Election security advice from Putin
Subscribe here | Email Eric
HELP US OUT: We want to know what you think about your favorite national security newsletter and how we deliver the news every day to your inbox! Time is running out to complete our survey, so let us know what's working for you, what isn't and what we're missing. Take the survey here.
And with that, to the news at hand.
As President DONALD TRUMP pledges to roll back mail-in voting, election officials are concerned that steps to limit America's voting systems will only make it easier for foreign hackers such as Russia to interfere in future elections.
On Monday, Trump announced in a post on Truth Social his intention to sign an executive order 'to lead a movement to get rid of mail-in ballots,' along with ending the use of 'Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES,' though he did not elaborate on what types of machines he was referring to.
Should Trump ban both mail-in ballots and voting machines, ballots would either need to be tediously and meticulously hand counted or the U.S. would need to create a system for voting online — which security experts warn could threaten the privacy and safety of America's elections — providing an opening for Russia.
'There is no feasible way to hand count U.S. general elections,' HARRI HURSTI, co-founder of the Voting Village at the annual DEF CON conference — where hackers can hunt for vulnerabilities in voting machines — told your host. 'Humans are slow and error-prone and also sometimes dishonest. … You would need to take a significant part of the whole labor force and dedicate those to election work for weeks.'
Rep. JOE MORELLE (D-N.Y.), ranking member of the House Administration Committee with jurisdiction over federal election issues, noted that hand counting ballots 'is an open invitation to being able to mess with the results.'
Russia has sought to influence elections around the world to peddle propaganda and to undermine global Western alliances such as NATO. The U.S. intelligence community concluded that Russia meddled in the 2016 U.S. election, and Moscow has been accused in recent years of attempting to influence elections throughout Europe, including Romania, Moldova and Georgia. In 2018, DHS' top cyber official cautioned that U.S. election infrastructure is regularly targeted by hackers to 'cause disruptive effects, steal sensitive data and undermine confidence in the election.'
Trump's latest attacks on U.S. election infrastructure come after he met with Russian President VLADIMIR PUTIN in Alaska on Friday. In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity following the meeting, Trump praised the Russian leader and suggested that he supported his debunked claims that the 2020 election was rigged.
'He said: 'Your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting,'' he told Hannity.
Trump has long claimed that mail-in voting leads to increased voter fraud, though there has been little evidence to support this. Around one-third of the electorate submitted their ballots by mail in the 2024 elections.
It's worth noting that state governments are in charge of holding elections, according to Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution, and any executive order or law seeking to overturn states' rights on this issue is certain to be challenged in court.
Still, the Trump administration has already taken steps in recent months to weaken U.S. election security in other ways. The administration froze efforts at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to help secure votes and challenge election-related misinformation. In addition, the team at the FBI that responds to foreign election interference was disbanded in February.
The White House insisted that Trump's effort to end the use of mail-in ballots is meant to enhance election security.
'President Trump wants to secure America's elections and protect the vote, restoring the integrity of our elections by requiring voter ID, ensuring no illegal ballots are cast, and preventing cheating through lax and incompetent voting laws in states like California and New York,' HARRISON FIELDS, White House principal deputy press secretary, said in a statement.
But the timing of Trump's announcement — right after a high-stakes meeting with Putin — has heightened concerns that Trump's actions, nudged by Putin, are aimed at suppressing certain voters and downgrading election security by eroding trust in the electoral process.
Colorado Secretary of State JENA GRISWOLD (D), the chief election official in her state, said through these actions, Trump had 'already made our elections less secure.'
'Russia attacked our elections in 2016 unsuccessfully. Russia is not a friend of the United States, and if the U.S. president does not realize it, this just shows how deranged Donald Trump's leadership style is,' Griswold said.
The Inbox
FIRST IN NATSEC DAILY — RWANDAN ARRIVALS: Rwanda tells our own Felicia Schwartz that the first seven migrant deportees arrived in the country Saturday, after she reported earlier this month that Kigali was the latest to bow to diplomatic pressure from the Trump administration to accept some of the thousands of migrants targeted under its mass deportation agenda.
The seven individuals are being visited by officials from the International Organization for Migration, and Kigali is providing social services, said YOLANDE MAKOLO, spokesperson for the Rwandan government. Three of the migrants have said they will return to their home countries, while four have indicated they want to stay in Rwanda. He declined to provide more details, citing the deportees' privacy.
