the above chart we have measured Paramount Skydance's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Paramount Skydance for free. What Does the ROCE Trend For Paramount Skydance Tell Us? There is reason to be cautious about Paramount Skydance, given the returns are trending downwards. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 11% that they were earning five years ago. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect Paramount Skydance to turn into a multi-bagger. The Bottom Line In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. Investors haven't taken kindly to these developments, since the stock has declined 57% from where it was five years ago. With underlying trends that aren't great in these areas, we'd consider looking elsewhere. One more thing to note, we've identified 2 warning signs with Paramount Skydance and understanding them should be part of your investment process. If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
David Sacks' "Goldilocks" scenario
David Sacks — famed tech founder & investor, co-host of the "All-In Podcast" ("The Rainman") and now White House special adviser for AI & crypto — declared Saturday on X that "Doomer narratives were wrong" about AI. Why it matters: The big takeaway from Sacks' post is that the fear of one AI frontier model dominating all now looks far-fetched, since high-performing competing models are diffusing power. "The AI race is highly dynamic so this could change," Sacks wrote. "But right now the current situation is Goldilocks": "We have 5 major American companies vigorously competing on frontier models. This brings out the best in everyone and helps America win the AI race." "So far, we have avoided a monopolistic outcome that vests all power and control in a single entity." "There is likely to be a major role for open source. These models excel at providing 80-90% of the capability at 10-20% of the cost. This tradeoff will be highly attractive to customers who value customization, control, and cost over frontier capabilities. China has gone all-in on open source, so it would be good to see more American companies competing in this area, as OpenAI just did. (Meta also deserves credit.)" "There is likely to be a division of labor between generalized foundation models and specific verticalized applications. Instead of a single superintelligence capturing all the value, we are likely to see numerous agentic applications solving 'last mile' problems. This is great news for the startup ecosystem." "There is also an increasingly clear division of labor between humans and AI. Despite all the wondrous progress, AI models are still at zero in terms of setting their own objective function. Models need context, they must be heavily prompted, the output must be verified, and this process must be repeated iteratively to achieve meaningful business value. Reality check: Though there's plenty of competition, as Sacks notes, the administration has worked closely with OpenAI on the Stargate Project. And as Axios' Scott Rosenberg noted recently, the history of tech shows that early dominant players could still fall to a competitor not yet born: Google came along to dominate what seemed like a well-established search industry in the early dot-com era. The bottom line: The "current state of vigorous competition is healthy," Sacks concluded. "It propels innovation forward, helps America win the AI race, and avoids centralized control. This is good news — that the Doomers did not expect."
Time Business News
3 hours ago
- Time Business News
The American Click: How Facebook Likes Influence Shop-Based Content in the USA
You'd be forgiven for thinking likes on Facebook are dead. Public counters are mostly hidden. Comments and shares steal the spotlight. But when it comes to Facebook's Shop-integrated content—especially in the U.S.—likes still matter. A lot. In a space where algorithmic trust and consumer psychology overlap, likes act as subtle validators. They hint at popularity, legitimacy, and relevance. And when your Shop post appears in a scroller's feed beside sponsored competitors, those tiny thumbs-up can be the difference between a bounce and a click. So, why do Facebook likes still hold influence in the USA's evolving social commerce landscape? And where does the practice of buying likes (yes, including the USA Facebook likes ) fit into this ecosystem of credibility and conversion? American consumers have grown suspicious of overly-polished digital storefronts. But they also crave social proof. On Facebook, where familiarity fuels decisions, likes still work as frictionless validators. Especially in Shop-linked content, likes create what marketers call perceived traction . It's a psychological nudge: 'If others liked it, maybe I should care too.' This matters even more when you're introducing a product to a new audience—likes can offset skepticism by suggesting community approval. For small brands trying to gain visibility in a saturated feed, even 100 likes from the real US-based user accounts can be enough to make a product post feel 'seen.' That's why many emerging sellers quietly purchase US likes for Facebook—to simulate momentum while their organic base builds slowly. The Facebook Shop ecosystem is built to reduce steps between discovery and purchase. But the system still leans heavily on engagement metrics—likes included—for algorithmic placement. That means more likes can translate into higher visibility, especially among local and demographically-targeted audiences. In the U.S., where mobile-driven shopping and community-focused buying trends dominate, these micro signals feed the machine. A product with zero engagement looks risky. But one with 45 USA likes on Facebook, even passively earned (or purchased), feels more viable. It's not just about visibility. It's about inertia. If the post looks active, users are more likely to tap. Let's be clear—buying likes is controversial. But it's also widely practiced. And when executed carefully (read: not in bulk, not with bots, not overnight), it can function as reputation scaffolding. Not manipulation, but social proof buffering. The phrase buy USA Facebook likes trends for a reason. U.S.