Editorial: The fault in our Starlink narratives
Elon Musk. (AFP)
Addressing the nascent computer industry in 1990, information theorist Neil Postman questioned the unspoken assumption that the capacity to process information is at the heart of society's ills.
'If children die of starvation in Ethiopia, does it occur because of a lack of information?' he asked. 'Does racism in South Africa exist because of a lack of information? If criminals roam the streets of New York City, do they do so because of a lack of information?'
Postman's prophetic words are important to remember in the aftermath of last week's Oval Office sitdown between President Donald Trump and President Cyril Ramaphosa and his delegation.
In that infamous meeting, South Africa's richest man Johann Rupert pleaded the case that the country's police stations are in desperate need of Starlink — the communication technology controlled by the world's richest man, Elon Musk.
Rupert has rightly received acclaim for his articulation of the fact that crime is devastating to the whole nation, and not one group in particular. But this particular point is worth considering.
Crime and its causes in this country are many, varied and nuanced. To his great credit once more, Rupert used the Western Cape as an example of its complexity. So often seen by outsiders as an oasis in a broader swamp, the province's neighbourhoods endure some of South Africa's most brutal, seemingly interminable violence.
Such crime is not going to be solved overnight with a satellite. But would the use of Starlink — presumably as a surveillance tool — have a measurable effect?
Lacking further evidence, we are not going to dispute the possibility. What we will caution against, however, is reducing our motivations to simple narratives.
The Starlink discussion is turning all shades of ugly and threatens to be the latest issue to tear at the perpetually shaky unity of our government.
Black economic empowerment has emerged as central to the debate. Resentment towards the policy has always existed but it has bubbled closer and closer to the surface as the economy falters, and the government endures sustained attack from a superpower using propaganda to cast redress as racial persecution.
As a democracy, it is incumbent on us to continually revisit the effectiveness of our practices, but it must be done for the right reasons.
The state should consider the unintended consequences that have flowed from its policies. The country might consider that in the Oval Office, the world witnessed not only our weaknesses but our peculiar, imperfect oneness as a people and ask where we are willing to compromise and for what real gain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
35 minutes ago
- The Herald
Ex-warder wins damages claim after son drowns at house where Madiba spent last part of prison term
They argued the employees failed to lock and secure the premises. The parents said they also failed to prohibit young children from entering the premises and to cover the pool with appropriate material to prohibit young children from falling in. They told the court the historic property's gates were hardly locked and that children from a neighbouring farm and the neighbourhood wandered inside and swam in the pool at the back of the property. The parents and three witnesses testified about lax security at the house. The mother testified that at the time of the incident, they lived with their three sons — about 500m from the Mandela house — in a home provided by the department. She said about six families lived down the road from the iconic house. The mother lived on the property for eight years between 2004 and 2012. 'She testified that anyone could move freely through the fence and that she had never observed any security or security post at the fence area bordering the prison property on which the Mandela house is situated,' the judgment reads. The mother told the court she was asleep at home on August 13 2010 when one of her sons ran inside 'shouting' that her baby had 'drowned'. She walked out and found the child 'lying on the ground outside the house on the grass'. 'He was soaking wet and not conscious. She tried cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] on him but he was just lying there, lifeless,' the judgment reads. The child was rushed to the Paarl Medi-Clinic where a doctor told her he 'had died'. She testified that her then husband 'was also extremely distressed and disturbed at the time and was running up and down in a very distressed and agitated state'. 'She stated that her whole life changed after the drowning of her son ... She suffered severely psychologically and was diagnosed with depression,' the judgment reads. 'Her marriage suffered terribly as [her husband] was always drinking after the incident and there was constant blaming and fighting in their relationship.' The father testified he had worked for the department for 18 years when he resigned in August 2014. 