TRUMP'S MIXED SIGNALS: Trump's keeping everyone guessing about what he meant by U.S. support for security guarantees for Ukraine.
On 'Fox & Friends' this morning, Trump said, 'You have my assurance, and I'm president,' that there won't be American boots on the ground to defend against another Russian incursion. But he didn't specify whether he'd offer air assets or other kinds of military support as a backstop to any European effort to protect Ukraine.
Europe has similarly been less committal about what it can provide to Ukraine. The Germans have said they can't commit troops on the ground. France and the U.K. are expected to lead some kind of response from the coalition of willing allies, but Paris is leaving the final contours vague as allies continue discussing security guarantees.
Trump added that Putin also may not want a deal with Ukraine, and Moscow may have vindicated his point. As all sides haggle over the location of a potential trilateral meeting, Putin pitched Trump on a meeting with Ukrainian President VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY in Moscow; that would likely be a no-go for Kyiv.
Read: Nahal Toosi, POLITICO: The Existential Meets the Absurd in Latest Ukraine Talks
ISRAEL'S PROPOSAL REVIEW: Israel is reviewing a ceasefire proposal mediated by Arab allies that would see a phased hostage release. Hamas agreed to the plan earlier this week, offering a potential glimmer of hope that the war would soon come to an end after nearly two years of fighting.
Felicia writes in to suggest you view these developments cautiously, if not skeptically. She says the talks have reached this stage many times, only to fall apart again — often when one party has been ready to accept the deal, the other felt they were better off still fighting.
Trump also appears to have lost interest in the negotiation effort; he pulled the U.S. out of the current round of talks last month and said during meetings with European leaders that Ukraine was the only conflict he had worked on but not solved, leaving out Gaza. The president has recently suggested that the remaining hostages in Israel will only be returned 'when Hamas is confronted and destroyed.'
SHEINBAUM DENIES DEA DEAL: The Drug Enforcement Agency announced a major bilateral initiative to dismantle Mexican drug trafficking networks, but Mexico's government is claiming it doesn't know anything about it.
'The DEA issued this statement; we do not know on what basis. We have not reached any agreement through any of the security agencies with the DEA,' Mexican President CLAUDIA SHEINBAUM told a morning press conference.
Sheinbaum, however, did note that Washington and Mexico City have negotiated for months on a security coordination agreement, which she described as 'practically ready.' That deal would provide a framework for coordination initiatives.
The program DEA announced, dubbed Project Portero, would create joint training programs for U.S. and Mexican law enforcement officials to collaborate. DEA didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
SOME NEWS ON THE HOME FRONT: We have a new anchor of NatSec Daily!
DANIELLA CHESLOW, who has served as POLITICO's deputy tech editor and contributed to your favorite natsec newsletter, is taking the helm at NatSec Daily — starting tomorrow.
A former foreign correspondent, Daniella has already brought her interest in national security issues to reporting tech stories. Take a look at her pieces detailing how Israel's high-tech defenses failed to stop the Hamas-led attack on Oct. 7, 2023, the potential for conflict in Iran to threaten tech companies' expansion plans in the Gulf and how NATO countries' commitments to spend more on defense are sparking an 'AI gold rush.'
Send tips and well wishes to Daniella at dcheslow@politico.com.
ERIC BAZAIL-EIMIL, your friendly NatSec Daily co-writer, is also embarking on a new role covering the Department of Homeland Security, as it becomes increasingly central to the Trump administration's foreign policy priorities, including deportations, drug control and border policing.
Fear not, though, Eric will still be popping in here to bring you juicy details on Latin America policy and the increasing role of migration policy in U.S. statecraft and national security strategy. And for the next few weeks, he'll be co-writing NatSec Daily with Daniella as she gets settled into the new role.
IT'S TUESDAY: Thanks for tuning in to NatSec Daily! This space is reserved for the top U.S. and foreign officials, the lawmakers, the lobbyists, the experts and the people like you who care about how the natsec sausage gets made. Aim your tips and comments at ebazail@politico.com, and follow Eric on X @ebazaileimil.
While you're at it, follow the rest of POLITICO's global security team on social media at: @dave_brown24, @HeidiVogt, @jessicameyers, @RosiePerper, @nahaltoosi.bsky.social, @PhelimKine, @felschwartz, @connorobrienNH, @paulmcleary, @reporterjoe, @JackDetsch, @magmill95, @johnnysaks130 and @delizanickel
Keystrokes
BRITAIN BACKS OFF APPLE: The British government has let go of its demand that Apple give 'backdoor' access to user data, Director of National Intelligence TULSI GABBARD said today in a post on X. She said she'd been working with 'partners' in the U.K. to 'ensure Americans' private data remains private and our constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected.'