-based likes carry more algorithmic and psychological weight for American shoppers. A buyer in Austin is more likely to trust likes from a familiar geographic sphere than random names with no visible relevance. It signals proximity, which implies legitimacy. Of course, the danger lies in misuse: overdoing it, mixing in low-quality engagement, or using services that don't match the intended audience. Authenticity still matters. But buying likes isn't inherently inauthentic—it depends on the execution and the intent. Facebook's current content-ranking model blends user interest, post engagement, and post type. While video and carousel posts generally get priority, Shop-integrated content that garners early interaction—including likes—gets nudged further. For new or mid-tier sellers, that nudge can make or break reach. Especially when the budget for boosting posts is limited. Buying a small batch of Facebook likes from the USA users can kickstart an algorithmic feedback loop: higher engagement = higher ranking = more organic reach. This matters most during time-sensitive promotions or product drops, where a stall in the first hour can mean invisibility for the rest of the campaign. Not all likes are created equal. Facebook knows this. And increasingly, so do consumers. That's why many growth-focused marketers now avoid generic like-buying packages that deliver irrelevant or foreign accounts. If your brand is U.S.-centric, choosing likes from the US-based users isn't just preferable—it is necessary. They align your visible metrics with your actual audience, which makes retargeting and lookalike ad strategies more effective. It also helps avoid red flags. A Facebook post about handmade jewelry in Kansas getting 700 likes from Southeast Asia? That's a trust-breaker. Buying USA Facebook likes—in moderation—avoids this pitfall. One site that consistently stands out in this space is . Operating since the early 2010s, fbskip has built a reputation as a reliable source of real Facebook and Instagram likes, with specific options for USA-based engagement. Their services are designed for authenticity—not inflated numbers—and offer a spectrum of targeted packages to suit small sellers and established brands alike. Whether you're aiming to grow gradually or just need a small boost for a new campaign, their user-friendly platform makes it easy to explore ethical, real-user interaction. The short answer: yes, but indirectly. Likes influence perception. Perception influences click-through. Click-through influences Facebook's ranking of your content. And higher-ranked posts get more Shop traffic. For small businesses without a dedicated content team or ad strategist, likes become the cheapest form of engagement signaling. They don't guarantee conversion. But they improve the context in which a decision is made. Boutique beauty brands use likes to add weight to skincare routine videos. Local fashion resellers tag U.S. likes to make their story highlights more trustworthy. Indie bookstores post seasonal product shots and seed them with 30–50 USA likes to increase story impressions. Subscription coffee startups rely on steady Facebook likes from the USA users to boost organic reach for their bundle promotions. In each case, likes act not as clout, but as contextual validators. They reassure, without needing to impress. Buying US Facebook likes can improve trust and geo-relevance. Organic reach often favors posts with early engagement—including likes. Shop-integrated content performs better when supported by visible validation. Avoid bulk packages from unrelated regions—they risk undermining credibility. USA likes on Facebook posts help build retargeting audiences within the U.S. market. Use likes to frame perception, not fake popularity. The keyword buy Facebook likes USA on Google and the offers you find there should be viewed as a tactic, not a strategy. In the U.S. retail content space, where Facebook still drives discovery and trust, likes are not dead currency. They're shorthand. A sign that others noticed. A sign that maybe, just maybe, this post is worth clicking through. That doesn't mean every brand should buy Facebook likes. But dismissing them outright? That's ignoring one of the few metrics Facebook still lets users see and interpret. For Shop-based content, especially among U.S. audiences, likes remain part of the buying funnel—quietly, invisibly, but decisively. Because in the era of scrolling commerce, the American click doesn't come from nowhere. It follows a signal. And sometimes, that signal looks like a thumb. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