'He suffered memory loss and would sometimes have fits at night. He had already been under psychiatric treatment for bipolar disorder before [the child's] death and his symptoms became worse after that,' the judgment reads. The minister argued that at the time of the incident, the property and swimming pool were under the control of a building contractor doing renovations and repairs to the pool. However, the minister did not pursue the argument during the trial. The minister also argued that the public was required to get permission from the department to enter the property. He said the parents 'did not obtain such authorisation and their son, so the defendants plead, had no authority to enter the premises, which includes the swimming pool'. But the court ruled in favour of the parents. 'I hold that the minister is liable for the agreed or proven damages suffered by the plaintiffs following the drowning of [the child] at the Drakenstein Correctional Centre on August 13 2010,' the judgment reads. The judgment effectively holds the correctional services minister liable for the 'agreed or proven damages' suffered by the parents. The minister was ordered to pay the parents' legal costs. TimesLIVE
The Herald
35 minutes ago
- The Herald
'I'll never apologise for visiting Bushiri's church': Shivambu
Shivambu said attending religious institutions is personal. 'Going to religious institutions is a personal choice for anyone. I go to many religious institutions, including those whose faith I don't associate with, for different reasons. We have to listen to different people. 'I attended the Jesus Nation Church in Malawi because I wanted to listen to the sermon during the Easter weekend, and I don't think there was anything wrong with that. If the South African government is looking for Shepherd Bushiri, they know which processes to follow and it doesn't have anything to do with Floyd.' While the MK Party distanced itself from Shivambu's visit, saying it was not authorised by the party leadership, Shivambu insisted he keeps party leader Jacob Zuma informed about his actions. 'There is nothing I do without informing the president,' he said. Shivambu also weighed in on the extradition case, suggesting there is 'unnecessary misplaced exuberance' around Bushiri's matter. 'I'm not responsible for law enforcement in South Africa. There is no court ruling in Malawi within the criminal justice system that links both countries that has instructed that he must be deported to South Africa. If there was such he would be hiding in Malawi, then that would have made him a fugitive. But there is no such.' TimesLIVE
The Herald
35 minutes ago
- The Herald
AgriSA and community leaders warn of economic fallout from tobacco legislation
Thousands of rural households could lose their livelihoods if the Control of Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Bill is passed, AgriSA has warned. In its parliamentary submission, AgriSA said the bill, in its current form, neglects to consider the broader implications on agricultural livelihoods. It said tobacco farming remained a vital income source for thousands of rural households, especially in provinces where alternative crops were not economically viable. 'We feel that good legislation is necessary to avoid harmful consequences that might not be foreseen in terms of the present bill. Our emphasis is on fixing what is wrong before we progress to further statutory requirements, the consequences of which have not been fully explored. 'We don't have a vested interest in smoking. We have a vested interest in a constructively regulated, purposeful, evidence-based bill that doesn't create the unforeseen consequence whereby we're supporting illegality through regulation, which is not appropriate to achieve the objective we all want to see achieved,' said AgriSA's Janse Rabie. Rabie said tobacco production dropped by about 50% in five years. 'Why? Because illicit trade has eaten their market away. That's the bottom line and farmers ask the honest question to government: why has government allowed our market to be eaten away by illicit trade? 'If you want to really address the harm, you need to properly legislate the ability to enforce. We absolutely need to make sure that what is in place is properly enforced and that we don't carry on a system that is not working and is allowing for additional illegality to take place.' Nedlac Community Trust CEO Nhlanhla Ndlovu said the issue of the Tobacco Bill was 'misguided from the point of view of not quantifying the impact to producers like farmers, with potential significant implications for the farmers, workers and communities they support'. 'It looks like there's an economic impact that will result in an inability, among affected farmers and communities, to make an income, but there's no viable replacement programme. You are taking away livelihoods in a context where crime stats are showing an increase across the board.' ActionSA MP and harm reduction advocate Dr Kgosi Letlape added his voice, saying the bill seemed to condemn adult smokers to death while 'concentrating solely on issues of youth uptake, which are important, but the deaths don't come from the youth'. He was also concerned about the impact on agriculture in SA. 'Should our agricultural sector be looking beyond our borders to progressive markets where their products could be used for less harmful sources of nicotine? 'My fear is not that the industry will die, it'll just be driven into the wrong hands.' TimesLIVE