Our colleague Mizy Clifton reports that the U.K. had ordered Apple to give it access to information secured by its 'Advanced Data Protection' software. Instead, Apple withdrew the software from the British market in February, saying it had 'never built a backdoor or master key' to its products and 'never will.'
Washington and London had clashed over the dispute, with The Financial Times reporting that Vice President JD VANCE was pressing the U.K. to back down.
The Complex
NATIONAL GUARD MEETS NDAA: As more Republican states send National Guard troops to Washington to support the president's alleged crackdown on violent crime in the nation's capital, two DMV lawmakers are working together to limit Trump's powers to deploy the Guard and plan to weave it into the NDAA.
Washington Del. ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, and Maryland Sen. CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, both Democrats, introduced a bill last week to grant the city autonomy over both its police forces and part-time military forces. Norton told our friends at Morning Defense that she's looking to include the legislation in the NDAA as an amendment when Congress reconvenes in September.
The legislation is unlikely to pass, given GOP control of both chambers. But it shows that the deployment of the guard remains a sharply contested issue along party lines.
On the Hill
AIDING AFGHAN ALLIES: A bipartisan group of lawmakers is looking to reinstate a State Department role tasked with finalizing relocation and protection efforts for Afghan allies who supported the U.S. during two decades of military operations in Afghanistan.
The bill, introduced by Reps. SYDNEY KAMLAGER-DOVE (D-Calif.), DINA TITUS (D-Nev.), MICHAEL McCAUL (R-Texas) and MIKE LAWLER (R-N.Y.) would codify the role of the Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts and improve the processing of Afghan relocation cases. That role was axed during Secretary MARCO RUBIO's overhaul of the State Department earlier this summer, but lawmakers are concerned that the absence of the position will hurt the U.S.' ability to help Afghan allies.
Kamlager-Dove called the effort a 'matter of moral responsibility, national honor and global credibility' and praised Afghan allies 'who risked everything to protect our servicemembers.'
'Their courage helped save American lives, and now it is our duty to protect theirs. This is not just about policy — it's about principle,' she continued.
The bill's future is uncertain. Though lawmakers in both parties have championed the plight of Afghan allies, the Trump administration has refused to expand legal pathways for migration. The administration also revoked temporary protected status for 9,000 Afghan refugees.
Transitions
— CHRISTOPHER KIRCHHOFF is joining Scale AI as head of applied AI strategy and global security. He founded the Pentagon's Silicon Valley office and previously worked for the White House National Security Council and Google.
— Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. DAVID ALLVIN said Monday that he plans to retire in the fall, a surprise move just halfway into his four-year term atop the military service, as our own Jack Detsch, Paul McLeary and Connor O'Brien reported Monday night.
— Former Homeland Security Secretary KIRSTJEN NIELSEN has joined the advisory board of Auburn University's McCrary Institute for Cyber and Critical Infrastructure Security.
— BECCA WASSER is now defense lead at Bloomberg Economics. She was previously deputy director of the defense program at the Center for a New American Security.
— BISHOP GARRISON has launched Orange Court Strategies. He most recently was vice president for policy with the Intelligence and National Security Alliance and worked at the Defense Department during the Biden administration.
— COREY BROSCHAK is now senior director of institutional affairs at the Brookings Institution. He most recently was acting deputy director of the global resilience team within the Arctic and Global Resilience Office at the Defense Department.
— MAHEEN HAQ is now a program and policy administrative assistant at the U.S. Council for International Business. She previously was at DGA Group.
What to Read
— Jared Mitovich, POLITICO: 'I Don't Think There's a Government in Latin America That Has Given In More'
— Chao Deng, The Wall Street Journal: How an Impossible Journey to the U.S. Gave an Injured Boy From Gaza a New Chance
— Heather Conley: American Enterprise Institute: Putin Embraces 'Russian America'
Tomorrow Today
— Center for Strategic and International Studies, 10 a.m.: The Future of U.S.-Australia Critical Minerals Cooperation
— New America, 10 a.m.: A virtual book discussion on 'Great Power, Great Responsibility: How the Liberal International Order Shapes U.S. Foreign Policy'
Thanks to our editors, Rosie Perper and Emily Lussier, who should never be trusted to count ballots by hand.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Burning-hot border fence? DHS plans to paint it black to deter migration
The Trump administration is painting the U.S.-Mexico border fence black to make the steel so hot migrants won't climb it. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem unveiled the plans Aug. 19 in a news conference in Santa Teresa, New Mexico, while workers ran paint rollers up the steel bollards behind her. When asked about the possibility that critics might call the heat-inducing paint job cruel, Noem said: "Don't touch it." Noem said the request to paint it black came from President Donald Trump. "Too high to climb. Too narrow to squeeze through. And now, at the President's direction, it will be painted black – so hot to the touch that criminal illegal aliens won't even try," Noem said in a post on X. As USA TODAY has previously reported, hundreds of miles of 30-foot barrier at the border already pose a deadly threat to migrants who attempt to scale the fence. Still, thousands of migrants have tried since President Donald Trump ordered construction of the 30-foot barrier during his first term. During a historic period of migration following the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2022, the county hospital in El Paso, Texas, treated 326 people for injuries – or nearly one per day. Some of the injuries were catastrophic: Nine people died that year after falling from the fence, which is roughly the height of a three-story building. From 2000 to 2019 – before the higher barrier was erected – the hospital registered a single death resulting from a fall from the border fence. Coyote smugglers have taken to throwing rope ladders over the 30-foot barrier or using steel rods shaped to hook over the fence. Increasingly, they're tunnelling under the barrier. Noem didn't tell reporters how much the paint job will cost. She praised Trump's war on illegal immigration, which Noem said has resulted in "the most secure border in our nation's history." Illegal crossings have fallen dramatically border-wide under Trump's crackdown. Migrant apprehensions have plummeted to fewer than 8,000 in July, compared with more than 104,000 during the same month a year ago, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. In El Paso Sector, which includes West Texas and New Mexico, interim Chief Patrol Agent Walter Slosar said the seven-day average for apprehensions currently sits at around nine, compared with around 400 at the same time last year. Adam Powell reports for the El Paso Times. Lauren Villagran reports for USA TODAY.


Los Angeles Times
a few seconds ago
- Los Angeles Times
NATO defense chiefs hold ‘candid discussion' on security guarantees for Ukraine
BRUSSELS — NATO defense chiefs held a 'candid discussion' Wednesday about what security guarantees they could offer Kyiv to help forge a peace agreement that ends Russia's three-year war on Ukraine, a senior alliance official said. Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, the chair of NATO's Military Committee, said that 32 defense chiefs from across the alliance held a video conference amid a U.S.-led diplomatic push to end the fighting. He said there was a 'great, candid discussion' in the call. 'I thanked everyone for their always proactive participation in these meetings: we are united, and that unity was truly tangible today, as always,' he wrote on social platform X without providing further details. Assurances that it won't be invaded again in the future are one of the keys for getting Ukraine to sign up for a peace deal with Russia. It wants Western help for its military, including weapons and training, to shore up its defenses, and Western officials are scrambling to figure out what commitments they might offer. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov chided efforts to work on security arrangements in Ukraine without Moscow's involvement. 'We cannot agree with the fact that it is now proposed to resolve collective security issues without the Russian Federation. This will not work,' Lavrov said Wednesday, according to state news agency RIA Novosti. Russia will 'ensure (its) legitimate interests firmly and harshly,' Lavrov added at a news conference in Moscow with Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman al-Safadi. U.S. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO's supreme allied commander Europe, took part in the virtual talks, Dragone said. U.S. Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was also due to participate, a U.S. defense official said. Caine also met with European military chiefs Tuesday evening in Washington to assess the best military options for political leaders, according to the defense official, who wasn't authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. President Trump met last Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska and on Monday hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and prominent European leaders at the White House. Neither meeting delivered concrete progress. Trump is trying to steer Putin and Zelensky toward a settlement more than three years after Russia invaded its neighbor, but there are major obstacles. They include Ukraine's demands for Western-backed military assurances to ensure Russia won't mount another invasion in the coming years. 'We need strong security guarantees to ensure a truly secure and lasting peace,' Zelensky said in a Telegram post Wednesday after Russian missile and drone strikes hit six regions of Ukraine overnight. Kyiv's European allies are looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement, and a coalition of 30 countries, including European nations, Japan and Australia, has signed up to support the initiative. Military chiefs are figuring out how that security force might work. The role that the U.S. might play is unclear. Trump on Tuesday ruled out sending U.S. troops to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Russia has repeatedly said that it would not accept NATO troops in Ukraine. Attacks on civilian areas in Sumy and Odesa overnight into Wednesday injured 15 people, including a family with three small children, Ukrainian authorities said. Russian strikes also targeted ports and fuel and energy infrastructure, officials said. Zelensky said the strikes 'only confirm the need for pressure on Moscow, the need to introduce new sanctions and tariffs until diplomacy works to its full potential.' Trump said Monday he has begun arrangements for a face-to-face meeting between Putin and Zelensky, although the Kremlin hasn't publicly confirmed such a possibility and no venue was suggested. Lavrov, in his Moscow press conference, said Russia is prepared to continue negotiations with Ukraine in any format. He said Putin proposed to Trump raising the level of representation in delegations that recently took part in largely fruitless direct talks in Istanbul. He added that 'a separate block (of talks) should be devoted to examining the political aspects of the settlement, along with the military and humanitarian ones.' Ukraine and Western leaders have accused Putin of dragging out peace negotiations in the hope of capturing more land before any settlement. French President Emmanuel Macron has said the summit could happen in Europe and proposed the Swiss city of Geneva. Switzerland has expressed its willingness to act as host. Putin's ability to travel abroad is limited because he is wanted by the International Criminal Court in The Hague on a warrant dating back to March 2023 for alleged involvement in the abduction of Ukrainian children. More than 100 countries are ICC signatories and have a legal obligation to arrest the Russian leader on their soil. Switzerland intends to ask the ICC to exempt it from sanctions in order to allow Putin in for a summit, according to a senior official in The Hague with direct knowledge of the request. The official was not authorized to speak about the proceedings and spoke on condition of anonymity. McNeil and Novikov write for the Associated Press. Novikov reported from Kyiv, Ukraine. Molly Quell contributed to this report from The Hague and Mike Pesoli from Washington.


Buzz Feed
a few seconds ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Body Language During Zelenskyy's White House Visit Spoke Volumes, Experts Say
When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., on Monday, there was much interest in what the visit would signal for the future of the US-Ukraine relations amid Russia's ongoing invasion. The two leaders greeted each other, posed for photos in front of the White House and answered questions from reporters in the Oval Office. As cameras captured the leaders' interactions, the words they spoke weren't the only part of the story. Body language experts say Trump's physical gestures, postures and touch revealed a complicated power dynamic ― one that often put Zelenskyy on the defensive. Many of Trump's gestures were a way to assert control and dominance, experts say. One of the more notable moments for body language experts was when Trump pumped his fist as Zelenskyy arrived at the White House. 'It starts out with Trump giving his power fist,' said Traci Brown, an author and body language expert. 'He's planning on being in full control. He's very cordial to Zelenskyy, complimenting his suit but sticking his hands way too close into Zelenskyy's space with his palm almost under his chin. This is a sign of control.' The fist pump is a 'symbolic punching motion,' according to Patti Wood, a body language and nonverbal communication expert and author of SNAP: Making the Most of First Impressions, Body Language, and Charisma. 'Subconsciously, what that means is he feels like he's in for a fight, and he has to defend himself,' she said. 'It's an example of what's called a symbolic weapon. And because it's the first thing he does in response to this meeting, that makes it much more powerful.' Later in the day, while joined by Zelenskyy and other world leaders, Trump gestured toward a painting of himself pumping his fist following his assassination attempt in 2024. Beyond the fist pump, there were other control-asserting gestures on display. Brown pointed to the way Trump pulled Zelenskyy toward him. 'This is an unconscious show that Trump can move him around,' she said. 'Zelenskyy sways but doesn't move his feet preferring to keep his independence.' Other experts said Trump's touch crossed into condescension. 'Trump is manhandling the president of a country. He's got a hold of him and is doing these really minimizing actions with Zelenskyy,' said Denise M. Dudley, a psychologist and author of Making Relationships Last. Noting that the Ukrainian president is physically smaller than Trump, she said she believes 'a more socially sophisticated person' in this position would avoid taking actions that emphasize the diminutive qualities of the person they're talking to. 'But Trump is just going for it,' Dudley added. 'He's putting his hand on top of his shoulder. He's putting his arm around him in a very patronizing way, as if to say, 'You're not on my level. I can usher you in like you're my date to the prom.' He's not treating him like an equal.' Wood similarly saw these gestures as belittling. 'The way Trump brings his arm up and around the shoulder, back and neck of Zelenskyy and pulls him in is kind of like a dad telling a kid 'you better behave,'' she said. The suit interaction sent mixed signals. Another telling moment came when the topic of Zelenskyy's suit came up ― a wardrobe choice that was notable given the previous criticism of the Ukrainian president's choice of clothing by conservatives. Brian Glenn of right-wing outlet Real America's Voice ― who had chided Zelenskyy for wearing his usual military-style attire instead of a formal suit during his February visit ― told the foreign leader, 'You look fabulous in that suit.' Trump expressed his agreement with that sentiment. GLENN: You look fabulous in that suit TRUMP: That's the one that attacked you last time ZELENSKYY: I remember that. You're in the same suit. I changed mine. — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 18, 2025 @atrupar/X / Via Twitter: @atrupar 'Trump does touch Zelenskyy when referring to the suit,' Brown said. 'This is a way to connect and also seems like he's showing Zelenskyy off in pride but belittling him just a touch with his tone when he says, 'I said the same thing.' Considering that last time Zelenskyy showed up in more casual attire, Trump now has proof that he has control.' Dudley similarly observed how Trump's gestures reinforced the unequal footing. 'He comments on his suit, and you see Trump hold his hand out, palm up. It's kind of a 'look at you,'' she explained. 'I think of it like if I went to see my dad and looked nice. He might be like, 'Oh, honey, look at you.' It's the kind of thing you don't do with another president ― 'Look at you. Love the outfit.'' Still, not all of Trump's behavior fell neatly into a controlling frame. Dudley pointed out that the former president seemed to share a rare moment of levity with Zelenskyy after the Ukrainian president's hilariously snarky response to Glenn's comment. 'I will say, it looks like Trump genuinely laughs,' Dudley said. 'I think he actually laughed at a comment about the suit. Generally, Trump is not somebody who genuinely laughs ― he's usually so singularly focused on putting on the Trump show. But here, with Zelenskyy, he let out a real laugh. I think that's interesting.' Other gestures struck a more neutral or even conciliatory tone, according to communication and body language expert Karen Donaldson. 'President Trump did the hand steeple ― in fact, a low steeple where his fingers are pointing down, which is a sign of self-assuredness, self-confidence and that he's comfortable in this space,' she said. 'The lower the steeple signifies more thoughtfulness, the higher the steeple represents more authority.' She also believes his earlier fist pumping was more a signal of solidarity than control and that the way he greeted him with his palms up showed a willingness to be open and honest. Zelenskyy's body language also said a lot. Zelenskyy's body language, meanwhile, revealed both resistance and composure in the face of Trump's physical assertiveness. 'We witness President Zelenskyy placing his hand on top of the President Trump's hand during the latter part of the handshake,' Donaldson said. 'Is it a cultural norm? No. When someone places their hand on top of another is during a handshake it's a subtle way to exert dominance over the other person.' Wood observed a similar sense of pushback, noting that Zelenskyy responded to Trump's tendency to pull people into him in his handshakes. 'So Zelenskyy took his left arm and hand and went into what's called a top-down position, where he's holding Trump's hand down as if to say, 'No, I'm going to battle with you. You're not going to pull me in and think you've won,'' Wood said. 'He keeps holding it, and Trump continues to tug, pulling them both close to his chest. You can see Zelenskyy pulled slightly off balance, but he maintains that top-down grip. It's a continued battle.' While taking questions from the press in the Oval Office, both leaders also sat forward in their chairs, a posture Donaldson described as a stance that 'signals preparedness and a readiness to engage in what's to come.' Even in these tense dynamics, Zelenskyy projected a measure of calm. 'President Zelenskyy has his hands clasped, with his fingers loosely interlaced,' Donaldson said. 'In respect to the context of sitting down, his fingers are loosely interlaced, which signals more comfort than discomfort. However, we often interlace our own fingers to feel more secure in a situation ― it's a form of self-soothing.' Taken together, the exchanges showed just how much was communicated without words. Trump's handshakes, fist pumps and touches broadcast confidence and dominance, often veering into condescension. But Zelenskyy's small acts of resistance ― with steady footing, controlled hand placement, and composed posture ― signaled that he was willing to stand his ground.